24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 521
1
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 521
Speaking to the barnes rep at DSC and talking about penetration.

He said that when one of they bullets hits at a faster speed it will mushroom faster and potentially penetrate less as a result. The example he gave was that a 30-06 might penetrate more than the same bullet shot out of a 300 win mag.

Anyone else heard about this - makes me wonder about ideal impact speed for penetration with the Barnes bullets? I've become a JJHACK believer and like the idea of 30 cal and two holes to aid in tracking and blood loss, so want penetration.

GB1

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,409
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,409
Shaking my head.

Just WOW....................


Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,919
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,919
I think that is certainly true with a cup and core, not so much with the Barnes. Optimal velocity......let’s just say 2000 + fps. memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,983
K
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,983
1900 and 1700 for the LRX is what they have said.

Sounds like he was confusing lead core performance.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,172
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,172
Not to confuse minimal impact with "Ideal impact"

Becareful, who you pick as your expert.
It just could be an opinion of one.


Randy
NRA
Patriot Life Benefactor





IC B2

Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,983
K
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 7,983
3200 and faster increases tissue damage quite a bit but no reduction in penetration with the ttsx.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 521
1
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 521
What do you think of the hypotheses - that higher speed might lead to lower penetration due to early mushrooming?

This actually came up because I was asking about penetration of a 250 TTSX going 2720 out of a .375 H&H. I did not feel I got as much penetration as I expected with that load.

Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,172
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,172
Try shooting Nosler Partition bullets. They work just fine in this caliber. (If) your not happy with your TTSX

Myself, I could use the above two choices or some other stuff. You need to have confidence in your equipment.
Wish you the best.


Randy
NRA
Patriot Life Benefactor





Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 18,909
1
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
1
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 18,909
Originally Posted by 10generation
I did not feel I got as much penetration as I expected with that load.


Wierd things happen.

I saw an X bullet stopped against a vertebrae on a large buck a buddy shot. Cartridge was a 7 STW.


The last time that bear ate a lawyer he had the runs for 33 days!
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 953
V
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
V
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 953
As fast as I can get them going. Never stopped one at 3400 fps mv in a 150 gr 30 cal on close shots.

IC B3

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
I have never stopped one in a deer yet and I have run them through deer from ~1600 FPS to >3600 FPS impact speeds.
Every single one of them showed good evidence of expansion and produced good wound channels. I did see where one separated at least one petal.

As far as ideal impact speed...With a TSX/TTSX the only assumption I can make based on more than 100 animals is that they are going to go through and exit. I did see one TTSX that was stopped in a large deer with a corner to corner shot and it performed perfectly and was an ad copy perfect mushroom on recovery. I have seen them go through ungodly amounts of bone and still exit. I have shot them out of a few guns that can push them over 3500 FPS and for my money there is no such thing as too fast. A little 80 grain TTSX out of a 243 at >3400 FPS will go through 3 feet of deer, so the only way I can look at them is stopping one in an animal is a pretty rare exception.

Edited to add: If you don't get enough penetration with a Barmes, your options to get more penetration are more or less limited to FMJs and solids.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,919
M
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,919


Edited to add: If you don't get enough penetration with a Barmes, your options to get more penetration are more or less limited to FMJs and solids.


^ This! ^ memtb


You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong." -Bob Hagel

“I’d like to be a good rifleman…..but, I prefer to be a good hunter”! memtb 2024
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,168
N
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
N
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,168
Originally Posted by MILES58
I have never stopped one in a deer yet and I have run them through deer from ~1600 FPS to >3600 FPS impact speeds.
Every single one of them showed good evidence of expansion and produced good wound channels. I did see where one separated at least one petal.

As far as ideal impact speed...With a TSX/TTSX the only assumption I can make based on more than 100 animals is that they are going to go through and exit. I did see one TTSX that was stopped in a large deer with a corner to corner shot and it performed perfectly and was an ad copy perfect mushroom on recovery. I have seen them go through ungodly amounts of bone and still exit. I have shot them out of a few guns that can push them over 3500 FPS and for my money there is no such thing as too fast. A little 80 grain TTSX out of a 243 at >3400 FPS will go through 3 feet of deer, so the only way I can look at them is stopping one in an animal is a pretty rare exception.

Edited to add: If you don't get enough penetration with a Barmes, your options to get more penetration are more or less limited to FMJs and solids.


Or maybe jump up a weight in the TSX/TTSX line if your really worried about penetration, but for me I shoot them a weight lighter than I would choose a NP for the same application and they just go through.


The collection of taxes which are not absolutely required, which do not beyond reasonable doubt contribute to public welfare, is only a species of legalized larceny. Under this Republic the rewards of industry belong to those who earn them. Coolidge
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,998
My limited experience from the last 25 years is that nothing out penetrates a Barnes except solids. Barnes typically open up to a lesser frontal area so encounter less resistance. They are also less dense than C&C bullets and the shank seems to keep them going in a straighter direction. With really high velocities of greater than 3000fps IMPACT velocities I have seen them shed the petals and they sure as hell penetrated. If you were disappointed in the performance of Barnes on Buffalo I suggest more velocity or go up to the 300's You definitely don't want to slow them down.


I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all.
Jack O'Connor
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,486
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,486
Light speed.

wink

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,158
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,158

Originally Posted by Jordan Smith

Light speed.


Hmmmm . . . Warp 1? I was thinking more like Warp 2 as optimal

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,486
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,486
Originally Posted by MuskegMan

Originally Posted by Jordan Smith

Light speed.


Hmmmm . . . Warp 1? I was thinking more like Warp 2 as optimal

Well that’s just unrealistic.







grin

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 13,401
Originally Posted by MuskegMan

Originally Posted by Jordan Smith

Light speed.


Hmmmm . . . Warp 1? I was thinking more like Warp 2 as optimal


The hell with light speed. Go straight to Ludicrous speed!


“There are some who can live without wild things and some who cannot.”
ALDO LEOPOLD
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,409
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 58,409
X's love speed and that's their AO.

Hint.................


Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
1
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,927
110’s @ Mach 3

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

675 members (160user, 007FJ, 1beaver_shooter, 16penny, 10gaugemag, 10gaugeman, 73 invisible), 3,091 guests, and 1,392 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,479
Posts18,471,757
Members73,936
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.127s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8949 MB (Peak: 1.0461 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-27 01:40:25 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS