|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,349
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,349 |
I would go with the remington. My cdl sf in 7mag shot excellent and had no issues.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,751
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,751 |
The action on the Winchester will be smooooooth.
Camp is where you make it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 408
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 408 |
I'll throw another punch for Remington but i may be a little bias because that's all I've ever had. I can't speak for Winchester because I've never owned one but know those who have that are equally pleased. I've heard and read lots of negatives about Remington but I've personally and honestly never had any issues with the ones I've owned or own now. In the past I had a Sendero 25.06, Classic 25.06, ADL 30.06 and a really older ADL wood stocked 25.06. My current rifles are a CDL 25.06, 700p LTR .308, and my daughter has a Rem 700SPS .260 that I put in a CDL wood stock. All these rifles have functioned flawlessly and been accurate for me and I wouldn't hesitate to buy another one.
Life's Tough, God's Good, Pray Hard!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,490
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 1,490 |
Fell hard for the 700 CDL when it was introduced. Bought a 25-06 and it quickly became my primary hunting rifle for deer, pronghorn & coyote. Topped mine with a 6x Leupold. Have taken mule deer at an honest 400 yards. Coyotes farther. Love the trim, lean lines of the CDL, just a great handling rifle and quite accurate. That said, today's Winchester Model 70 is a fine rifle... I honestly think it's just a matter of personal preference. Regards, Guy
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 425
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 425 |
I have a CDL in 25-06 on its 10 day wait right now. Obviously I have not shot it yet but it is an incredibly nice rifle, the action, handling, wood, the way it shoulders.......are all spot on. I looked at the M70 featherweight as well (online), it seems like a great rifle as well. The 2 inches of barrel length probably won't be a big deal but you will lose a little FPS, not enough for a coyote or deer to know the difference. I have a 700 ADL tactical in 223 that has been an amazing rifle, I have yet to find a load that shoots terrible in it. That is part of the reason I went with a M700 CDL.
Last edited by bmoney; 03/02/19.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,554
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,554 |
My first bolt action centerfire rifle was a Remington 700 BDL in 25-06. I used it plenty on woodchucks and NY State deer. It was very accurate, and knocked the snot out of anything I shot. I sold it and bought a Tikka 243 in 1995 as the 25-06 was a bit much for varminting around here. I like the 24" barrel in this round. Remington also has the advantage of so many aftermarket parts. The CDL model is really a pretty rifle. Remington took the best of the BDL and the Classic and made a very good looking package.
On the other hand, since 1995 I have come to appreciate the Model 70 design. I like the safety especially. However, that is not a deal breaker. I think the Winchester Featherweight will be lighter than the Remington CDL. My DBL wasn't a light rifle.
NRA Endowment Life Member, G.O.A supporter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 1 |
Looking at the Wichester featherweight pretty hard, and the Extreme Weather. The stainless featherweight doesn’t come in the quarterbore. That would interest me. Bmoney, I saw your pics, Looks like a nice rifle. The first pic makes it look like the recoil pad to stock fit is off? Probably just the pic. I think I like the longer barrel in this caliber, as well, but the two inches won’t cost me that much. Decisions, decisioms.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,020 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,020 Likes: 1 |
If I was buying new, the quality issues with Rem lately would make me look real hard at the particular rifle before I threw down my coin. FN is doing a good job with Winchester and IMHO have the better quality at this time. If looking at used, it depends on when they were made.
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,933 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,933 Likes: 1 |
I am looking for a .25-06 for deer and yotes, similar. both the Model 70 EW and the CDL-SF are similar in weight. Either rifle will likely end up in a McMillan Hunter Edge. Basically looking for a walking rifle for mulies and smaller, for open country. I like stainless, since I hunt in any weather, but not stuck on it. I like the Model 70, but the Remingtons have always treated me just as well, and they seem to heve better aftermarket support(triggers,and such).My questions are:
Which rifle is more reliably accurate?(have read accuracy may be better in CS barrels? Truth, or BS?)
Which do you have, and your impression of it?
Is there a better option in the weight and price range?
I like the Remington’s 24 inch barrel for this caliber vs. the 22 inch tube on the Winchester. Thoughts?
Thanks.
I’m a Model 70 guy, but a Model 700 would be fine for the uses that you have in mind. I prefer the old-style Model 70 trigger but they’ve been discontinued so you might need to add a Timney to the Model 70. Accuracy is about the same and both may need tweaks so that’s a wash. Remington has more aftermarket support but most of what’s offered for a Model 700 that’s not offered for a Model 70 is for precision and tactical rifles, so that’s also a wash. That said, get a Tikka or a Sako if out-of-the box accuracy is an overriding factor. You don’t need CRF for deer and yotes, so all that’s left is the three-position safety, which is a matter of taste. I’d look at balance. I shoot a lot of offhand so I like a rifle that’s a bit muzzle heavy. I’d handle both rifles, see which one hangs better, and buy that. The longer barrel of the Remington might win there, especially compared to a Model 70 Featherweight. The EW is worse since the stock is so much heavier toward the rear. You can ignore this if you typically shoot from a rest. With all of that in mind, I’d look at the total cost (price + shipping + tax, etc.) of the rifle, plus the price + shipping + tax, etc. required to make any upgrades that it’s likely to need (McMillan stock, Timney trigger, etc.). That figure might open up your options to include semi-custom rifles like the Barrett Fieldcraft that don’t need those things. You could also buy parts on the Classifieds and build a Frankengun. It would take longer but it might be more fun. Okie John
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 2,386 Likes: 1 |
Good thinking, Okie John. As a walking rifle offhand shooting will be part of its repertoire. Balance will matter. Of course putting a featherweight or EW into a McMillan Hunter Edge could affect balance to the positive. Either rifle will be getting a new stock, most likely. The Barrett and Kimbers are lighter than I care for, and I like my bolt to lock shut on safe. Spend too much time threading my way through thickets and such for a non locking bolt. This rifle is moremfor open country, but that by no means rules out thick cover use at times. Which means finding an old safety would have to happen for the Remington. The 70 Sporter has a 24” barrel for the .25-06, and weighs two ounces more than the EW, according to Wichester specs. The extra is either in the non fluted barrel that is two inches longer, which I expect is the case, or the difference between the wood sporter stock and the synthetic EW stock. A McMillan like I am looking at would put the rifle under 7 lbs. bare. Add some Talleys and a lightweight scope, should end up under 8-1/2 lbs. all up. The CDL SF weighs a bit more as it comes, so the weight issue is nonexistent. An 8 or 8-1/2 lb. rifle in this caliber will be a soft shooter, I think. And settle nicely for offfhand shooting and shooting off a pack. I am going to have to get my hands on these and figure it out from there. But it is probably going to end up being some flavor of Winchester before it’s all over. That just seems to check more boxes, overall.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 287
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 287 |
I have two M700s and one M70. Love them all. Since you specify 25/06 I would go Remington as this caliber likes 24" barrels. If it wasn't for that I'd say handle them both and pick the one that feels right.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,641
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,641 |
Remington all day every day.
Accuracy potential vs tradition imho
No knock on Winchester...but I despise 3 position safety’s and CRF rifles.
Both are good guns, both will likely need the bugs worked out, both will serve you well But, but, you're gonna need that CRF in case you get charged by a wounded coyote or deer, that can be lethal!
Imagine a corporate oligarchy so effective, so advanced and fine tuned that its citizens still call it a democracy.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
Remington all day every day.
Accuracy potential vs tradition imho
No knock on Winchester...but I despise 3 position safety’s and CRF rifles.
Both are good guns, both will likely need the bugs worked out, both will serve you well But, but, you're gonna need that CRF in case you get charged by a wounded coyote or deer, that can be lethal! The CRF is the least of your worries with a Rem abortion. I'd be worried about the gun going off when the safety's engaged, not to mention the POS won't even lock the bolt, the flimsy, sheet metal extractor breaking, the brazed on handle falling off....
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 19,277 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 19,277 Likes: 2 |
Remington all day every day.
Accuracy potential vs tradition imho
No knock on Winchester...but I despise 3 position safety’s and CRF rifles.
Both are good guns, both will likely need the bugs worked out, both will serve you well But, but, you're gonna need that CRF in case you get charged by a wounded coyote or deer, that can be lethal! The CRF is the least of your worries with a Rem abortion. I'd be worried about the gun going off when the safety's engaged, not to mention the POS won't even lock the bolt, the flimsy, sheet metal extractor breaking, the brazed on handle falling off.... And I suppose you've had all those things happen to you.....you know, first hand experience.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170 Likes: 5
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 96,170 Likes: 5 |
Looking at the Wichester featherweight pretty hard, and the Extreme Weather. The stainless featherweight doesn’t come in the quarterbore. That would interest me. Bmoney, I saw your pics, Looks like a nice rifle. The first pic makes it look like the recoil pad to stock fit is off? Probably just the pic. I think I like the longer barrel in this caliber, as well, but the two inches won’t cost me that much. Decisions, decisioms. Buy the Featherweight.
Life Member SCI Life Member DSC Member New Mexico Shooting Sports Association
Take your responsibilities seriously, never yourself-Ken Howell Proper bullet placement + sufficient penetration = quick, clean kill. Finn Aagard
Ken
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
The CRF is the least of your worries with a Rem abortion. I'd be worried about the gun going off when the safety's engaged, not to mention the POS won't even lock the bolt, the flimsy, sheet metal extractor breaking, the brazed on handle falling off....
And I suppose you've had all those things happen to you.....you know, first hand experience. James, last yr. Mule Deer wrote a lengthy uhhh, response to JorgI about Newer Production 700s. He addressed issues directly and the conclusion from M D was that he hunted & shot the 700s AND would buy new ones if he needed to. I wish I could find that 'thread'. It's in either Ask Gunwriters OR Hunting Rifles forums. Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,346 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,346 Likes: 2 |
i would rather buy a different brand rifle than a Remington 700 if you are going to be in extreme wet - cold weather and camping. reason Remington 700`s have a problem of freezing up in the bolt and firing pin gets froze ,rifle will not fire. it has happened to me and others in the mountains on pack hunts and in northern Minnesota callin coyotes at night. i also don`t like the way the bolt will just fall open on safety either when bumped when on a long pack hunt. but Remington does make a good accurate rifle and for a day hunt guy in warmer weather they work fine for that. for durability give me either a Winchester,Weatherby,Savage,Browning or a Ruger they do not freeze up as easy and these brands have a better safety system too.
LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
Remington all day every day.
Accuracy potential vs tradition imho
No knock on Winchester...but I despise 3 position safety’s and CRF rifles.
Both are good guns, both will likely need the bugs worked out, both will serve you well But, but, you're gonna need that CRF in case you get charged by a wounded coyote or deer, that can be lethal! The CRF is the least of your worries with a Rem abortion. I'd be worried about the gun going off when the safety's engaged, not to mention the POS won't even lock the bolt, the flimsy, sheet metal extractor breaking, the brazed on handle falling off.... And I suppose you've had all those things happen to you.....you know, first hand experience. So are you calling me a liar? Or better yet a troll with nothing better to do? I've never bought a Yugo, but I knew what POS they were. It's called research. On record here as having owned TWO (2) 700s,one went back to Remington for a over cut chamber for the locking lugs (35 Wheelen Classic), the other is a 22-1250 that I still have up in our place in PA and it serves ONE function, shooting ground hogs from our porch. The safety is never used and the rifle is loaded one round at a time. On the bolt handles, seen more than one at the range. extractor issues, never seen, but I sort of believe the likes of Don Heath and another 700 user who used to post here (AFP) who admitted to a few extractor failures due to debris getting caught behind the extractor. As to the bolt not locking, surely you can attest to that. Fire on Fail safety, there's probably been a dozen incidents posted here from fellow members with pretty good reputations, not to mention internet searches on myriad litigation on the subject. How's that or again are you questioning my veracity?
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612 |
Biggest poser on this site.....
Gerry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 42,662 Likes: 12 |
Typical hayseed response to simple opinions supported by facts. That's ok...
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
|
|
|
|
95 members (358wsm, 338Rules, 10gaugemag, 257wthbylover, 907brass, 19 invisible),
2,218
guests, and
899
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,643
Posts18,533,677
Members74,041
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|