24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 543
W
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
W
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 543
Hello Frankk,
Do you understand how to check parallax? I've had rifles start acting crazy with Leupold scopes. When I checked the parallax at 100 yds, it was all over the place. On one scope, the crosshair was floating around almost 8", measured on a Redfield target with 1" grid squares. It was obvious there was something wrong internally. The parallax on that scope should be set at 150 yds. You shouldn't see much crosshair movement at 100 yds. Maybe none at all. Sadly this happened to me more that once.

Good luck,
Steve

GB1

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 845
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 845
Replace the scope

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,343
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,343
Originally Posted by Frankk
Originally Posted by Formidilosus
AB3’s generally shoot well.
Vertical split rings are garbage and cause for quite a few scope issues. Leupold is beyond suspect.


So what rings do you recommend without breaking the bank.

And I also heard a lot of Leupold horror stories. I’ll need to research some scope test methods beyond RiverRider’s helpful mirror test if my re-mounting efforts don’t work. I really wish I had another scope to try but that not an option at the moment.

Burris Signature rings will alleviate any alignment issues unless they are extremely severe.

There isn't a lot to test on the scope without burning through ammo. If everything is mounted correctly and it still shoots crappy, take the scope off and send it to Leupold as that is most likely the problem.

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
Originally Posted by Frankk
I was just at the range shooting 3/4 MOA groups at 100 yards on a ladder test... When suddenly my last heaviest ladder group scatters everywhere at a 2 foot radius. I then checked with a proven load and it’s still scattered.

I think obvious things to look at are my scope mounts and the scope itself. I’ll check screws and bedding on my picatinny rail, and I’ll check the tightness and position of my Warne PA Rings. I’ll check my scope (Leupold VX3i 2.5-8x36) with a box tracking test. I have already checked action bolts torque when I was on site, but I will take the stock off later to see if there is any obvious with the bedding.

So is there anything else I need to consider?

Thanks,
Frank

Bedding is not going to cause that type of problem.. Some of these threads are just fu cking funny... Or "never not funny", to quote someone I've heard here....


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
Originally Posted by Formidilosus
AB3’s generally shoot well.

Vertical split rings are garbage and cause for quite a few scope issues. Leupold is beyond suspect.


My exact thoughts. I'd toss the damn vertical split fuggers in the trash can and at least buy a set of PRW's. There are a lot of great options (at many price points), that will fit on that rail... I'm very suspect of the rail mounting itself, as he says it was "glass bedded" onto the rifle. Not that glass bedding a rail is a bad thing, but I'm wondering if he actually removed the screws from the rail and action and checked every one to see if it was actually grabbing the receiver. Did he use longer screws in the area that needed the bedding? If it's not the scope (which I've had those (yes that brand) go bad a few times), it's the mounting system...


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
IC B2

Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,907
W
WAM Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,907
In the most complex of technical terms, I think your scope has simply schit the bed. Get some Burris Signature rings with the inserts and a new scope. Get the Leupold fixed and sell it. Happy Trails


Life Member NRA, RMEF, American Legion, MAGA. Not necessarily in that order.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,024
Originally Posted by Frankk


I didn’t use scope alignment bars because I didn’t think I needed that precision for max hunting range of 200 yards with 2.5-8 scope.



You sound like a prime candidate for a Leupold executive...


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
F
Frankk Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter

You sound like a prime candidate for a Leupold executive...


Please let me know if you have something constructive to say. I’m not particularly advocating Leupold or anything else and I certainly did not intend to sound like that.

I would just like to solve a problem

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
F
Frankk Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
Originally Posted by bsa1917hunter
I'd toss the damn vertical split fuggers in the trash can and at least buy a set of PRW's. There are a lot of great options (at many price points), that will fit on that rail...

I'm very suspect of the rail mounting itself, as he says it was "glass bedded" onto the rifle. Not that glass bedding a rail is a bad thing, but I'm wondering if he actually removed the screws from the rail and action and checked every one to see if it was actually grabbing the receiver. Did he use longer screws in the area that needed the bedding? If it's not the scope (which I've had those (yes that brand) go bad a few times), it's the mounting system...


I will definitely be looking for different rings. I really wish I saw some bad reviews about them before I bought them in the first place.

On subject of bedding I find the rail to be very straight but did see a tiny gap over back bearing surface when I only had front screws in place. The gap was almost but not quite large enough to shove a thin sheet of paper under it. I could have probably inserted all screws and be done with it but I wanted to do best that I could do. So based on friend’s’ recommendation, I applied epoxy under back bearing surface only and I only had front bearing screws in place when I did that. There is no gap now and all surfaces on a rail are flat. All screws were and are now again torqued at 20 in-pds with blue loctite. I’m not sure how else I should address that rail.

Last edited by Frankk; 10/25/19.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,105

I too suspect it’s the scope from the sudden and dramatic shotgun pattern it’s shooting and your apparently eliminating the other possible causes.

I’ve had a Leopold back in the day that after a controlled fall with me protecting the scope as I was going down shoot a foot to the right at a 100 yds on checking it after missing a big bull at three hundred.

Should it turn out not to be the scopes fault which I think is quite doubtful, it’s never a bad idea to have an extra scope in the safe.

IC B3

Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
F
Frankk Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
On subject of mounting, I previously had aluminum Talley Rings that bolted directly to the receiver with horizontal clamp. I purchased the rail and Warne rings to have adjustment for better eye relief clearance. So what does everyone think of those Talley ring?

Last edited by Frankk; 10/25/19.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
I think most would agree that Talley Lightweights are okay, but if you need the flexibility of the picatinny rail I see no need toget away from it. There are plenty of good rings that will work on the rail. I personally like Burris Zee rings. I'm sure you're aware of the advantages of the Signature Zee ring, too. I use those myself on one particular rifle and they work fine.


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
Many folks have used Warne vertical split rings without issue for years. That is simply not the problem that'll cause 2 foot damned groups. He said they weren't all loose and chit.

I will not argue those that claim problems with them. I am sure they're convinced of it. LOL

Fugg the Chinmade Burris chit. Nobody needs commie crap.

I personally have no faith in Talley Lightweights anymore, but, many people have used them for years without discontent. LOL

Your scope is bad until proven otherwise, if you say everything was bolted up good.


Last edited by MtnBoomer; 10/25/19.

"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!"
--- Kid Rock 2022


Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Boomer, I don't think Burris Zee rings are made in China. If that's the case these days, I think I'd refrain from buying anymore. I know some Burris rings---I think they're Tactical Extreme, or some such, ARE made in China. They're okay, but I'd choose something else for that type of ring.


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Whoa. They ARE made in China now. Damn.


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
F
Frankk Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
I was just going to buy Low Burris Signature Zee Rings for 1-inch scope, but I cannot find any on amazon, midway, brownells or natchez. It seems that I can only get them for medium or higher.

Last edited by Frankk; 10/25/19.
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
I buy all kinds of Chinachit, but draw the line with new rings! LOL

Crap, I have ChinkoSwfas and Burrichows in use. Whatever.

We'll need the scope tested before blaming the mounts, no?


Why was the rail epoxied?


"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!"
--- Kid Rock 2022


Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 31,414
Originally Posted by RiverRider
Whoa. They ARE made in China now. Damn.

The XTR Signature rings are dandies, but wish they'd make them incountry.


"I can't be canceled, because, I don't give a fuuck!"
--- Kid Rock 2022


Holocaust Deniers, the ultimate perverted dipchits: Bristoe, TheRealHawkeye, stophel, Ghostinthemachine, anyone else?
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
F
Frankk Offline OP
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
F
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 229
My plan of action will be to give my rifle setup another go at the range next week. I have verified all mounting and action torques, and verified alignments as best I can. I’ll have to find another scope to try if I still have problems.

I do appreciate the advice about the vertical Warne PA Rings but I decided to make them work for me. I honestly don’t think any minor misalignments would have caused damage because I kept to the specified low torque, but I decided to check that alignment. So I made some alignment bars out of some good 1-inch bar stock (I have a lathe) and alignment looks good. I may decide to lap the rings at some point but I don’t think those rings are my problem.

Thank you all for your comments and please wish me luck going forward.

Last edited by Frankk; 10/26/19.
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Originally Posted by RiverRider
I think most would agree that Talley Lightweights are okay, but if you need the flexibility of the picatinny rail I see no need toget away from it. There are plenty of good rings that will work on the rail. I personally like Burris Zee rings. I'm sure you're aware of the advantages of the Signature Zee ring, too. I use those myself on one particular rifle and they work fine.



Talley LW’s suck.


Burris XTR (aka Horn) rings are retard high and made by the communists.


Originally Posted by 16penny
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

553 members (16penny, 007FJ, 02bfishn, 160user, 10gaugeman, 16gage, 61 invisible), 2,478 guests, and 1,307 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,435
Posts18,470,821
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.100s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9016 MB (Peak: 1.0567 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 18:11:56 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS