Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Aaron Rodgers

I recently read a stat that Rodgers is 0-37 against winning teams when behind going into the 4th quarter. A quarterback should be judged on one thing - winning. That's a fact a Packer fan will trot out ,along with the Super Bowl trophies, in EVERY circumstance other than Rodgers. Maintaining a Rogers Mystique gives Packer fans something to cling to at night.

All of these Minnesotans commenting is F**king hilarious!

On the contrary, Packer fans have taught us that the only thing that matters is winning Super Bowls. Yep, Aaron Rodgers won the one he was in - so did Trent Dilfer and Jim McMahon. Tom Brady has been in NINE. Tom Brady has won SIX, including thee of the last five.

Oh wait, Rodgers would have won more if he played for a better team? Me too.

I don’t think 🤔 Rodgers ever deflated and balls either. If you can’t win, cheat, that’s Tom Brady’s motto!

Haters will always be jealous of Brady...

All of these Minnesotans commenting is F**king hilarious!

Part of the problem with Rodgers is that he does not have an attitude that brings out the best in the other players around him at times. He has all the skill in the world, but will readily blackball his own teammates if he doesn't like something about them.

Brady will try to help anyone become a better player. That is the difference between the "supporting cast" of both. Brady can make a cast out of castoffs, while Rodgers can put his best athletes out of the game plan altogether. He is about as passive-aggressive as it gets, including with his own family and with all of his coaches over the years.

One player knows what it takes to win; the other wants to do all the winning himself. Because of that, Rodgers will never reach the heights that he could have and won't in the future either.

NFL-level football is not about athleticism, as every player has that (for the most part). It is about teamwork, doing one's job every play, and building a group of men willing to work together.

You mean both of them?

For Pete sake will somebody say "BOOK IT!" already.

I am a Packers fan. And a Rogers fan. My second favorite team, and QB, in the NFL.
But; I think there has never been a coach/quarterback synergy quite like Brady/Bellichick in the history of the league. Change either, and the synergy is gone.
Is Rogers a first ballot hall of famer? Absolutely.
Would Rogers have won more games than Brady in your hypothetical situation? I truly don’t believe so.

Both are no doubter 1st ballots.

Part of the problem with Rodgers is that he does not have an attitude that brings out the best in the other players around him at times. He has all the skill in the world, but will readily blackball his own teammates if he doesn't like something about them.

Brady will try to help anyone become a better player. That is the difference between the "supporting cast" of both. Brady can make a cast out of castoffs, while Rodgers can put his best athletes out of the game plan altogether. He is about as passive-aggressive as it gets, including with his own family and with all of his coaches over the years.

One player knows what it takes to win; the other wants to do all the winning himself. Because of that, Rodgers will never reach the heights that he could have and won't in the future either.

NFL-level football is not about athleticism, as every player has that (for the most part). It is about teamwork, doing one's job every play, and building a group of men willing to work together.