Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire JEWS - Were The Nazi's on the Right Track?

Well, I tried to give you several recent Jewish heroes that are highly touted here at the Campfire. That is, if you need several or so.

Yeah,...I know.

Alan Dershowitz,....attorney for O.J, Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffrey Epstein.

,....your hero.

You left out a few.

Epstein is dead, you know. OJ is in jail ? Weinstein’s using a walker now, poor thing and may be headed to jail.

What did he catch besides taco recipes and frozen tundra photos?

lengua has got pricey pretty hard to find anyone selling them tacos now.

I wish people here would pay attention to the original question posed.

Deacon Flave's title for the post shows that this was a question for a particular subset of the forum: Jews.

Allow me to explain, as a lawyer.

Though he has passed, Justice Antonin Scalia still guides my legal work, especially in analyzing the meaning of words. His book, "Reading Law", is my most important guide to such things.


I direct everyone to the chapter of Contextual Canons at the section "Prefatory-Materials Canon". That section explains that when something has been drafted where there is a form of preamble before the substantive text, one should look to the preamble to understand the meaning of what follows in the text.



What Deacon Flave did with this post is include a preamble, or prefatory statement, something that was done in the Constitution for the Second Amendment (the prefatory phrase being "A well regulated militia...")* before his full question about Nazis. When read together, it's very clear that Deacon Flave meant to ask the question ONLY to Jews. This is why he wrote "JEWS - Were the Nazis on the Right Track"? The preamble/prefatory clause of the post clearly limits the audience for the question. Anyone who isn't a Jew should not answer the original question. Of course, tacos and Unz products are fair game for everyone.

* As Scalia noted in the Heller opinion, the prefatory clause of the Second Amendment has to be read in the context of the times it was written, and at that time the phrase "well regulated" didn't mean something that was burdened by laws or regulations; rather, it meant something akin to "fully operational" or "well equipped".

my old lady is 65 and still slim, i know how to pick them. would never have a BMW.

Flave's not deep enough to have considered all of that. He's the embodiment of the saying, "In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king".

Flave pitches his bullshit to the blind so he can feel like a king.

Nice try Remsen, 'flave will be along soon to tell you that nobody wants to read all that stuff. Do you really have a large nose? I have a cute little Irish pug nose but have been told on this site that I am a jooo so I need a little validation on the 'street cred factor'. I have been circumcised if that is a factor.

your meshugeneh sp?



mike r

oh,....and it's obvious that you're not one of the blind,....but that you will make use of the one eyed king.

Sadly no. If you'd like some maybe move to Israel?

It would probably benefit you more to interact with Nadler, Schiff, Schumer, Sanders, and Bloomberg.

They're bad examples that many people are starting to take notice of.

History doesn't always repeat, exactly,....but it often rhymes.

I can only guess as to the parameters that Flave intended, but i assume you're allowed to answer since your screen name can be pronounced as "gee, no ", which is what a real jew would say when asked for a refund. Plus, cow tongue is a delicacy for us as well, i even have one pickling right now. I would sponsor you if flave requires such a thing.

I don't doubt that.

But it won't be for me to say. I'm just an old hillboomer living in the wilds of Kentucky.

It's the young folks that are waking up.

That's a good one!