Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Trayvon Martin II

"Joe" lives: Perter Boyle

This story gets deeper and deeper, no wonder the cops are so revered in this area.


https://investigations.ajc.com/caroline-small-shooting/

“This is the worst one I’ve ever investigated,” said Mike McDaniel, a retired GBI agent who supervised the 2010 criminal investigation into the officers’ actions. “I don’t think it’s a good shoot. I don’t think it’s justified.”

Only Leo gets to decide who is dangerous and needs shooting. Getting charged and having someone fighting over your gun is no excuse to shoot someone - if the person attacking is black, unless you are a Leo. No way would they take your gun and shoot you with it.

Those cops in Georgia are not raciest, they shoot white people too, even white women ! Of course she was driving a Buick,, that in itself, is grounds for at least a good ole fashioned azzwhoopen !

This ones growing by leaps and bounds.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-attorney-ahmaud-arbery-case/3114440001/

Sir: If I am headed down the public street on foot unarmed and you head me off twice with a truck and I have no private or public property close by to take refuge in and you obviously not an officer get out with a gun to attempt a hostile action on me am I doing anything unlawful if I try to take control of your firearm? Remember I tried to avoid you once and I'm at that time legally in a place I can be. That is the issue here. The two white men were in no way threatened by the Jogular until they interrupted his travel and displayed a firearm with the implicit and probably explicit threat to shoot him. If he feared for his life was that a rational fear? If he feared for his life what were his options? I for one would NOT have thought submitting to armed men on the street to be an option. My first thought would be take cover and get out of there, absent that option my next move would have been to fight my way out best I could.

Jaguar doesn't actually ready any rebuttals.

But if we followed your reasoning to its inevitable and logical conclusion, it would negate the entire concept of citizens' arrest.

Yours arent worth reading.

Calling names isnt regarded as a rebuttal in some circles.

Any time you want to answer the question about why the majority of a certain constituency lives their life pissing and moaning about how miserable America is and cant live within the parameters of civilized society, study in school, have families with two parents, hold down jobs and pay taxes rather than live off taxes crackers pay let me know.

I'm not interested in hearing from you, as I once did, that the problem is they arent treated well like they are in Mt which is why they are just great there, as you said a few years ago I'm ready to hear.

Are you ever going to explain why you keep mentioning Montana?

Or are you too stupid to do that as well?

Well, they were in danger.

You evidently are too stupid to provide a logical reply. What's wrong, are you too stupid to remember the stupid crap you posted about that before.

Only two topics that'll reach a 100 pages quick is jiggers and cops, this one may make 200 soon.

Sooo, you don't know why you keep mentioning Montana?

Or cause those that choose to confront strangers while armed to actually understand the potential consequences of their action. Smart people act in a thoughtful manner.


mike r

Bet there weren't any demonstrations over that one in some other state nor for this one either - https://www.nydailynews.com/news/na...deputy-field-gathering-article-1.1771525

A lot of you guys have a lot to learn about arrest/use of force and how it applies to the 4th Amendment.

And if you don't start learning about it, there's a good possibly you're going to get jammed up at some point. Badly.

I can agree with the wisdom in that.

Why do you keep mentioning Montana?

How is it that cops can shoot first, but the military has to be shot at first? Maybe I’m wrong....

Then again, what do you expect for $32k/year....