|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,934 Likes: 11
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,934 Likes: 11 |
I wonder what opinion Eddie Haskell had on this.
Not a real member - just an ordinary guy who appreciates being able to hang around and say something once in awhile.
Happily Trapped In the Past (Thanks, Joe)
Not only a less than minimally educated person, but stupid and out of touch as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54 |
Well... he is stating the guy was loitering so the cop was investigating. Being a Constitutional Conservative, Id expect him to understand the Constitution. The 14th Amendment covers this.
Chicago vs Morales....
That case doesn't prevent police officers inquiring into purpose when they see loitering. It merely establishes the rule that when asked, strictly to end loitering status, to move along, the officer may not arrest the person for loitering if the person merely refuses to obey the command. This doesn't mean, however, that the person cannot then be arrested for behaving in an aggressive and threatening manner in reaction to the inquiry.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
Well... he is stating the guy was loitering so the cop was investigating. Being a Constitutional Conservative, Id expect him to understand the Constitution. The 14th Amendment covers this.
Chicago vs Morales....
That case doesn't prevent police officers inquiring into purpose when they see loitering. It merely establishes the rule that when asked, strictly for ending his loitering status, to move along, the officer may not arrest the person for loitering if the person merely refuses to do obey the command. It doesn't mean, however, that the person cannot then be arrested for behaving in an aggressive and threatening manner in reaction to the inquiry. A police officer doesn't need a reason to approach anybody. Just like you don't need a reason to say hello to a person in the library. They are consensual encounters.
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701 |
Well... he is stating the guy was loitering so the cop was investigating. Being a Constitutional Conservative, Id expect him to understand the Constitution. The 14th Amendment covers this.
Chicago vs Morales....
That case doesn't prevent police officers inquiring into purpose when they see loitering. It merely establishes the rule that when asked, strictly for ending loitering status, to move along, the officer may not arrest the person for loitering if the person merely refuses to do obey the command. It doesn't mean, however, that the person cannot then be arrested for behaving in an aggressive and threatening manner in reaction to the inquiry. Your lost dude.... you ever hear of freedom of speech or freedom of expression. Nothing he did was illegal. You dont understand your rights or the law.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54 |
Well... he is stating the guy was loitering so the cop was investigating. Being a Constitutional Conservative, Id expect him to understand the Constitution. The 14th Amendment covers this.
Chicago vs Morales....
That case doesn't prevent police officers inquiring into purpose when they see loitering. It merely establishes the rule that when asked, strictly for ending his loitering status, to move along, the officer may not arrest the person for loitering if the person merely refuses to do obey the command. It doesn't mean, however, that the person cannot then be arrested for behaving in an aggressive and threatening manner in reaction to the inquiry. A police officer doesn't need a reason to approach anybody. Just like you don't need a reason to say hello to a person in the library. They are consensual encounters. Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54 |
Your lost dude.... you ever hear of freedom of speech or freedom of expression.
Nothing he did was illegal.
You dont understand your rights or the law.
I would have felt physically in jeopardy had I asked this guy what he was doing there (which I am allowed to do), and he reacted to me the way he did to the officer. You are not permitted to place others in reasonable fear of imminent physical harm for merely asking a question.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701 |
Well... he is stating the guy was loitering so the cop was investigating. Being a Constitutional Conservative, Id expect him to understand the Constitution. The 14th Amendment covers this.
Chicago vs Morales....
That case doesn't prevent police officers inquiring into purpose when they see loitering. It merely establishes the rule that when asked, strictly for ending his loitering status, to move along, the officer may not arrest the person for loitering if the person merely refuses to do obey the command. It doesn't mean, however, that the person cannot then be arrested for behaving in an aggressive and threatening manner in reaction to the inquiry. A police officer doesn't need a reason to approach anybody. Just like you don't need a reason to say hello to a person in the library. They are consensual encounters. Exactly. Exactly what? LMAO... you said he was investigating him based on profiling.... then you said he didnt have the right to respond the way he did, which is 100% incorrect... Exactly.... lmao...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701 |
Your lost dude.... you ever hear of freedom of speech or freedom of expression.
Nothing he did was illegal.
You dont understand your rights or the law.
I would have felt physically in jeopardy had I asked this guy what he was doing there (which I am allowed to do), and he reacted to me the way he did to the officer. You are not permitted to place others in reasonable fear of imminent physical harm for merely asking a question. Hahahahahahaha Then since your a big juicy vagina maybe you shouldnt be a cop... Reasonable fear because he talked back to you? Hahahahahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354 |
Your lost dude.... you ever hear of freedom of speech or freedom of expression.
Nothing he did was illegal.
You dont understand your rights or the law.
I would have felt physically in jeopardy had I asked this guy what he was doing there (which I am allowed to do), and he reacted to me the way he did to the officer. You are not permitted to place others in reasonable fear of imminent physical harm for merely asking a question. You mean, like the McMichaels did? And, that entitles you to use lethal force, obviously.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. deflave has never had a "point". Don't sully his reputation like that. My guess is that the cop just wanted to goad him into doing something so he could justify a little whup-ass fun.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. Really, he wouldnt have done it huh... you should check out youtube, tons of videos of cops over stepping their bounds... So... did Arbery need to respond to the cop? Did he need to give him his ID? Looked to me like he complied when he didnt need too, and became agitated because he was profiled. Again, maybe you should read up on your rights....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,953 Likes: 54 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. Really, he wouldnt have done it huh... you should check out youtube, tons of videos of cops over stepping their bounds... So... did Arbery need to respond to the cop? Did he need to give him his ID? Looked to me like he complied when he didnt need too, and became agitated because he was profiled. Again, maybe you should read up on your rights.... I don't have a problem with profiling as a guide to who cops should inquire into and who they needn't bother with. That's PC BS.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701
Campfire Regular
|
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 1,701 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. Really, he wouldnt have done it huh... you should check out youtube, tons of videos of cops over stepping their bounds... So... did Arbery need to respond to the cop? Did he need to give him his ID? Looked to me like he complied when he didnt need too, and became agitated because he was profiled. Again, maybe you should read up on your rights.... I don't have a problem with profiling as a guide to who cops should inquire into and who they needn't bother with. That's PC BS. Hahahahaha no... no its not... its called violating ones rights hahahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,632 Likes: 3
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 7,632 Likes: 3 |
More and more evidence that he was a thievin' little jigger, errr I mean jogger. I don't feel sorry for the little mother fugger, people get tired of these joggers stealing their sheit. Another little Trayvon, Michael, Dindunuffin. Fuqk Him
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
|
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 Likes: 13 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. deflave has never had a "point". Don't sully his reputation like that. My guess is that the cop just wanted to goad him into doing something so he could justify a little whup-ass fun. SheRoy, When I speak, it's best that others listen.
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354 |
More and more evidence that he was a thievin' little jigger, errr I mean jogger. I don't feel sorry for the little mother fugger, people get tired of these joggers stealing their sheit. Another little Trayvon, Michael, Dindunuffin. Fuqk Him Bravo. At least you are bold about your anti-Americanism.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354 |
The cop was within his rights to stop and ask the guy a question, just like you are at liberty to do that. That was Deflave's point. Naturally, the cop wouldn't have done so unless he had a hunch something was up, based on the totality of the circumstances. deflave has never had a "point". Don't sully his reputation like that. My guess is that the cop just wanted to goad him into doing something so he could justify a little whup-ass fun. SheRoy, When I speak, it's best that others listen. That's funny. I say EXACTLY the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,685 Likes: 24
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 24,685 Likes: 24 |
More and more evidence that he was a thievin' little jigger, errr I mean jogger. I don't feel sorry for the little mother fugger, people get tired of these joggers stealing their sheit. Another little Trayvon, Michael, Dindunuffin. Fuqk Him Bravo. At least you are bold about your anti-Americanism. You lefties hate men don't you ?  Edit to say - damn right mirage243 fk these little worthless SOB's - same goes for lefty pusscakes on this website .
Last edited by ol_mike; 05/19/20.
PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Bristoe
The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 4,354 |
More and more evidence that he was a thievin' little jigger, errr I mean jogger. I don't feel sorry for the little mother fugger, people get tired of these joggers stealing their sheit. Another little Trayvon, Michael, Dindunuffin. Fuqk Him Bravo. At least you are bold about your anti-Americanism. You lefties hate men don't you ? Not at all. I certainly don't hate myself. But I don't much care for anti-Americans like mirage243.
|
|
|
|
|
493 members (007FJ, 19rabbit52, 222Sako, 308xray, 29aholic, 12344mag, 38 invisible),
1,762
guests, and
1,195
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,010
Posts18,520,643
Members74,020
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
