Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Barr says... Well, this doesnt make sense.

To be traitorous, he would have to be an actual American to start with. Sleeper Agent, or Manchurian Candidate is a more accurate description.

Any of the three: deserving of Capitol Punishment.

And I agree, but they will have to prosecute half of the Congress and many of the Senate and put them in prison, to hopefully bring this to an end. Probably 40% of the population think Trump is getting his due. I'm certainly not one of them, I'm thrilled he's willing to keep doing it. Probably 75 to 100 people would have to be prosecuted to turn the corner on this crap. Don't get me wrong, I would love to see that, but it's a risk. I don't want to see prosecuting one president after another starting. I think Trump is as honest a politician we've had in years. But no good deed goes unpunished.

To kill the snake......

Your pretty spot on Cariboujack. The aftermath of arresting and prosecuting a former Pres. for BS FISA charges would be petty, especially when much larger crimes and charges are looming. You have to bring the Queen down before the King.
Go back and reread or re-listen to what Barr said and try to understanding his meaning.

You really should give Trump more credit, he is really not that stupid.

obama just does what he is told, not big on thinking.

Yeah, can you imagine a president Stacey Abrams and who her advisers would be and what they would have her do. If Biden is elected we could face that.

To think that the a Democrats will not prosecute President Trump after he leaves office because he was kind enough not to prosecute Obama, or that “it’s just not done here in America, is naive at best.

"EXPECT" is the operative word... I.e., (and IMHO) he's inferring they're safe - maybe to let them drop their guard before the hammer drops down..

Hope, hope, hope, hope, hope,........................

Those who have tasted the fruits of this system cannot possibly be relied upon to make it right.




The reason we have the rights enumerated such as we do isn’t so that a father and son can plink on a sunny Saturday morning.

The Deep State doesn't work logically.

You have to affiliate with one of he parties. When your party's in power, you get a cushy government job. Through contacts and lobbyists you get offered "investments" and entertainment that greatly raise your salary. When your party's out of power, you get a cushy job with some think tank or as a lobbyist. All that works unless you upset the applecart too much.

I don't think Barr wants Clapper, Brennan etc. to go to jail, let alone Obama or Biden, because that would upset the applecart. Barr seems to be slow walking this, the same as the Republican Congessmen and Senators did.

The reason Comey and Stroczk etc. stepped so far out of line is they were convinced there would be another 8 years of a Democrat presidency and there would be no consequences.

Trump, of course, is the first prominent politician who did not pay his dues in the Deep State. So if fhey can get him, it doesn't upset the applecart. In fact, it protects the Deep State.

The people don't rule. They serve the Deep State. So fuggedaboudit and go out shooting or fishing.

I would remind you gentlemen again, just who Bill Barr is.... He was DOJ's "clean up the mess" guy after Ruby Ridge. He set up the scenario wherein Louis Freeh who actually gave the order, "shoot any armed occupants on sight"....was not charged when the smoke cleared. Do not expect any justice from William Barr, unless it coincides with his career goals.

BINGO!,

This begs the question, it’s obvious who Barr was and what he is, so why did President Trump hire him?

More important, why keep him after he publicly admits that his DOJ will not seek True Justice.

Steve, Sad to think, but are there ANY good men, tried and true to the oath of office and the constitution within the DC anthill?

Not if they saw heads on poles and treasonous basturds in trees.

How fast would Democrat’s charge Trump and put him in the gas chamber if charging ex-POTUS’s becomes the norm?

Or W Bush put to death for perceived crimes against humanity?

Sidney Powell

This seemed like an incredibly obvious possibility. Also from a PR standpoint, easier to investigate him later when "the evidence led us there". As opposed to how the Dems operate, target someone first and then see what kind of 'evidence' they can dig up.

Here is a different perspective on Barr's comment.

https://patriotpost.us/articles/707...m_campaign=snapshot&utm_content=body

Barr Plays It Cool
The AG said that Durham's investigation is unlikely to include Obama and Biden.

Those with an abiding respect for Rule of Law may have been discouraged by news yesterday that U.S. Attorney John Durham’s investigation of the investigators of the Russia-collusion hoax is unlikely to end in the cuffing and stuffing of Barack Obama and Joe Biden — despite Obama’s fingerprints being all over the coup crime scene.

Sometimes, though, a few choice words can do more lasting damage than a frog march: “This cannot be, and it will not be, a tit-for-tat exercise,” said Attorney General William Barr. “We are not going to lower the standards just to achieve a result.”

Let’s think about those two sentences for a moment. Both imply wrongdoing, and both imply an unwillingness by Barr to stoop to the level of those wrongdoers. But neither signals any sort of capitulation. Far from it. Barr, as is his penchant, is playing it cool, refusing to get out over his skis. Instead, he’s allowing a seasoned and highly regarded U.S. attorney to quietly gather the facts and do his job. And if doing his job requires that he first focus a few levels down from Obama and Biden, where bad actors like Peter Strzok and Kevin Clinesmith were operating, then so be it.

“I’m a little surprised by that statement,” said President Donald Trump yesterday. But this, too, is a good thing. If our nation’s attorney general is seen as little more than the president’s toadie, then his credibility will be greatly diminished — and so will be the findings of the investigation he launched. Here, the contrast between Barr, a by-the-book lawyer who first served as attorney general under George H.W. Bush, and Obama’s first attorney general, Eric Holder, couldn’t be starker. “I’m still the president’s wing-man,” said Holder in 2013, “so I’m there with my boy.”

The moment a nation’s attorney general claims to be “there with my boy” the president is the moment a Department of Justice has lost its way.

But there is something on which AG Barr and President Trump agree wholeheartedly, and it should give encouragement to every citizen who respects the law and wants to see justice done in this case. The mainstream media ignored it, of course, but former DOJ attorney Andrew McCarthy captured it in National Review:

What happened to the president in the 2016 election, and throughout the first two years of his administration, was … a grave injustice and it was unprecedented in American history. … We saw two different standards of justice emerge, one that applied to President Trump and his associates, and the other that applied to everybody else. We can’t allow this ever to happen again [emphasis added].
If that last sentence sounds familiar, it’s because President Trump has been saying the exact same thing for months now. And if our mercurial president and his cool-as-the-other-side-of-the-pillow attorney general can agree on only one thing, let it be this.

I think this is an accurate summary of the situation. I don't expect anyone to actually be prosecuted. Barr will say this is what happened but no charges are being brought. The comments above are also the reason I don't agree with those who say we have the government we deserve. Come election time we are given a choice of candidates. That choice is pre-determined by the Parties.