|
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,078 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,078 Likes: 3 |
It is a felony to brandish firearms. They knew this, I am sure. So howyasupposed to protect yer house from the mob if'n ya can't handle yer weapon?? MM Not by running out onto the lawn/driveway with firearms in ready position while said mob passes by on the road. If they step onto your lawn, you can demand they leave. If you see violent intent, according to the laws of your state/city, you may be able to protect yourself with force. The law would see it that way, just as they are. The owners of said gated community would have the right to kick people off the road and out of the community. Once they broke through the gate onto private property they became trespassers. Funny how the DA gives no [bleep]....what they did is called brandishing. Look it up. It's a felony. Keep trying to convince yourselves, boys. It's not a crime if you reasonably feared for your life or property.
Tarquin
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 5,756 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 5,756 Likes: 3 |
It is a felony to brandish firearms. They knew this, I am sure. So howyasupposed to protect yer house from the mob if'n ya can't handle yer weapon?? MM Not by running out onto the lawn/driveway with firearms in ready position while said mob passes by on the road. If they step onto your lawn, you can demand they leave. If you see violent intent, according to the laws of your state/city, you may be able to protect yourself with force. The law would see it that way, just as they are. The owners of said gated community would have the right to kick people off the road and out of the community. Once they broke through the gate onto private property they became trespassers. Funny how the DA gives no [bleep]....what they did is called brandishing. Look it up. It's a felony. Keep trying to convince yourselves, boys. Are you well versed on the castle doctrine in that state. Seems to me the minute the gate came down, they actually had the right to confront the trespassers! The defense of charges won't cost the owners a cent. They will be defended with dollars from gun rights, and property rights groups! If tbey start a gofund me, I will donate!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,557
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,557 |
The McCloskeys are stupid. They could at least put on some shoes.
I am glad they did what the did,.......butI hate for them be portraying gun owners, in their stupid ,unprepared manner.
They committed assault by pointing their weapons at the mob.
The McCloskeys can go Phugg themselves. They’ve made a fortune by going after decent folk and defending in court the very criminals they were pointing their guns at. A pair of liberal Democrat D-bags that are now feeling the pay back from the very system they want to shove down everyone else’s throat. Had this been you on your lawn instead of them, they’d be the ones filing law suits against you on behalf of the mob. Phugg em a hundred times over...
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644 |
The McCloskeys are stupid. They could at least put on some shoes.
I am glad they did what the did,.......butI hate for them be portraying gun owners, in their stupid ,unprepared manner.
They committed assault by pointing their weapons at the mob.
The McCloskeys can go Phugg themselves. They’ve made a fortune by going after decent folk and defending in court the very criminals they were pointing their guns at. A pair of liberal Democrat D-bags that are now feeling the pay back from the very system they want to shove down everyone else’s throat. Had this been you on your lawn instead of them, they’d be the ones filing law suits against you on behalf of the mob. Phugg em a hundred times over... See
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,650 Likes: 12
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,650 Likes: 12 |
[Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Wrong. Put down the pipe, man. Meth is bad for you. You can't accost "protesters" with a firearm and be "standing your ground." I don't know how you could possibly see it otherwise, except for the meth you are obviously smoking. You don't know WTF you're posin about. Missouri's SYG and Castle Doctrine laws allow a person to use lethal force to defend themselves from a threat wherever they have a right to be. These people certainly had a right to be on their own property, and the attackers didn't. So, they had a right to defend themselves against the attackers, up to using lethal force. If you want to play semantic games like a liberal, "protestors" protest in permitted public areas. Attackers kick down a gate and come onto people's private property. This is a dead end for the prosecutor.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,859
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,859 |
Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law. The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused. With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate. The D.A. doesn't have squat.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
– DocRocket (In reference to ElkSlayer91)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644 |
When they start coming after a staunch conservative with a massive trophy room, that continues to pay taxes to the enemy because his wife's name is on the deed, then I'll get concerned.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26 |
The McCloskeys are stupid. They could at least put on some shoes.
I am glad they did what the did,.......butI hate for them be portraying gun owners, in their stupid ,unprepared manner.
They committed assault by pointing their weapons at the mob.
The McCloskeys can go Phugg themselves. They’ve made a fortune by going after decent folk and defending in court the very criminals they were pointing their guns at. A pair of liberal Democrat D-bags that are now feeling the pay back from the very system they want to shove down everyone else’s throat. Had this been you on your lawn instead of them, they’d be the ones filing law suits against you on behalf of the mob. Phugg em a hundred times over... Cannot / Do not disagree with that analysis.
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want. Rehabilitation is way overrated. Orwell wasn't wrong. GOA member disappointed NRA member 24HCF SEARCH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26 |
Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law. The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused. With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate. The D.A. doesn't have squat..Except the need for Vagisil.
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want. Rehabilitation is way overrated. Orwell wasn't wrong. GOA member disappointed NRA member 24HCF SEARCH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,785 Likes: 26 |
[Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Wrong. Put down the pipe, man. Meth is bad for you. You can't accost "protesters" with a firearm and be "standing your ground." I don't know how you could possibly see it otherwise, except for the meth you are obviously smoking. You don't know WTF you're posin about. Missouri's SYG and Castle Doctrine laws allow a person to use lethal force to defend themselves from a threat wherever they have a right to be. These people certainly had a right to be on their own property, and the attackers didn't. So, they had a right to defend themselves against the attackers, up to using lethal force. If you want to play semantic games like a liberal, "protestors" protest in permitted public areas. Attackers kick down a gate and come onto people's private property. This is a dead end for the prosecutor. It's a dead end for him, too. But he's too fugking stupid to understand that.
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want. Rehabilitation is way overrated. Orwell wasn't wrong. GOA member disappointed NRA member 24HCF SEARCH
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 9,189 |
It is a felony to brandish firearms. They knew this, I am sure. So howyasupposed to protect yer house from the mob if'n ya can't handle yer weapon?? MM Not by running out onto the lawn/driveway with firearms in ready position while said mob passes by on the road. If they step onto your lawn, you can demand they leave. If you see violent intent, according to the laws of your state/city, you may be able to protect yourself with force. The law would see it that way, just as they are. The owners of said gated community would have the right to kick people off the road and out of the community. Once they broke through the gate onto private property they became trespassers. Funny how the DA gives no [bleep]....what they did is called brandishing. Look it up. It's a felony. Keep trying to convince yourselves, boys. It's not a crime if you reasonably feared for your life or property. [Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Wrong. Put down the pipe, man. Meth is bad for you. You can't accost "protesters" with a firearm and be "standing your ground." I don't know how you could possibly see it otherwise, except for the meth you are obviously smoking. You don't know WTF you're posin about. Missouri's SYG and Castle Doctrine laws allow a person to use lethal force to defend themselves from a threat wherever they have a right to be. These people certainly had a right to be on their own property, and the attackers didn't. So, they had a right to defend themselves against the attackers, up to using lethal force. If you want to play semantic games like a liberal, "protestors" protest in permitted public areas. Attackers kick down a gate and come onto people's private property. This is a dead end for the prosecutor. [quote=HuntnShoot]Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law.[/quote
Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law.
The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused.
With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate.
The D.A. doesn't have squat. How many of that violent, criminal, trespassing mob were arrested? How many of these violent felons that violated the property and safety of that community are now facing charges? None of you get it. The facts don't matter. There is no law and order, because those who control the narrative control the "facts". According to their narrative, those were protesters, and the couple committed a crime. The DA agrees. So who is right and who is wrong, here? Use your fuucking brains, numbskulls.
I belong on eroding granite, among the pines.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 54,284 |
I can't even read this whole thread. There are so many f uc king pussies that frequent this site anymore. Brainwashed cuckolds. The state has told y'all what is what for so long that you just freaking obey.
This is way beyond the first step. The first step was when all you pussies agreed that it wasn't right to shoot somebody for stealing. The bottom line on thievery isn't that it's your work so much as what do you do when all you put up is gone? You starve just like anybody else who doesn't have anything. And you get to starve while watching your wife and kids starve too.
Y'all also just worry about waving guns around. Is it better to just shoot into the mob and kill some people? Displaying weapons has stopped a lot of crimes and prevented a lot of deaths. Whoever came up with "brandishing" is a real shixtheel. Should you be able to point your gun at some family on the road that accidentally cuts you off? Hell no, but this is a totally different situation.
I hope these two are punished to the full extent of the law because they are part and parcel of the system that did this and they also purport to support the very ones they were pointing their guns at. Under normal circumstances, with normal people, f u ck the BLM [bleep] whether they were in the yard, in the house, in the street or whatthef u ck ever.
Some of y'all are gonna deserve what is coming your way.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 27,091 |
Didn't antifa say the battle field was where ever they are standing?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,248 Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,248 Likes: 15 |
The McCloskeys can go Phugg themselves. They’ve made a fortune by going after decent folk and defending in court the very criminals they were pointing their guns at. A pair of liberal Democrat D-bags that are now feeling the pay back from the very system they want to shove down everyone else’s throat. Had this been you on your lawn instead of them, they’d be the ones filing law suits against you on behalf of the mob. Phugg em a hundred times over... Rather harsh assessment of the McCloskeys unless you know more than the news reported. Personal injury lawyers are a necessary evil. If not for injury lawyers coal mines and offshore oil companies would be extremely dangerous work places. Drunk drivers could kill and maim. Insurance companies could refuse to pay. Innocent people could be thrown in prison. Lawyers do a lot of good.
Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel. Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you." Hebrew Roots Judaizer
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,668 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,668 Likes: 1 |
If you want to play semantic games like a liberal member of the jury, "protestors" protest in permitted public areas.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,668 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 18,668 Likes: 1 |
this is just another example of the need to think carefully when a confrontation involves the right to bear arms, happens with frequency. just ask cops who have to make similar decisions, sometimes it is cut and dried OK, others and the cops get hung out to dry
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,249
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 5,249 |
The concept is simple. Rich lawyers living in a house like that. Someone is seeing big fines and a whole lot of dollar signs.
Otherwise no one would give a hoot about it.
I could wish a lot of things on my worst enemy but neuropathy ain't one of them.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 1,644 |
The concept is simple. Rich lawyers living in a house like that. Someone is seeing big fines and a whole lot of dollar signs.
Otherwise no one would give a hoot about it. Fugg, I don't give a hoot about it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,859
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 4,859 |
Pointing a firearm at people not attacking you is not covered in any "stand your ground" law. Pointing a firearm at people criminals, who have destroyed private property (DESTROYED GATE) to GAIN access to PRIVATE PROPERTY(GATED COMMUNITY) not IS attacking you AND "IS" not covered in any "stand your ground" law. The group, BLM, have already established a precedent proving out they are criminals from the murders and property destruction they have caused. With that hard fact established, any citizen in that gated community had a right to brandish arms against a criminal gang once they destroyed property to gain access and stepped across the boundary line of the broken gate, because they would legally be within their right to claim in fear of their life, based on the precedent established and present destruction of property at their doorstep, destroyed gate. The D.A. doesn't have squat. How many of that violent, criminal, trespassing mob were arrested? How many of these violent felons that violated the property and safety of that community are now facing charges? None of you get it. The facts don't matter. There is no law and order, because those who control the narrative control the "facts". According to their narrative, those were protesters, and the couple committed a crime. The DA agrees. So who is right and who is wrong, here? Use your fuucking brains, numbskulls. You are clueless. If by chance the DA got a guilty verdict, it would be thrown out on appeal, and if they didn't, the USSC would.
"He is far from Stupid"
”person, who happens to have an above-average level of intelligence”
– DocRocket (In reference to ElkSlayer91)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,571 Likes: 7
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8,571 Likes: 7 |
Local Dirt
You don't have to agree. However you are as stupid as the McCloskeys if you cannot understand what is happening in this country.
You clearly do not know the law .
Every gun owner / concealed carry person should know enough to understand the possible laws that can get you in trouble , especially in Dem. cities with
overzealous prosecuters.
The McCloskeys broke the law , not by brandishing , but by pointing the weapons at the mob.
|
|
|
|
566 members (1beaver_shooter, 1_deuce, 10Glocks, 163bc, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 68 invisible),
2,143
guests, and
1,102
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,565
Posts18,531,742
Members74,039
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|