Another reason someone won't be drinking coffee at McDonald's any more. Two things this video left out of the jury decision:
1. The jury's award , (2 days of coffe sales), was lowered substantially by the judge. Was the judge paid off by McDonald's? We'll never know.
2. One important reason the jury sided with the older lady over the big corps was the following. The testimony of McDonald's, in order to minimize the injuries was based on the woman's age. They said that because she was not expected to enjoy the sexual pleasure of a young woman, she had no use for the area that was burned. Therefore, she was not entitled to any damages for that area. The jury was biased at that point yet still was reasonable having only insisted on 2 days sales punitive damages of which the judge objected and committed judicial activism.
