|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16 |
I have a Savage 99 in 250-3000 and would a Leupold Rim Fire (2x7) handle the recoil of the 250? I was given the scope and like the magnification of 2x7. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks.
In my many years,
I have come to a conclusion,
that one useless man is a shame,
two is a LawFirm, and three or
more is a Congress.
- John Adams -
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,458 Likes: 2 |
Should. The only difference between their RF and CF scopes is the parallax-free distance for those w/o AO ... 60 yards for the RF, 150 yards for the CF. One nice plus to the RF 2-7X is a finer crosshair than the CF. I'd go for it without a second thought.
Tom
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
Here be dragons ...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,054
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 11,054 |
I'd call Leupold and ask them.
"There's more to optics than meets the eye."--anon
"...most of us would be better off losing half a pound around the waist than half a pound on our rifle."--dhg
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,377
Campfire Tracker
|
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,377 |
It might depend on which 2-7 Rimfire that you have. The one that I have is the Vari-X l that I think has the 28mm objective. That one is a lighter weight 2-7 than the newer ones, so they might have cut a few corners on the inside on that model. CallIng Leupold is your best bet. I wouldn’t gamble my hunt on it, but that’s just me. A .250 isn’t a hard recoiling rifle, so you might be okay with it. I like a little heavier Duplex for a bigger game rifle than what I see in the rimfire scopes.
My other auto is a .45
The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,269
Campfire Ranger
|
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 17,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,652 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,652 Likes: 1 |
Should. The only difference between their RF and CF scopes is the parallax-free distance for those w/o AO ... 60 yards for the RF, 150 yards for the CF. One nice plus to the RF 2-7X is a finer crosshair than the CF. I'd go for it without a second thought.
Tom Tom is correct. When I got a new .375 Holland and Holland, I wanted to test it out right away. I put on a Leupold rimfire 3-9x on it and shot it a LOT, never any problem at all. John
|
|
|
|
|
255 members (257 mag, 12344mag, 2500HD, 10ring1, 1lessdog, 160user, 31 invisible),
1,687
guests, and
1,058
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,630
Posts18,492,978
Members73,977
| |
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
