Lots of guys went into combat at 17, Mr. Rittenhouse performed excellently under pressure..
Self-defence is one thing.. but
Was it anything like real urban combat? 🤔
As opposed to a video game?
"...if the gentlemen of Virginia shall send us a dozen of their sons, we would take great care in their education, instruct them in all we know, and make men of them." Canasatego 1744
I think this is the proper pose for the statue of Saint Kyle. The city of Kenosha should make it about the size of the Statue of Liberty and have him facing Portland.
That Zaminski moron is pretty much another childish thug, his rap sheet just shows what an impulsive dipwad he is. If Rittenhouse is convicted of ANYTHING, it will be totally unjust. I understand he was a minor and that was stupid, but without the rifle he'd probably be beaten into vegetable pulp.
Up hills slow, Down hills fast Tonnage first and Safety last.
Lots of guys went into combat at 17, Mr. Rittenhouse performed excellently under pressure.
My feelings exactly. He demonstrated remarkable fire discipline if you watch all the tapes closely. Watch some of the LEO shooting tapes. Many of them seem like panicked mag dumps. Not bashing LEOs just stating the truth.
I do believe that he acted in self defense. I also believe that he placed himself in a situation that a smarter, more mature person would have avoided. Some seem enraptured by the fact that he could shoot well enough to save his life. Most anyone can be taught to shoot. Discrimination and good judgement require more effort so many avoid it.
mike r
Don't wish it were easier Wish you were better
Stab them in the taint, you can't put a tourniquet on that. Craig Douglas ECQC
His decision on being there is independent of his decisions after being placed in harms way. I would advise any young man not to be there. I agree there, but once there he acted well and I believe he is innocent.
His decision on being there is independent of his decisions after being placed in harms way. I would advise any young man not to be there. I agree there, but once there he acted well and I believe he is innocent.
This is my position as well. I would add he had every right to be there, just not a good decision. The constitution guarantees the right to peacefully protest without an age limitation.
He was also an underage kid that should not have been there, play silly games win silly prizes
Why shouldn’t he have been there? It’s America, shouldn’t he be able to go anywhere he pleases without having to fear for his life? Law and order should be maintained by local law enforcement. The criminal rioters/looters/ seeking to strip other Americans of their freedom to move freely throughout the country at will are to blame and the local govt officials that refused to maintain law and order are just as guilty. To blame the victim is what’s silly, as most of your positions are.
he kept a cool head in a bad situation, better than a lot here could do.
God bless Texas----------------------- Old 300 I will remain what i am until the day I die- A HUNTER......Sitting Bull Its not how you pick the booger.. but where you put it !! Roger V Hunter
I do believe that he acted in self defense. I also believe that he placed himself in a situation that a smarter, more mature person would have avoided. Some seem enraptured by the fact that he could shoot well enough to save his life. Most anyone can be taught to shoot. Discrimination and good judgement require more effort so many avoid it.
mike r
I won't disagree that he shouldn't have been there but the video evidence clearly shows that he was justified in his actions, and that's all we really need to know IMO.
Actually in reality if it weren't for the leftist's in charge there should be more of these incidents and more shooting of Antifa/BLM azzholes in my mind.