JFC Trump's legal team is a little too busy right now to provide the friggin Campfire doubters a detailed PowerPoint presentation with all the detailed fraud information so that you have a chance to review it before they prosecute the biggest crime syndicate in the history of the world in a matter of weeks.
I thought we were told this was a sting operation that started right after the 2016 election.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Yep, Tucker bashing Sidney Powell because she hasn't handed over her evidence. Fugg Faux!
Bahaha! I knew you guys would turn on him! I predicted this!
My old post:
"It will be funny seeing how many people you guys will turn on when no evidence of any kind of widespread election rigging is found and they have to report that. And I bet you guys won't accept court decisions either, when they are against Trump.
It doesn't matter what the truth is, it won't be accepted, the hardcore Trumpsters will just turn against the messengers. The ONLY outcome that will be accepted and believed is a pro-Trump outcome. That's crazy.
And that's why "MAGA" is a cult."
truly culty!
Communist 20/20 hindsight.
Pfft.
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want.
When he replaced $14M/year Bill O'reilly in 2017, Tucker was only getting $1M/year. That was when the Murdock sons took over. The lib billionaires have been giving Tucker a lot of raises in 3 years.
I sure hope Tucker is greatful.
As of his last show, He obviously is..
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want.
Yep, Tucker bashing Sidney Powell because she hasn't handed over her evidence. Fugg Faux!
Well, I just listened to it, seemed a pretty straight forward analysis of the matter. She's not provided evidence and that is what he said. BFD
Had Tucker watched today's news conference he would have heard Rudy and Sydney explain that the evidence they have is sworn affidavits from individual eye witnesses who have bravely come forward, under penalty of felonious perjury, to make their statements. They also explained that the evidence would be presented in a court of law, where the press would be able to hear it and do their own due diligence and investigation.
Did she specifically say that regarding the claims of changed votes via the software?
Yes.
Looks like we're going to try this case in the media?
Just like everything else the commies decide is a blight on our "democracy"?
Try the case in court, Sidney. Just like you said you would and just like our founders designed.
Fugk the media. They deserve nothing, except a Ziploc.
Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want.
Tucker will not look like a sell out. He will continue his shtick. He will talk crap day after day about the bad people in the US. He will continue to make lots of money. The left will still bad mouth him. None of this will change.
Don't be fooled. There is a fundamental change in affect.
In a couple years Hannity and Tucker will be birds of a feather.
Yep, Tucker bashing Sidney Powell because she hasn't handed over her evidence. Fugg Faux!
Well, I just listened to it, seemed a pretty straight forward analysis of the matter. She's not provided evidence and that is what he said. BFD
They can't provide evidence because of the Commies...Dominion has ties to Soros and Clinton Foundation. They don't want their witness suicided...Im surprised the one woman in Michigan was willing to let them use her name...
Like I said BFD. It's a non issue. That she hasn't and that Tucker has said she hasn't, which is true. No there there. Bunch a'do about nothing, per usual.
That’s about how I see it. Does anyone really believe that if there was a smoking gun and direct evidence that Tucker would be like no thanks I’m good I don’t want to report it.
I mean that she hasn't provided the smoking gun at thistime is mute. I have no idea if there is one. Tucker just said she hasn't provided one, a truth. None of this discussion means Tucker sold out. That is the no there there oart.
George Floyd Covid-19
How good was your analysis on these two?
We all know you swallow the leftist BS hook deep.
I retired from the Johns Manville asbestos pop tart factory in ‘59, and still never made the connection.—-Slumlord
Maria Bartiromo: How did you respond to Tucker Carlson? Did you get angry with the show because they texted you and asked you to provide evidence of what you’re alleging?
Sidney Powell: No, I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence in fact I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics of the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person. But he was very insulting, demanding and rude and I told him not to contact me again in those terms.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Tucker has been compromised. I'm less concerned about his segment tonight and more concerned about his general silence over the past couple weeks on the voter fraud issue as a whole. There's a chit ton of smoke and he's pretty much ignored it, which I think is telling.
Be that as it may, I don't think he was totally out of line with his comments about Sydney Powell tonight. Boiled down he said... 1) we asked for evidence, 2) she told us to fuq off, 3) if she has it and wants to come on, she's welcome and 4) that's all we know at this point. I didn't find that unreasonable, of him or Sydney Powell.
I get Sydney and Rudy aren't going to tip their hand but dam, the clock is ticking and quickly approaching the final hour. They need to get the wheels in motion asap. My fear is their strategy is to play up the innuendo in hopes that they might be able to cast doubt in enough state certifications, forcing a12th amendment scenario. That's a Hail Mary of a strategy if so.
I agree with this post completely. Tucker works for a media company, and a corrupt one at that. I have no illusions of how that fact influences his behavior...we know it now and he’ll have to live with the consequences of his choices. He had a solid track record of journalism leading up to the election and I’m sure he sees the vig for him carrying the water is prioritized access. Sidney’s been giving interviews...I’m not sure why suddenly she’s reticent to appear on his show except for the fact that he requested the proof...and that’s where he got stupid and greedy. He must know she can’t poison her case for the sake of his show.
I sure as hell hope they have what they claim to have and have a plan to make the case soon. The misdirect by the media back to C19 is siphoning off a lot of energy the sheeple had initially to right this wrong. The stalwart will be with him to the end but that the media will discredit any organized effort to display that support.
Originally Posted by Goosey
Bahaha! I knew you guys would turn on him! I predicted this!
Gooseman, the adults are talking. You can go back to huffing dong, sweetie.
that Sidney Powell is a nice looking women for 65 she is tall has big milkers and looks like an ex model. I want to look for pics of her when she was younger
Maria Bartiromo: How did you respond to Tucker Carlson? Did you get angry with the show because they texted you and asked you to provide evidence of what you’re alleging?
Sidney Powell: No, I didn’t get angry with the request to provide evidence in fact I sent an affidavit to Tucker that I had not even attached to a pleading yet to help him understand the situation and I offered him another witness who could explain the mathematics of the statistical evidence far better than I can. I’m not really a numbers person. But he was very insulting, demanding and rude and I told him not to contact me again in those terms.
