I'm looking for an opinion. This is the top of the receiver of a Savage 99 chambered for .308 Win. I understand being factory drilled for a scope was an option from the information I can find. I want to repair the drill and tap damage done to the receiver by previous owners. There are 7 holes to the right of the pin. I am trying to figure out if any of these 7 holes might be factory drilled before having it repaired by a gunsmith. I will likely have more money tied up in the gun than what it is worth but I believe the gun is worth preserving. Suggestions/Comments welcome.
I think that 99 was owned by the same guy i got a win mdl54 from. It had 17 holes total in it! If you are going to have those filled I would have all filled and then the correct d&t done. Probably would cost the same and you could be sure they were sound threaded. Jm2 c worth The Lightfoot mount would cover the holes and you could just hunt it.
Last edited by deerstalker; 12/20/20.
the consolidation of the states into one vast republic, sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all those that have preceded. Robert E Lee ~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
I'm looking for an opinion. This is the top of the receiver of a Savage 99 chambered for .308 Win. I understand being factory drilled for a scope was an option from the information I can find. I want to repair the drill and tap damage done to the receiver by previous owners. There are 7 holes to the right of the pin. I am trying to figure out if any of these 7 holes might be factory drilled before having it repaired by a gunsmith. I will likely have more money tied up in the gun than what it is worth but I believe the gun is worth preserving. Suggestions/Comments welcome.
All 308's would be factory drilled and tapped. It looks like they tried to drill it for that Redfield that has a big gap for the front screws.
The original ones are there. Hopefully you can save them. Actually... they might work as is. Here's what they look like:
Yours:
Last edited by Calhoun; 12/21/20.
“The Savage 99 Pocket Reference”. All models and variations of 1895’s, 1899’s and 99’s covered. Also dates, checkering, engraving.. Find at www.savagelevers.com
By the time Savage started chambering 99s in .308 they were factory D&T, so four of those holes are factory. New bases using the factory holes should cover the extra holes.
I think I bought that rifle on GunBroker and returned it. The one I got looked worse but may this is the one. I don't think it can be repaired and if if can it'll cost a lot. I offered the seller $250 for the stocks but didn't hear back. Other than that it was a VERY nice rifle. Return it if you can and cut your loses.
Thanks for the replies and thanks to Calhoun for supplying the pictures! I appreciate everyones help. It will be a few months but I will post pictures of the finished product.
I believe David Royal's book states D&T was a factory option when the .308 came out. Are there examples of .308Win's without factory D&T? I am debating about welding all the holes and using a Lightfoot mount. Even though the receiver will have been repaired I want to keep in in an "original" configuration.
The 243/308/358 cartridges are only present in 99's with a serial number of 900,000 or higher.
I have never seen or heard of a 900,000 series receiver or later that wasn't factory drilled for scope bases. But maybe I missed some?
“The Savage 99 Pocket Reference”. All models and variations of 1895’s, 1899’s and 99’s covered. Also dates, checkering, engraving.. Find at www.savagelevers.com
This .308 did come from GunBroker and the seller did not go out of his way to show pictures of the top of the receiver. So far my gunsmith feels the receiver is repairable but I will be upside down on the value. I appreciate the insight!
If I received a Swiss-cheesed gun like that, and hadn't been expecting it, it would go right back in the box and then back to the seller. Having to eat some postage is a lot better than living with such an albatross around my neck.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty