24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,737
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,737
Why would we want to buy anything from Amazon?


"Whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force." --Thomas Jefferson

GB1

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,654
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,654
Ama-who?


https://postimg.cc/xXjW1cqx/81efa4c5

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Soli Deo Gloria

democrats ARE the plague.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,448
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,448
Originally Posted by HitnRun
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by AB2506
WTF writes a book that glorifies wolves in Yellowstone?


Any educated conservationist know introduced Canadian grey wolves wiped out over 70 per cent of the elk and moose in TNP.

Dumb cowboy Timmy and his anti nature idiot anti science cousin are truly clueless anti conservation clowns. shame on them



And if you knew anything about the history of the park, you'd know that bison and elk populations were artificially inflated for decades to attract tourism and to the detriment of the entire park ecosystem. You might start your education with Playing God in Yellowstone, by Alston Chase. The overgrazing was so bad that at one point there were literally no beaver left in the park (though they were everywhere outside the park). Wolves are a natural part of the Yellowstone ecosystem, but like elk, they have to be kept in balance. No wolves in the park at all and massive elk populations to the point of no beaver, is not a balanced ecosystem.


Since when is Yellowstone a balanced ecosystem. There isn’t a single indigenous species to Yellowstone other than mountain goats and grouse. Everything else was pushed or hauled there by people. It is laughable to see how naive people are to the natural aspects of Yellowstone when they don’t have a clue to what there really wasn’t in Yellowstone until the settlement of the western United States.



Uhhhhh, what?

Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,840
B
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
B
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,840
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by Tarkio
I glanced at his fb page. Not a damn thing related to cattle or cowboy work.




Not every book can be about cowboys and cattle. His topic is wolves. Don't see the big deal here.

Your cranium must be emptium .


FUGK CCP

It’s time to WAKE UP
GOD BLESS THE USA
WWG1WGA
THERE ARE NO COINCIDENCES
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by HitnRun
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by AB2506
WTF writes a book that glorifies wolves in Yellowstone?


Any educated conservationist know introduced Canadian grey wolves wiped out over 70 per cent of the elk and moose in TNP.

Dumb cowboy Timmy and his anti nature idiot anti science cousin are truly clueless anti conservation clowns. shame on them



And if you knew anything about the history of the park, you'd know that bison and elk populations were artificially inflated for decades to attract tourism and to the detriment of the entire park ecosystem. You might start your education with Playing God in Yellowstone, by Alston Chase. The overgrazing was so bad that at one point there were literally no beaver left in the park (though they were everywhere outside the park). Wolves are a natural part of the Yellowstone ecosystem, but like elk, they have to be kept in balance. No wolves in the park at all and massive elk populations to the point of no beaver, is not a balanced ecosystem.


Since when is Yellowstone a balanced ecosystem. There isn’t a single indigenous species to Yellowstone other than mountain goats and grouse. Everything else was pushed or hauled there by people. It is laughable to see how naive people are to the natural aspects of Yellowstone when they don’t have a clue to what there really wasn’t in Yellowstone until the settlement of the western United States.



That's funny. Before European settlers arrived in North American at least 10 million elk roamed the continent, but none lived in Yellowstone till day before yesterday? Archaelogical evidence says they've been on the continent for 120,000 years, but not in Yellowstone where the habitat is prime? Wolves and Grizzly are native to the Park too, just as buffalo. Wolves and grizz feed on large ungulates. Yellowstone Park (with its current borders) is not a complete, self-contained and self-regulating ecosystem anymore, therefore man has a role to play to keep it in balance. Yellowstone with no beaver is absurd, but that was the condition of the park 60 years ago because there were so many elk that they destroyed beaver habitat and food supplies to the point of virtually eliminating beaver from the park. This had all sorts of negative consequences for other wildlife and flora in the park too. The reintroduction of the wolves has changed that for the better (beaver are back in large numbers and with that elevated water tables and willow stands and fish and birds), but the wolf populations must be kept in check. You really should read Alston Chase's book "Playing God in Yellowstone". He also wrote a book highly critical of the destruction of the American logging industry under the fig-leaf of saving the spotted owl.


Tarquin
IC B2

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,864
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,864
Likes: 3
They could have had a hunting season every year at Yellowstone and surrounding areas to "harvest" surplus cow elk. The DNR could have regulated the number of tags and length of it as needed. It would have provided food and recreation for real Americans.

But no, let's reintroduce wolves.

Last edited by RJY66; 01/21/21.

"Men must be governed by God or they will be ruled by tyrants". --- William Penn

Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by RJY66
They could have had a hunting season every year at Yellowstone and surrounding areas to "harvest" surplus cow elk. The DNR could have regulated the number of tags and length of it as needed. It would have provided food and recreation for real Americans.

But no, let's reintroduce wolves.


No, they couldn't because the public wouldn't support it. Something akin to what existed before Euro settlers----a mix of human hunters and wolves to control ungulate populations was desired because it was "natural". We have hunters and now we have wolves. Just need to keep the wolf populations in check.

Last edited by Tarquin; 01/21/21.

Tarquin
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,654
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,654
Diarrhea is also natural. just sayin.


https://postimg.cc/xXjW1cqx/81efa4c5

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

Soli Deo Gloria

democrats ARE the plague.

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 1
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 3,952
Likes: 1
[Linked Image]

Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 6,063
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
Diarrhea is also natural. just sayin.


Agreed. Here is how bad it was: when Grizzly bear populations in the park were plummeting, a group of conservationists proposed sending teams of archers on horseback into the Yellowstone backcountry to arrow large numbers of elk and bison and then drag them into meat piles to simulate the kinds of mass killings the natives had done in bygone eras and therewith, provide grizz with a good source of protein and fat so their numbers could recover. It would also replace the dumps the bears had grown used to go feeding on (but which the Park had closed). This was a win-win solution by virtually any definition: archers on horseback simulating what native Americans had done and recapturing the high-quality protein and fat source the grizz had enjoyed in prior centuries. You know what the grizzly bear advocates said? NO!!. In fact, one of them actually said (this was an environmentalist, mind you) "if we can't have grizzly bears naturally, then we won't have them at all". They were willing to see grizzly bears perish from the Yellowstone out of fealty to some warped, non-sensical, idiotic notion of "natural".



Last edited by Tarquin; 01/21/21.

Tarquin
IC B3

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 3
H
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
H
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by HitnRun
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by AB2506
WTF writes a book that glorifies wolves in Yellowstone?


Any educated conservationist know introduced Canadian grey wolves wiped out over 70 per cent of the elk and moose in TNP.

Dumb cowboy Timmy and his anti nature idiot anti science cousin are truly clueless anti conservation clowns. shame on them



And if you knew anything about the history of the park, you'd know that bison and elk populations were artificially inflated for decades to attract tourism and to the detriment of the entire park ecosystem. You might start your education with Playing God in Yellowstone, by Alston Chase. The overgrazing was so bad that at one point there were literally no beaver left in the park (though they were everywhere outside the park). Wolves are a natural part of the Yellowstone ecosystem, but like elk, they have to be kept in balance. No wolves in the park at all and massive elk populations to the point of no beaver, is not a balanced ecosystem.


Since when is Yellowstone a balanced ecosystem. There isn’t a single indigenous species to Yellowstone other than mountain goats and grouse. Everything else was pushed or hauled there by people. It is laughable to see how naive people are to the natural aspects of Yellowstone when they don’t have a clue to what there really wasn’t in Yellowstone until the settlement of the western United States.



That's funny. Before European settlers arrived in North American at least 10 million elk roamed the continent, but none lived in Yellowstone till day before yesterday? Archaelogical evidence says they've been on the continent for 120,000 years, but not in Yellowstone where the habitat is prime? Wolves and Grizzly are native to the Park too, just as buffalo. Wolves and grizz feed on large ungulates. Yellowstone Park (with its current borders) is not a complete, self-contained and self-regulating ecosystem anymore, therefore man has a role to play to keep it in balance. Yellowstone with no beaver is absurd, but that was the condition of the park 60 years ago because there were so many elk that they destroyed beaver habitat and food supplies to the point of virtually eliminating beaver from the park. This had all sorts of negative consequences for other wildlife and flora in the park too. The reintroduction of the wolves has changed that for the better (beaver are back in large numbers and with that elevated water tables and willow stands and fish and birds), but the wolf populations must be kept in check. You really should read Alston Chase's book "Playing God in Yellowstone". He also wrote a book highly critical of the destruction of the American logging industry under the fig-leaf of saving the spotted owl.



What’s funny is your lack of understanding what wasn’t in Yellowstone before the Europeans came. All the game that resides in Yellowstone were a result of encroachment and transplant.

All the game including elk, bighorn sheep, deer, Buffalo, even grizzly bears were all plains animals. What you see there now is the result of human interference. Check out the Corps of Discovery and you will see that once they came to the Rocky Mountains, they almost starved.

Now go back to Tim’s loser of a relative and read his book and Alston Chase’s book, but don’t forget they are found in Barnes and Noble in the fiction section.


Originally Posted by RJY66

I was thinking the other day how much I used to hate Bill Clinton. He was freaking George Washington compared to what they are now.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,361
Likes: 15
R
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
R
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,361
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
Diarrhea is also natural. just sayin.


Agreed. Here is how bad it was: when Grizzly bear populations in the park were plummeting, a group of conservationists proposed sending teams of archers on horseback into the Yellowstone backcountry to arrow large numbers of elk and bison and then drag them into meat piles to simulate the kinds of mass killings the natives had done in bygone eras and therewith, provide grizz with a good source of protein and fat so their numbers could recover. It would also replace the dumps the bears had grown used to go feeding on (but which the Park had closed). This was a win-win solution by virtually any definition: archers on horseback simulating what native Americans had done and recapturing the high-quality protein and fat source the grizz had enjoyed in prior centuries. You know what the grizzly bear advocates said? NO!!. In fact, one of them actually said (this was an environmentalist, mind you) "if we can't have grizzly bears naturally, then we won't have them at all". They were willing to see grizzly bears perish from the Yellowstone out of fealty to some warped, non-sensical, idiotic notion of "natural".




have a link to the fascinating archers on horseback fairy tale?

Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,256
Likes: 39
Campfire Kahuna
Online Content
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,256
Likes: 39
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
Diarrhea is also natural. just sayin.


Agreed. Here is how bad it was: when Grizzly bear populations in the park were plummeting, a group of conservationists proposed sending teams of archers on horseback into the Yellowstone backcountry to arrow large numbers of elk and bison and then drag them into meat piles to simulate the kinds of mass killings the natives had done in bygone eras and therewith, provide grizz with a good source of protein and fat so their numbers could recover. It would also replace the dumps the bears had grown used to go feeding on (but which the Park had closed). This was a win-win solution by virtually any definition: archers on horseback simulating what native Americans had done and recapturing the high-quality protein and fat source the grizz had enjoyed in prior centuries. You know what the grizzly bear advocates said? NO!!. In fact, one of them actually said (this was an environmentalist, mind you) "if we can't have grizzly bears naturally, then we won't have them at all". They were willing to see grizzly bears perish from the Yellowstone out of fealty to some warped, non-sensical, idiotic notion of "natural".




have a link to the fascinating archers on horseback fairy tale?


Lol, that's almost to much to believe.


Paul

"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.

Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.

molɔ̀ːn labé skýla

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 15
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 19,619
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by Tarquin
Originally Posted by oldtrapper
Diarrhea is also natural. just sayin.


Agreed. Here is how bad it was: when Grizzly bear populations in the park were plummeting, a group of conservationists proposed sending teams of archers on horseback into the Yellowstone backcountry to arrow large numbers of elk and bison and then drag them into meat piles to simulate the kinds of mass killings the natives had done in bygone eras and therewith, provide grizz with a good source of protein and fat so their numbers could recover. It would also replace the dumps the bears had grown used to go feeding on (but which the Park had closed). This was a win-win solution by virtually any definition: archers on horseback simulating what native Americans had done and recapturing the high-quality protein and fat source the grizz had enjoyed in prior centuries. You know what the grizzly bear advocates said? NO!!. In fact, one of them actually said (this was an environmentalist, mind you) "if we can't have grizzly bears naturally, then we won't have them at all". They were willing to see grizzly bears perish from the Yellowstone out of fealty to some warped, non-sensical, idiotic notion of "natural".




have a link to the fascinating archers on horseback fairy tale?


+1

Though to be authentic they should not have used horses and only sharp rocks and pointy sticks.


MAGA
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,499
Likes: 4
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,499
Likes: 4

Since when is Yellowstone a balanced ecosystem. There isn’t a single indigenous species to Yellowstone other than mountain goats and grouse. Everything else was pushed or hauled there by people. It is laughable to see how naive people are to the natural aspects of Yellowstone when they don’t have a clue to what there really wasn’t in Yellowstone until the settlement of the western United States.[/quote]



That's funny. Before European settlers arrived in North American at least 10 million elk roamed the continent, but none lived in Yellowstone till day before yesterday? Archaelogical evidence says they've been on the continent for 120,000 years, but not in Yellowstone where the habitat is prime? Wolves and Grizzly are native to the Park too, just as buffalo. Wolves and grizz feed on large ungulates. Yellowstone Park (with its current borders) is not a complete, self-contained and self-regulating ecosystem anymore, therefore man has a role to play to keep it in balance. Yellowstone with no beaver is absurd, but that was the condition of the park 60 years ago because there were so many elk that they destroyed beaver habitat and food supplies to the point of virtually eliminating beaver from the park. This had all sorts of negative consequences for other wildlife and flora in the park too. The reintroduction of the wolves has changed that for the better (beaver are back in large numbers and with that elevated water tables and willow stands and fish and birds), but the wolf populations must be kept in check. You really should read Alston Chase's book "Playing God in Yellowstone". He also wrote a book highly critical of the destruction of the American logging industry under the fig-leaf of saving the spotted owl.
[/quote]


What’s funny is your lack of understanding what wasn’t in Yellowstone before the Europeans came. All the game that resides in Yellowstone were a result of encroachment and transplant.

All the game including elk, bighorn sheep, deer, Buffalo, even grizzly bears were all plains animals. What you see there now is the result of human interference. Check out the Corps of Discovery and you will see that once they came to the Rocky Mountains, they almost starved.

Now go back to Tim’s loser of a relative and read his book and Alston Chase’s book, but don’t forget they are found in Barnes and Noble in the fiction section.[/quote]


Could it have been then as now that many species have moved from the mountains to the plains as it is easier to spot and outrun wolves in the open?


Dog I rescued in January

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]



Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 14
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by CowboyTim
He's been working in and around Yellowstone for years, this is his first book. Glad it's doing well, waiting patiently for my copy so I can read it.

Grand Lady Of Yellowstone.
Reminds me of Buzz. Almost 5000 posts and poof he was gone

Last edited by Hastings; 06/17/23. Reason: added word

Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 15
Buzz?

I'm a bit fuzzy this morning, who's Buzz?

I never viewed this CowboyTim thread as a shining star in the Campfire history books.

And 'poof' he was gone?

I guess we'd need to define 'poof'.

To this day those slanderous reviews of his Cousins book are still on Amazon.

Notta one of you fu_cks that posted them had ever read the book or even knew who the hell his cousin was.

Far to much like a bunch of guys that wanted the dorky kid to go home so they kicked his Sisters ass.

I suppose if it works it works but sheezz.

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 23,689
Likes: 1
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 23,689
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by JeffA
Buzz?

I'm a bit fuzzy this morning, who's Buzz?

I never viewed this CowboyTim thread as a shining star in the Campfire history books.

And 'poof' he was gone?

I guess we'd need to define 'poof'.

To this day those slanderous reviews of his Cousins book are still on Amazon.

Notta one of you fu_cks that posted them had ever read the book or even knew who the hell his cousin was.

Far to much like a bunch of guys that wanted the dorky kid to go home so they kicked his Sisters ass.

I suppose if it works it works but sheezz.

Shouldn’t brag about voting for Biden then promote your brothers new book. Fugk Cowboytim.



Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 9,743
Likes: 15
Originally Posted by jackmountain
Shouldn’t brag about voting for Biden then promote your brothers new book. Fugk Cowboytim.

Agreed, but they fugked his Cousin not him.

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,985
Likes: 17
C
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,985
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by JeffA
...To this day those slanderous reviews of his Cousins book are still on Amazon.

Notta one of you fu_cks that posted them had ever read the book or even knew who the hell his cousin was.

Far to much like a bunch of guys that wanted the dorky kid to go home so they kicked his Sisters ass.

I suppose if it works it works but sheezz.

Asymmetrical warfare is a thing...

The left does it VERY VERY VERY well...

The right... sometimes... usually not.

i.e. Usually the right just let's Kyle walk up a street alone... and shouts "Ra Ra... Sis Boom Ba" from a keyboard.


If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.



Page 9 of 10 1 2 7 8 9 10

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

432 members (12344mag, 1badf350, 22kHornet, 160user, 22magnut, 1OntarioJim, 42 invisible), 1,544 guests, and 1,166 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,098
Posts18,522,238
Members74,026
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.108s Queries: 55 (0.035s) Memory: 0.9444 MB (Peak: 1.0756 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-19 12:23:19 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS