|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17,527 |
Is it possible the kid got into the dumpster on his own? I live in a large Hispanic community, and they don't have the greatest track record of watching their kids. Just last summer a 2 year old was "playing unattended " at 9 pm near a river. Found him a month later 10 miles downstream...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,289
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,289 |
My earliest memory is that of climbing into a pen with a big ol' bull, I was maybe 2 1/2 or so. Teenage brother jumped in, grabbed me and climbed the rails with me under his arm, probably saved me from getting stomped. Dad and Mom were right there but I guess I got away from them.
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down.
Last edited by jnyork; 02/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,297
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 8,297 |
We need to start back hanging these perpetrators on the courthouse square. They cannot be rehabilitated and demonstrating what happens...might save another child’s life. Never should have stopped. Judge: You have been found guilty and are sentenced to death by hanging. The sentence will be carried out in 3 days at noon. If you wish to appeal the decision you must submit by tomorrow at noon. If you do so the appeal will be heard the following morning. Defendant: I will file an appeal. Judge: Thank you, Your appeal is denied. Bailiff, take him to the gallows. Defendant: That ain’t right! Judge: It is in my court. Bailiff! i believe this should be done again in America forever >> hang`em
Last edited by pete53; 02/21/21.
LIFE NRA , we vote Red up here, Norseman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down.
Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything.
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 02/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,606 |
We need to start back hanging these perpetrators on the courthouse square. They cannot be rehabilitated and demonstrating what happens...might save another child’s life. Never should have stopped. Judge: You have been found guilty and are sentenced to death by hanging. The sentence will be carried out in 3 days at noon. If you wish to appeal the decision you must submit by tomorrow at noon. If you do so the appeal will be heard the following morning. Defendant: I will file an appeal. Judge: Thank you, Your appeal is denied. Bailiff, take him to the gallows. Defendant: That ain’t right! Judge: It is in my court. Bailiff! i believe this should be done again in America forever >> hang`em Until it's us they are parading through on made up charges just to make us swing from the gallows. we're certainly a dying breed.....
Beware of any old man in a profession where one usually dies young.
Calm seas don't make sailors.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down. Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. How would that be the case? Who actually has the right and authority to decide what the public is entitled to know about such a grievous situation? Where is that specifically stated?
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,289
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 15,289 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down.
Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. So, the people of Cheyenne are not entitled to know there is some jerk running around killing babies and throwing them in a dumpster? You sound like a cop and/or a democrat.
Last edited by jnyork; 02/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,606
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,606 |
I have noticed that Hispanic parents tend to let their toddlers and young children wander without supervision.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down.
Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. So, the people of Cheyenne are not entitled to know there is some jerk running around killing babies and throwing them in a dumpster? You sound like a cop and/or a democrat. Not while it's an on-going investigation. Why would you want to tip off a suspect or influence the trial? If there was a public safety risk, it would be made public (ie a be on the lookout). Take a deep breath and realize you're clueless. You sound like so.eone with no common sense
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 02/21/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down. Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. How would that be the case? Who actually has the right and authority to decide what the public is entitled to know about such a grievous situation? Where is that specifically stated? Probably within the policy of the investigating agency. If the public needs to know, they'll be informed (if safety is an issue). If it's an on going case, especially of such importance, they probably want to do it by the book. Which doesn't include releasing every detail of the case prior to an arrest.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down. Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. How would that be the case? Who actually has the right and authority to decide what the public is entitled to know about such a grievous situation? Where is that specifically stated? Probably within the policy of the investigating agency. If the public needs to know, they'll be informed (if safety is an issue). If it's an on going case, especially of such importance, they probably want to do it by the book. Which doesn't include releasing every detail of the case prior to an arrest. "Probably" is too vague an answer for most of this. Yes, the LEOs through their "procedures" have the power to suppress or keep info secret during the ubiquitous "ongoing investigation", but too often they do that because they can and not because it is the best thing to do, or legally prudent for the public. If you want a powerful example, look at the event involving the Las Vegas shooter/mass murderer. He was dead at the scene and no one else ever was charged with any direct involvement - but most of the info of interest to the tax-paying public was withheld and withheld.
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,994
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,994 |
We need to start back hanging these perpetrators on the courthouse square. They cannot be rehabilitated and demonstrating what happens...might save another child’s life. Yes, I agree! Open to the public!
lightman
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down. Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. How would that be the case? Who actually has the right and authority to decide what the public is entitled to know about such a grievous situation? Where is that specifically stated? Probably within the policy of the investigating agency. If the public needs to know, they'll be informed (if safety is an issue). If it's an on going case, especially of such importance, they probably want to do it by the book. Which doesn't include releasing every detail of the case prior to an arrest. "Probably" is too vague an answer for most of this. Yes, the LEOs through their "procedures" have the power to suppress or keep info secret during the ubiquitous "ongoing investigation", but too often they do that because they can and not because it is the best thing to do, or legally prudent for the public. If you want a powerful example, look at the event involving the Las Vegas shooter/mass murderer. He was dead at the scene and no one else ever was charged with any direct involvement - but most of the info of interest to the tax-paying public was withheld and withheld. And that situation has nothing to do with the one we're discussing. It's OK that you don't know what you speak of, but stop acting like you do.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2 |
After two days, STILL absolutely no information available about how the baby got dead and in the dumpster. Nothing at all. Either the Cheyenne news org's are dropping the ball or the police have completely shut it down. Perhaps it's an on going investigation and you're not entitled to know anything. How would that be the case? Who actually has the right and authority to decide what the public is entitled to know about such a grievous situation? Where is that specifically stated? Probably within the policy of the investigating agency. If the public needs to know, they'll be informed (if safety is an issue). If it's an on going case, especially of such importance, they probably want to do it by the book. Which doesn't include releasing every detail of the case prior to an arrest. "Probably" is too vague an answer for most of this. Yes, the LEOs through their "procedures" have the power to suppress or keep info secret during the ubiquitous "ongoing investigation", but too often they do that because they can and not because it is the best thing to do, or legally prudent for the public. If you want a powerful example, look at the event involving the Las Vegas shooter/mass murderer. He was dead at the scene and no one else ever was charged with any direct involvement - but most of the info of interest to the tax-paying public was withheld and withheld. And that situation has nothing to do with the one we're discussing. It's OK that you don't know what you speak of, but stop acting like you do. Absolutely no attempt there to relate one crime to another - it was presented as an example or LEO behavior with regard to release of data. I know for certain that the citizens who pay for all of the LE machinations have the right to know the facts they pay for in a timely manner. Having watched this "information management" pattern develop and unfold for more than 60 years, it is likely that I know at least as much as do you - and probably more.
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31,262 Likes: 4
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 31,262 Likes: 4 |
Is there some reason you need to know all the details other than just being curious? What good would it do for you to know the ongoing details? "Right to know" has no bearing on need to know.
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 986
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 986 |
Castorate those bastards.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,549 Likes: 2 |
Is there some reason you need to know all the details other than just being curious? What good would it do for you to know the ongoing details? "Right to know" has no bearing on need to know. Very good question. Personally, I don't feel the need to know "all of the details" in the general run of instances. I have very little curiosity about gory stuff or other folks' personal details. It is a matter of principle. It has to do with the undue management and withholding of information in general. Similar to bristling when there is an accident on Interstate 15 and the LEOs shut the whole thing down for hours to enable their "investigation" and maneuvers - apparent attempts at justification of their paychecks and certainly a display of "authority" - instead of simply getting the vehicles off the highway safely and opening the road. Yes - I have heard it - 'investigation for the insurance lawyers." Contrast the current disruptive tactics with the sensible way such things were done 40 years ago. Principle is involved. By the way - and I disagree - right to know has huge bearing in those instances when one needs to know. I do appreciate your inquiry.
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,677 Likes: 9 |
Is there some reason you need to know all the details other than just being curious? What good would it do for you to know the ongoing details? "Right to know" has no bearing on need to know. Very good question. Personally, I don't feel the need to know "all of the details" in the general run of instances. I have very little curiosity about gory stuff or other folks' personal details. It is a matter of principle. It has to do with the undue management and withholding of information in general. Similar to bristling when there is an accident on Interstate 15 and they LEOs shut the whole thing down for hours to enable their "investigation" and maneuvers - apparent attempts at justification of their paychecks and certainly a display of "authority" - instead of simply getting the vehicles off the highway safely and opening the road. Yes - I have heard it - 'investigation for the insurance lawyers." Contrast the current disruptive tactics with the sensible way such things were done 40 years ago. Principle is involved. By the way - and I disagree - right to know has huge bearing in those instances when one needs to know. I do appreciate your inquiry. So you're just a nosey do gooder looking for something to complain about? Way to make a child's death about your wants. Classy. Again, you (as someone not involved, family, victim, etc)) have zero right to know the details of an on going investigation. Period. Ps I'd bet a dollar the suspect is currently in the clink.
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 02/22/21.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,921 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 25,921 Likes: 2 |
Maybe they are trying to protect the mother of the child from undue public scrutiny.
Maybe they are trying to gather enough evidence to gain a conviction without tipping off the prime suspect that they know who she is.
Lots of reasons to keep your cards close to your chest in a case like this. Belay your morbid curiosity and let the cops do their job.
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,084 Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,084 Likes: 2 |
Maybe they have this figured out and are trying to tie up all the loose ends and get their evidence secured without interference. You always try to have your evidence admissible. I know of a murderer that was released in Winnfield Louisiana a good many years ago because the cops got him to tell where the murder weapon was and he confessed to the killing after they continued to interrogate him after he requested to remain silent and asked for an attorney.
Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.
Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
|
|
|
|
636 members (007FJ, 160user, 10ring1, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 12344mag, 68 invisible),
2,613
guests, and
1,377
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,211
Posts18,485,426
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|