Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Accepted origins of Europeans being disputed

1.0 migrations stopped outta africa 60 to 80k yrs ago.
Earlier migrations of human variants started around 250 to 400k yrs before.
These earlier ones became your cro magnon, neanderthal, and denosivian.
Some of these earlier migrations became isolated populations in the SE asia large pacific island regions. Think austraila and aborigines.

The point is the 1.0s that stopped migrating or became isolated.
Failed to evolve more from interbreeding with cro magnon, neanderthal, and denosivian DNA.
2.0,s are a result of that interbreeding.

1.0s on the planet are missing gene markers from those 3 groups and failed to become human 2.0,s.

All this came out with the human genome project and the human dna code being mapped.

The reasearch and proof is their .
It is not PC at all.

1.0,s exist.
And 2.0,s exist.
That is the cold hard truth....


Sime NAPA,s have been blessed with 2.0 gene gifts from interbreeding somewhat.
But it takes a whole hellava lot longer than 450 to 500 yrs to modify brain structure and functions compared to eons of what evolution and migrations did.


The research and proof is their to be had.
It's just seen as a bad thing in this day and age to speak of it.

Simply google fu,ing
Differences in race IQ
Differences in racial physiology, body structure, and DNA markers.
Differences in racial medical protocols
Just to name a few....


Opens up all studies for one to read.


Be careful ...

You might be called a racist when you find out their is a less evolved species of humans over the entire planet.
1.0,s......
And they cause most of the problems/ issues on the planet to begin with.

Chuck....
70,000 BC.....

renegade this opens up all kinds of things to think about. since we're all down here together the question is begged, what to do next? i think the decision has been made. we're seeing it on tv and in the movies. it might slow down advancement to the other planets, but it keeps us urthlings from being strung out so far, from the most advanced to the least advanced. maybe there'll be an advantage in that in the long run?

Long term space flight will require the entire crew to have their appendix removed.
99.9% of Astronauts returning to earth have had a appendicitis within 3 yrs after returning to earth.
The ones that didnt had it removed earlier in life
Speculation is that it is a control mechanism built into us by our creator's/engineers.
Nearest star is 4 some odd light years away.
We cant make it their doing lightspeed before we die from a appendicitis in suspension for the journey.

Read all this in more detail in Omni Magazine back in the early 80,s.

Strange but interesting article for what it is worth.

If we can fold space and travel.

The appendix thing is probably moot.....

We cant even figure out reliable cold fusion..

Something the size of a microwave that runs off 1oz of tap water pwer up a home???


LOL!!!

He has to one of Whoopi Golberg's ancestors.

If you consider the series of perfect conditions it takes to become a fossil, you realize that fossil study gives limited returns, for other than identification and limited lifestyle purposes.

The Africa thing was, and is, a liberal myth.

Humans, in the early stage, were like any other organism on the planet. They thrive and multiply in areas conducive to human habitation, and struggle to survive, move or die out in areas inhospitable to habitation.

That's why eskimos built totem poles steada pyramids.

99.99999.......% of all things that die, don't make it ta fossildom. They get et or dry up and blow away.

To become a fossil, ya basically hadda die in a tar pit or in a river or lake, and become covered in mud.

Then, your mud tomb hadda be covered for millions of years by a low sea, without earthquakes or volcanic activity disturbing the process.

After that, the sea/dry cycle hadda repeat itself, until the fossil process was complete.

And your fossil location better end up pretty close ta the surface a million years later, or you won't be discovered, due to economics.

So, a fossil can prove a human ancestor was in a place along time ago, but that's all it proves.

No one knows, or will ever know, the circumstances surrounding human development, including the location where it "all began".

it's good that noone has overtly ruled out the possible or potential fact that several sub-species of humans were seeded at far distant distances from each other. r&d was performed and then allowed the sub-species groups to multiply. later the experiment from the efforts were completed, abandoned or both. otherwise, humans of various persuasions have been on the urth for a period far greater than 6,000 years or so.