Bacon throat!!! Such dainty little pecker tongs!!! Haha
Look at that pork build up around his wrists! Poor [bleep] gonna croak man. He obviously should of paid more attention to his wife. But then years of dainty pecker tongs more than likely left her starving..
Your Every Liberal vote promotes Socialism and is an attack on the Second Amendment. You will suffer the consequences.
GOA,Idaho2AIAlliance,AmericanFirearmsAssociation,IdahoTrappersAssociation,FoundationForWildlifeManagement ID and MT.
Hey Stick! Whilst you gots the hacksaw out you needs to be cutting down all the butt stocks on what's left of your rifles to give yourself a length of pull of six inches there bouts so you can reach the trigger with them dainty little T Rex arms of yours... Larry reminds me of a pink smurf... Bet that boy can't even reach his own ass to wipe it. Hint, LAUGHING... WINNING!
Few things funnier than The Twatly Trifecta Melting down in unison,groovin' on how The Whine is in Perfect Harmony to boot...you "lucky" kchunts. Hint. Congratulations?!?
At least you get to read my EVERY word and Splendid Pixel,as I fixate your every thought. Hint.
Fortunately for you Melting Maidens,Imagination and Pretend are free,so you gals can "afford" to "contribute". No wonder you MUST steal pics?!? Hint.
Bless your poor poor(literally) hearts for Trying,Whining,Melting and Crying.
The less you "know","do" and "see",the "better" Reupold is. Undoubtedly,you Whining CLUELESS Kchunts,are "responsible" for a "bunch" of scope "Sales".
Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............
'BIC,
Xtreme Hardcore Gear. Throw a little attention to the AICS DBM mag latch and you have something. I tend to shorten same and double spring,for POSITIVE retention. Hint.
I'm not familiar with MDT...................(grin)
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
While strapped in to your "Command Center",for a BIG GoogleFu Moment,what sorta tension are you driving on your helmet's chin strap and your bib...you "lucky" kchunt. Hint. Congratulations?!?
How many times a day do you think about me? Not on a GOOD day,just an average one? HINT.
Fortunately for you Melting Maidens,Imagination and Pretend are free,so you gals can "afford" to "contribute". No wonder you MUST steal pics?!? Hint.
Bless your poor poor(literally) hearts for Trying,Whining,Melting and Crying.
The less you "know","do" and "see",the "better" Reupold is. Undoubtedly,you Whining CLUELESS Kchunts,are "responsible" for a "bunch" of scope "Sales".
Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!..............
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Nice pic, but you have too little depth of field and some detail is lost. Try decreasing your focal length a bit, and/or increasing your f-stop and slowing your shutter speed a tad, then you won't have so much bokeh on the subject itself. A little is fine, but too much blurs detail. On a stationary eider, a slower shutter speed shouldn't be an issue. And without a busy back or foreground, a little less bokeh is affordable.
I realize you will find this fascinating, but one or two scopes aren't a reliable sample to determine reliability of a manufacturer....
I have (50) Leupolds and only (1) failure. That was my fault for building a cantilevered [diving board] scope base that shook the reticle out. Leupold sent me a new scope.
Compare that to the trouble I have had with my (1) USO, manufactured wrong, adjustable objective off by 180 degrees in the double pitch threads... they fixed for free (1) B&L manufactured wrong, the 4x12x40 made with misaligned lenses (2) Burris, (1) runs down battery (6) IOR, (1) has a turret failure (1) Zeiss Conquest has a 12X BCD reticle in a 15X scope, and US customer support that just keeps asking me with weight of my bullet, so they can run their computer program (5) SWFA (1) manufactured wrong, the 20X made with misaligned lenses...they offered me a trade in. I told them it would be morally wrong to let them to sell it again.
Maybe you just don't know what a failure is.
Or maybe you need to run thousands of rounds through them, carry them in a scabbard on horseback or drag them across mountains, you know, because mountains are harder on scopes than swamps, rocky creek beds, woods and the high desert.
Of course there are those that have failures but have no clue they are experiencing a failure
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
. I shoot more than a box a year and have never had a failure. Though I doubt I have a round count of over 500 on any of them. I also have some Leupold made Redfields that have been great. None have adjusted precisely getting them zeroed, but have been 100% reliable once there. VX-2 and below.
How dare you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. By your standards we could say you are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? (I'm starting to suspect this of Big Stick)And don't tell me I don't shoot enough. What do you do big stick? Shoot in your sleep? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize it's your right to have that choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign. It makes you look kinda one way intolerant.
Last edited by Filaman; 06/12/21.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
I realize you will find this fascinating, but one or two scopes aren't a reliable sample to determine reliability of a manufacturer....
I have (50) Leupolds and only (1) failure. That was my fault for building a cantilevered [diving board] scope base that shook the reticle out. Leupold sent me a new scope.
Compare that to the trouble I have had with my (1) USO, manufactured wrong, adjustable objective off by 180 degrees in the double pitch threads... they fixed for free (1) B&L manufactured wrong, the 4x12x40 made with misaligned lenses (2) Burris, (1) runs down battery (6) IOR, (1) has a turret failure (1) Zeiss Conquest has a 12X BCD reticle in a 15X scope, and US customer support that just keeps asking me with weight of my bullet, so they can run their computer program (5) SWFA (1) manufactured wrong, the 20X made with misaligned lenses...they offered me a trade in. I told them it would be morally wrong to let them to sell it again.
Maybe you just don't know what a failure is.
Or maybe you need to run thousands of rounds through them, carry them in a scabbard on horseback or drag them across mountains, you know, because mountains are harder on scopes than swamps, rocky creek beds, woods and the high desert.
Of course there are those that have failures but have no clue they are experiencing a failure
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
. I shoot more than a box a year and have never had a failure. Though I doubt I have a round count of over 500 on any of them. I also have some Leupold made Redfields that have been great. None have adjusted precisely getting them zeroed, but have been 100% reliable once there. VX-2 and below.
How darer you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. But youo are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize that's your choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign.
Better low light performance is BS, more like who turned off the lights
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
You Amazingly STUPID Fhuqks simply never disappoint in Comedic Grandeur,by simply doing your best...you "lucky" kchunts. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Pardon an innate ability,to steer your crossed-eyes wherever I please,as I please. Should it help your Meltdown,be be sure to quantify same as being a "fluke". Hint. LAUGHING!
I rather enjoy Paula's Spandex Chronicles,from the Fascinating World of her pointy head and GoogleFu,as she fights "bravely" to bring her Imagination and Pretend to "life" for "vindication". Hint.
In fairness however,few things are fhuqking more HILARIOUS,than a Texas meltdown and a drooling attempt to "talk" rifles. She can almost know what a paragraph is. ALMOST. Hint.
Fortunately for you Melting Maidens,Imagination and Pretend are free,so you gals can "afford" to "contribute". No wonder you MUST steal pics?!? Hint.
Bless your poor poor(literally) hearts for Trying,Whining,Melting and Crying.
The less you "know","do" and "see",the "better" Reupold is. Undoubtedly,you Whining CLUELESS Kchunts,are "responsible" for a "bunch" of scope "Sales".
Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!.................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
How darer you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. But youo are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize that's your choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign.
Better low light performance is BS, more like who turned off the lights
[/quote]
Filaman, he/she, whatever it is, isn't happy unless it's insulting someone's intelligence. That's the true mark of insecurity. My old school friction 3-9x40 Leupold Vari-X 1 will easily take me to 30 minutes after sunset. That's old technology at Leupold's lowest level. Anyone who would refer to that as "who turned out the lights" is speaking from emotion, not experience.
Bacon throat!!! Holding zero is big bidness!!! Haha
Ping pong balls for the win. Once you've wrestled everything else in life is easy. Dan Gable I keep my circle small, I’d rather have 4 quarters than 100 pennies.
How darer you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. But youo are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize that's your choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign.
Better low light performance is BS, more like who turned off the lights
Filaman, he/she, whatever it is, isn't happy unless it's insulting someone's intelligence. That's the true mark of insecurity. My old school friction 3-9x40 Leupold Vari-X 1 will easily take me to 30 minutes after sunset. That's old technology at Leupold's lowest level. Anyone who would refer to that as "who turned out the lights" is speaking from emotion, not experience. [/quote]
You don't even know what you aren't seeing with inferior optics
I got banned on another web site for a debate that happened on this site. That's a first
How darer you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. But youo are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize that's your choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign.
Better low light performance is BS, more like who turned off the lights
Filaman, he/she, whatever it is, isn't happy unless it's insulting someone's intelligence. That's the true mark of insecurity. My old school friction 3-9x40 Leupold Vari-X 1 will easily take me to 30 minutes after sunset. That's old technology at Leupold's lowest level. Anyone who would refer to that as "who turned out the lights" is speaking from emotion, not experience.
You don't even know what you aren't seeing with inferior optics
[/quote]
If my inferior optics get me through legal shooting light, what more do I need?
How darer you insinuate all leupold lovers are too stupid to know when they've had a failure! Most every one of us here have admitted they are a pain to set. But youo are too stupid to recognize what we appreciate about them. They're light (Big deal on a rifle you're going to carry in the mountains all day where Oxygen is sparse) and at least one of you has admitted that once set they stay set. Mine do. And you fail to admit that Leupold will give you better low light performance for the money than about any scope out there in its price range. What is your motivation for this constant bashing? Do some of you work for their competitors? If you don't like them don't buy them. We recognize that's your choice. I own and use several brands of scopes. I have some Vortex, at least one B&L and Weaver. They all work for me but I prefer my Leupolds over all of them. So use what you want but please get off your soap box and quit this bashing campaign.
Better low light performance is BS, more like who turned off the lights
Filaman, he/she, whatever it is, isn't happy unless it's insulting someone's intelligence. That's the true mark of insecurity. My old school friction 3-9x40 Leupold Vari-X 1 will easily take me to 30 minutes after sunset. That's old technology at Leupold's lowest level. Anyone who would refer to that as "who turned out the lights" is speaking from emotion, not experience.
You don't even know what you aren't seeing with inferior optics
[/quote]
Don't tell me what I know or don''t know. You don't know me. I''ve shot rifles with everything from Schmit Und Bender to Tasco on top. . Yeah there are better scopes out there but not for what I do with them and in their price range. Like I said, use what you want but get off your constant bugling that we who like Leupold are too stupid to know what we like or what we need.
Last edited by Filaman; 06/12/21.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
You gals REALLY go for the throat,with your Hissy Fitting Cat Fights,trying to Out-Dumbfhuqk one another with your Amazing STUPIDITY...you "lucky" kchunts. Hint. Congratulations?!?
Few things as "compelling" or "heralded" as The Reupold Golf Cart Zero Test and zero rounds shot. Hint. LAUGHING!
Reupold's 30mm Lapping bar is skookum however. Hint. LAUGHING!
Fortunately for you Melting Maidens,Imagination and Pretend are free,so you gals can "afford" to "contribute". No wonder you MUST steal pics?!? Hint.
Bless your poor poor(literally) hearts for Trying,Whining,Melting and Crying.
The less you "know","do" and "see",the "better" Reupold is. Undoubtedly,you Whining CLUELESS Kchunts,are "responsible" for a "bunch" of scope "Sales".
Hint.
Fhuqking LAUGHING!.................
Brad says: "Can't fault Rick for his pity letting you back on the fire... but pity it was and remains. Nothing more, nothing less. A sad little man in a sad little dream."
Don't tell me what I know or don 't know. You don't know me. I''ve shot rifles with everything from Schmit Und Bender to Tasco on top. . Yeah there are better scopes out there but not for what I do with them and ihjn their price range. Like I said, use what you want but get off your constant bugling that we who like Leupold are too stupid to know what we like or what we need.
I have been here for 15 years. I may have used ignore on 3 people. I am going to shuffle it off to the list. I have yet to find any kind of value in any of its content. No humor, no helpfulness, no personality, no color, completely dour and unintriguing. That's saying something when Lil Twig stays, but you get booted.
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/921/zoU8yU.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/921/Zij9eq.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/923/xMLwmg.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/924/1AiJeI.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/923/kJlpyb.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/922/lzI5oW.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/923/QZx2V3.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/k5V8Q18L/90-550x550-Front-Color-White.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/921/DG4unc.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/924/bbBpWd.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]](https://i.imgur.com/kl0ojCj.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/7Lpzm3nh/0.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/922/FA27y7.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/W337x449/2-F879-F28-7814-4-C5-A-B20-D-6-FCE24-F696-EE.jpg)
![[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]](https://i.postimg.cc/wx5NQsyx/queefcontest-illustration-libertyantoniasadler-metro.png)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/924/kfN48s.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/923/01qiQQ.jpg)
![[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]](https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/1280x1024q90/922/CR5Xua.jpg)