Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Is concealed carry just for wealthy working class?

Dropped once never fired??????

Let's see.

Handle of "Western Juniper", a specific juniper (Juniperus occidentalis ) , not just "Juniper".

Went to an "Ag school" .........perhaps a "Forestry" student? Range & Grassland Ecology student? Mmmmnn??

Seemingly has a tendency to bring up social subjects, not Ag subjects? Comments that bring up tension and conflict on the forum.

And not surprised by the tendency of many here to disagree with his points and his methods.



Says he overlooks it:



Yet continues to reply to posts about it.

Interesting stuff, eh folks?

Perhaps one of those Ag students that was more interested in the societal implications of "Ag" (Forestry included due to the handle of a specific type of juniper?) and therefor has knowledge of class structure and terminology?




Then again, maybe just a well rounded individual that happens to like Juniper occidentalis? And enjoys a good online confrontation?

Oh well, seems to me many here overlook class and concentrate on deeds. Which is the way I prefer it. Fortunately, as ORACLE, I now have a pretty good idea who's who around here.

Pics or it never happened.....
😄😄😄😄😄

Just another garden variety 24 hr sockpuppet.
They come in rotations.

If Bin would ban one or two of em and their IP address.
It would probably shut down 15 or 20 of em total.
All multiscreening from the same couple of dipschit losers.

Hey hey now.

I thought that was reserved for us Dagos.

Please, DO NOT include the French with us.

I asked if concealed carry is a high-prole thing because I want to know the answer, or more specifically, I want to know how people here think about it. Why the people here? Because I thought they would be interested enough to consider the answer. I want to know the answer because I want to understand the conflict around the issue whether it's also a conflict of classes.

Do you consider me a lefty? Is it just because I brought up the subject of social class at all or is there something else?

And Juniper trees smell like cat pizz too....

😆😆😆😆😆

And even a small pistol can be used effectively when necessary. Both when full and empty. So can a roll of coins, a bumbershoot, a newsmagazine, thumbs, rocks, branches, etc.

But, un pistola grande works too.

Is the growth of actual practice of concealed carry endemic exclusively among high proles, petit-bourgeoisie or the wealthier segment of the working class?

Most often I see it characterized as a thing favored by conservative members of the Republican party and criticized and chastened by liberal members of the Democratic party. Yet it seems equally evident that there are a lot of people, regardless of their political ideology, that do not and will not carry.

* Upper class -- they might own a few Purdeys and if they own a handgun it would be a Webley revolver, but they certainly don't carry it, ever.
* Upper-Middle -- the Mark and Patricia McCloskeys, hopeless affectation at best
* Middle class (American bourgeoisie) -- Clark Griswold, corporate policy forbids it, they're also too insecure to try anything perceived as unconventional, unwilling to offend anyone or assert themselves at the risk of acceptance, most likely to go along with "gun control" out of fear
* High Prole (petit bourgeoisie) -- often richer than the middle class, displayed in their high-end bass boats, $35K turbo SxS, new Harley or KTM motorcycle, and 45 foot 5th wheel with a new high-end turbo diesel duallie; they're also under less supervision at work than the corporate man or the wage slave below them, they may even own the small business, and they carry
* Mid Prole -- Fred Flintstone, Archie Bunker, Homer Simpson, like the white collar office worker, they're under too much supervision to get away with carry that's against company rules and even if they put it on after work to affect a less supervised high prole, they don't often go anywhere but their own house or Walmart. Even when they travel, it's likely to tourist places like Disney resorts. Most likely to open carry (at Walmart).
* Low Prole -- have a good probability of a criminal record, either felony, drugs, or domestic that keeps them prohibited, most likely to carry illegally but most don't because of the greater probability that even if they're lawful, they live in an area that's overpoliced and they're likely to be harrassed

It’s like Duck911 and slavek had a love child.

WTF is this? I can't even make it past the second sentence. You are deranged..

I just saw you post after I replied to the OP.

GFY.

I believe in constitutional carry with ZERO permits or checks for all USA non felons. That is my FIRM stance, and one I actually try to perpetuate and advance, actively..