|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,680
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,680 |
[quote=utah708]I have worked with 3 6.5-284s, and while I like them very much, I think the long bullets in .264 caliber make it a better match with a long action (and the original post specified a short action.) If you get an assortment of 130-140 gr bullets and do the math to see how much ends up down in the case when the cartridge OAL is held to 2.8" and you will see what I mean.
I'm not the best to give an opinion as i can't make up my own mind. But I'm curious Utah708, why would the 260 be ok and not the 6.5/284. Both use the same bullets and if I'm not mistaken the 284 version gives you more capacity.
I do like the 25/284 option as I'm nuts over 25 caliber at the moment and know you can get some great speed with it.
I have one other to cause a little confusion eventhough it is not one listed, the 338-08. As crazy as I am with the 25 caliber, i feel the same about the 33 caliber and love it in the LA version 338-06
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,162 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,162 Likes: 6 |
There's quite a bit of application difference for most folks between the 243 and the 300 WSM but some of the others mentioned will cover the whole spectrum from varmints to caribou (ok, elk too) quite well if not be the best choice for either end of things.
The 6.5-284 has significant capacity over the 260 and I might opt for the 7 SAUM if going bigger (Probably not as practical as the WSM though) just because I like its shape better.
If you would consider the 260 then the fact that some bullets might protrude down into the 6.5-284 case is of no consequence because it will still have considerably more capacity than the 260.
Of the options you gave I would go with the 6.5-284 for from coyotes to big game it should work quite well with the right bullet and wouldn't be "out of place" on either end.
Gdv
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,883
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,883 |
The 7wsm like I mentioned would be the dream machine for me that could handle any longrange hunting task as well.
I would do the 243 with the 115 or 117 sierra's for long range play and paper punching, plus I bet they would do a number on a deer quite a ways out there.
308 if factory match ammo is going to be used at all.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,731
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,731 |
Hello, if you're still taking comments from the floor, here goes:
The .243 Win is the smallest legal deer cartridge in many rifle states. Recoil will be less than the .308 because of lighter bullets. 100's are definitely deer killers, smaller, lighter for varmints too. My AI take is that you can still shoot your Wins in it, but to appreciate the AI, you have to reload. You get 5 - 10% more velocity than it's parent. In the case of the .243, you don't really need it.
The .308 Win is legend because it is accurate, bullet selection is unparallel, and good match bullets are common. I'm loading .308 now for my M1A competitions. The 168 Matchkings, and now the 155's. Very versatile, available, and not too hard on the shoulder. Cost is a little more than the .243 for bullets especially for varmints, but bigger critters can be dispatched.
The only other cartridge I know is the .300 WSM. I will tell you that it kicks, the SAMMI specs are sloppy, brass is sloppy, at least Win stuff is. I would get a minimum SAMMI spec chamber if I have another done. Shells are expensive, hard to find, and if you don't like 180's you're going to reload. Unless you're going to hunt beanfields or engage in long range benchrest, the benefits are small. I'd take the .308 to hunt and shoot paper, or the .243 if recoil is an issue knowing it will do the job and open up the door to varmint hunting.
"I didn't get the sophisticated gene in this family. I started the sophisticated gene in this family." Willie Robertson
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,836
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,836 |
Mainly just looking for something fun to play with. Of your list I would pick the .243 Win. It will do deer quite handily and is hilarious on varmints. Ammo can be found anywhere if for some reason you aren't reloading. Also it ranks in the top 3 of my favorite cartridges.
There comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor polite, nor popular -- but one must ask, "Is it right?"
Martin Luther King, Jr.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 61,130 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,294 |
the 6.5 just reaches out and tickles all the others.... woofer
"I would build one again, if it were not for my 350RM (grin)."
MtnHtr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,590
Campfire Outfitter
|
OP
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,590 |
I appreciate all the suggestions guys. I'm going to investigate the .260 thing a little further as I hadn't thought of that. I also really like the .243 and .308. I now they're "boring", but they sure do work well and ammo is everywhere...and cheap.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 957
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 957 |
I know it is not on your list, but the 284 win itself is an excellent all-around cartridge. I run 140gr tsx's at avg 2960fps and I use it on deer, sheep, goats, elk,and moose. It is nice to shoot and can reach out when you need to. No sense going wildcat when the original is so good. Just my humble opinion.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,578 |
[quote=utah708]I have worked with 3 6.5-284s, and while I like them very much, I think the long bullets in .264 caliber make it a better match with a long action (and the original post specified a short action.) If you get an assortment of 130-140 gr bullets and do the math to see how much ends up down in the case when the cartridge OAL is held to 2.8" and you will see what I mean.
I'm not the best to give an opinion as i can't make up my own mind. But I'm curious Utah708, why would the 260 be ok and not the 6.5/284. Both use the same bullets and if I'm not mistaken the 284 version gives you more capacity.
Sorry for the delay in answering your question, but have been busy. The box on a short Remington 700 limits the cartridge OAL to 2.80. The length of a 6.5-284 case to the base of the neck is 1.91", while the same dimension on a 260 is 1.77". A 140 Nosler Partition is 1.30" long meaning that .41" of bullet extends down into the body of the case on a 6.5-284. On a 260, only .27" does. On the 140 gr Sierra boattail, which measures 1.25", the intrusion is .36" and .22" respectively. Some people say that such intrusion of the bullet into the case is not a problem, but I don't like it. In addition, the .260 is really sweet with 100-120 gr bullets, while the 6.5-284 strokes with 120-140 gr. That makes the bullet length issue doubly significant. This is why I like the 6.5-284 on a long action. I had mine throated so that a 120 Ballistic Tip comes right to the base of the neck.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,883
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,883 |
George of GAPrecision likes the 243, FWIW.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 15,565 |
Once I fry the barrel on my GAP 308, it will become a 260 AI......
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,680
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,680 |
Utah708,
thanks for the info and i now understand. good info to know also if building a 6.5/284.
Chip
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,085 Likes: 1 |
6.5-284.
Less filling and tastes great.
Expat
"There are no dangerous weapons. There are only dangerous men." - Robert Heinlein
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,064
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,064 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 14,807 |
Since you have not mentioned any specific competition for the rifle and its going to be heavy and bulky I would leave thought for a switch barrel gun. Not to disparage heavy and bulky as that profile shoots! A competitor here changes barrels at the match! The barrels on his gun are just hand tightened by notches on the end of the barrel at the muzzle. This system works and he shoots very well. There are other switch barrel methods of course. I just mentioned a one off idea. You could contact Moe Difino on this at. Master Class Sports Incorporated, 166 Pocono Rd, Brookfield, CT 06804 (203) 775-1013 166 Pocono Rd, Brookfield, CT 06804 As for cartridges get what you want as thats the fun of it all. Here is a link to some sniper history. Link to sniper rifle history. Pictures
|
|
|
|
601 members (1100mag, 1beaver_shooter, 1badf350, 10gaugemag, 160user, 50 invisible),
18,971
guests, and
1,329
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,973
Posts18,539,922
Members74,052
|
Most Online20,796 04:44 PM
|
|
|
|