Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Wyoming Game and fish department, the worst in the lower 48?

All the western states suck, midwest and southeast >same-same, northeast well that goes without saying it sucks. Never met any one there I gave a damn about.
Canada, that frozen wasteland ain't worth a damn, bunch of frozen rednecks.

I have been to Wyoming and head there every chance I get.

Their guys cannot possibly pray to be as bad as the Michigan DNR they’re the absolute worst.

Right you are, and no place in the Western states is more sucky than Wyoming. It is a cold, desolate, windy , barren useless piece of the earth not good for anything. Folks looking to move somewhere for a better way of life should look instead to Texas, or maybe Montana, I hear it's real nice up there.

When I was young and working back east, I got a new boss. He said he was from Wyoming, so I said I'd always wanted to visit Wyoming.

His reply was "what the hell for?" He was from Rock Springs.

Pretty much all game and fish depts suck. It is government run after all....

Colorado is really bad. Deer are 100,000 animals below state objective. Their solution is to keep shooting does and allowing the 4th season rut hunt.

You guys are all wrong, California is the worse. The cost of hunting and fishing licenses here are more than an out of state license in many states. The wardens use the French method of justice. You are guilty until till you prove yourself innocent. Besides that, the biggies in fish and game are appointed by the Governor and everybody knows what a liberal jerk he is.

Worse than Nevada? Surely you jest. Suprised they haven't brought in wolves, maybe the only thing stopping that is the bastages would starve.

Only BG animal doing well is antelope, just because of all the newer alfalfa farms, no thanks to NDOW.

Dont forget the wolves

CP&W wasn't behind that fiasco.

😂😂😎

you should probably ahve a clue what the definitions of terms used are. Possession lmit does not mean"how many you have in your freezer" it means how any are in your posession. let's say you are on a 3 day fishing camping trip and the CREEL limit per day is 6 yet at the tent you have 15, fish, and 4 in your creel downa t the stream when you get checked. you are within the daily Creel limit but over the possession lmiti.

You really are an idiot aren't you.....

I agree 100% but those same people who are taking exception lead the charge in bitching about the border and Texas - where is the difference?

And for the record - Wyoming or any other state can run their business how they want. If you guys don't like NR that's cool - I might could get behind that only residents can hunt the state they reside in.

only an idiot doesnt see the Irony in Ribka's words compared to the OP

Irony???? BS

😁

he is literally framing his statements with the same argument as the OP. IE the Op is blaming the satte for poor management decisions forced on them by the Feds, Ribka is simply using the same words putting the blame on Texans for illegal immigrants when the Feds are casuing the problem

Here is your clue Otis. In general your creel and possession limits are exactly the same. And you are allowed to have in your possession a one day limit of fish. Doesn't matter if it is in your creel or freezer they all count as part of the "limit".

https://wgfd.wyo.gov/Regional-Offic...n-you-explain-creel-and-possesion-limits

The difference being the WGAF has spent millions of hunter dollars helping the feds with their wolf and Grizzly programs. The state of Wyoming does not have to help the feds. The state of Texas is not spending money helping the feds with their illegal immigrant fetish.

I do own a house in Wyoming, had the same renters for 12 years. Seems to be some misconception among many of the posters, I truly like Wyoming a great deal second only to Texas. I am not saying anything against the state itself just the piss poor excuse for wildlife management WGAF is. Love that acronym.