24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,281
Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,281
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by ol_mike
Wouldn't it kind of be a good thing, lay ALL of the evidence out for ALL to see?

twitter/book and anywhere else where a conservative could get a word in edge-wise would have to work overtime to make sure the dummies were told what to think.

Bingo.

As Q said, "How do you introduce evidence legally?"

Let me get this straight, jag.

Are you saying that indicting Trump is a good thing and part of, The Plan, in order to use the courts and discovery to expose the truth?
That Trump and The Patriots are hoping for an indictment?

Liz Cheney is pushing hard for her committee to send a referral to the DOJ for indictment, while the chairman or the committee says no.

Does this mean Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, knowing that an indictment is
“how you introduce evidence legally (Q)”?

Defendants are usually given lot's of leeway on discovery. Except by corrupted judges which is a concern to everyone. I can see The Donald reaching way back and bringing in a whole lot of witnesses that will say the democRATs have been out to get me and trumped up these charges. If an indictment comes, Donald Trump as the defendant has tons of opportunities to bring up democRAT dirt.

Yep, discovery will be good for The Donald.

kwg
Does this mean Liz Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, as she is the one calling for these much desired indictments?

Liz Chaney has burned her "white hat" bridge. She is so full of hate she is just focused on filing on Donald Trump to hurt him. She probably has a corrupt judge in her back pocket. That is the only reason why she is calling for the indictment.
kwg


For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
GB1

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,654
Likes: 2
A
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,654
Likes: 2
She ain’t full Hate .. She’s being told what to Do by the Corporate Globalist ..
This is all Business..

Roll Them or They Roll You

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
S
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by ol_mike
Wouldn't it kind of be a good thing, lay ALL of the evidence out for ALL to see?

twitter/book and anywhere else where a conservative could get a word in edge-wise would have to work overtime to make sure the dummies were told what to think.

Bingo.

As Q said, "How do you introduce evidence legally?"

Let me get this straight, jag.

Are you saying that indicting Trump is a good thing and part of, The Plan, in order to use the courts and discovery to expose the truth?
That Trump and The Patriots are hoping for an indictment?

Liz Cheney is pushing hard for her committee to send a referral to the DOJ for indictment, while the chairman or the committee says no.

Does this mean Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, knowing that an indictment is
“how you introduce evidence legally (Q)”?

Defendants are usually given lot's of leeway on discovery. Except by corrupted judges which is a concern to everyone. I can see The Donald reaching way back and bringing in a whole lot of witnesses that will say the democRATs have been out to get me and trumped up these charges. If an indictment comes, Donald Trump as the defendant has tons of opportunities to bring up democRAT dirt.

Yep, discovery will be good for The Donald.

kwg
Does this mean Liz Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, as she is the one calling for these much desired indictments?

Liz Chaney has burned her "white hat" bridge. She is so full of hate she is just focused on filing on Donald Trump to hurt him. She probably has a corrupt judge in her back pocket. That is the only reason why she is calling for the indictment.
kwg
So, knowing this should we still support jag and his theory that this is a good thing?


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,362
Likes: 3
If there's an indictment it's more likely to come from the Fulton County DA than the DOJ.

https://www.businessinsider.com/former-white-house-counsel-trump-likely-prosecuted-georgia-2022-6


Remember why, specifically, the Bill of Rights was written...remember its purpose. It was written to limit the power of government over the individual.

There is no believing a liar, even when he speaks the truth.
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,281
Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 19,281
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by jaguartx
Originally Posted by ol_mike
Wouldn't it kind of be a good thing, lay ALL of the evidence out for ALL to see?

twitter/book and anywhere else where a conservative could get a word in edge-wise would have to work overtime to make sure the dummies were told what to think.

Bingo.

As Q said, "How do you introduce evidence legally?"

Let me get this straight, jag.

Are you saying that indicting Trump is a good thing and part of, The Plan, in order to use the courts and discovery to expose the truth?
That Trump and The Patriots are hoping for an indictment?

Liz Cheney is pushing hard for her committee to send a referral to the DOJ for indictment, while the chairman or the committee says no.

Does this mean Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, knowing that an indictment is
“how you introduce evidence legally (Q)”?

Defendants are usually given lot's of leeway on discovery. Except by corrupted judges which is a concern to everyone. I can see The Donald reaching way back and bringing in a whole lot of witnesses that will say the democRATs have been out to get me and trumped up these charges. If an indictment comes, Donald Trump as the defendant has tons of opportunities to bring up democRAT dirt.

Yep, discovery will be good for The Donald.

kwg
Does this mean Liz Cheney is a White Hat pretending to be a Black Hat, as she is the one calling for these much desired indictments?

Liz Chaney has burned her "white hat" bridge. She is so full of hate she is just focused on filing on Donald Trump to hurt him. She probably has a corrupt judge in her back pocket. That is the only reason why she is calling for the indictment.
kwg
So, knowing this should we still support jag and his theory that this is a good thing?

It makes no difference whether you support or do not support Jag. He's just contributes to the forum. Read him or ignore him as you wish. None of this is mandatory reading. You won't be graded either way.
kwg


For liberals and anarchists, power and control is opium, selling envy is the fastest and easiest way to get it. TRR. American conservative. Never trust a white liberal. Malcom X Current NRA member.
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 2
B
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 3,883
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by rainshot
Well they’re courting a civil war.

Should be a short one.

Last edited by BuckHaggard; 06/14/22.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,181
Likes: 3
R
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
R
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59,181
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by JPro
They are so scared of him and what he represents. If you can't beat 'em, cheat 'em.
THAT!! Wonder if "Weak-Tit-Garland" will ever prosecute those illegal protesters outside the homes of conservative SCOTUS justices??

Nah - he ain't got the balls...


Ex- USN (SS) '66-'69
Pro-Constitution.
LET'S GO BRANDON!!!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,700
Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 15,700
Likes: 4
[video:youtube][/video]


[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]

Z
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

606 members (10gaugemag, 10Glocks, 160user, 06hunter59, 007FJ, 64 invisible), 2,708 guests, and 1,402 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,409
Posts18,528,121
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.156s Queries: 31 (0.012s) Memory: 0.8488 MB (Peak: 0.9202 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-21 23:11:35 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS