Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire UVALDE SCHOOL SHOOTING - Timeline and Breakdown

Gin Blossoms Burns,

I understand Mike G has to have a certain level of tact when addressing the situation in the manner he did and I believe that's why he hit the pause button and made an addendum concerning the agents that entered the room. That's the addendum that details your being a lying POS at the 5:20 mark in case you forgot why you frantically posted for the past 20 hours straight. LOL

I think most any first responder that has responded to an "all hands on deck" situation knows that cops talk. And standing around there for that amount of time and nobody mentioning that he had already expended a whole lot of rounds is very, very, very hard to believe.

And they were on scene when the four shots were fired at 12:21. That's in the ALERRT timeline that I'm sure you still haven't read because you don't really give a fugk or want to help resolve any issues in your own backyard, you just want to post pictures of your fat fugking head on top of a donkey.

Drama. Negative discourse with no winner.

These posts by Gin Blossom and rcjizzguzzlia are a perfect example of just how self-absorbed the two are.

19 children slaughtered. A detailed timeline by an irrefutably reputable organization is released, and all these two fugk-tards can talk about is how good they are at shooting fake birds and that a super bad ass good friend once told him he shot a pistol kinda sort of well.

LOL

I'd love to meet the women that sleep with these idiots. LOL

When a cop in that position calls his boss so that his boss can make a shoot/don’t shoot decision for him, he needs to look for a new profession. That’s his job. I would have made my decision independently.

What makes you think there aren't any experts in law enforcement tactics posting on here?

I can think of four without batting an eye. There are likely more.

You and Burns, ain't one of 'em.

LOL

It really eats Burns up to be called out for being a nothing.

LOL

It's tough to read and view but I appreciate anyone taking the time to do so.

This is something a lot of people don't want to hear but it's true.

So soft armor and helmet sanitizer boy knew there was going to be some serious stuffing of wounds taking place, and triage was being set up in a hallway, but the guys "Scott" trained had no knowledge of the situation.

You're really killing it, Johnny.

LOL

Dumb fugking hick.

Oh my fugking Christ.

LMFAO

79S is referencing the timeline he was deployed to the middle east serving his country.

And your reply is a string of fugking ponies in butt fugk nowhere.

LOL

What a fugking idiot.

I think we all were.

Unreal.

Yeah, it's called three generations of alcoholism.

LOL

Here's to hoping Santa brings you a new head for Christmas.

LOL

Haha. Come on Flave. He’s just a boy. Take it easy on him.

I'm sure Kyle Lamb will make him a mojito while Mike Glover massages his feet.

Sweet baby haysoos Butterball, I have certain level of respect for your willingness to parade your stupidity around like a badge of honor. I was laughing at you. I was not criticizing the officer for not taking the shot, and I have been crystal goddam clear about that from the onset. I am retired law enforcement (Coast Guard) where I served as a Judgmental Pistol Course (shoot/don't shoot instructor) and I served as a reserve deputy with Harrison CountyMississippi County Sheriff's Department. I have been to two LE academies. I would still be serving if I hadn't slaughtered my shoulder. I have seen you brag about damn near everything but your time behind the badge. Why don't you take a moment to tell us about it?

Backing up to shoot/don't shoot. That decision was the officer's. It does not lie with the supervisor. I'll explain why. The supervisor wasn't there. Crazy tactical concept huh? For Burns and the rest of you not familiar with Law Enforcment 101. Every officer is trained and empowered to make shoot/don't shoot decisions on their own. It is one of the most fundamental principles of LE. As I wrote earlier, my criticism is not of the officer passing on the shot. It is of him seeking permission from his supervisor. Hint, there's a reason the experts highlighted this in their timeline.

You'll note that I have abstained from commenting on specific tactics inside the building, other than inaction of course. The reason for that, is that I haven't been trained in that tactical scenario.

John, I want to spend a little more time making something clear, since you struggle with reading comprehension. You are painfully [bleep] dumb. It's a severe case too. You dare to call into question the service, or lack thereof of others, when you yourself have never served in an enforcement capacity. That's why you cling to your acquaintances accomplishments as if they are your own. I'll let you in on a little secret. They laugh at you behind your back. Don't take that too personally though. It's pretty common for cops to laugh at wannabe groupees.

'Flave. Thanks for posting the Mike Glover videos.

Yes, thanks for posting this, to bad Burnzy opened his yap and tried to highjack another important discussion.

Thanks again for information Flave. Between, Jag, Burns, HC etc just about every good thread gets sidetracked and not for the better.