|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889 |
Anybody use em, and how do you like em? Thinking of getting one for a henry.
Romans 5:1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140 |
I put one on a BL-22 two years ago. Love it. I went with the tallest front post Skinner offered, thinking I'd file if necessary. It wasn't, the tall post was what I wanted. I can't see regular open sights well anymore, but with the Skinner I do quite well. The little rifle goes on walkabouts with me a lot! Still carries like a lever action rifle should.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304 |
Great sights. My favorite peep out there!
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889 |
My eyesight on irons is not what it used to be. Glad you like yours, think I'll try a couple
Romans 5:1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,532
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,532 |
I installed one of the Skinner sights on my Winchester 94-22 magnum.
Added a white dot to the front at the same time.
Great sights for older eyes!
Virgil B.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking. Who said anything about a barrel mounted aperture sight on this thread, besides you?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304 |
This is where they typically mount on most levers or pumps. Pretty fast sight.
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346 |
Thumbs up on the silver lid choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,304 |
Thumbs up on the silver lid choice. Ha. Thanks OG54!
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking. I know they make one that mounts on the barrel, but mine is the standard receiver mounted sight. I use it as a ghost ring unless I'm shooting paper from a rest. I'm imoressed how fast and accurate the aperture sight is, and how forgiving it is of older eyes
Last edited by 300_savage; 08/04/22.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,712 Likes: 2
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 33,712 Likes: 2 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking. Who said anything about a barrel mounted aperture sight on this thread, besides you? Apparently he knows little of Skinner Sights. http://skinnersights.com/henry-repeating-arms.html
Conduct is the best proof of character.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,098 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking. Who said anything about a barrel mounted aperture sight on this thread, besides you? That's where I always saw them mounted before I started to categorically ignore them. Even mounting them on a bolt or way up on a receiver is a less than ideal spot optically. Why the great stampede away from receiver sights and tang sights? You get a helluva lot more windage and elevation with them to boot.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346 |
The thing with any aperture rear sight is for maximum benefit it needs to be positioned as close to the eyeball as possible. The Skinner sight is a compromise in that regard - mounted out on the barrel far ahead of the eye, the eye/brain mechanism doesn't digest the automatic centering of a circle as effortlessly as it would if mounted behind the receiver, plus you sacrifice a huge amount of sight radius which is a factor in accurate shooting. There's a reason you have never seen, nor will you ever see, an aperture sight mounted out on the barrel of a serious competitor's rifle, and we duffers should pay more heed to lessons those fellas learned the hard way.
Don't get me wrong, it's a compromise but not a deal breaking compromise. On a personal level I've tried them and found them lacking. Who said anything about a barrel mounted aperture sight on this thread, besides you? That's where I always saw them mounted before I started to categorically ignore them. Even mounting them on a bolt or way up on a receiver is a less than ideal spot optically. Why the great stampede away from receiver sights and tang sights? You get a helluva lot more windage and elevation with them to boot. Well that ain't now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,240 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 19,240 Likes: 3 |
Why the great stampede away from receiver sights and tang sights? You get a helluva lot more windage and elevation with them to boot. Because to be one of the cool kids you gotta have a skinner. No thanks, I'll stick with my Williams. They've served me well for near 50 years and the Skinners are goofy looking things.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346 |
Why the great stampede away from receiver sights and tang sights? You get a helluva lot more windage and elevation with them to boot. Because to be one of the cool kids you gotta have a skinner. No thanks, I'll stick with my Williams. They've served me well for near 50 years and the Skinners are goofy looking things. Oh my.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 1,889 |
I doubt I'll get one. It would have to replace rear sight (barrel mounted). I don't believe that'll be a benefit over factory Buckhorn. If I could mount on receiver closer to my eye it would be similar to a peep on a bow. I'd have to check someone else's rifle with a barrel mount before I'd buy one.
Romans 5:1
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 346 |
I doubt I'll get one. It would have to replace rear sight (barrel mounted). I don't believe that'll be a benefit over factory Buckhorn. If I could mount on receiver closer to my eye it would be similar to a peep on a bow. I'd have to check someone else's rifle with a barrel mount before I'd buy one. What?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,140 |
You can get a receiver mounted aperture sight, and a blank to fill the dovetail in the barrel after you remove the factory rear sight. You would probably need a taller front sight, you have to shoot to know for sure. A receiver aperture sight is, in my experience, way better than factory open sights, especially if you have older eyes. But some folks shoot factory open sights quite well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,208
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,208 |
I have a Williams 5D mounted on my old Marlin 94 25-20 and a Skinner Express on a 336 38-55. I prefer the Skinner. They are almost identical distance from the rear of the receiver.
|
|
|
|
431 members (1Longbow, 17CalFan, 007FJ, 12344mag, 160user, 10Glocks, 46 invisible),
1,769
guests, and
1,075
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,002
Posts18,481,334
Members73,959
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|