24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,113
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,113
Likes: 1
This pic proves nothing except this load was accurate in my rifle. Very slight breeze left to right. Gray duct tape was my target.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]

GB1

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 560
U
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
U
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 560
How about 6mm/284 with Nosler 95gr & H4831, mine has killed about 40 Deer an Antelope over the last 20 years.

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,264
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,264
Many moons ago I was gearing up to do a 7mm WSSM, which I think would provide similar ballistics on an even shorter action. And then I got married and had kids and paused some off the wall projects.
Always loved my original 280, should never have sold it. Don’t love my Kimber 280 AI, but can’t deny the usefulness of a stainless lightweight rifle in a do all caliber. Actually kicks a little on the stiff end for what I like, I’m assuming because it’s so light.

Not sure if I go for a 284 if building something in that power level, but I could definitely see picking one up in the right package and hunting it.


"For some unfortunates, poisoned by city sidewalks ... the horn of the hunter never winds at all" Robert Ruark, The Horn of the Hunter

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by exbiologist
Many moons ago I was gearing up to do a 7mm WSSM, which I think would provide similar ballistics on an even shorter action. And then I got married and had kids and paused some off the wall projects.
Always loved my original 280, should never have sold it. Don’t love my Kimber 280 AI, but can’t deny the usefulness of a stainless lightweight rifle in a do all caliber. Actually kicks a little on the stiff end for what I like, I’m assuming because it’s so light.

Not sure if I go for a 284 if building something in that power level, but I could definitely see picking one up in the right package and hunting it.

Rebarrel that bugger to 7x57! Fits beautifully in that action.

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,625
Likes: 1
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,625
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Teeder
Originally Posted by exbiologist
Many moons ago I was gearing up to do a 7mm WSSM, which I think would provide similar ballistics on an even shorter action. And then I got married and had kids and paused some off the wall projects.
Always loved my original 280, should never have sold it. Don’t love my Kimber 280 AI, but can’t deny the usefulness of a stainless lightweight rifle in a do all caliber. Actually kicks a little on the stiff end for what I like, I’m assuming because it’s so light.

Not sure if I go for a 284 if building something in that power level, but I could definitely see picking one up in the right package and hunting it.

Rebarrel that bugger to 7x57! Fits beautifully in that action.


I'd just load the 280AI a little lighter, and have the option of more velocity when wanted.


FÜCK Jeff_O!

MAGA
IC B2

Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 205
W
WEL Offline
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
W
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 205
Years ago the f class guys started necking down 284 brass to 6.5 because of the high bc bullets available. Now they are necking up 6.5 284 brass to use the heavier high bc 7 mm bullets. Life is just a big circle lol. It’s a shame the 284 never caught on with gp. It’s a great round.

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,349
N
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
N
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,349
The 284 needs a relaunch. I'm sorry, but not everything needs to be based on a military cartridge.
I do prefer military based ammo though. Lots of good brass.
5.56, 7.62 and 30-30 just cause, 45-70. All good stuff. 22LR was used as a training round too.


I am the NorthEast WoodsBeast!

"System version 1.3, divorced"
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293
KDK Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,293
I Winchester were to offer the .284 in one of the versions of the Extreme Weather, I'd be likely to buy one.

Originally Posted by Nessmuk
The 284 needs a relaunch. I'm sorry, but not everything needs to be based on a military cartridge.
I do prefer military based ammo though. Lots of good brass.
5.56, 7.62 and 30-30 just cause, 45-70. All good stuff. 22LR was used as a training round too.


Originally Posted by ingwe
This is a shooting forum, there is no place here for logic.
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,421
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 10,421
I’ve had/owned: 7mmTCU, 7mm International, 7-08, 7x57mm’s, 284, 280’s, 280AI, & 7mm RM’s.
The first two mentioned were for pistol silhouette shooting, (Contender & modified XP-100) but I think they would be fine for deer - depending…
From 7mm International (rifle) through 7mm RM should be good up through elk at least, in my opinion, depending…
I prefer long action rifles to short action. If I could only have one, it would not be the 7mm TCU, 7mm International or the 284 - due to either brass or power.
I’ve shot more game with the 7x57, 280, & 7mm RM. Which one I’d prefer would mainly depend on where I lived & hunted. The 280 AI would be fine too, so far mine has just been a paper shooter.
If I were to mainly hunt in the mountains I’d prefer more power/velocity. If I mainly hunted on the prairie with longer shots likely, again more power/velocity.
Where I now mostly hunt, it would be a tough choice between the 7x57 Remington 700 and the 280 Remington 700, both work well. I certainly would not need the magnum and I wouldn’t trust the TCU at over 200 yards.
I don’t have anything against the 7-08, it’s just the short action I don’t care for.

In my opinion, arguing which cartridge is the best depends on variables. I wouldn’t pick the 30-30 for mountain or prairie hunting and I wouldn’t pick the 300 RUM for the Eastern woods deer hinting.

Further, it’s a fine line between using different cartridges such as 7-08, 7x57, 284, 280, 280AI, & 7mm RM.

BTW, I like Chevy trucks more than Dodge trucks. 😬


I prefer classic.
Semper Fi
I used to run with the hare. Now I'm envious of the tortoise and I do my own stunts but rarely intentionally
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,745
T
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
T
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 46,745
Originally Posted by Teeder
Unfortunately, I keep coming back to this thread. Anyone ever make a short action Montana in .284? I happen to have an extra laying around. crazy laugh


An extra Montana you say....Hmmm.


Camp is where you make it.
IC B3

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,499
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,499
Going to have my 284 put together within the next month. Was holding out while looking for the right long action to build off of. Well, anyway I loaded up two dummy rounds one was 3.1" and the other was 2.97". I sat them next to each other and thought about what my big deliberation was( I have a nice, lightweight donor action to build off of already) and had a good laugh at myself. Told my smith I would drop off the barrel and donor next week!


Tell me the odds of putting grease on the same pancake? I Know they are there, well ice and house slippers. -Kawi
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,226
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by tzone
Originally Posted by Teeder
Unfortunately, I keep coming back to this thread. Anyone ever make a short action Montana in .284? I happen to have an extra laying around. crazy laugh


An extra Montana you say....Hmmm.

I have nib 7-08. Was to be for my daughter, but she's losing interest in hunting.

Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,508
R
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,508
I think the Montana would be a poor choice to turn into a 284 which has a larger body diameter than a 308 based ctg. The threaded area of the barrel shank gets pretty thin.



“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,655
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,655
Originally Posted by RinB
I think the Montana would be a poor choice to turn into a 284 which has a larger body diameter than a 308 based ctg. The threaded area of the barrel shank gets pretty thin.
That's been the most folks thought. However, I am pretty sure a poster here from MT converted one to a X284 variant some time ago. Thinking it was the 6mm version.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

590 members (1234, 007FJ, 1beaver_shooter, 10Glocks, 12344mag, 1936M71, 70 invisible), 2,519 guests, and 1,303 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,084
Posts18,482,814
Members73,959
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.183s Queries: 43 (0.005s) Memory: 0.8747 MB (Peak: 0.9648 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-01 23:03:13 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS