Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Feds to Work With Natives to Restore Bison to Grasslands

Pard, you are better than this... But that statement seems to be sarcastic and critical of the individuals being referred to as the "dynamic duo". Using sarcasm and making snarky comments can sometimes be perceived as negative or dismissive, and may not be the most effective way to communicate or engage in meaningful dialogue.

If you have concerns or disagreements with the actions or behavior of these individuals, it may be more productive to express your opinions and ideas in a respectful and constructive manner. Open and respectful communication can be a powerful tool for promoting understanding and creating positive change

Come on kitten, you know there was no intent to change anyone's mind.

The crampfire minds are shallow, and frozen.

Pard, always remember it's important to recognize that people may engage in conversations or debates for different reasons, and changing someone's mind is not always the primary goal. Some individuals may engage in discussions simply to share their perspective or express their opinions, while others may engage in discussions to learn from others or gain a better understanding of different viewpoints.

That being said, it's also possible for individuals to engage in discussions with the goal of changing someone's mind. However, it's important to approach these conversations with respect and empathy, and to recognize that people may have deeply held beliefs and perspectives that are difficult to change. Instead of trying to force someone to change their mind, it can be more productive to listen actively, ask questions, and try to find common ground.

Pard, this statement, as it seems to be an opinion or expression that lacks context. It's important to remember that people have different experiences, backgrounds, and perspectives, and it's not fair or accurate to make sweeping generalizations about any group of people. It's important to approach discussions and debates with an open mind, and to listen to and consider different viewpoints before drawing conclusions.

Hilarious.

You are pretty close to pulling it off, one or two more hero pics will get everyone on board.

Pard, It's not uncommon for people to find serious comments or opinions humorous, especially in social situations where there may be a lighthearted or playful atmosphere. It's possible that my tone or in this case my delivery of my comments could be coming across in a way that is unintentionally humorous to you and others.

It's also possible that you may find my serious comments humorous because they are unexpected or divergent from the current conversation or mood. In some cases, people like you may use humor as a coping mechanism or defense mechanism to diffuse tense or uncomfortable situations.

was just thinking of this

For the non-resident interest in this thread <me>.

For Wyo antelope non-resident I did due diligence research for DIY hunting. OnX map software, research draw stats for units, learn about trespass fees, how important public vs private boundaries are, lodging, call WGF offices and ask questions. And apply for tag.

I did same for Montana. Doing this due diligence is intended to minimize surprises.

An option for example is to pay ~$50k for a sheep on the AZ Hualapai rez that is pretty much a guaranteed success. Easy way to buy a result in place of a DIY gamble. But it's called hunting, not shooting.

Assume I did a fair amount of diligence for Montana and felt confident that I could <not would> gain permission for a T2 BMA. I would have backups for T1 BMA if problems with T2 permissions. But.

Part of my non-resident research is hunting forums and the like. Here is this thread where Montana T2 BMA associated with APR is discussed. And permission access problems described. Also where an advocate for BHA <mr buzz> claims no problems with T2 BMA access, but Montana residents describe issues with access. And mr buzz stating he won't share a location to T1 APR access "north of the river" because he doesn't want to pick up beer cans, booze bottles.

My takeaway is that APR is not what they claim to be. Might say it's somewhat of a private hunt club, somewhat of an organization where monied people donate same to feel virtue for saving the bison, somewhat of an organization to reduce cattle ranching <the goal to convert people to eat plants>, somewhat of an organization to reduce or restrict hunting. Meanwhile, spokesmen who have a degree of prominence suggest APR is virtuous while enjoying hunting access for the time being. And supports their income stream for their organizations like BHA.

That is a snapshot of my interest in this thread.

I'll close with a base comment: Fugg Off losttail60.

What Buzzie doesn't know...he lies about.


Hence the massive amount of lies.

The fact of the matter is the AP will continue to buy land from willing sellers. They will continue to allow public hunters and they will continue to run bison.

No amount of whining from the old hens on the fire is going to change that.

Fact.

Callnum, The phrase old hens appears to be used as derogatory language and could be interpreted as disrespectful or dismissive towards individuals who may have differing opinions or perspectives. It is important to engage in constructive and respectful communication, even when there are disagreements. It's important to listen to and understand different viewpoints and to express one's own ideas and thoughts in a way that is considerate and respectful of others. Using derogatory language or dismissive statements can be harmful and can further polarize and divide individuals rather than fostering meaningful conversation and understanding.

Callnum, This statement by you in regards to American Prairie buying land, public hunting, and bison management. It suggests that the organization will continue to engage in these practices regardless of any opposition or criticism. It is important to remember that individuals and organizations have a responsibility to act in a way that is ethical and sustainable, and to consider the impact of their actions on the environment and communities. It's also important to engage in constructive dialogue and collaboration with others to address concerns and find solutions that benefit all parties involved.

^^^^^^^^^This dude is a font of knowledge on a host of subjects, it's uncanny.

He's almost Starman-like..

Same as the Chinese and their buttboy Gates.

Salud bitch

I’m just some guy browsing through, didn’t know about AP or yourself. You have, at least, put a name and a face on BHA.

Since you appear to be so prominently involved in regional politics and Left-leaning causes in general it seems improbable that you are completely uninformed as to the nature and origins of AP’s donations. From this side of the aisle we sort of assume all you Leftist types are in cahoots.

For my own part I will freely admit to being a financial retard but for anyone interested here’s AP’s finances as of calendar year 2021: Cutting to the chase; net total assets $110+ million up $33+ million from 2020. I do understand much of this can result from land acquisitions, earned revenues etc etc but seems likely there has to be substantial cash inflow involved.

I got no yardstick at present to compare that net worth with other similar hunting and conservation-related non-profits. Grist for further googles I guess.

https://americanprairie.org/app/uploads/2023/03/2021-Audited-Financial-Statements-Final-4.pdf

thought BLM was federal land open to everyone?

Is that something BHA is going to change too to damage sportsmen caldumb?

Land Tawney at BHA was in on this grift too.

Lol, "Kickback Buzzy".

Now it's a fact.