|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,665 Likes: 9
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 26,665 Likes: 9 |
Little Cowboy and his Plywood horse is quick to step-up...
Phil You haven't got anything right yet Philly. Good of you not to start now. If Joe Biden pulled his dick out of your ass today and told the truth about Ukraine....you would change your tune. Because you are spineless. The TRUTH may be coming out for some sunshine now. We'll see just who has something hide RE: Ukraine
FJB & FJT
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
Name calling sure is useful, just look at the facts
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,240 Likes: 11
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 10,240 Likes: 11 |
NATO "estimates" Russian losses. It's hard to know who is losing what but I do know this didn't have to be. All those buildings destroyed did not have to be. This entire thing is insanity. They were urged to talk with Putin very early. All he wanted is for Ukraine to be neutral and leave its Russian speaking citizens unharmed but that was apparently a bridge too far for the fearless Zelenskyy. isn't it a pretty site. We have our fearless leaders in Washington to blame for it all too since they financed it. Yep, and let’s not forget who it was that put Zelensky in power to serve as a puppet.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58 |
Name calling sure is useful, just look at the facts Which facts are you looking at? Facts like how the US leader in CLNG stock price doubles and triples when ever our State dept meddles in Ukraine? Those ones?
I am MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,286 Likes: 9
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 8,286 Likes: 9 |
NATO "estimates" Russian losses. It's hard to know who is losing what but I do know this didn't have to be. All those buildings destroyed did not have to be. This entire thing is insanity. They were urged to talk with Putin very early. All he wanted is for Ukraine to be neutral and leave its Russian speaking citizens unharmed but that was apparently a bridge too far for the fearless Zelenskyy. isn't it a pretty site. We have our fearless leaders in Washington to blame for it all too since they financed it. Yep, and let’s not forget who it was that put Zelensky in power to serve as a puppet. Victoria Nuland?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58 |
Or other facts like how Liz Cheney took testimony in 2018 from LNG analysts stating that it would be bad for business if Russia was allowed to keep selling gas to willing buyers in Europe?
Or that her lawyer husband is deeply connected to Chenier Energy?
Or maybe how Biden said he would blow up the pipeline?
Facts like that?
I am MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
Name calling sure is useful, just look at the facts Which facts are you looking at? Facts like how the US leader in CLNG stock price doubles and triples when ever our State dept meddles in Ukraine? Those ones? Like it or not the US committed to this in 1994 and as Greyghost said, Russia is the aggressor, those are the facts. Not to say there isn't a lot of other meddling that took place.
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58 |
Facts like how Biden said an Invasion of Ukraine would be reason enough to destroy a pipeline and nullify natural gas contracts?
Funny how a Pro NATO leader got somehow put in power in Ukraine....
I am MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16 |
Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer another boomer with dementia war monger. Not surprised. Old neocon and neolib men love to send young American men to die in wars for nothing
Last edited by ribka; 03/15/23.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 18,034 Likes: 17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 18,034 Likes: 17 |
I am opposed to war in general, however we signed on for this in 1994.
There ya have it..... Boom, sha sha Boom Can you produce the documents our congress signed approving this war? 1994 Trilateral StatementAt the time of Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine held the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world, including an estimated 1,900 strategic warheads, 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and 44 strategic bombers. By 1996, Ukraine had returned all of its nuclear warheads to Russia in exchange for economic aid and security assurances, and in December 1994, Ukraine became a non-nuclear weapon state-party to the 1968 nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The last strategic nuclear delivery vehicle in Ukraine was eliminated in 2001 under the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). It took years of political maneuvering and diplomatic work, starting with the Lisbon Protocol in 1992, to remove the weapons and nuclear infrastructure from Ukraine The Massandra Accords set the stage for the ultimately successful trilateral talks. As the United States mediated between Russia and Ukraine, the three countries signed the Trilateral Statement on January 14, 1994. Ukraine committed to full disarmament, including strategic weapons, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia. Ukraine agreed to transfer its nuclear warheads to Russia and accepted U.S. assistance in dismantling missiles, bombers, and nuclear infrastructure. Ukraine’s warheads would be dismantled in Russia, and Ukraine would receive compensation for the commercial value of the highly enriched uranium. Ukraine ratified START on February 3, 1994, repealing its earlier preconditions, but it would not accede to the NPT without further security assurances. Budapest MemorandumThe United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Welcoming the accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as non-nuclear-weapon State, Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all nuclear weapons from its territory within a specified period of time, Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the Cold War, which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces. 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 3. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind. 4. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. 5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State. 6. Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America will consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. Slick Willy was the pres at the time and perhaps he could have negotiated a different deal, and perhaps if Trump has remained pres he could have negotiated to prevent the current situation. We will never know. I dont support this "conflict" and dont take it as such, its just the facts that lead up to this, Biden's connection with Ukraine is certainly in question as well. Keep in mind those nukes were ALL aimed at the US at that time. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution supersedes everything you just posted.
"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical." -- Thomas Jefferson
We are all Rhodesians now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58 |
Name calling sure is useful, just look at the facts Which facts are you looking at? Facts like how the US leader in CLNG stock price doubles and triples when ever our State dept meddles in Ukraine? Those ones? Like it or not the US committed to this in 1994 and as Greyghost said, Russia is the aggressor, those are the facts. Not to say there isn't a lot of other meddling that took place. A lot of other meddling..... Just coincidence I guess then.
I am MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer another boomer war monger. Not surprised. Old neocon and neolib men love to send young American men to die in wars for nothing You love to make stuff up and just generally stir the pot, that is your MO, how can I be a war monger if I said I was opposed to war....?
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16 |
You just stated boomer that we are obligated to go to fight Russia. Why would I be nice to some demented old fool who wants a nuclear war with Russia which would obviously destroy our country? Did our congress approve this war? Why did we invade Syria a sovereign country without congressional approval? Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer another boomer war monger. Not surprised. Old neocon and neolib men love to send young American men to die in wars for nothing You love to make stuff up and just generally stir the pot, that is your MO, how can I be a war monger if I said I was opposed to war....?
Last edited by ribka; 03/15/23.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
I am opposed to war in general, however we signed on for this in 1994.
There ya have it..... Boom, sha sha Boom Can you produce the documents our congress signed approving this war? 1994 Trilateral StatementAt the time of Ukraine’s independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, Ukraine held the third largest nuclear arsenal in the world, including an estimated 1,900 strategic warheads, 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and 44 strategic bombers. By 1996, Ukraine had returned all of its nuclear warheads to Russia in exchange for economic aid and security assurances, and in December 1994, Ukraine became a non-nuclear weapon state-party to the 1968 nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT). The last strategic nuclear delivery vehicle in Ukraine was eliminated in 2001 under the 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). It took years of political maneuvering and diplomatic work, starting with the Lisbon Protocol in 1992, to remove the weapons and nuclear infrastructure from Ukraine The Massandra Accords set the stage for the ultimately successful trilateral talks. As the United States mediated between Russia and Ukraine, the three countries signed the Trilateral Statement on January 14, 1994. Ukraine committed to full disarmament, including strategic weapons, in exchange for economic support and security assurances from the United States and Russia. Ukraine agreed to transfer its nuclear warheads to Russia and accepted U.S. assistance in dismantling missiles, bombers, and nuclear infrastructure. Ukraine’s warheads would be dismantled in Russia, and Ukraine would receive compensation for the commercial value of the highly enriched uranium. Ukraine ratified START on February 3, 1994, repealing its earlier preconditions, but it would not accede to the NPT without further security assurances. Budapest MemorandumThe United States of America, the Russian Federation, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Welcoming the accession of Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as non-nuclear-weapon State, Taking into account the commitment of Ukraine to eliminate all nuclear weapons from its territory within a specified period of time, Noting the changes in the world-wide security situation, including the end of the Cold War, which have brought about conditions for deep reductions in nuclear forces. 1. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.2. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their obligation to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, and that none of their weapons will ever be used against Ukraine except in self-defence or otherwise in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. 3. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to Ukraine, in accordance with the principles of the Final Act of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, to refrain from economic coercion designed to subordinate to their own interest the exercise by Ukraine of the rights inherent in its sovereignty and thus to secure advantages of any kind. 4. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm their commitment to seek immediate United Nations Security Council action to provide assistance to Ukraine, as a non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, if Ukraine should become a victim of an act of aggression or an object of a threat of aggression in which nuclear weapons are used. 5. The Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America reaffirm, in the case of Ukraine, their commitment not to use nuclear weapons against any non-nuclear-weapon State party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, except in the case of an attack on themselves, their territories or dependent territories, their armed forces, or their allies, by such a State in association or alliance with a nuclear-weapon State. 6. Ukraine, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the United States of America will consult in the event a situation arises that raises a question concerning these commitments. Slick Willy was the pres at the time and perhaps he could have negotiated a different deal, and perhaps if Trump has remained pres he could have negotiated to prevent the current situation. We will never know. I dont support this "conflict" and dont take it as such, its just the facts that lead up to this, Biden's connection with Ukraine is certainly in question as well. Keep in mind those nukes were ALL aimed at the US at that time. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution supersedes everything you just posted. Laughing............ you think this is the first time for that.........?
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 60,875 Likes: 58 |
If you think that Russia invaded for the reasons given by our govt and news media....then you are not opposed to war.
I am MAGA.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,798 |
I just stated the facts, get over your self You just stated boomer that we are obligated to go to fight Russia. Why would I be nice to some demented old fool who wants a nuclear war with Russia which would obviously destroy our country? Did our congress approve this war? Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer another boomer war monger. Not surprised. Old neocon and neolib men love to send young American men to die in wars for nothing You love to make stuff up and just generally stir the pot, that is your MO, how can I be a war monger if I said I was opposed to war....?
For those without thumbs, it's s Garden fookin Island, not Hawaii
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 24,372 Likes: 16 |
your facts? You just stated we need to go defend Ukraine and fight Russia but you're not for war. logical facts in your old confused mind? lol. Why did the US invade Syria in 2014 and why have we declared a war there? I just stated the facts, get over your self You just stated boomer that we are obligated to go to fight Russia. Why would I be nice to some demented old fool who wants a nuclear war with Russia which would obviously destroy our country? Did our congress approve this war? Both Russia and China took advantage of our being tied down with a 20 year war, and unwilling to stand-up when it counts. We missed the opportunity back in 2014. But it doesn't change the fact that we don't roll over now. Russia is the aggressor, not Ukraine...
Phil Those are the facts as I see them as well. You a Boomer, GenX, or Millennial? Boomer another boomer war monger. Not surprised. Old neocon and neolib men love to send young American men to die in wars for nothing You love to make stuff up and just generally stir the pot, that is your MO, how can I be a war monger if I said I was opposed to war....?
Last edited by ribka; 03/15/23.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,827 Likes: 16
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 7,827 Likes: 16 |
I wish there was more Millennials hanging out here. I'd like to hear their opinions. This one is firmly against all US involvement. No financial, no material, no sanctions, no meddling, etc etc.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,992 Likes: 56
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,992 Likes: 56 |
Late Boomer, here. 100% against any sort of involvement (other than as a peace broker, perhaps, but I wouldn't trust this bunch in office for that), as I've been saying from day one.
|
|
|
|
258 members (10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 2ndwind, 1beaver_shooter, 16gage, 36 invisible),
2,476
guests, and
1,293
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,322
Posts18,526,419
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|