24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 17 of 108 1 2 15 16 17 18 19 107 108
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,229
Likes: 14
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,229
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance instructs slaves to obey their masters.

.
Wrong. That was Paul that said that. He was always sliding something in that contradicted Jesus.


Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
GB1

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by Raspy
Originally Posted by DBT
Poppycock, all we have about Jesus is what is written in the new testament, the apocryphal works and commentary by authors long after the described events. There is no 'archeological evidence' to prove the existence of Jesus.

Below is some evidence....not actual proof, but evidence....as we discussed before... There is much evidence in God the Bible that strengthens our Faith in the hope for things promised and unseen.....that is all I've got.

Robert Van Voorst studied the opponents of early Christianity and concluded clearly:
“[N]o pagans and Jews who opposed Christianity denied Jesus’ historicity or even questioned it.” (Van Voorst, Jesus Outside, p. 15)
He elaborates:
“[I]f anyone in the ancient world had a reason to dislike the Christian faith, it was the rabbis. To argue successfully that Jesus never existed but was a creation of early Christians would have been the most effective polemic against Christianity … [Yet] all Jewish sources treated Jesus as a fully historical person … [T]he rabbis … used the real events of Jesus’ life against him” (Van Voorst, Jesus Outside, pp. 133–134.)
Jesus’ enemies unintentionally did Him a great service: they corroborated the accounts written about Him. They used the real events of Jesus’ life against Him, which you only do when you cannot deny that those events happened.

More.....
On the Sea of Galilee, Christ’s childhood town of Nazareth is still active today. In addition, ancient harbors matching the biblical record have been located in recent drought cycles. In fact, a first century Galilean fishing boat was recently unearthed from the mud and preserved. Although we have no idea who the boat belonged to, it matches the biblical record for the vessels used by Christ’s disciples.

Capernaum, a town often visited by Jesus, is widely excavated and protected. Specific sites of interest include the synagogue at Capernaum where Jesus cured a man with an unclean spirit and delivered the sermon on the bread of life, and the house of Peter where Jesus healed Peter’s mother-in-law and others.

Other archaeological sites involved in Christ’s ministry include Chorazin (where Jesus taught in the synagogue), Kursi (the swine miracle), Tabgha (loaves and fishes), the Mount of Beatitudes (Sermon on the Mount), Caesarea Philippi (Peter’s confession), and Jacob’s well where Jesus spoke to the Samaritan woman.

You don't provide any archaeological evidence for
the actual existence of Jesus..One could write a
tale about Spidermans adventures in NYC using
actual locations, but it doesn't provide evidence
for an actual spiderman.

Also you are throwing in Miracle claims,
Which the Prof.Bart Ehrman you mentioned
doesn't support.

Early Xtian art depicts a Jesus looking like an
effeminate beardless Apollo with a magic wand
..do you take that as evidence for Jesus?


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Raspy
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance intructs slaves to obey their masters.

That is true and let me add from research please......

God’s way of eliminating slavery was to allow the biblical teachings to spread throughout all cultures. Indeed, it was the Judeo-Christian teaching that human beings have intrinsic value and worth as a result of being made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-27) that brought an end to slavery. Many in the abolitionist movements of England and America in the nineteenth century were Protestant evangelical Christians. And they viewed slavery as being fundamentally inconsistent with the historic Christian view of man’s creation and redemption.
So while the Bible doesn’t formally and explicitly condemn slavery, neither does it condone it. It was the unique ethical message contained in Scripture concerning human dignity and redemption that provided the moral and spiritual force that ultimately succeeded in eliminating slavery as an institution. The gospel message of salvation in Jesus Christ remains a powerful force against human evil and social injustice. It is also the only antidote for each human being’s slavery to sin and death.


Oh god, you really need to read your bible.

Thanks for the put-down....

No, seriously - read your bible.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Raspy
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Raspy
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance intructs slaves to obey their masters.

That is true and let me add from research please......

God’s way of eliminating slavery was to allow the biblical teachings to spread throughout all cultures. Indeed, it was the Judeo-Christian teaching that human beings have intrinsic value and worth as a result of being made in God’s image (Genesis 1:26-27) that brought an end to slavery. Many in the abolitionist movements of England and America in the nineteenth century were Protestant evangelical Christians. And they viewed slavery as being fundamentally inconsistent with the historic Christian view of man’s creation and redemption.
So while the Bible doesn’t formally and explicitly condemn slavery, neither does it condone it. It was the unique ethical message contained in Scripture concerning human dignity and redemption that provided the moral and spiritual force that ultimately succeeded in eliminating slavery as an institution. The gospel message of salvation in Jesus Christ remains a powerful force against human evil and social injustice. It is also the only antidote for each human being’s slavery to sin and death.


Oh, come on now, that's ridiculous. A poor attempt at rationale. The way to abolish something despicable is to speak out against it, to condemn not support. To condemn the practice of slavery does not include saying "slaves, obey your masters."

Thanks...ridiculous to you but not to me...It was still bad now that we look back.....for context, do not forget the times Scriptures were written....most slave were the indentured type...the institution of slavery was so deeply rooted in ancient culture that it could not be dismantled overnight. Old Testament scholar Gleason L. Archer notes: “As to the moral status of slavery in ancient times, it must be recognized that it was practiced by every ancient people of which we have any historical record: Egyptians, Sumerians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Phoenicians, Syrians, Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Greeks, Romans, and all the rest.” Furthermore, Christian apologist Paul Copan states: “During the first century A.D., approximately 85 to 90 percent of Rome’s population consisted of slaves.” Slavery was viewed as playing a critical economic role for society. Nevertheless, the Old Testament Mosaic Law limited and regulated the practice and sought to correct its inhumane abuses (Exodus 20:10; 21:20-27). Unlike with slavery in other cultures, the masters in a biblical context did not have absolute rights over their slaves. Forms of slavery and servitude were permitted in the Old Testament, but it was never considered the moral ideal (Deuteronomy 15:18).
Servitude and slavery practiced in a biblical context bear little resemblance to the tyrannical type of slavery found in the American antebellum South and in other modern Western countries. Certain moderate forms of “servitude”—for example, indentured (voluntary) servitude—were considered morally beneficial before God under certain circumstances in the Old Testament. Examples of this are seen in voluntary indenturement in order to earn a living or to learn a trade. It could also include the indenturement of a criminal in order for the offender to render restitution. But in none of these moderate cases, nor even the more extreme case of foreigners captured by the Israelites in war, would the so-called slave or servant be viewed as a mere piece of property without human rights. Nor would the time of servitude be constituted as a life term of bondage (Deuteronomy 15:12-13). Many slaves in the ancient world, and especially those held by the Hebrews, were able to earn their freedom.

It's not just ridiculous to me, it's ridiculous in its own right.

It fails logically and it fails ethically.

You don't condemn slavery by saying 'slaves, obey your masters.'

This can't be construed in any way, shape or form as condemning slavery, because the instruction 'slaves, obey your masters' essentially condones, not condemns slavery.

Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Raspy
I said to all that Christians cannot prove the scriptures in God the Bible.

So why believe it? There's so much immorality in the bible that it's not a good aspiration to lead your life against anyway.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by RHClark
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
[quote=Jim_Conrad]My question would be what exactly did Christianity bring to the table that wasn't already there?

The Ten Commandments, the original Western core values.

Perhaps investigate the bronzes and stone carvings
on The Supreme court, Washington.

just to list a few ....

Confucius,
Mohammed,
shield of Achilles
four pagan elements: air, earth, fire, and water.
Roman praetor publishing an edict.
Themis, the Greek Goddess of Justice and Law.
Justicia, of the four Virtues in Roman mythology.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance instructs slaves to obey their masters.

.
Wrong. That was Paul that said that. He was always sliding something in that contradicted Jesus.


We have nothing from Jesus, whatever is written in the new testament purports to speak on behalf of Jesus and God;

''Fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath; instead, bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. 5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear and sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6And do this not only to please them while they are watching, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
I said to all that Christians cannot prove the scriptures in God the Bible.

So why believe it? There's so much immorality in the bible that it's not a good aspiration to lead your life against anyway.

Perhaps they believe primitive pagan style human sacrifice has magic blood that will
attain them eternal life...Catholics are convinced that they are eating the 'transubstantiated'
flesh of Christ at mass.

May as well buy Merlin's alchemy and Arthur's magic
sword/rule by divine right while they are at it.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,229
Likes: 14
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 13,229
Likes: 14
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance instructs slaves to obey their masters.

.
Wrong. That was Paul that said that. He was always sliding something in that contradicted Jesus.


We have nothing from Jesus, whatever is written in the new testament purports to speak on behalf of Jesus and God;

''Fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath; instead, bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. 5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear and sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6And do this not only to please them while they are watching, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.
Wrong. Paul went off the reservation and came up with a bunch of stuff Jesus never said at the time he (Jesus) was walking the earth. Every church has a Paul that comes in and tries to usurp authority, and almost always strays (purposely) away from Jesus' message.


Patriotism (and religion) is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

Jesus: "Take heed that no man deceive you."
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by Hastings
. Every church has a Paul that comes in and tries to usurp authority, and almost always strays (purposely) away from Jesus' message.

Who recorded the sermon on the mount?
and how can you trust it's veracity?

Gospels differ in how the thieves on the cross
spoke to Jesus...one says both thieves rebuked
Jesus, another gospel says only one thief rebuked
Jesus, which is true?..

One gospel says the women arrived in the dark
at the tomb. ..another gospel says the sun had
already risen...
One gospel says The women ran away and told
nobody of their experience, another gospel
contradicts saying they told everyone they could.

Of course this is all written By anonymous non-
witnesses, yet believers take it as the infallible
inspired words of g0d.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
antlers Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
My question would be what exactly did Christianity bring to the table that wasn't already there?
It was this New Covenant brand of love that began to change the world. The citizens of the Roman Empire began to internalize this and embrace it. The empire began to change and then the world began to change. Something that was unprecedented happened. Something that had never happened before happened.

In his book, ‘The Triumph of Christianity’, Bart Ehrman…a world renowned New Testament manuscript scholar, but also an atheist…said, “Christianity not only took over an empire, it radically altered the lives of those living in it. It opened the door to public policies and institutions to tend to the poor, the weak, the sick, and the outcast as deserving members of society. It was a revolution that affected government practices, legislation, art, literature, music, philosophy, and—on the even more fundamental level—the very understanding of billions of people about what it means to be human. However one evaluates the merits of the case, whether the Christianization of the West was a triumph to be treasured or a defeat to be lamented, no one can deny it was the most monumental cultural transformation our world has ever seen.”


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
My question would be what exactly did Christianity bring to the table that wasn't already there?
It was this New Covenant brand of love that began to change the world. The citizens of the Roman Empire began to internalize this and embrace it. The empire began to change and then the world began to change. Something that was unprecedented happened. Something that had never happened before happened.

In his book, ‘The Triumph of Christianity’, Bart Ehrman…a world renowned New Testament manuscript scholar, but also an atheist…said, “Christianity not only took over an empire, it radically altered the lives of those living in it. It opened the door to public policies and institutions to tend to the poor, the weak, the sick, and the outcast as deserving members of society. It was a revolution that affected government practices, legislation, art, literature, music, philosophy, and—on the even more fundamental level—the very understanding of billions of people about what it means to be human. However one evaluates the merits of the case, whether the Christianization of the West was a triumph to be treasured or a defeat to be lamented, no one can deny it was the most monumental cultural transformation our world has ever seen.”

Maybe try Richard Tarnas- Harvard...He paints
a somewhat different perspective...and attributes
much change in the world to the secular breakaway/
growth and Pagan principles Xtianity adopted in
science and Law. Etc.
With 'heretic' greats like Copernicus ,Galileo, Kepler ,
Newton ,forging ahead with science despite Xtian
church resistance and persecution for defying their
wonky world progress debilitating theology.

It's really a 50/50 split whether the Roman empire became Xtian or Xtians became Greco-Romanised.

We do know that 4th century BC Greeks posited a
helio-centric model , while the church resisted such
into the 19th century.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 5,808
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Starman
Originally Posted by antlers
Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
My question would be what exactly did Christianity bring to the table that wasn't already there?
It was this New Covenant brand of love that began to change the world. The citizens of the Roman Empire began to internalize this and embrace it. The empire began to change and then the world began to change. Something that was unprecedented happened. Something that had never happened before happened.

In his book, ‘The Triumph of Christianity’, Bart Ehrman…a world renowned New Testament manuscript scholar, but also an atheist…said, “Christianity not only took over an empire, it radically altered the lives of those living in it. It opened the door to public policies and institutions to tend to the poor, the weak, the sick, and the outcast as deserving members of society. It was a revolution that affected government practices, legislation, art, literature, music, philosophy, and—on the even more fundamental level—the very understanding of billions of people about what it means to be human. However one evaluates the merits of the case, whether the Christianization of the West was a triumph to be treasured or a defeat to be lamented, no one can deny it was the most monumental cultural transformation our world has ever seen.”

Maybe try Richard Tarnas- Harvard...He paints
a somewhat different perspective...and attributes
much change in the world to the secular breakaway/
growth and Pagan principles Xtianity adopted in
science and Law. Etc.
With 'heretic' greats like Copernicus ,Galileo, Kepler ,
Newton ,forging ahead with science despite Xtian
church resistance and persecution for defying their
wonky world progress debilitating theology.

It's really a 50/50 split whether the Roman empire became Xtian or Xtians became Greco-Romanised.

Yeah, millenia of indoctrination and forced belief never made any of it true. Thank god secularism (through science and recently governance) has brought us into better times.


Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Originally Posted by Raspy
Whatever you said...everyone knows you are a lying jerk.

That's a bold assertion. Point out where you think I lied.

Well?
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
DBT Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,718
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by DBT
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by DBT
The bible does not condemn slavery, Jesus for instance instructs slaves to obey their masters.

.
Wrong. That was Paul that said that. He was always sliding something in that contradicted Jesus.


We have nothing from Jesus, whatever is written in the new testament purports to speak on behalf of Jesus and God;

''Fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath; instead, bring them up in the discipline and instruction of the Lord. 5 Slaves, obey your earthly masters with respect and fear and sincerity of heart, just as you would obey Christ. 6And do this not only to please them while they are watching, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God from your heart.
Wrong. Paul went off the reservation and came up with a bunch of stuff Jesus never said at the time he (Jesus) was walking the earth. Every church has a Paul that comes in and tries to usurp authority, and almost always strays (purposely) away from Jesus' message.

Paul was the great promoter of christianity, his works are included in the new testament, which some consider to be the inspired word of God. Now you are saying that Paul was wrong. Yet we have no condemnation of Slavery by any of the bible's authors, there is no condemnation of slavery in the bible, so if Paul was wrong, what else is wrong?

Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by DBT
Socrates expressed the golden rule long before Christianity.

....

prof.Bart Ehrman (who some Xtians like to cite) recently stated it long predates Jesus...He also teaches that Xtian claims of persecution are exaggerated and that he doesn't support Xtian
claims of Biblical miracles...so we can see how
selectively xtian apologists cite Ehrman..LoL.

Ehrman tells how Xtians campaigned for religious
freedom leading up to Constantine , and that late 4th
century Xtian Emperor Theodosius outlawed freedom
of religion - making Xtianity the state enforced faith
combined with persecution of non-Xtians ...


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9,097
Originally Posted by mauserand9mm
Yeah, millennia of indoctrination and forced belief never made any of it true. Thank god secularism (through science and recently governance) has brought us into better times.

St.Augustine rode the tail of pagan Plato
St.Aquinas rode the tail of pagan Aristotle.
The church employed pagan Latin and Greek.
Codex book system used by church is Pagan.
Julian calendar (basis of today's) is Pagan.
The Rennaisance relied heavily on pagan
concepts, The Scientific Revolution proved
pagan scientist/philosophers correct.
Thankfully the Enlightenment followed the
Sci.Rev and secularism gained a firm foothold
in favor of rational and emperical based brains.


-Bulletproof and Waterproof don't mean Idiotproof.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
antlers Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
The facts regarding the historicity of early Christianity are that a tiny first-century sect which arose in the armpit of the Roman Empire…and Judea was certainly considered as such…and whose leader was rejected by His own people and crucified, not only survived, but thrived, in the face of organized and violent state-sponsored opposition.

This small Nazarene cult was eventually embraced by the very empire that for 300 years sought to extinguish it. Even nowadays there’s a cross commemorating Jesus’ crucifixion adorning the emperor’s entrance into the Roman Coliseum.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
antlers Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
Karen Armstrong said in her book, ‘Fields of Blood’ (Religion and the History of Violence) that “Against all odds, ‘by’ the third-century, Christianity had become a force to be reckoned with. We still do not really understand how this came about.” But nobody can deny that it happened.

Jesus’ followers (then and now) know quite well how it came about. And believers nowadays know quite well how it came about: they take seriously the eyewitness testimonies of those who were there for these events and eventually documented them for the entire world.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
antlers Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
It happened; and it’s amazing that it did. Sandwiched between the power structures of the Jewish Temple and the Roman Empire, this small movement began in Galilee with a day laborer that we know as Jesus of Nazareth. It’s amazing that anything about Him even survived, but it’s undeniable that it did.

Jesus Himself actually predicted this. Gathered with His closest followers on their way to Caesarea Philippi, He inquired of them what the word on the street was about Him. They replied that some thought He was a reincarnated prophet and some thought He was John the Baptist brought back to life. Then He asked specifically who they (His closest followers) thought He was, and Peter made his profound and declarative statement. And Jesus confirmed the truth and accuracy of Peter’s declaration, and He said that on the basis of that eloquent statement, that He’d build His ekklesia, His assembly, His movement.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
antlers Offline OP
Campfire Ranger
OP Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,576
Likes: 13
And Jesus made it crystal clear to them that death would not overcome His ekklesia. Not His death, and not their deaths. Nothing was gonna stop His new movement. And it didn’t. And it hasn’t. And it won’t. Neither of the power structures of the Jewish Temple or the Roman Empire were fans of new movements. Good things didn’t happen to people who started new movements back then and there.

And some of those same closest followers of Jesus would document why His death was not the death of His movement. And the reason why Jesus’ death was not the death of His movement is because Jesus didn’t do what all other dead people do ~ He didn’t stay dead.


Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
Page 17 of 108 1 2 15 16 17 18 19 107 108

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

568 members (10gaugeman, 22kHornet, 06hunter59, 10ring1, 219 Wasp, 219DW, 48 invisible), 1,904 guests, and 1,190 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,219
Posts18,524,577
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.107s Queries: 55 (0.033s) Memory: 0.9578 MB (Peak: 1.0970 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-20 13:40:54 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS