|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,410
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,410 |
If hunting in big bear country which would be more appropriate?
I’m thinking the .338 Fed with 210 partitions or some Flavor of a TTSX might be the trick, and in a lighter rifle. Thoughts?
Hardin284
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,361 Likes: 9
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 56,361 Likes: 9 |
I'd go for maximum horsepower and quality bullet construction.
_______________________________________________________ An 8 dollar driveway boy living in a T-111 shack
LOL
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,477
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 2,477 |
I would go for whichever rifle I was most confident in and was most comfortable carrying to increase the chance of it actually being close by when the bear shows up. Either loaded with a good bullet designed for penetration will get to the vitals. I would lean toward a mono personally since your muzzle velocity and impact velocity are going to be awfully similar in a defense situation and monos will open great and penetrate at those high speeds.
A lot of the 338 Federal rifles I have seen had shorter barrels (22" or less) which I like in brushy country. I would think you would still get good performance with the Federal in an 18-20" package which would be darn handy. Certainly the '06 will work with 18-20" also but then you might as well be carrying a .308, also a reasonable choice.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,955 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,955 Likes: 1 |
The 338Fed really doesn't offer much over the 308 or 30-06. I suspect some they/thems like it cuz it's different.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,251 Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 17,251 Likes: 1 |
I doubt any animal would be able to tell a noticeable difference between the two chamberings, assuming similar bullet selection. So I would go with whichever particular rifle you'd rather carry.
Now with even more aplomb
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,889 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,889 Likes: 6 |
Back about 20 years ago i was talking to some Inuit, Seal hunters about what guns they were using, to kill Seals And Walrus, they said .223 I said what about Polar Bears?? That's when we bring out the .243s, some times it helps to talk to the people that are killing critters they usually know what it takes to do the job, with out a lot of B.S. Rio7
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,249 Likes: 27
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,249 Likes: 27 |
If hunting in big bear country which would be more appropriate?
I’m thinking the .338 Fed with 210 partitions or some Flavor of a TTSX might be the trick, and in a lighter rifle. Thoughts? Have you ever tried a 200gr partition in a 30-36? If not, you should look into it. It will out penetrate that 210 .338 pill from the 338 Federal. I'd pick the good ol 30-06 with that bullet, personally. But then again, it would also depend on what rifle it's housed in and your style of hunting and what you want to carry.
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style. You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole. BSA MAGA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1 |
Having owned and shot both quite a bit, I doubt there is much difference between the 2. I'd run a 185 TTSX in the Federal to 2700 or a smidge more or a 175 LRX/180 TTSX in the 06 at a smidge under 2800. I suspect penetration to be about the same and frontal area of the expanded bullets to be about the same. And thus arrive at same:same.
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,381
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 4,381 |
I’m not real sure that .03” more in bullet diameter will make a lot of difference in the end result of making an animal dead or not, but I have read that animals do show more reaction to being shot with a larger diameter bullet.
My other auto is a .45
The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,150 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,150 Likes: 6 |
Back about 20 years ago i was talking to some Inuit, Seal hunters about what guns they were using, to kill Seals And Walrus, they said .223 I said what about Polar Bears?? That's when we bring out the .243s, some times it helps to talk to the people that are killing critters they usually know what it takes to do the job, with out a lot of B.S. Rio7 I guess I just never ran into the same fellas you did. I put in 8 years repairing generators, heavy equipment and delivering marine cargo from Attu to the MacKenzie Delta, YT. As a generalization, I can safely say one thing, they use what they happen to have.
Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 1 |
In truth the 06 loaded with a new mono like Hornady’s CX 190 grain bullet with a .575 BC at 2,700 fps smokes the 338 Fed hands down. Forget far downrange, the 210 grain Partition in a 338 Fed can’t come close at any range. For bear worries at 200 yards, the 06 has a velocity of 2,394 fps delivering 2,414 ft-lbs. At 200 yards the 338 Fed launched at 2,525 fps is traveling 2,108 fps delivering 2,072 ft-lbs. The 06 throughout 100-500 yards with that bullet smokes the 338 Fed in every way. BTW drift is 5.7” for the 06 at 300 yards; the 338 Fed drift is 9.4”. That’s almost double the wind drift at 300 yards.
What would you rather carry when hunting if bears are a concern?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,737 Likes: 18
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,737 Likes: 18 |
Black bear or grizzly country?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 4,680 |
I doubt any animal would be able to tell a noticeable difference between the two chamberings, assuming similar bullet selection. So I would go with whichever particular rifle you'd rather carry. This seems right. A slightly wider bullet for the 338, about the same weight if you're loading big in the 06, but probably going a little slower. A push?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,859 Likes: 1 |
My 338 Fed with my 185 TTSX load.......
Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,712 Likes: 7
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,712 Likes: 7 |
If hunting in big bear country which would be more appropriate?
I’m thinking the .338 Fed with 210 partitions or some Flavor of a TTSX might be the trick, and in a lighter rifle. Thoughts? The 06 will always hold more powder, so it will always hit harder, so that's what I would pick. I would use heavier, top quality bullets, such as a 168 TTSX, 180 gr A-Frame, or the like.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,363 Likes: 1 |
Good load for the 338 Fed started at 2,750 fps, however it will only equal the 06 at the muzzle and slightly beyond and will trail the 06 at 150 yards out in measured impact velocity and energy. The 338 Fed will fall behind by more than 200 ft-lbs energy at 300 yards. There’s no substitute for the benefit of a higher BC load.
Splitting hairs for sure, however the OP is nebulous at best using a term like “killing power”. I’m merely saying the 06 loaded in this fashion 190 gr CX w/.575 BC is by all measures more powerful than the 338 Fed using a 210 Partition. The 06 loaded like this also throws more heat than the 338 Fed 185 ttsx at 150 yards and beyond. Both are more than suitable for the same game.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,889 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 6,889 Likes: 6 |
flintlocke, the group of guy's I talked to about 5 of them, all seemed to agree on what they were using, I didn't interview the whole Community. makes sense they would use what ever they had and had ammo for. Rio7
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,607 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3,607 Likes: 2 |
Id stick with my 168 ttsx out of 06 that’s zipping around 2900 and retains 100% of its weight. If thick country, shorter distance than the 180 mono would be just fine. Cup and core? 200 partition or A frame
All of them do something better than the 30-06, but none of them do everything as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,936 |
From the OP's choices, I would go with a 338 Federal.
Main reason being, I have a rifle chambered in 338 Federal, but no 30-06's.
Would much prefer one of my 338-06's, 416 Remington, or 45-70 though.
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515 Likes: 1 |
NAD…No appreciable difference
“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”. Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
|
|
|
|
510 members (19rabbit52, 1234, 1lessdog, 160user, 10ring1, 204guy, 36 invisible),
2,351
guests, and
1,127
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,857
Posts18,517,699
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|