|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,353
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,353 |
Not sure how old the young daughter is or what her physical stature is. My young daughter is 27 and she loves shooting and hunting. So some of this may depend on age and size of the girl.
338-06 shooting a 160 at 3100 fps, assuming an 8.5 pound rifle. 13.2 recoil velocity 22.3 foot pounds of recoil
6.5 any cartridge shooting a 140 at 2700 fps, assuming same 8.5 pound rifle. 9.6 recoil velocity 12.2 foot pounds of recoil
Both cartridges completely adequate for elk under the OP mentioned 300 yards or less. I know which one my daughter would be wanting to shoot and practice with.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,319 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,319 Likes: 3 |
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power? Dober nudges me now and again to run the 120 TTSX at pretty blazing speeds from a Mashburn or Rem Mag. Swears it’ll knock critters on their chin and I have nothing but full on respect for his experience in those regards cause he’s likely done it more than once!
Semper Fi
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303 |
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power? I think SD meant something related to confidence in penetration, and retained weight back when everything was a relatively simple non-bonded cup and core bullet. With the advent of core-jacket bonding, multi-core and mono-metal bullets the SD means nothing these days as a way to compare a 200gn bullet. Those who have used them in a 30/06 know that a 200gn mono will penetrate and retain almost all of it's weight, a bonded bullet will usually end up under the skin on the off side, but still at >80% weight, a simple cup and core will frag and be at ~65% weight, and a match type bullet (VLD-H type) would penetrate a couple of inches and frag massively. Yet as a 200gn 30cal bullet, they ALL have the same SD.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,885 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,885 Likes: 1 |
Hey Beretzs "I think it was written back in the day Coni Brooks of Barnes Bullets used a 160 Barnes out of a 338 for darned near everything".
I think Connie also used a 185 grain X bullet in Africa for a pretty impressive string of one shot kills. I watched her on TV take a 400 yard shot on a really big Mule deer.
I have been using some variety of the X bullet since they first came out. But went from the 250 grain to the 225 TTSX in my .338 and 200 grain to 168 TTSX in my 30-06. I loaded up some 210 TTSX for my manly grandson for our big moose and gave him a 338-06.
We rarely shoot past 150 yards on moose or bears. Caribou can be a bit of a stretch on open tundra.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 426
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 426 |
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power? Yes, SD has its place for big game. But you really need to have different recommended SD for cup/core and copper bullets (and maybe tough bonded cup and core bullets). If a 338, 200gr cup and core bullets retain 65% of its weight during penetration, it ends up at 130gr. A 160gr copper bullet will retain 95%+ of its weight during penetration, so it ends up at 152gr, heavier than the 200gr cup and core bullet. That's why you can drop down in weight when shooting a copper bullet. In my 7mm08 I shoot a 120gr TTSX, in a cup/core bullet most shoot a 140gr. After many deer and hogs (all one shoot drops), I never recovered a TTSX.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,701 Likes: 6 |
I've never recovered a core lokt.
The way life should be.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037 |
For the young girl. 7mm-08 and 140gr Partition. A .260rem or 6.5CM and 140 partitions as well. BTDT. Recent purchase 7mm-08 and 6.5cm like the 120gr TTSX alot at near 3000fps.
Your Every Liberal vote promotes Socialism and is an attack on the Second Amendment. You will suffer the consequences.
GOA,Idaho2AIAlliance,AmericanFirearmsAssociation,IdahoTrappersAssociation,FoundationForWildlifeManagement ID and MT.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932 |
Barnes manual shows 3250fps out of a 25" barrel with two different powders.
I would have zero issues using a 160gr mono out of a 338-06 at 3100fps on elk. Although my preference is 200-210gr out of my 338-06's. I have some 160's on the shelf, but have not loaded any yet.
Arcus Venator
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,179 |
I'd hunt with 200-210 in my 338-06. I have a good load using the 225 grain Partition; I have used this load on a moose in BC only took one round.
Randy NRA Patriot Life Benefactor
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,833 Likes: 20
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,833 Likes: 20 |
My granddaughter hunts with a 270 and a 130 tipped Bear Claw. She weighs about 105 lbs. that 338-06 with a break should be fine, best not forget ear plugs before you light it off. I forgot to wear plugs with a 300 Win Mag Kleinguenther. My right ear rang for two days. I jumped a pig, hit him on the run, but I think I hurt as bad as he did. I sold that rifle as soon as I got back home. I will never own another with a brake.
Last edited by hanco; 03/17/23.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,725 Likes: 11
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,725 Likes: 11 |
. I know elk are being killed with 6.5 manbuns, but I just have a hard time thinking it’s fair to the animal. I want a clean humane shot and a quick kill if possible. I prefer too much ‘gun’ as opposed to just enough. You see, the problem with "too much gun" is the fact it's too much for you, not the elk. You won't practice. You will flinch. You will be knocked off target upon breaking the shot. You will ask yer "pard", did i hit it jerry?" Or you could be "under gunned".....practice all off season, no flinching, and you'll be able to spot your hits (or misses). And kill the schiet out of elk. If you've never seen what a 140 or 147eldm does to an elk, I get the ignorance. Trust me, they work. I will report back how the 6mm creed with 105bthp or 108eldm work on elk. As that will be my elk rifle and bullet combo this year
Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 03/17/23.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,353
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,353 |
Have a pretty good idea how it will do. If I get a chance to use some 95 vld will post that as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,237 Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,237 Likes: 5 |
I’ve only killed two elk but both were with a 180 Accubond out of 338Fed doing 2700fps. The first bull was a high shoulder shot at 200 yards and the bullet penetrated both shoulders and exited, leaving beautiful round holes through both shoulder blades, close to 2x the original bullet diameter. That bull fell instantly.
The second bull was a frontal shot at about 100 yards through the neck, breaking the spine and spinning the bull’s head around close to 360 degrees by the time he hit the ground. Another instant kill.
Given that the 160TTSX is a mono and will retain essentially all of its original weight, I would have no qualms about using it on elk.
Now the recoil is another story. As stated above the brake will help, but muzzle blast can induce a flinch just like recoil can. The child needs to be able to shoot whatever she’s hunting with, so a smaller cartridge would be my pick so the young lady can get a chance to shoot it and become skilled with it rather than develop a flinch or any other bad habits.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,412 Likes: 3
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,412 Likes: 3 |
I have been lucky enough to take two elk with my .338-06AI, both were with 185 gr. TTSX, neither took a step.
My elk hunting days are done, and I have moved down to the 160 gr. for a little less recoil. I would not be afraid to take them back to Montana.
To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.-Richard Henry Lee
Endowment Member NRA, Life Member SAF-GOA, Life-Board Member, West TN Director TFA
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914 Likes: 2 |
Not sure how old the young daughter is or what her physical stature is. My young daughter is 27 and she loves shooting and hunting. So some of this may depend on age and size of the girl.
338-06 shooting a 160 at 3100 fps, assuming an 8.5 pound rifle. 13.2 recoil velocity 22.3 foot pounds of recoil
6.5 any cartridge shooting a 140 at 2700 fps, assuming same 8.5 pound rifle. 9.6 recoil velocity 12.2 foot pounds of recoil
Both cartridges completely adequate for elk under the OP mentioned 300 yards or less. I know which one my daughter would be wanting to shoot and practice with. This
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229 Likes: 1 |
I've never recovered a core lokt. Too many pieces to look for? Sorry, couldn't resist! 😄
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 140
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 140 |
Powder Valley has 160 and 185 TTSX on sale right now for those interested.
|
|
|
|
446 members (12savage, 16gage, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 10gaugemag, 160user, 49 invisible),
2,189
guests, and
1,115
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,859
Posts18,497,125
Members73,979
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|