24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Not sure how old the young daughter is or what her physical stature is. My young daughter is 27 and she loves shooting and hunting. So some of this may depend on age and size of the girl.

338-06 shooting a 160 at 3100 fps, assuming an 8.5 pound rifle.
13.2 recoil velocity
22.3 foot pounds of recoil

6.5 any cartridge shooting a 140 at 2700 fps, assuming same 8.5 pound rifle.
9.6 recoil velocity
12.2 foot pounds of recoil

Both cartridges completely adequate for elk under the OP mentioned 300 yards or less. I know which one my daughter would be wanting to shoot and practice with.

GB1

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,319
Likes: 3
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 15,319
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by flintlocke
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power?

Dober nudges me now and again to run the 120 TTSX at pretty blazing speeds from a Mashburn or Rem Mag. Swears it’ll knock critters on their chin and I have nothing but full on respect for his experience in those regards cause he’s likely done it more than once!


Semper Fi
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by flintlocke
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power?

I think SD meant something related to confidence in penetration, and retained weight back when everything was a relatively simple non-bonded cup and core bullet.

With the advent of core-jacket bonding, multi-core and mono-metal bullets the SD means nothing these days as a way to compare a 200gn bullet.

Those who have used them in a 30/06 know that a 200gn mono will penetrate and retain almost all of it's weight, a bonded bullet will usually end up under the skin on the off side, but still at >80% weight, a simple cup and core will frag and be at ~65% weight, and a match type bullet (VLD-H type) would penetrate a couple of inches and frag massively. Yet as a 200gn 30cal bullet, they ALL have the same SD.

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 1
1
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
1
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,885
Likes: 1
Hey Beretzs "I think it was written back in the day Coni Brooks of Barnes Bullets used a 160 Barnes out of a 338 for darned near everything".

I think Connie also used a 185 grain X bullet in Africa for a pretty impressive string of one shot kills. I watched her on TV take a 400 yard shot on a really big Mule deer.

I have been using some variety of the X bullet since they first came out. But went from the 250 grain to the 225 TTSX in my .338 and 200 grain to 168 TTSX in my 30-06. I loaded up some 210 TTSX for my manly grandson for our big moose and gave him a 338-06.

We rarely shoot past 150 yards on moose or bears. Caribou can be a bit of a stretch on open tundra.

Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 426
M
MOW Offline
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
M
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 426
Originally Posted by flintlocke
I am not trying to make an argument here, just asking...but for many, many years the old hunter/writers seemed to credit high sectional density bullets as necessary factor in cleanly killing big game. Not many years back the thought of using, for instance, a 130 grain bullet in the '06 for big game would have raised eyebrows. A 160 in a .34 also seems like an awful low sectional density (haven't looked it up). Has SD been discounted as a factor in killing power?

Yes, SD has its place for big game. But you really need to have different recommended SD for cup/core and copper bullets (and maybe tough bonded cup and core bullets). If a 338, 200gr cup and core bullets retain 65% of its weight during penetration, it ends up at 130gr. A 160gr copper bullet will retain 95%+ of its weight during penetration, so it ends up at 152gr, heavier than the 200gr cup and core bullet. That's why you can drop down in weight when shooting a copper bullet. In my 7mm08 I shoot a 120gr TTSX, in a cup/core bullet most shoot a 140gr. After many deer and hogs (all one shoot drops), I never recovered a TTSX.

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 4
B
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 4
I've never recovered a core lokt.


The way life should be.
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037
S
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,037
For the young girl. 7mm-08 and 140gr Partition. A .260rem or 6.5CM and 140 partitions as well. BTDT. Recent purchase 7mm-08 and 6.5cm like the 120gr TTSX alot at near 3000fps.


Your Every Liberal vote promotes Socialism and is an
attack on the Second Amendment. You will suffer the consequences.

GOA,Idaho2AIAlliance,AmericanFirearmsAssociation,IdahoTrappersAssociation,FoundationForWildlifeManagement ID and MT.

Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
CRS Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,932
Barnes manual shows 3250fps out of a 25" barrel with two different powders.

I would have zero issues using a 160gr mono out of a 338-06 at 3100fps on elk.
Although my preference is 200-210gr out of my 338-06's. I have some 160's on the shelf, but have not loaded any yet.


Arcus Venator
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,179
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 17,179
I'd hunt with 200-210 in my 338-06. I have a good load using the 225 grain Partition; I have used this load on a moose in BC only took one round.


Randy
NRA
Patriot Life Benefactor





Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,832
Likes: 19
Campfire Savant
Online Content
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 151,832
Likes: 19
My granddaughter hunts with a 270 and a 130 tipped Bear Claw. She weighs about 105 lbs. that 338-06 with a break should be fine, best not forget ear plugs before you light it off. I forgot to wear plugs with a 300 Win Mag Kleinguenther. My right ear rang for two days. I jumped a pig, hit him on the run, but I think I hurt as bad as he did. I sold that rifle as soon as I got back home. I will never own another with a brake.

Last edited by hanco; 03/17/23.
IC B3

Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,722
Likes: 10
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 8,722
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by asheepdog
. I know elk are being killed with 6.5 manbuns, but I just have a hard time thinking it’s fair to the animal. I want a clean humane shot and a quick kill if possible. I prefer too much ‘gun’ as opposed to just enough.

You see, the problem with "too much gun" is the fact it's too much for you, not the elk. You won't practice. You will flinch. You will be knocked off target upon breaking the shot. You will ask yer "pard", did i hit it jerry?"

Or you could be "under gunned".....practice all off season, no flinching, and you'll be able to spot your hits (or misses). And kill the schiet out of elk.

If you've never seen what a 140 or 147eldm does to an elk, I get the ignorance. Trust me, they work.

I will report back how the 6mm creed with 105bthp or 108eldm work on elk. As that will be my elk rifle and bullet combo this year

Last edited by Jackson_Handy; 03/17/23.
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,352
Have a pretty good idea how it will do. If I get a chance to use some 95 vld will post that as well.

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 3
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,235
Likes: 3
I’ve only killed two elk but both were with a 180 Accubond out of 338Fed doing 2700fps. The first bull was a high shoulder shot at 200 yards and the bullet penetrated both shoulders and exited, leaving beautiful round holes through both shoulder blades, close to 2x the original bullet diameter. That bull fell instantly.

The second bull was a frontal shot at about 100 yards through the neck, breaking the spine and spinning the bull’s head around close to 360 degrees by the time he hit the ground. Another instant kill.

Given that the 160TTSX is a mono and will retain essentially all of its original weight, I would have no qualms about using it on elk.

Now the recoil is another story. As stated above the brake will help, but muzzle blast can induce a flinch just like recoil can. The child needs to be able to shoot whatever she’s hunting with, so a smaller cartridge would be my pick so the young lady can get a chance to shoot it and become skilled with it rather than develop a flinch or any other bad habits.

Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 3
I have been lucky enough to take two elk with my .338-06AI, both were with 185 gr. TTSX, neither took a step.

My elk hunting days are done, and I have moved down to the 160 gr. for a little less recoil. I would not be afraid to take them back to Montana.


To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them.-Richard Henry Lee

Endowment Member NRA, Life Member SAF-GOA, Life-Board Member, West TN Director TFA
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 2
R
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by 30338
Not sure how old the young daughter is or what her physical stature is. My young daughter is 27 and she loves shooting and hunting. So some of this may depend on age and size of the girl.

338-06 shooting a 160 at 3100 fps, assuming an 8.5 pound rifle.
13.2 recoil velocity
22.3 foot pounds of recoil

6.5 any cartridge shooting a 140 at 2700 fps, assuming same 8.5 pound rifle.
9.6 recoil velocity
12.2 foot pounds of recoil

Both cartridges completely adequate for elk under the OP mentioned 300 yards or less. I know which one my daughter would be wanting to shoot and practice with.

This

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,229
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by bluefish
I've never recovered a core lokt.

Too many pieces to look for?




Sorry, couldn't resist! 😄

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 140
C
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
C
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 140
Powder Valley has 160 and 185 TTSX on sale right now for those interested.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

515 members (12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 204guy, 007FJ, 1OntarioJim, 1badf350, 54 invisible), 2,362 guests, and 1,016 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,802
Posts18,496,340
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.163s Queries: 49 (0.018s) Memory: 0.8912 MB (Peak: 0.9950 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-07 21:09:04 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS