Tweet says "Use of military aviation along line of contact may indicate deterioration of Ukraine's air defenses" but Bristoe reads, and subsequently declares, that "Russia owns the sky over Ukraine."
That's his idea of facts.
If Russia owned the sky...this would have been a three day special operation.
Tweet says "Use of military aviation along line of contact may indicate deterioration of Ukraine's air defenses" but Bristoe reads, and subsequently declares, that "Russia owns the sky over Ukraine."
That's his idea of facts.
If Russia owned the sky...this would have been a three day special operation.
Ok Patton.
We completely owned the skies in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and bombed the schit out of civilians to establish flourishing democracies. How did that work out for the US? lol
Tweet says "Use of military aviation along line of contact may indicate deterioration of Ukraine's air defenses" but Bristoe reads, and subsequently declares, that "Russia owns the sky over Ukraine."
That's his idea of facts.
If Russia owned the sky...this would have been a three day special operation.
Ok Patton.
We completely owned the skies in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and bombed the schit out of civilians to establish flourishing democracies. How did that work out for the US? lol
Answer you own question...
100 hr war...heard of it?
Putin tried, I stress tried, to do the same thing...3 day special operation. Heard of it?
If Russia owned the sky...this would have been a three day special operation.
Ok Patton.
We completely owned the skies in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and bombed the schit out of civilians to establish flourishing democracies. How did that work out for the US? lol
We very quickly took control of the countries and seats of Goverment except in Syria and Yemen where we never did establish air dominance.
Then we dealt with insurgencys that out lasted our will and the skill of or our political leaders.
What was your MOS?
John Burns
I have all the sources. They can't stop the signal.
Tweet says "Use of military aviation along line of contact may indicate deterioration of Ukraine's air defenses" but Bristoe reads, and subsequently declares, that "Russia owns the sky over Ukraine."
That's his idea of facts.
If Russia owned the sky...this would have been a three day special operation.
Ok Patton.
We completely owned the skies in Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria, Somalia, Yemen and bombed the schit out of civilians to establish flourishing democracies. How did that work out for the US? lol
I won't pretend to know a damn thing about fighters or how air supremacy ties into strategic war planning, but an important distinction here is that we 'invaded' those countries as liberators, not conquerors. If we had intended to conquer, those conflicts would have been waged and ended MUCH differently.
Due to the tactics used, I am guessing Russia's real intent was to totally conquer Ukraine, and has failed to do so due to whatever conspiracy theory a guy wants to dream up.
Originally Posted by Lying George yelling at clouds
The 35 still has literally dozens of critical failure issues.
Figure out the beach balls are glued down yet? myriad
But here's a whole page full of them, CHEETO... assload
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Hmm, using all caps, must have struck a nerve. Fugly losers are sensitive that way...
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”
Like the typical fat kid loser, in the back of the bus whining ...
A good principle to guide me through life: “This is all I have come to expect, standard lackluster performance. Trust nothing, believe no one and realize it will only get worse…”