24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,124
Likes: 1
F
Campfire Outfitter
OP Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
F
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,124
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Hastings
Did not our USN sailors disable ships to the point they could not leave California and proceed with their orders to go to Vietnam? As in serious sabotage?
Yes, and thousands of sailors signed anti deployment pledges (thousands more did not) in the early 70's, Coral Sea, Kitty Hawk, Constellation and of course the famous 'million dollar paint scraper' in the reduction gears of the Enterprise. By any other name it would have been a mass mutiny. It turns out (speaking as a vet) the war was a sham and a waste...but, they did take the oath of enlistment...and later broke it.


Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
Originally Posted by flintlocke
Nothing personal here at all, swabs will fight...with leadership. But the inescapable conclusion, after steaming 2,000 nm your task force did NOT get the Pueblo....it is a museum in North Korea to this day. You may have been locked and loaded with mucho firepower and deadly intentions, but like the Pueblo, your task force did not fire a shot. The only battle the USN has had since ww2, that I am aware of, in 1988 the Simpson fired 4 missiles into an Iranian gunboat.

The decision not to start WWIII was made by LBJ. He gave them a WWII piece of junk and some crypto gear that was of no use to them or anyone else in exchange for return of the crew. The value of the bargain to either side is debatable. At the time, I was also serving on a WWII piece of junk. It was of virtually no worth. It's main value was that it had been overhauled to manage a little more speed for the express purpose of keeping up with the Enterprise during flight ops. As was demonstrated, when the Pueblo was grabbed, the only thing that could stay with the Enterprise was 4 of it's most important assets for protection.

re the Florida. Those subs are a lot bigger then you suspect and the gulf is particularly shallow there. SSGN boats are often used in a manner that puts them on display like the SSNs as opposed to SSBNs. The Red Sea has little deep water and that's why the SSGNs there and are on the surface there transiting shallow waters. I have participated in a number of ASW tests and you may be assured that any nuke boat is more than capable of remaining undetected if it chooses to. Something as trivial as a gunboat is not going to make one do anything is chooses not to. There is a reason why the bulk of our nuclear deterrence is vested in those boats and will remain so until someone demonstrates that they can find and track them. Just like the Navy is an integrated force that is designed to designate specific units to specific tasks, it is also integrated to the tasks of the other branches.

How the civilian leadership chooses to use it is a wholly separate concept.

Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 39,301
Originally Posted by Fury01
The strength of a Nation is equal to its strength of character plus its resolve.
We know well the history of fallen “empires”and thought the USA was never an Empire we once had the strength of an Empire. We do no longer.

Well said. The OP is just BS. But what do I know. I only served 24 years. Last duty station was TRF Banger.


The first time I shot myself in the head...

Meniere's Sucks Big Time!!!
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,574
A
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
A
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 8,574
The Treason ..

Mallet giving the Chineses Heads Up 24/7 ..

If he ain’t Mr. Pudd’n Bagel Factory is ..

We’ve been Play’d ..

You just can’t Handle the Truth ..

Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 959
D
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
D
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 959
How many times have our elected officials sent troops to an area as a show of force and then tied their hands behind their backs with excessive rules of engagement?


Nobody's right if everybody's wrong.
Getting into reloading to save money is like getting married for free sex.
IC B2

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,074
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,074
Dumb question...

They'll kick aaassss and take no prisoners...

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 1
MAC Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by MAC
I want to point one thing about the topic the OP lists, US submarines always surface before going through Hormuz as a protocol. They DO NOT transit the strait submerged. There is NO way any Iranian vessel forced one of our nuclear subs to do anything. The sub was approaching the strait submerged and then surfaced as part of the normal transit routine and Iran is running around claiming they "forced" it to do what it was already going to do.

But Hey, what the hell do I know? I only served in the USN for more than 25 years as a navigation specialist. I'm sure many of the members here that have never been in the USN, never plotted a course and have never been underway on the ocean know a lot more about it than this retired navy chief does.

Okay then why would we put a US submarine in such a vulnerable position?

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AxRWb2jE...1e3A/s1600/Strait_of_Ormuz_GeoGarage.png

You don't know a damn thing about naval warfare or anything else. The USN sends vessels into every area of international waters and the Gulf is international waters. I swear I have come across morons in my day but you take the cake.


You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,241
K
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
K
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,241
Originally Posted by flintlocke
MOGC...The brown water navy in Nam were bad ass warriors (not Kerry) to the core ...NOBODY would suggest otherwise. I'm no naval historian but using the internet as a source, no matter how you phrase the search terms, the blue water Navy, with the exception of the Simpson noted above, has not been in action since ww2. Delivering naval artillery barrages from offshore does not really meet the definition of battle...where the protagonists are shooting at each other. Yes, the Navy has been in some high tension trouble spots around the world...but not in a battle.
Wow. Question, are you aware of another Navy that wants to challenge or bang heads with the US Navy? Has there been a willing country that wanted to test our Navy? No there hasn't. Our Navy is quite capable. All the antennas, radars and launchers on our ships actually work unlike say...Russia. Their stuff is just for show, it doesn't work. They have radars that don't emit a danged thing. You know why? Because there aren't even cables or wave guides running to them.

Of course our Navy will fight. It is all too much like a video game for them not too. Pretty sure our BMD's are the only ships that can shoot ICBM's and satellites...in space.


-Piss into the wind.
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,469
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,469
Originally Posted by KSMITH
Originally Posted by flintlocke
MOGC...The brown water navy in Nam were bad ass warriors (not Kerry) to the core ...NOBODY would suggest otherwise. I'm no naval historian but using the internet as a source, no matter how you phrase the search terms, the blue water Navy, with the exception of the Simpson noted above, has not been in action since ww2. Delivering naval artillery barrages from offshore does not really meet the definition of battle...where the protagonists are shooting at each other. Yes, the Navy has been in some high tension trouble spots around the world...but not in a battle.
Wow. Question, are you aware of another Navy that wants to challenge or bang heads with the US Navy? Has there been a willing country that wanted to test our Navy? No there hasn't. Our Navy is quite capable. All the antennas, radars and launchers on our ships actually work unlike say...Russia. Their stuff is just for show, it doesn't work. They have radars that don't emit a danged thing. You know why? Because there aren't even cables or wave guides running to them.

Of course our Navy will fight. It is all too much like a video game for them not too. Pretty sure our BMD's are the only ships that can shoot ICBM's and satellites...in space.


The Ukrainians sank the Russian flagship of the Baltic.

Enough said.

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 50,169
Likes: 1
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 50,169
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by gunzo
Hell, any American military with a trigger needs permission. They have a phone attached to the trigger with a higher up on the other end.

It's gotta be that way when you have 25 year old Lieutenants.


The only thing worse than a liberal is a liberal that thinks they're a conservative.
IC B3

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,074
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,074
Regarding the story about Iranian navy forcing the sub to surface....first, listen to Mac, he knows what he's talking about....

Second, 5th fleet commented on the alleged incident...no boats where in the straight that day or recently.

It's bs.

Mac, thank you for your service...

Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,413
R
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
R
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,413
Originally Posted by MAC
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by MAC
I want to point one thing about the topic the OP lists, US submarines always surface before going through Hormuz as a protocol. They DO NOT transit the strait submerged. There is NO way any Iranian vessel forced one of our nuclear subs to do anything. The sub was approaching the strait submerged and then surfaced as part of the normal transit routine and Iran is running around claiming they "forced" it to do what it was already going to do.

But Hey, what the hell do I know? I only served in the USN for more than 25 years as a navigation specialist. I'm sure many of the members here that have never been in the USN, never plotted a course and have never been underway on the ocean know a lot more about it than this retired navy chief does.

Okay then why would we put a US submarine in such a vulnerable position?

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AxRWb2jE...1e3A/s1600/Strait_of_Ormuz_GeoGarage.png

You don't know a damn thing about naval warfare or anything else. The USN sends vessels into every area of international waters and the Gulf is international waters. I swear I have come across morons in my day but you take the cake.

So you haven't a clue? What navel warfare edicts would put a valuable submarine into a relatively shallow and narrow area in a very dangerous part of the world and make it a habit of surfacing, especially in the strait of Hormuz? Mac I really question anything you say about your experience in the Navy. Now yes I do know the US Navy goes anywhere it likes but sending a submarine into the Persian Gulf and exposing it reeks of blithering idiocy.


Dog I rescued in January

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]



Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,694
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,694
Originally Posted by flintlocke
MOGC...The brown water navy in Nam were bad ass warriors (not Kerry) to the core ...NOBODY would suggest otherwise. I'm no naval historian but using the internet as a source, no matter how you phrase the search terms, the blue water Navy, with the exception of the Simpson noted above, has not been in action since ww2. Delivering naval artillery barrages from offshore does not really meet the definition of battle...where the protagonists are shooting at each other. Yes, the Navy has been in some high tension trouble spots around the world...but not in a battle.

Guess you weren't on the USS KIDD DD661 when she steamed into the Inchon harbor where she could bring direct gunfire on hidden shore battery emplacements. This action put the KIDD directly under the guns of the Norks and the KIDD took casualties. My dad was on the #1 gun mount and took shrapnel in his legs from a shell burst. He wasn't alone, others got wounded also.

Dad was also on the KIDD's rifle squad and participated in evacuating American, English and French citizens from Formosa islands during the first communist crisis that occurred there after the Korean War. Going ashore in small boats, often at night and going inland to the various plantation homes and getting those families to safety ahead of the communist forces occasionally resulted in skirmishes between the U.S. forces and the red soldiers and guerillas. Dad was issued an M1 Carbine and liked the lightweight and firepower. To say the USN wasn't involved in battle since WWII is either ignorance or blatantly ignoring facts.


Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 19,495
G
g5m Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 19,495


Retired cat herder.


Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,241
K
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
K
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,241
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by MAC
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by MAC
I want to point one thing about the topic the OP lists, US submarines always surface before going through Hormuz as a protocol. They DO NOT transit the strait submerged. There is NO way any Iranian vessel forced one of our nuclear subs to do anything. The sub was approaching the strait submerged and then surfaced as part of the normal transit routine and Iran is running around claiming they "forced" it to do what it was already going to do.

But Hey, what the hell do I know? I only served in the USN for more than 25 years as a navigation specialist. I'm sure many of the members here that have never been in the USN, never plotted a course and have never been underway on the ocean know a lot more about it than this retired navy chief does.

Okay then why would we put a US submarine in such a vulnerable position?

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-AxRWb2jE...1e3A/s1600/Strait_of_Ormuz_GeoGarage.png

You don't know a damn thing about naval warfare or anything else. The USN sends vessels into every area of international waters and the Gulf is international waters. I swear I have come across morons in my day but you take the cake.

So you haven't a clue? What navel warfare edicts would put a valuable submarine into a relatively shallow and narrow area in a very dangerous part of the world and make it a habit of surfacing, especially in the strait of Hormuz? Mac I really question anything you say about your experience in the Navy. Now yes I do know the US Navy goes anywhere it likes but sending a submarine into the Persian Gulf and exposing it reeks of blithering idiocy.
How do you think they get into the Persian Gulf then? Are you suggesting they are air-lifted? How do you think they get through the Suez Canal, Bosphorous, Bab Al Mandel etc..? You should keep to worrying about your Cheeto supply from going stale and leave the submarining to the experts. You just don't make sense. Especially if you think Iran forced a damned thing on a nuclear sub.


-Piss into the wind.
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
M
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,735
Originally Posted by rickt300
So you haven't a clue? What navel warfare edicts would put a valuable submarine into a relatively shallow and narrow area in a very dangerous part of the world and make it a habit of surfacing, especially in the strait of Hormuz? Mac I really question anything you say about your experience in the Navy. Now yes I do know the US Navy goes anywhere it likes but sending a submarine into the Persian Gulf and exposing it reeks of blithering idiocy.

You have got to be one of the most blissfully ignorant idiots on the fire! Since time immemorial nations have put weapons on display the show their would be opponents that this is the power to destroy you or defend you. It is one of the perks that the people running countries retain to themselves. They oft times even use those perks well in fact.

An SSGN carries almost 200 nuclear capable missiles with a range of 1000 miles and it can disappear into undetectability and stay there for months. The cobra in the bathtub is not so worrisome as the one that disappeared into the garden. The consideration that there is a bunch of SSBNs with much more fearsome weaponry lurking god knows where. is not a small part of why those SSGNs are often on display. That is no small part of what they are designed for.

Last edited by MILES58; 04/21/23.
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,356
Likes: 7
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 44,356
Likes: 7
Originally Posted by MAC
I want to point one thing about the topic the OP lists, US submarines always surface before going through Hormuz as a protocol. They DO NOT transit the strait submerged. There is NO way any Iranian vessel forced one of our nuclear subs to do anything. The sub was approaching the strait submerged and then surfaced as part of the normal transit routine and Iran is running around claiming they "forced" it to do what it was already going to do.

But Hey, what the hell do I know? I only served in the USN for more than 25 years as a navigation specialist. I'm sure many of the members here that have never been in the USN, never plotted a course and have never been underway on the ocean know a lot more about it than this retired navy chief does.



Lol. 🙃


Slaves get what they need. Free men get what they want.

Rehabilitation is way overrated.

Orwell wasn't wrong.

GOA member
disappointed NRA member

24HCF SEARCH
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 1
MAC Offline
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,213
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by rickt300
So you haven't a clue? What navel warfare edicts would put a valuable submarine into a relatively shallow and narrow area in a very dangerous part of the world and make it a habit of surfacing, especially in the strait of Hormuz? Mac I really question anything you say about your experience in the Navy. Now yes I do know the US Navy goes anywhere it likes but sending a submarine into the Persian Gulf and exposing it reeks of blithering idiocy.

The USN has been putting subs into the Persian Gulf for decades MORON. If you don't understand that then you are just flat out a card carrying IDIOT.

There is a line in a movie that says "Never go full retard." You just went FULL RETARD! You seem hellbent on going through life STUCK ON STUPID! Your ignorance and idiocy appear to be boundless. I don't know what you do, or did, for a living but you were never in the USN and you simply do not have any validity to make a comment on it. Go away Child, you bore me.


You get out of life what you are willing to accept. If you ain't happy, do something about it!
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

609 members (007FJ, 1936M71, 160user, 12344mag, 16penny, 17CalFan, 60 invisible), 2,415 guests, and 1,291 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,141
Posts18,484,085
Members73,966
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.279s Queries: 51 (0.006s) Memory: 0.9070 MB (Peak: 1.0303 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-02 14:43:00 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS