Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Wyo corner crossing update

I don’t know what the answer is, but regardless of whether no one wanted them 100 years ago, people want access now. The landowners were the only people who had access to public property. Therefore, it wasn’t public. Reasonable access isn’t a helicopter ride. However, just compensation is warranted. I agree with that. Seems to me tho, a multi millionaire isn’t concerned with a monetary settlement for public access.

Once again, not saying the landowner shouldn’t be compensated. I just don’t think that is where his interests lie.


JMO

Clyde

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕🖕

Had a kid ride his bicycle across the corner of my yard, guess I should call the cawps and file a civil suit lol


Corner crossing is public to public. Get over it people.

Buzzys re-election campaign poster🖕🖕🖕🖕🤣🤣🤣

Probably not, and really why should it be. All most here can do is think of their own selfish interests. Some can not even fathom the thought that a person might not be motivated by self interest, but by right and wrong.

Lands and ranches do come up for sale occasionally. Those lands could be bought. Right of ways, or easements taken out and the balance of the land sold for nearly the original investment.

It took 150 years to get where we are today, It will most likely take another 150 to solve the situation the proper way.

Most of these ranches are a collection of many, many deeded properties.

Buzz schooling the non hunters of the fire is never not funny.

Why did you change your handle Callnum?

Buzz ain’t schooled schit son

When you want to book your canoe ride in the east and hear banjos 🤣🤣🤣

Buzz taking the fire non hunters on this thread to the woodshed is never not funny.

Did buzz take you behind the woodshed?

My understating the criminal trespass charges were dismissed. Not sure the reasoning for the dismissal.

The guys brought a ladder. It nor the hunters touched the private land. Now sure the space above the private property was occupied by the ladder and and the bodies of the hunters.

However, what damages where there to the property owners? They were suing for 7M saying the value of their land was reduced by that much. Love to see how they would prove that.

Reminds me of the old tale where a scrooge of a guy sued a another poor guy for eating a bowl of rice while smelling scrooge's meat dinner cooked. The poor guy enjoyed the smell and it made his rice taste better. Judge found that the poor guy did indeed steal the smell of scrooge's meal. Judge asked the poor guy if he had any money. Guy pulls out a few copper pennies. Judge told the poor guy to drop the coins from one hand to another. The judge then turned to scrooge and told him the recompense for stealing a smell is the sound of coins.


My understanding was that the owner chained the fence posts together. Doesn't some of the chain also go over the public land?

The landowner did indeed run a chain from one T-post to the other. Thereby doing the same thing himself that he sued the hunters for doing.

The irony.

Listening to Communist propaganda on the 'Fire is NEVER funny.

You still haven't made your case about what part of Skavdahl's recent ruling will be over-turned on appeal and why.

What a great win for outdoor recreationist's opening up 2.44 million acres in Wyoming.

I Wouldn't do that. Stupid idea. Would you put pictures out on the internet of any other valuables such as jewelry, coins, oxycontin, on the internet in case criminals were shopping?

I am not sure what the beef is with you or BHA but you folks did a great service this time and put a wealthy usurper in his place.

Perhaps someone could explain in a short epistle what the issue is with this man and BHA.