Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Amy Coney Barrett,...

Along with the SC ruling, this is the first thing to be done after the wire removal! 🤬 memtb

https://babylonbee.com/news/supreme-court-rules-texas-must-replace-barbed-wire-with-red-carpet

Appears to me he is suggesting that states’ rights to secceed were removed in the war, and now states’ rights to defend their border against foreign invasion have been as well.

Remember the Constitution is meant to curtail an over active federal govt, not to enumerate states’ rights. Where in the Constitution is it left explicitly to the Feds to guard our borders?

I don't know.


That why I have been asking before we go all Mothers Against Canada.

It is interesting though that a conflict fought over slavery is being used to debate a conflict over slavery.

Roberts & Barrett what the hell is wrong with them to allow this invasion to continue. Good for Texas to stand their ground. I don't want all these illegals coming to Louisiana our state is already dark enough with blacks now I have to look at brown skin and listen to nothing but spanish speaking. I was at walmart the other day felt like I was in Mexico with all the mexicans this has to stop.

Yes

Here’s where it’s in the constitution;

Section 4

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Is that granting to the Feds the right to stop states from guarding their borders, or is it assigning the Feds the duty to guard the borders?

And Republican form of govt??? What about OUR SACRED DEMOCRACY!?

A document written to be understood by the general population needs no court to explain the obvious. A state has the right of self defense as surely as an individual citizen.

W H A T ??????????? OMG i'm triggered
WASHINGTON, DC — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett fielded questions from reporters regarding her controversial vote to remove razor wire from the Texas border and claims it has absolutely nothing to do with her plans to re-landscape her yard this summer.

"My plans to have a nice row of Elm trees planted along the southern fence of my backyard has nothing to do with my vote to allow more gardeners, er, I mean illegal immigrants, into the country," Justice Barrett explained.

Great post. Well done mike, outstanding!

Should we tell him?

I had first typed out a grand response as to the Southern perspective of the war and a pretty good argument expressing the fact that the war was fought over a LOT more than slavery. Upon reflection, I decided to relate this instead, in which I will paraphrase. I can dig up the exact text if needed, given enough time.

Toward the end of his life in an address given at New Orleans, former Confederate President Jefferson F. Davis reflected on the war. He plainly stated that the constitutional issues that resulted in the secession of the Southern states have yet to have been resolved and that he feared that they one day would come forth again to be resolved. As this was a good number of years after the war, he was obviously not referring to slavery. It was constitutional state's rights and Federal control over the states. Think about it. This is a former successful U.S. Army officer, a graduate of USMA (West Point), a colonel combat veteran of the Mexican War, a former son-in-law of U.S. President & General Zachary Taylor, a former U.S. Secretary of War, a successful planter, a former U.S. Senator, and a former General of Mississippi State Troops, before becoming President of the Confederate States of America. I think it reasonable to accept that he had the credentials to know what he was speaking of. If anyone has the inclination, I highly suggest reading his book, The Rise And Fall Of The Confederate Government. I have the privilege of personally knowing two of his descendants in Mississippi, one of them for 55 years now. DEO VINDICE

It's not that complicated. Nobody disputes that the border belongs to the Federal Government, but that border is a line down the middle of the Rio Grande.

Are States themselves owned by the Federal Government, or is it the other way around?

That is what is at stake here.

Women are generally unreliable in such roles.

Not very many, more not, than worthy. That is his track record, don't expect this to change if he is voted in as POTUS.

I'll vote for him, but knowing he will do what he has done in the past. Trump is an apprentice when it comes to hiring the right people. That is his proven weakness.

Youse guys are going to someday realize, all you are seeing is designed for a reason.

Things Are Not As They Appear.

But The Plan is working. The people are gradually becoming awake as to the tyranny of the US Neonazi Government.

Like Trump said at Turning Point, When the people learn the truth they will support what WE do. The People are learning.

The Tide is turning. As Q said, "The Old Guard is being turned out for the New."

We are Winning.

How relevant it is I’am not sure, but as I understand it the SCOTUS ruling stated “ may take down the wire” not shall take down the wire, or must take down the wire, bfurthermore they made no mention of Texas ability to replace said wire. Appears to me as asine it may be we could end up with a situation feds take it down and just as fast Texas puts it back up. Resolution, conservatives win all three branch of federal gov’t and 2/3 of leglislatures and governorship of the states in 2024. God Bless America once again.

Great!! Is greg abbott finally showing some balls?