|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
Believe in god on this site, now that's funny. Believing in god and acting according to the bible are two completely different things.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,104 Likes: 5
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,104 Likes: 5 |
When you intentionally misquote what was said (like you clearly did) in order to support your position, then your position is a weak position. "I don't know therefore GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD." "It's so wonderous therefore GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD." How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
Living in a false world you are.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 19
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 19 |
Living in a false world you are.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
Must be a pervert, sex, sex motions, yup a pervert.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
Earlybrd they mention you in the bible.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,175 Likes: 25
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 61,175 Likes: 25 |
Believing is simple. The devil believes.
These premises insured by a Sheltie in Training ,--- and Cooey.o "May the Good Lord take a likin' to you"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451 |
I SEE RODTHEWAD IS STILL FLAPPIN HIS LIPS, PUT THE MAGGOT ON IGNORE GUYS HES JUST BAITING YOU
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
The devil lives here. the devil is in all of you. Lost souls that can't find their way, how sad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Mar 2024
Posts: 160 |
Yep , here comes more name calling. that all you losers have.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 19
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 15,174 Likes: 19 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451 |
i guess he answered me but then i dont care. wonder if hes one of the FBY paid [bleep] stirers
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 674
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 674 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,786
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,786 |
"The Gospel is foolishness to them that are perishing".
USMC 0351
We know the price of everything and the value of nothing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 451 |
"The Gospel is foolishness to them that are perishing". so very true,
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,539 Likes: 10
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,539 Likes: 10 |
When you intentionally misquote what was said (like you clearly did) in order to support your position, then your position is a weak position. "I don't know therefore GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD." "It's so wonderous therefore GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD."
How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments. "I don't know therefore NO GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD." "It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD." How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments.
Every day on this side of the ground is a win.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,688 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,688 Likes: 1 |
When you intentionally misquote what was said (like you clearly did) in order to support your position, then your position is a weak position. "I don't know therefore GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD." "It's so wonderous therefore GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD."
How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments. "I don't know therefore NO GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD." "It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD." How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments. The fact remains that it is evidence that justifies a conviction of truth, and as we have zero evidence for the existence of any of the countless versions of God and gods that people have believed in and worshipped, there is no reason to be convinced that any of them exist. Which is where faith and its drivers, the promise of eternal life, desire for meaning, fear of annihilation, etc, comes into play. And again, what is written in old scrolls about God or gods is not evidence for their existence. Faith, despite your protests, is a belief held without the support of evidence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,583 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 15,583 Likes: 8 |
Why don't you have a discussion about the fact that sure evidence for one individual may not serve as any evidence for another, and the forever subjectivity of that matter. It might illuminate the futility of these puerile yakking matches.
NRA Member - Life, Benefactor, Patron
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,104 Likes: 5
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,104 Likes: 5 |
When you intentionally misquote what was said (like you clearly did) in order to support your position, then your position is a weak position. "I don't know therefore GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore GOD." "It's so wonderous therefore GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore GOD."
How every you want to paraphrase it they are all bad arguments. "I don't know therefore NO GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD." "It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD." How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments. I made no such argument, no would I say such as argument disproves a god(s), merely that such arguments are not good arguments for a god(s). I position here always has been, and remains " I see no good evidence for the existence of a god(s)." Yes, our universe if vast and wonderous. It experiences a period of rapid inflation a bit over 13 billion years ago. That does not mean the expansion started from a true "nothing", nor does it mean it was done by a old white haired due in a toga living outside space/time. Yes, Science doesn't have all the answers, but we're working on real answers and not relying on bronze age fairytales.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 490 Likes: 2
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Aug 2023
Posts: 490 Likes: 2 |
"I don't know therefore NO GOD" "It's beyond my comprehension therefore NO GOD." "It's so wondrous therefore NO GOD." "Science is too hard for me to understand therefore NO GOD."
How ever you want to paraphrase it, the above are all WORSE arguments. Nobody is making that argument.
|
|
|
|
544 members (12344mag, 06hunter59, 10gaugemag, 160user, 1beaver_shooter, 16gage, 58 invisible),
2,752
guests, and
1,224
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,644
Posts18,512,455
Members74,010
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|