|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 253
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 253 |
I am new to speer products, and my 375 H&H is shooting the 270 BTSP's very well....is this bullet similar in construction to the nosler partition?
I am thinking of using this on moose and bear,
thanks
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
No, the Speer boat tail soft point is in no way similar to a Nosler Partition. The Speer is a cup-and core bullet -- a gilding metal jacket surrounding a lead core. The Nosler Partition jacket is divided into two portions, with a lead core in each end separated by a gilding metal "partition". It is designed to blow the front end off for expansion, then the partition end continues through like a solid for penetration. When it was designed -- perhaps copied from the German H-Mantel might be more accurate -- it was pretty much the only "premium" bullet available to American handloaders. It is an archaic design that has been superceded by better bullets for several decades, but its adherents are feverishly dedicated to it. (I suspect I ought to don my Nomex about now... .) I personally do not like them, because I've never been able to get them to shoot worth anything in any of my rifles, and I don't like a bullet designed to blow bits and pieces of it through the animal. Those who like them, though, really like them. Speer boattails tend to be expremely accurate in every rifle I shoot them in, and perform very well on game up to caribou size or so. I would not use them on moose and bear on purpose, though shooting half an ounce or more of lead and copper tends to correct for a lot of omissions in design. Were I to want to shoot a Speer bullet at moose or bear, I would shoot a 285 gr Grand Slam. I have not tried them in my .375 Ruger, but I have shot a pile of game with 250 GS's in my .35 Whelen, and they worked quite well on elk and moose. My .375 does shoot 270 gr TSX's very well, so you might try them as well. Dennis
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954 |
Not many bullets are equal to the nosler partition IMO..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Those who like them, generally really like them. I don't. Don't like Dodges and Brownings either . Dennis
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 973
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 973 |
They are not equal as others have stated. I would use the 270 gr "Average Bullet" for anything up to elk for anything but bison and heavy bear. Just so you know, There is 300 gr nosler partitions going for $26.70 at website: http://www.shootersproshop.com/?p=11&b=8&s=150&t=375or www.shootersproshop.com under the "factory 2nds" for less than the sierras are going for. I'd buy them while you can. I just bought 200 and wish I could have bought 1000. But, from what others have said, 300 gr sierras are very good bullet for not being premium or partition style bullets. I'll be testing them my self. I've had great accuracy from sierra GK in all calibers, but when it counts a better constructed bullet will not make you hesitate. Take advantage of the partition sale now. even if you cant shoot them well in your rifle, You could get rid of them later for equal or better bullets. In my experience, Sierra GK and Barnes TSX have had great accuracy. TSX is expensive, but very well worth it. They expand in small game but penetrate deeep. Sierra is good for a light to medium bullet in the game range for caliber. Partitions are supposed to be great, but I have to test them yet. They could be my favorite bullet at this factory discount for a premium bullet. I just have to see if they're accurate.
Last edited by gohip; 02/09/09.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 89 |
Get the partitions. They've been around forever, just like the H&H, and I've never heard anything bad about them from actual hunters. In the 60s they were THE bullet.
Thanks, Gohip. I already have a couple hundred ABs and will order a couple hundred partitions. Always looking for a good buy.
I may order some GS bullets too. The idea of Weatherby power and range and TSX killing punch in a relative low-pressure load fascinates me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,381
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,381 |
Well, they both fly out the end of the barrel when you pull the trigger but that's where the similarities end.
"This duty fell upon me and was the worst job I ever had in my life. I have known men I would rather shoot than the worst of dogs."
Frank Wild Second in Command Endurance 1914-1916
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Get the partitions. They've been around forever, just like the H&H, and I've never heard anything bad about them from actual hunters. In the 60s they were THE bullet. I'm pretty sure I'm an "actual hunter", and I don't have much good to say about Partitions. Tried them for several years, in the 70's and 80's, when they were among "the bullets". Never got good accuracy, and didn't like the fragmentation effect. I greatly preferred Speer Grand Slams, until they changed them from the dual-core originals to just another cup and core. The 60's were a long time ago. There are several better bullets now, and most of the bullets available today, even the "standards", are quite a bit better than they used to be. Partitions kill just fine, and are a good choice for those who like them. But they are by no means the only choice, nor even the best choice. In my opinion, after killing big game for the past 30-some years, in a dozen states and a couple of foreign countries. But truly, your mileage may vary... Dennis
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,930
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,930 |
For bear and moose -- No way
Phil Shoemaker Alaska Master Guide, Alaska Hunter Ed Instructor FAA Master pilot www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.comAnyone who claims the 30-06 is not effective has either not used one, or else is unwittingly commenting on their marksmanship.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954 |
Muledeer, The early Nosler still touted by some even today, as you know were screw machine bullets and I couldn't get them to shoot. I also didn't particularly like the way they performed on game from time to time..
Todays Nosler is one of my favorite bullets and if I don't want it to fragment the frontal portion I simply go to a heavier weight in the same bullet.
I particularly like the 400 gr. 416 bullet on Buffalo. I don't like Nosler partitions in below .270 caliber.
Opinions vary and I have as much hunting experience as anyone on this side of the big pond, and recognize that you also have that amount of experience...You don't like'em, Ross Seyfried loves them, I love them, and Phil Shoemaker likes X bullets, so there ya go...Different strokes for different folks.
I believe the biggest mistake that hunters make in judging bullets is to use the bullet maker as the criteria for judging bullets...It just won't work.
IMO some bullet makers make the best 277 bullets or 308 bullets and another maker may make the best 416 or 375 bullet..thus the constant conflict...
I love the 130 gr. Speer in the .284 cal. but don't particularly like Speer bullets in general..the same applies to the 250 gr. Sierra 375 bullet, its a real dandy killer and performs to perfection, but IMO most Sierra bullets suck! As I said, I love Noslers but only in .277 cal and up. I love the old 75 gr. Barnes X in my 6x45, but have had many failures with Barnes X...I don't like the very popular Swift bullets as I believe them to ball up too smooth, stop on the offside skin and sometimes leave me with a long trail and no blood, but only on plainsgame, as they seem to work well on buffalo???? There are just so many varibles when it comes to bullets that I doubt if any of us will really know who is right or wrong, if any of us are.
The point I am trying to make and some may disagree is that I like certain bullets and the maker means nothing to me, I only judge the bullet itself...I have never seen this in print btw..
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Ray, that may be the most sense any of us have made on bullets on the Internet . I have to say -- I have never tried Partitions in any caliber over .284. You have just jarred some scales loose from my hardened thinking... I have had wonderful success with Speer boattails and Grand Slams in .257, .277, and .284 diameters. Good results with the old Speer GS's in the Whelen -- but we know what the marketeers did to that bullet. I like TSX's really well, in 6.5, .284 and .338. They shoot well in my .375 Ruger, but I haven't punched anything with one yet. But you are ever so right -- it does frequently vary by bullet within a manufacturer's lineup. Hmmm...might have to rethink Partitions in .338 and up... Thanks...that is a very thought-provoking post. Dennis
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,930
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,930 |
Ray, Muledeer( John) - as opposed to muledeer without capitalization (Dennis)- also loves the Nosler Partitions - as do I. In fact I have killed a lot more game with partitions than X bullets and the newer large bore partitions typically penetrate as deep as x bullets. they are just not as environmentally friendly and you know what a PC, sensitive type guy I am.
Phil Shoemaker Alaska Master Guide, Alaska Hunter Ed Instructor FAA Master pilot www.grizzlyskinsofalaska.comAnyone who claims the 30-06 is not effective has either not used one, or else is unwittingly commenting on their marksmanship.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,398
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,398 |
Ray,
Can you elaborate on the "screw machine" Noslers, please? Are you referring to "screw presses," which Nosler uses a lot on their current production? They've been updated to use computer controls to allow an operator to work more than one machine, but they're still screw presses.
But maybe I've missed the point?
Edited to say: the lead wire itself for the bullets are formed from a hydraulic press.
Last edited by Jaywalker; 02/10/09.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
Clearly they are not equal bullets, nor would I use them interchangeably. And while the Speer is probably best used as a longer distance elk type bullet on the heavy end of things, I have no doubt that it would work just fine on bear or moose in many cases as well. That said, I can't imagine why I'd go moose or bear hunting with it when I could just as easily choose the Nosler instead.
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 19,722
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 19,722 |
Clearly they are not equal bullets, nor would I use them interchangeably. And while the Speer is probably best used as a longer distance elk type bullet on the heavy end of things, I have no doubt that it would work just fine on bear or moose in many cases as well. That said, I can't imagine why I'd go moose or bear hunting with it when I could just as easily choose the Nosler instead. I don't think I'd try the Speer on large bear. But on Moose come on my Aunt and Uncle used to stack them like cord wood with the 6MM Remington and 100 Core-Lokts� .
NRA Lifetime Member
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 89
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 89 |
In the H&H, any bullet will do meese! As for bears, most Alaskans I've met seem quite secure with a Super Blackhawk for protection.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 311
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 311 |
I tried Barnes X once for brown bear, it worked in 350 grain flavor in .416 Taylor. I tried Nosler Partition in 9.3x62, 286 grain flavor on black bear. The X bullet broke the off side shoulder on the brown bear and exited. The Partition didn't exit that I could find on the black bear. Heavier Nosler Partitions are supposed to have heavier jackets, yet I have this puzzle I have no solution for. I like the .375 diameter Speer 300 grain BTSP for long range use, on paper targets. With the experince of those who post here, I think I'll keep them for elk or moose hunting.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,494
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 20,494 |
Have absolutely no idea why anyone "needs" a 0.375" bullet for moose when a 0.308" bullet works so well. At moderate velocities, I have found that Hornady Interlocks worked fine, but when the speed goes over 3K, a tougher design can be more useful. Partitions work good, the TSX seems to do the trick for me, and I have found them to hold a little tighter groups in my rifles. Wonderful to have so many great bullets at our disposal.
"Keep thy heart with all diligence; for out of it are the issues of life." (Prov 4:23) Brother Keith
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,491 |
....and mooses have bigger and harder bones and greater size in general than do the bears on average, so....what was the question again? Partitions are never a poor answer though!
Sometimes, the air you 'let in'matters less than the air you 'let out'.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,954 |
Dennis, The 210 Nosler .338 will out penetrate the Nosler 250 gr. in the .338...I suppose because it is going faster and the partition works at both weights or perhaps the 210 partition blows off, but what ever the case the 210 Nosler is an awesome bullet in the .338 IMO...The 300 gr. Woodleigh is a real tough cookie to beat, its a hammer on anything and you get a lot of pass throughs with it, and the ones recovered are about like a baseball..I am not fond of the 225 Nosler as its neither fish nor fowl..The 250 Nosler will give you pretty mushrooms and does a pretty good job on anything, it may not penetrate like the 210 but it certainly does the job. Some folks like a bullet to expand all its energy in the animal and some like two holes..I personally lean towards two holes, but have seen some fantastic kills when a bullet stops on the off side skin..
|
|
|
|
393 members (10Glocks, 007FJ, 160user, 1lesfox, 10ring1, 12344mag, 32 invisible),
1,998
guests, and
1,136
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,391
Posts18,469,863
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|