Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Congress woman Gabby Giifords has been shot.

I for one would be, this is not the way to run a railroad, that and the fact innocent bystanders were also killed or injured.

This IS NOT the way a republic is run. It IS the way 3rd world chit holes are.

I'm no lawyer but I thought SC nominees only needed Senate approval. I could be wrong...

isaac, don't lawyers have a saying about bad facts make for bad law? Judicial devotion to Stare-Decisis seems to come and go. Rick

I believe you are right.

Again Barak taxes is not extortion. Read the Bible again or does Jesus' words pertaining to taxes not apply to you?

Yes, actually I would. This type of action isn't warranted and only makes our case IRT firearms ownership, and liberty in general, harder to defend. It opens too many doors justifying increased scrutiny and limits on the people in an era that has seen too many abrogations of our freedom already. We have a method for changing things, and it was given good use this November, but it seems too slow and in the wrong direction for some. Newton's Third Law applies here, and the reaction to this incident may be very detrimental to our freedoms.

Barak,

Then come right out and say you were wrong and that there is NO justification for taking a pistol and blowing this woman's brains out. None.

The exercise of her constitutional duty to collect and spend tax money? No. The use of the rule of law to collect tax money? No.

You can't have it both ways Barak. Either this is evil from an unbalanced mind or it is not. There is no justification for evil and you have repeatedly tried to come up with one.

Will

I read it again. Where does he say it's not extortion?

� while so many others have become so proud of being insensitive �

+1. Could not have said it better. Look for all manner of proposed new gun restrictions at the Federal level. Please note I said proposed.

Where does he say it is?
He said pay your taxes. He didn't say pay your taxes only if you agree with government.

So would I.

yep

That would be me. I take a certain pride in not giving a dam about what befalls a politician.


Innocent bystanders,..yes. Politicians,..not so much.


Of course, people in general usually jade me which is why I live back in the woods.

Fox just interviewed a Dr that helped restrain the shooter. Sounded to me like the shooter was trying to change magazines when they restrained him. A woman grabbed the gun and magazine from his as three guys were on top of him.

He was shooing into a tight group of people.

Also heard that it was a Glock 19.

FWIW...

Some are just more subtle about it, makes them no less insensitive and perhaps more of a snake. Can't abide a snake

I'll say there was no justification, but I won't say that I was wrong, because I never said there was justification.


Go back and read some more.

I said very little at all about the shooter. The thing I said that took this whole thread off to the races was that the injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. The shooter didn't enter into that argument. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

My fictional support for the shooter was manufactured out of whole cloth as the quality folks all struggled desperately to be seen loudly condemning me for showing insufficient deference to the Almighty State (pbui).

What other folks do you put in the sub-human category?

Me too.

Matthew 22:15-22