Home
Just heard on the news that Tucson Congress woman "Gabby" Giffords has been shot while at an event in Tucson. Apparently several other people were shot as well. She is alive and at a hospital but nothing else has been said.
I wonder? She's been very active on closing the border. Could it be the cartels?
You can damn well bet the anti-gun people are gonna be on a roll with this.
Paul B.
That sucks...
Sounds bad,..

http://www.npr.org/2011/01/08/132764367/congresswoman-shot-in-arizona
"shot in the head" doesn't sound good.

Sycamore
Reports indicate that the shooter was caught almost immediately.

Be interesting to find out who he is.
Just looked on Democratic Underground and people there are blaming the tea party.

Talk about some brain dead sumbitches.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Reports indicate that the shooter was caught almost immediately.

Be interesting to find out who he is.
Yes it will.
I'm guessing some latino punk who is out to make a name for himself rather than action by a cartel.

Hope she makes it.
Fox is saying 11 people shot
Originally Posted by Bristoe


Be interesting to find out who he is.


That's an understatement... the pot was already at full boil.

FYI, CNN is reporting a dozen people shot.
And only one hit her???
Originally Posted by TexasRick
And only one hit her???


Eyewitnesses are saying that the gunman rushed up and shot her point blank in the head.
checked again :
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/08/arizona-congresswoman-reportedly-shot-public-event/
Quote
Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot along with three of her aides by a gunman Saturday morning outside a grocery store in Tucson while holding a public event, Fox News has confirmed.

Twelve others were shot as well at Giffords' "Your Corner" event held at Safeway. The gunman is in custody.

Giffords was taken to a hospital but the condition of those shot was not immediately known, a senior congressional aide told Fox News.

The three staffers who were shot worked out of Giffords' Arizona office

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ortedly-shot-public-event/#ixzz1ATLu40M4
JHC...her assailant will be the headline and cause of so many theorized sub-plots that the simple fact he's a frikken,whacked out kid will be lost on many.
Just reported that she is dead. Damn shame.
She and 6 others killed!
Damn!

Prayers on the way for all those injured.
Can't imagine the blame game to come.
Prayers to the families!

Regardless of Political party this should never happen. She was good and bad, but she was still a person. This is senseless, cowardess and stupid.

Idiots!
Originally Posted by dennisinaz
She and 6 others killed!
She died? Wow! Tragic.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
Just looked on Democratic Underground and people there are blaming the tea party.

Talk about some brain dead sumbitches.


The anti-tea party cook remarks are all over the place from mental midgets leaping to the rather astonishing conclusions that Rush and Palin are to blame.

Everyone prematurely guessing at the identity and motives of the shooter -- based soley on their own warped libtard ideology -- is sickening.

There is apparantly no limit to the utter stupidity and classless invective of our citizenry...
Hence the reason I think there is no return. Too many dumbphucks, but I'll continually kick them till my last breath.


Again, crying shame and this should never happen but you can't stop one retard intent on harm.
Quote
Congresswoman, 6 Others, Killed By Gunman


Quote
Giffords was married to astronaut Mark Kelly, a veteran of Desert Storm. They have two children.
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
Can't imagine the blame game to come.


cnn replies to the story are full of the blame game posts frown

My prayers are with the famillies of the victims.
MSNBC is asking all witnessess if a semi auto was used or not.
I can bet that new guns laws are going to be blamed, semi auto's are going to be blamed. Expect new gun laws and changes to take place.

Stupid People need to get their head out of their a$$es and realize shootings and killings do nothing!

RIP Mrs. Giffords and others that time was ended too soon!

Kique
As for those classless people getting exersize jumping to their own conclusion and spouting their ideology, they are a product of anonimity on the internet. Too easy to make statements here on the net than to have to look someone in the eyes and make such foolish statements.
The real sad part about these statements, there are people out there clueless enough to believe what they read here.
Just awfull.

We all will be subject to endless finger pointing and hysterical accusations from the talking idiots in office and media.

God speed to all involved.
Aw geeze.
This is not good for our country.
I heard a child was killed also. I don't understand
Fox is saying the assasin was shot by security guards but is still alive.
what is this f@#$ing world coming too.
Quote
2:34 p.m. ET: As we said earlier, when news is breaking fast there's often conflicting information. While NPR, Fox and CNN all report being told by sheriff's officials that Giffords has died, MSNBC is saying it has been told she is still live.
A UMC staff member is saying she is alive and in surgery.
Quote
2:37 p.m. ET: KOLD-TV in Tucson reports it has been told by hospital officials that Giffords is alive and in surgery.


http://www.kold.com/Global/story.asp?S=13807790
Originally Posted by Steelhead
I heard a child was killed also. I don't understand


Dirt bags, is my guess...never a good thing.
Fox has reported the wound was indeed fatal.
Fox has just reported she is ALIVE.
Check current headline.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Fox has just reported she is ALIVE.


Still alive per Fox News.
Quote
Posted: Jan 08, 2011 12:04 PM Updated: Jan 08, 2011 12:39 PM
(Source: CNN) (Source: CNN)
Click image to enlarge

TUCSON, AZ (RNN) -U.S. Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords, D-AZ, was shot at point-blank range at a public event in Tucson, AZ.

Seven people were injured and four were killed in the incident.

According to Darci Slaten, University Medical Center public affairs officer, Gifford's death has not been confirmed.

"She is alive and in surgery right now," Slaten said.

Earlier, CNN and Fox News had both confirmed Giffords' death.
The third-term congresswoman was reportedly shot in the head, according to the "Tucson Citizen."

The shooting happened just after 10 a.m. at the Safeway on Ina and Oracle, Pima County Sheriff's Department spokesman Jason Ogan said.

The injured were taken to University Medical Center (UMC) in Tucson.

Darci Slaten confirmed that five to seven patients have been admitted.

Slaten said there were four fatalities, but would not confirm the identities.

Representative Giffords, D-Arizona, has served Arizona's eighth district in Congress since 2007.
Still saying she's alive and critical. Hope for the time being the bastard that shot her is too. Can you use gasoline on a waterboard?
This FOX headline still up,though.Regardless, of course I hope I'm wrong.


URGENT: Democrat Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Ariz. Fatally Shot
I am watching Tucson ABC affiliate Channel 9 on the shootings. According to them, there is no official report of any fatalities. There is also a report of a news conference at University Medical Center at 1:30. The station also just reported that according to ABC News, Congresswoman Giffords is still alive in critical condition.

TT
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.

Iphones are great when you are out and about.
PIO of UMC saying that she was shot in the head. Didn't say that she was dead. CNN
UMC staff lady on CNN still saying she is alive. Comfirmed 1 child was also shot.
PIO UMC: She's still in surgery. Others injured in surgery.
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.



She had a D rating from both NRA and GOA, not sure how pro 2nd Amendment she was, although she supported doing away with the D.C. ban.

She voted for Obamacare, Repealing Don't ask, Don't tell and the Dream Act.

So she was really all over the map and only moderate on a few issues.

Also she has a 100% grade from NARAL. She is big time Pro Choice, NOT Pro Life.
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.


Dang shame. frown We need more like her.

I hope the perpetrator succumbs to any injuries he received.
Hospital rep on TV now. Fox News
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.





She had a D rating from both NRA and GOA, not sure how pro 2nd Amendment she was, although she supported doing away with the D.C. ban.

She voted for Obamacare, Repealing Don't ask, Don't tell and the Dream Act.

So she was really all over the map and only moderate on a few issues.


Who cares about her freaking politics right now...for the love of God! 12-13 people were shot. Politics doesn't matter, IMHO, human life does.
Kids, Fed. Judge, Congresswoman, civilians...what has it come to???
Reports said he 'shouted something'...

Lemme guess: Allah Akbar...

This whole thing is terrible.. You can bet the libbies will be calling for tons more 'gun control', if not out an out Marshall Law..
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Gabby_Giffords.htm

Damn shame. It'll be interesting to see who the punk was.
It is a damn shame, I don't care what her politics are. She is also a wife and mother.

Prayers for all the victims & their families.
Originally Posted by Pugs
http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Gabby_Giffords.htm

Damn shame. It'll be interesting to see who the punk was.



Yes it will, bet they keep that underwraps as long as they can, if the old boy is "not" white.
Originally Posted by T LEE
It is a damn shame, I don't care what her politics are. She is also a wife and mother.

Prayers for all the victims & their families.


EXACTLY MY POINT! She is a human and politics are just bullschitt right about now! Say your prayers!
Originally Posted by fatjack34
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.





She had a D rating from both NRA and GOA, not sure how pro 2nd Amendment she was, although she supported doing away with the D.C. ban.

She voted for Obamacare, Repealing Don't ask, Don't tell and the Dream Act.

So she was really all over the map and only moderate on a few issues.


Who cares about her freaking politics right now...for the love of God! 12-13 people were shot. Politics doesn't matter, IMHO, human life does.
Kids, Fed. Judge, Congresswoman, civilians...what has it come to???


Get a grip. How many people will this chick have killed by being a Pro Abortion nut and voting for Obamacare which will kill people.

The Truth should always matter.

How many troops have died in Afghanistan in the past couple months because of this Administration and these [bleep] Democrats? I care far more about them.
She is alive. One of her aides was killed. Twelve to fifteen people shot, is the latest word. The earliest reports are of a twenty-something Latino being the shooter. I have no confirmation on the latter-it is just tentative.
My Sister and BIL live less than 2 miles from there. Prayers sent to all!
She had a pretty tough stance on illegals and even called for the National Guard to help out down there. If there is a link to this shooting, this might be a wake up call for this Country.
Fox reports that a bystander returned fire.
Originally Posted by Foxbat

Get a grip. How many people will this chick have killed by being a Pro Abortion nut and voting for Obamacare which will kill people.

The Truth should always matter.

How many troops have died in Afghanistan in the past couple months because of this Administration and these [bleep] Democrats? I care far more about them.


wow!
They just reported that she is responding to commands.
If she pulls through she has isaac to thank for it.
OMG.....you're incorrigible!! TFF too!
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by Foxbat

Get a grip. How many people will this chick have killed by being a Pro Abortion nut and voting for Obamacare which will kill people.

The Truth should always matter.

How many troops have died in Afghanistan in the past couple months because of this Administration and these [bleep] Democrats? I care far more about them.


wow!


Exactly what I thought...could not even respond to it. WOW!
Reports are tentative on the Latino shooter. I have no idea of their accuracy. Lots of libnuts going crazed on the 'net.
ABC saying the shooter is a Caucasian in his twenty's.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Originally Posted by Foxbat

Get a grip. How many people will this chick have killed by being a Pro Abortion nut and voting for Obamacare which will kill people.

The Truth should always matter.

How many troops have died in Afghanistan in the past couple months because of this Administration and these [bleep] Democrats? I care far more about them.


wow!


Don't worry Sycamore, the shooter will turn out to be an Illegal Alien and you leftists can cry that it was a senseless death that could have been averted if we didn't have guns, not because we've got 14 million illegals running around killing people every day.
Death and taxes have nothing on certainty compared to your predictions.
Vet
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
She is alive. One of her aides was killed. Twelve to fifteen people shot, is the latest word. The earliest reports are of a twenty-something Latino being the shooter. I have no confirmation on the latter-it is just tentative.
Sounds like a Tea Party guy, for sure. smirk
Just heard that also.
Originally Posted by denton
Fox reports that a bystander returned fire.
That could pan out well.
Some deaths are more certain,quicker and unexpected than others,too!
Now saying it was a Afghanistan vet.

I personally think they are running in circles and need to slow down and FIND OUT.
Originally Posted by fatjack34
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.





She had a D rating from both NRA and GOA, not sure how pro 2nd Amendment she was, although she supported doing away with the D.C. ban.

She voted for Obamacare, Repealing Don't ask, Don't tell and the Dream Act.

So she was really all over the map and only moderate on a few issues.


Who cares about her freaking politics right now...for the love of God! 12-13 people were shot. Politics doesn't matter, IMHO, human life does.
Kids, Fed. Judge, Congresswoman, civilians...what has it come to???


Ever consider that POLITICS may have been the motivation? Unfortunately nothing that has happened can be undone now.
i just hope it (the shooter) wasn't someone protesting that she wasn't enforcing Border Security in an effective manner.
Federal Judge killed
Fox: Federal judge John Roll killed in shooting.
Also a Federal Judge killed in the shooting.
Exactly, trying pretend politics aren't involved in a guaranteed politically motivated killing is beyond naive.

This wasn't a random act of violence.

She was killed because she was a politician. All that's unknown is what political position the shooter was pissed off by.
what a mess.
prayers for the victims and families.
Shooter had a white sounding name.
Jarrod something was the name FOX is putting out.
Jarrod Laffer/laffner something of the sort is the name going around on FOx 10 News
Originally Posted by Steve
Fox: Federal judge John Roll killed in shooting.


He had been under Marshalls protection for death threats a year or so ago for certifying a lawsuit against a Rancher by Illegal Aliens.
22 Year old white male according to Fox
Originally Posted by denton
Fox reports that a bystander returned fire.


Anyone heard from Crossfire?
Originally Posted by Enrique
Jarrod Laffer/laffner something of the sort is the name going around on FOx 10 News


Knew a guy named Bob Smith - from Puerto Rico. What will interest me is if the guy is allowed to live long enough to give a statement.
I'm not going to say ANYTHING about this, until things settle down a bit,....and there are some clear denominators.

At this time this is all conjectural "Talking Head" chatter,...........

GTC
Scanned through the thread and have a couple of comments. I bet the shooter is a left wing loon or a hispanic, or both.

The other thing I have seen no mention of is the draconic gun control laws they are going to shove down our throats, because of this shooting.

You know "Never let a good crisis go to waste"....
Was shooter shot?
Obama has been salivating for his own McVeigh....
UMC DR. says child died.
UMC chief Surgeon saying 1 or 10 died at UMC and was a child. 5 in critical care and 5 in Surgery. Giffords has came out of surgery and He is expecting a recovery. She was shot thru the brain.
Quote
He is expecting a recovery.


Some of the better news of terrible event.
A democrat who supported stronger border security and the 2nd amendment. Too bad there aren't more like her.
LINK to Fox story
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by denton
Fox reports that a bystander returned fire.
That could pan out well.


Here's our very OWN

Talking [bleep] Head,.....

not saying anything,.....

noise and chatter more then adequate......and clearly a new form of masturbation.

GTC
This is terrible but I'll say this, when our politicians repeatedly show themselves to not only be unresponsive but downright hostile to the will of the people, this is the kind of thing that will happen. There are lots and lots of crazy people out there and politics will make them even crazier.
What will of the people was Giffords hostile towards as it related to this specific shooter POS?
Text from a You Tube video discusses Conscience dreaming. A 22 year old nut job, period.
Tend to agree with Cossatotjoe_redux, sad but probably very true.
radio in Arizona reporting 10 at the hospital, 5 in critical condition, including Giffords, Giffords was "shot through and through" the brain, is in critical condition, and the surgeon says the next 24 hours will tell the tale.

Also, one child and one federal judge are stated to have died.

Sycamore
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Text from a You Tube video discusses Conscience dreaming. A 22 year old nut job, period.


Scott....right the [bleep] on with that summation!
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
A democrat who supported stronger border security and the 2nd amendment. Too bad there aren't more like her.


It would appear that she was AGAINST Arizona SB 1070.
Originally Posted by isaac
What will of the people was Giffords hostile towards as it related to this specific shooter POS?


I'm just speaking in general. People are pissed. In my county, the last election wiped out all the encumbants and put Republicans in offices THAT HAD NEVER, in the 175 year history of the county been held by Republicans. When people are pissed, the crazies do stuff like this. Expect more of it as things get worse.
[Updated at 4:07 p.m. ET] Rep. Gabriella Gifford is in critical condition and a young child has died after a shooting at a political meeting at an Arizona grocery store, a hospital spokesman said Saturday.

Gifford, who was hosting the event, is under anesthesia after undergoing surgery for a single gunshot wound to the head, said Dr. Peter Rhee, Trauma Director at the University Medical Center in Tucson.

"The Congresswoman is not deceased. She is in critical condition," Rhee said in a press conference. "I am very optimistic about recovery."
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
This is terrible but I'll say this, when our politicians repeatedly show themselves to not only be unresponsive but downright hostile to the will of the people, this is the kind of thing that will happen. There are lots and lots of crazy people out there and politics will make them even crazier.


You look like a pretty good verifier of your own thesis there, Buck,.....

Another talking head,......all [bleep] ego and noise,.....and not a goddam lick of sense.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
This is terrible but I'll say this, when our politicians repeatedly show themselves to not only be unresponsive but downright hostile to the will of the people, this is the kind of thing that will happen. There are lots and lots of crazy people out there and politics will make them even crazier.


You look like a pretty good verifier of your own thesis there, Buck,.....

Another talking head,......all [bleep] ego and noise,.....and not a goddam lick of sense.

GTC


Right, you're the one always raising hell about one thing or another and barely speaking English to boot.

I'm saying nothing more controversial than that there are lot of pissed off people out there right now and some of them are crazy.
I understand your pitch but was Giffords the first person shot? Was she even the intended primary target?

And, a 22 year old psycho is hardly the political victim and he certainly is not a credible spokesperson or arbiter for the will of the people being downtrodden by politicians.
Foxbat,

I don't presume you are a moron, just because you have posted some dumb things today. They were so dumb even I won't bother refuting them.

Giffords is probably the most moderate of the Democrat Congressman in Arizona. If she is replaced, it WILL be by someone more liberal. She is the wife of an active duty service member. She is moderate for her District.

I NEVER thought I'd see the day when a Democratic Tucson congressman stuck up for the Second Amendment.

Sycamore
Originally Posted by isaac
I understand your pitch but was Giffords the first person shot? Was she even the intended primary target?

And, a 22 year old psycho is hardly the political victim and he certainly is not a credible spokesperson or arbiter for the will of the people being downtrodden by politicians.


I didn't say he was. He is crazy, obviously, but the overall mood of the country is extremely pissed right now. When the mood is like that, crazy people get crazier.
Originally Posted by isaac
I understand your pitch but was Giffords the first person shot? Was she even the intended primary target?

And, a 22 year old psycho is hardly the political victim and he certainly is not a credible spokesperson or arbiter for the will of the people being downtrodden by politicians.


True, it may have been the judge....

If you watch the purported Youtube made by the shooter, it is mainly aimed at Government control and repeatedly refers to controlling ones own currency and using gold instead of U.S. currency.

IF this is really his, it is going to be spun right at the Tea Party by the left.

http://shortformblog.com/culture/jared-loughner-youtube-videos/
WOW I was on facebook and "Texans for Arizona's New Immigration Law" posted a youtube clip the nut job posted. He has issues and is a nutbag!
Get a Rope!
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by isaac
I understand your pitch but was Giffords the first person shot? Was she even the intended primary target?

And, a 22 year old psycho is hardly the political victim and he certainly is not a credible spokesperson or arbiter for the will of the people being downtrodden by politicians.


True, it may have been the judge....

If you watch the purported Youtube made by the shooter, it is mainly aimed at Government control and repeatedly refers to controlling ones own currency and using gold instead of U.S. currency.

IF this is really his, it is going to be spun right at the Tea Party by the left.

http://shortformblog.com/culture/jared-loughner-youtube-videos/


Oh yeah, get ready for it. It will be open season on the Tea Party.
They name the shooter on Drudge,..as Jared Laughner.

This is supposedly his Youtube page, don't know if it's legit. Bunch of rambling.....

[b][color:#3333FF]Ramblings[/color][/b]
Fox News currently saying his "favorite books" Mein Kompf" -Hitler; "Communist Manifesto".
Last post on "MySpace" was "Goodbye friends".

Sounds like a nut job for sure.

He was upset about our currency not being backed by gold, and the "illiteracy of the people in district 8".
I read that he was on Hawkeye's twitter account.
Originally Posted by Sycamore
Foxbat,

I don't presume you are a moron, just because you have posted some dumb things today. They were so dumb even I won't bother refuting them.

Giffords is probably the most moderate of the Democrat Congressman in Arizona. If she is replaced, it WILL be by someone more liberal. She is the wife of an active duty service member. She is moderate for her District.

I NEVER thought I'd see the day when a Democratic Tucson congressman stuck up for the Second Amendment.

Sycamore


And all I pointed out initially was that the poster claiming she was conservative and pro life and pro gun was wrong according to her actual votes on the issues.

Being the wife of an active duty serviceman didn't stop her from voting to put queers in the military.

People are trying to make her a martyr that was against illegals and pro gun. Both are not truthful, she voted for the damn Dream Act. She was all over the map.

If she was pro gun how did she get "D" ratings from both the GOA and NRA?
He obviously crazy as a loon, but the reality is, this opportunity will not be wasted by the left.
It's pretty sad when they report that she is DEAD and then the surgeon gets up and says that she is alive, has one gunshot wound to the head and he is "optimistic" of her recovery. The Doc actually looked like he believed what he was saying so what a stretch that these jokers said she was dead and family had to hear that when, in fact, it wasn't true!!!
Quote
By TERRY TANG and AMANDA LEE MYERS, Associated Press Terry Tang And Amanda Lee Myers, Associated Press � 19 mins ago

TUCSON, Ariz. � Rep. Gabrielle Giffords of Arizona was shot in the head Saturday when an assailant opened fire outside a grocery store during a meeting with constituents, killing a 9-year-old boy and a federal judge and wounding several others in a rampage that rattled the nation.

Giffords was among at least 10 people wounded, and the hospital said her outlook was "optimistic" and that she was responding to commands from doctors. The hospital said a 9-year-old child was among the killed, and a U.S. Marshal said a federal judge was also fatally shot in the attack.

Giffords spokesman C.J. Karamargin said an unspecified number of her staff members were injured in the shooting. Congressional officials said an aide to the Democrat was killed, but few details were released about the staff members.

Police say the shooter was in custody, and was identified by people familiar with the investigation as Jared Loughner, 22. Pima County Sheriff's officials said he used a pistol to carry out the rampage. U.S. officials who provided his name to the AP spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to release it publicly.
Oh good, the TSA is helping in the investigation....
Unfortunately but predictably, this will be spun far beyond what it likely is, the random act of a deranged individual. Whether he is a right wing nut job or a left wing nut job, or whatever, his mental condition is the key factor, not his politics. The content of somebody's delusional system can be anything, political or otherwise. Think about John Hinkley's obsession with Jodie Foster.

Prayers for the victims and their loved ones.

Paul
Honestly, I don't know why anyone is shocked. Do you not remember how mad people were at those townhall meetings for healthcare reform? I suspect that at some of those things, but for security goons, some of those congressmen would have been beaten up by a mob at the very least, people were so mad.

But this is just terrible all the way around for lots and lots of different reasons.
AP has the 22 year old gunman identified as Jared Laughner.
Fox News reported, also, that someone in the audience fired on the suspect.
She seems like a decent person and an honest politician. This is a terrible thing on many levels, as she was doing what a good representative should be...meeting the people and listening to them.

On another level, this will only serve to further shrink our rights and give fodder to those who are hell-bent on controlling society, all the while rationalizing it by using incidents like this as prime examples of why they are right, and we need to be guided and controlled.

My thoughts are with the good lady, and I hope for the day we hear of her recovery. We also need to remember the fate of the injured and those who passed today.
Originally Posted by POC
Fox News reported, also, that someone in the audience fired on the suspect.


....In Arizona,....WTH else would you expect ?

Locally this is no clearer then it is Nationally,....the cracks about whether "Gabby" supported 1070 or not are both RUDE, Misdirected, and intrusive,....CHEAP SHOTS !.....at a time when we should ALL be praying for her recovery.

GTC

Originally Posted by NWPA
AP has the 22 year old gunman identified as Jared Laughner.


Yep, that's his name. You should check out his youtube page and his facebook page. The boy is more than half a bubble off of plumb.

www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10
Originally Posted by Enrique
WOW I was on facebook and "Texans for Arizona's New Immigration Law" posted a youtube clip the nut job posted. He has issues and is a nutbag!
Get a Rope!


Probably wouldn't even make the top 5 for Kook of the Year on here.
Never have Heller and McDonald been more important.

The craziness this lunacy will trigger will be staggering.
Live updates from Giffords press conference

* Story
* Comments

Live updates from Giffords press conference

Becky Pallack/Arizona Daily Star Arizona Daily Star | Posted: Saturday, January 8, 2011 1:37 pm | Comments

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

*
*

University Medical Center is hosting a press conference for the official word on the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords and several of her supporters this morning.

Trauma surgeon Peter Rhee called the situation a catastrophe. He said UMC received 10 patients and one child who is dead. Five are in critical condition and five are in surgery, he said.

The congresswoman is in critical condition. Neurosurgeons have finished operating on her after she was shot through the head one time. Rhee is optimistic about her condition because she was able to follow commands.

Giffords will go into the intensive care unit.

Rhee did not release information about any of the other patients.

Mayor Bob Walkup called it a "grave tragedy" for Tucson, Arizona and the nation. He asked people to pray. He said those who died won't be forgotten.

The Tucson Police Department is supporting the Pima County Sheriff's Department investigation, Walkup said.

Walkup spoke to Giffords' father and told him his family has Tucson's prayers, he said. Giffords' father was overcome with emotion, said Walkup, tearfully.

TPD Chief Roberto Villase�or said TPD has secured the offices and residences of Giffords and other federal officials as a precaution, although there was no information of a threat.

University of Arizona president Robert Shelton said he sends his thoughts and prayers to the families. He acknowledged the good work of law enforcement and medical professionals.
Originally Posted by mike762
Originally Posted by NWPA
AP has the 22 year old gunman identified as Jared Laughner.


Yep, that's his name. You should check out his youtube page and his facebook page. The boy is more than half a bubble off of plumb.

www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10


Just looked at the youtube stuff,....sounds very disjointed,...clinically schizo kinda stuff.
He owns nunchucks also.
Sounded a little like Hawkeye or similar
Originally Posted by mike762


That dude is wacked out of his skull.

Brian.
It would appear so.
Originally Posted by Enrique
WOW I was on facebook and "Texans for Arizona's New Immigration Law" posted a youtube clip the nut job posted. He has issues and is a nutbag!
Get a Rope!


If he has truly killed a child a rope is too good for him. Only truly sadistic and or insane folks kill children. They will spin this politically for sure but the bottom line will always be this person is a mental case...
Brain Damage from Summer Temperatures / Sun is not uncommon here,....

I'm glad he didn't start in on "International Bankers"

GTC
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Never have Heller and McDonald been more important.

The craziness this lunacy will trigger will be staggering.


That sir is for sure and for certain...
One doesn't need to know anything about the shooter know he's a nut job, other than his actions today, it needs no reinforcement.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by mike762


That dude is wacked out of his skull.

Brian.


No doubt...
What he did is proof enough ain't it?
Originally Posted by Steelhead
What he did is proof enough ain't it?


Watching his videos are proof that he suffers from severe Schizophrenia. Dude makes John Hinkley look normal in comparison.

Brian.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
What he did is proof enough ain't it?

+1 the proof is in the pudding. Prayers sent to the victims and families.
the suspect appears to be in custody.

hopefully he'll be better protected by the Custodians than the Kennedy Assasin was.
Trying to get the latest "update" puts the "program" into an endless loop,....

this is the Headline,....that won't download it's "Update"

U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords's outlook is "optimistic," but 5 die, including a judge and a child. � Obama sends FBI director
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_congresswoman_shot
So,....when you "Open" that it doesn't do a little dance, and go back to previous pages ?

That's DAMN sure what it does here,....on Qwest DSL,.....

GTC
From his own page per mike7.62...dude's favorite books. Doesn't sound very conservative or right-wing to me. More like a college hanger-on whackjob nutcase.

Animal Farm, Brave New World, The Wizard Of OZ, Aesop Fables, The Odyssey, Alice Adventures Into Wonderland, Fahrenheit 451, Peter Pan, To Kill A Mockingbird, We The Living, Phantom Toll Booth, One Flew Over The Cuckoo's Nest, Pulp,Through The Looking Glass, The Communist Manifesto, Siddhartha, The Old Man And The Sea, Gulliver's Travels, Mein Kampf, The Republic, and Meno.
It ain't qwest - mine does it too.

Might be an old page or something.

Either way for a young kid to do this - well it's screwed up. Sad day. Prayers for the family's

Spot
Palins website had a gunsite on Giffords district...that ain't gonna go over good.

http://www.talksy.com/83221/the-pal...gabrielle-gifford-s-district-is-down-now
Odds are, and just saying, that at least some of the shooting victimes weren't hit by the nutcase, but by security and possibly civilians in the crowd.

Not that it minimizes anything, and definitely not the gravity of Rep. Giffords' condition nor the loss of life, but it certainly could compound and add complexity to the situation.
already talking gun control on fox
This is already about the bad right wingers , tea party and Palin. No real info but lots of bs . Yes it will be about gun control as well.
How many people think that some sick progressives in district 8 are toasting to the death of a Bush appointed judge?
A seriously mentally ill man shot some people.

Whatever "motive" he may have had came from the other side of the rabbit hole.

He's just a nut. That's all there is to say about it.
I hope none of the dead or wounded were hit by a citizen returning fire.
That would add a lot of problems.
Now FOX is saying they have no records of the guy being a veteran- go figure that rumor would be leak immediately without confirmation.
Originally Posted by Bristoe
A seriously mentally ill man shot some people.

And a politician and a judge too--don't forget them.
Photos of alleged shooter
http://gallery.pictopia.com/azstar/gallery/102269/photo/8842226/?o=12

http://twitpic.com/3o8ajp/full
Originally Posted by Bristoe
A seriously mentally ill man shot some people.

Whatever "motive" he may have had came from the other side of the rabbit hole.

He's just a nut. That's all there is to say about it.

===========

Yes sir!
I doubt the guy is in ANY way connected to any right wing, tea party or Military organization.

The video on Youtube of him burning a US flag is pretty much a dead giveaway.

The reading material he lists is also a clue.

I'm betting this guy is pretty much a lone nut-job.

From FoxNews off the punks web-site. This sounds a whole lot like a couple folks here. eek

edited - go find it if you like but it's scary
Originally Posted by jim62
I doubt the guy is in ANY way connected to any right wing, tea party or Military organization.

The video on Youtube of him burning a US flag is pretty much a dead giveaway.

The reading material he lists is also a clue.

I'm betting this guy is pretty much a lone nut-job.

Saw on TV that there is no evidence confirming he was a veteran.
CBS evening news reporting 19 shot instead of 10
Originally Posted by Pugs
From FoxNews off the punks web-site. This sounds a whole lot like a couple folks here.




Go join Democratic Underground and you can participate in the discussions that say he sounds like *everybody* on here.

The difference between you and them is only a matter of degree.
Originally Posted by Gus
the suspect appears to be in custody.

hopefully he'll be better protected by the Custodians than the Kennedy Assasin was.


Yeah, that was my first thought???

Eyewitness (an MD) account: Giffords was shot from about 2 feet away. Still, she was sitting up and was responsive. The witness describes Loughner as about 6 feet tall, 150 pounds. Witness denies that anyone returned fire. One of Gifford's aides tackled the shooter, several of them separated him from his firearm and held him down, while a female bystander removed the magazine from the weapon. Hope she cleared the chamber as well.
He certainly doesn't have the look of your typical pro gun person.
My buddy just called me, his buddy's buddy in LE in AZ said the shooter used a Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.
Gifford was hit in the temple and the the bullet exited her forhead. Man, she was lucky!

JD338
Originally Posted by JD338
Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.


A 30 round clip on a Glock? I've never heard of such a thing.

Brian.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by JD338
Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.


A 30 round clip on a Glock? I've never heard of such a thing.

Brian.


http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/MAG258-36.html
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by JD338
Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.


A 30 round clip on a Glock? I've never heard of such a thing.

Brian.


Well that's 'cause you're from Kali whistle where they are illegal.
Here is a twenty five rounder for a .45 cal.

http://www.thegunsource.com/item/43135_Scherer_High_Capacity_Magazine_SCHERER_MAG_GLOCK_45ACP_E.aspx
Palin listed Giffords' seat as one of the top "targets" in the midterm elections because of the lawmakers' support for the health care law.

"For example, we're on Sarah Palin's targeted list, but the thing is, that the way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they have to realize that there are consequences to that action," Giffords said in an interview with msnbc.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Msnbc makes Sarah Palin sound like a killer..Shocker huh -this came from my yahoo homepage.
My prayers go out to all those involved and their family's. This isn't the way to go about making changes, but like so many others I'm wondering what the after effects of this is going to be...

A federal judge is supposed to make a ruling on California's AB962 on the 18th...

Hope that judge isn't going to take this creeps action and use it against us.



Phil
twitter here

Comments from someone who knew him: Pothead, reclusive, obsessed with the 2012 prophecy, very liberal, very left wing, suffered a severe bout of alcohol poisoning.
Originally Posted by ColeYounger


Interesting. Thank ya kindly.

Brian.
I think all sides need to tone down the rhetoric that just feeds these wackos. I understand that the shooter�s favorite book is Mein Kampf and that he exhibited paranoid tendencies on a web site..

In any event, the possibility of additional gun restriction is looming - perhaps in the form of capacity limits, semi-auto limits, competency (and psychological) tests for purchasers), restrictions on CCW, etc. I certainly hope there are no serious calls for such, but they are possible.

Originally Posted by denton
twitter here

Comments from someone who knew him: Pothead, reclusive, obsessed with the 2012 prophecy, very liberal, very left wing, suffered a severe bout of alcohol poisoning.


Interesting. She was also known for liberal leanings also - better health care, higher veterans beneifts, improved Medicare.
LE is having a news conference in about 8 minutes...
This person seems to be just like the Fort Hood shooter.
Except he is not Muslim.
More like the VT shooter,I think. One isolated incident committed by some delusional paranoid or schizophrenic who has been a walking incendiary device since the Dems started moving back to center.
sheriff stuck it to the media outlets.
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by fatjack34
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Originally Posted by 470Nitro
Giffords was pretty conservative in her views. She was pro Second Amendment, Pro border security and pro life. She just introduced a bill this week requiring Congress to take a pay cut.

She is married to CPT Mark Kelly, a Navy pilot, a Desert Storm veteran and an astronaut. Kelly was in the queue to pilot the next shuttle mission.





She had a D rating from both NRA and GOA, not sure how pro 2nd Amendment she was, although she supported doing away with the D.C. ban.

She voted for Obamacare, Repealing Don't ask, Don't tell and the Dream Act.

So she was really all over the map and only moderate on a few issues.


Who cares about her freaking politics right now...for the love of God! 12-13 people were shot. Politics doesn't matter, IMHO, human life does.
Kids, Fed. Judge, Congresswoman, civilians...what has it come to???


Get a grip. How many people will this chick have killed by being a Pro Abortion nut and voting for Obamacare which will kill people.

The Truth should always matter.

How many troops have died in Afghanistan in the past couple months because of this Administration and these [bleep] Democrats? I care far more about them.


you know, through the years i have seen posts by a lot of idiots on this forum, but you sir can go straight to hell. With my apologies to the administrator for that remark.
There were a lot of people killed today, a lot of people wounded in MY state. Giffords is a democrat, i am a conservative republican, so WHAT!
This stuff is not suppose to happen, particularly in my state.
Giffords was and is a pretty nice woman that often has views different than mine.
That does NOT mean these things are to happen.

dickweasel
I also am praying for Rep. Gilford's recovery. It makes no difference which letter follows her name (D or R), she is a victim. As for the alleged shooter, if it is who has been reported, he would appear to be mentally ill, based on his ramblings on You Tube, I would say he is neither left wing or right wing. Schizophrenia doesn't have political leanings. Everyone is a threat to a paranoid personality.
Originally Posted by denton
twitter here

Comments from someone who knew him: Pothead, reclusive, obsessed with the 2012 prophecy, very liberal, very left wing, suffered a severe bout of alcohol poisoning.


IF that's true, the mainstream media will cover it up like an outbreak of VD among the deacons. Their mantra will be -- as we're already seeing -- almost entirely anti-gun.
Seriously doubting that all the rounds that hit folks came from the nutjob's pistol, as one of the staffers said he was tackled VERY quickly, and one of the tacklers was the next guy in line to speak with the Congresswoman.
This is not looking like an easy ride,....

Best advice is to ignore FOOLS, and their beaking off, it has nothing to do with our own local situation.

I'd like to thank those who chased down the "Inside Skinny", and in this case Mike762 for these links. Best they be got back up......

Link: www.youtube.com/user/Classitup10

WATCH these, before they are taken down, would be my best advice.

Az. did NOT need , or want this,.....and I'd encourage all to remember that.
Eyewitness (an emergency room doc) I heard interviewed on Fox refuted any notion of a second shooter. Said the perp was the sole shooter and fired cooly and methodically for what he estimated to be 8 to 10 seconds before being tackled. Entirely plausible.
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by JD338
Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.


A 30 round clip on a Glock? I've never heard of such a thing.

Brian.


http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/MAG258-36.html
I have three of them, all made by Glock themselves.
Great RUMOR, but,....GOOD Hunters know how to wait

GTC


Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said Saturday evening that the man linked to the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and others might have an accomplice.

"We are not convinced he acted alone," Dupnik said at a news conference.

Dupnik said investigators have reason to believe the 22-year-old suspect whom he would not name came to the scene with someone else. "We have photos," Dupnik said of the gunman's companion.

Nate T. Grey, of the FBI, referred to bringing "those responsible" to justice.

Six people have now died in the attack, said Grey, who is in charge of the FBI office in Phoenix. Five people died at the scene and a 9-year-old girl died at a hospital, said Dupnik.

There was no security at the event, a meet-and-greet outside a Safeway on the northwest side, Grey said.

Two of the people who were wounded have not been identified by authorities, he said.

The surgeon is "cautiously optimistic" that Giffords "may survive," Dupnik said.

Federal Judge John Roll went to mass at Tucson's cathedral, as he did every Saturday, and on his way home decided to stop and say �hi' to Giffords, his friend, Dupnik said.

"He was at the wrong place at the wrong time," Dupnik said.

Dupnik called two people who tackled the gunman "were brave individuals, noting that the semi-automatic pistol still had ammunition when the gunman was taken into sheriff's custody.

He said the gunman was a subject of, "some police interest in the recent past," and he has made death threats in the past, but not toward Giffords. There was no reason to worry about the Giffords event in advance, he said. The attack started at 10:10 a.m. amid a crowd of about two dozen people.

The gunman might have planned to shoot himself, Dupnik told reporters.

Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by ColeYounger


Interesting. Thank ya kindly.

Brian.
Don't bother with them. Only the ones made by Glock are reliable.
through the years it has been very easy and not considered worthy of comment to approach elected officials.
as a very young boy when barry goldwater was first running for office, i sat on his lap with him on his horse in prescott.
When mccain first ran for office, he was hanging around at the square in prescott.
I would have NOT thought it possible for someone to do this in this state. Which i guess proves i am an old man and not in touch with the times.
Heck, you could write or call congressmen/women in this state and they would respond to you.

for that matter, my wife seems to remember rightly or wrongly that giffords was at a border rally this summer along the border.

by the way greg, this morning was up on a 4x4 road off the gila river. 80year in a jeep with his 50something daughter had a flat tire. We stopped to change it for him.
Would you believe upon us leaving this rather good looking woman grabbed by hand to shake it,then kissed my hand?
Must be the facial fur i sport.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
One doesn't need to know anything about the shooter know he's a nut job, other than his actions today, it needs no reinforcement.


Random murder of bystanders. Yeah, he shot a judge and congressman. That makes him a political assassin at best. Then shooting those just gathered around? That makes him a cowardly, bent, twisted, perverted sonofabitch on nobody's side but his own. Rick, forgive me but there's no synonym. Doesn't matter how decrepid his past, how unfulfilling his childhood, or how persecuted he may have felt. I'll be first in line to throw the switch, drop the hammer or push the syringe. But he'll have an attorney, exposure and sympathy from some. Most likely trial delays and appeals. Just hope he dies as swiftly as McVeigh after Oklahoma. Kill him quickly, extreme prejudice.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by JD338
Glock 45 with a 30 round clip.


A 30 round clip on a Glock? I've never heard of such a thing.

Brian.


http://www.cheaperthandirt.com/MAG258-36.html
I have three of them, all made by Glock themselves.


a 30 rd. glock 45 mag?

i don't think so
Originally Posted by shootem
Originally Posted by Steelhead
One doesn't need to know anything about the shooter know he's a nut job, other than his actions today, it needs no reinforcement.


Random murder of bystanders. Yeah, he shot a judge and congressman. That makes him a political assassin at best. Then shooting those just gathered around? That makes him a cowardly, bent, twisted, perverted sonofabitch on nobody's side but his own. Rick, forgive me but there's no synonym. Doesn't matter how decrepid his past, how unfulfilling his childhood, or how persecuted he may have felt. I'll be first in line to throw the switch, drop the hammer or push the syringe. But he'll have an attorney, exposure and sympathy from some. Most likely trial delays and appeals. Just hope he dies as swiftly as McVeigh after Oklahoma. Kill him quickly, extreme prejudice.


Amen.
e.g.
There was no security at the event, a meet-and-greet outside a Safeway on the northwest side, Grey said.

There was a Tuscon Daily Star web news blurb up,....( I read it aloud to Vanimrod ) all full of quotes from one of her "Congressional Aides",.....HIS "Eyewitness account",.....he used the phrase "caught in the crossfire",....while describing how he passed up the opportunity to stop the thing before it started.

....It's been "Taken Down",....and will require some searching,....

GTC
Originally Posted by Kentucky_Windage
Eyewitness (an emergency room doc) I heard interviewed on Fox refuted any notion of a second shooter. Said the perp was the sole shooter and fired cooly and methodically for what he estimated to be 8 to 10 seconds before being tackled. Entirely plausible.


8-10 seconds, yeah, I can easily see that.

[bleep]' nutcase.
Originally Posted by rockchucker

a 30 rd. glock 45 mag?

i don't think so
33 round 9mm.
i know they make the 33 rd 9mm.

some one state he used a glock 45. and i don't believe they make a 30 rounder for that.

Originally Posted by RoninPhx
through the years it has been very easy and not considered worthy of comment to approach elected officials.
as a very young boy when barry goldwater was first running for office, i sat on his lap with him on his horse in prescott.
When mccain first ran for office, he was hanging around at the square in prescott.
I would have NOT thought it possible for someone to do this in this state. Which i guess proves i am an old man and not in touch with the times.
Heck, you could write or call congressmen/women in this state and they would respond to you.

for that matter, my wife seems to remember rightly or wrongly that giffords was at a border rally this summer along the border.

by the way greg, this morning was up on a 4x4 road off the gila river. 80year in a jeep with his 50something daughter had a flat tire. We stopped to change it for him.
Would you believe upon us leaving this rather good looking woman grabbed by hand to shake it,then kissed my hand?
Must be the facial fur i sport.


She sounds like one of my students, I probably kissed HER hand sometime recent,.....and she was just thinking that it was the right thing to do.

you gracious and well behaved old fart.

GTC
Originally Posted by rockchucker
i know they make the 33 rd 9mm.

some one state he used a glock 45. and i don't believe they make a 30 rounder for that.

You may be right. I don't know.
That video of him in the wizard robe and HappyFace burning the American flag in the desert was sure weird.

Betcha he's been under psychiatric care, probably voiced some crazy ideas that the counsellor was praying he never acted-out.
Factory Glock 33-round 9mm 3rd Generation New Unmarked magazines. Fits Glock 17, 18, 19, 26, and 34. also fits Kel-tec rifles which use the Glock

Looks like someone beat me to it, but there is the facts.
For those ESPOUSING the "Lone Gunman" theory, I went and searched,.....this little "HERO's" report,.....

His 15 seconds of fame might have lain in STOPPING this , before it started,

I encourage you to read, and RE-READ his little tale ....



Link: http://azstarnet.com/news/local/crime/76bc3c24-1b79-11e0-b748-001cc4c002e0.html

Home / News / Local / Crime
Witness: Gunman 'was going for the congresswoman'

* Story
* Comments

Witness: Gunman 'was going for the congresswoman'

By Patrick Finley Arizona Daily Star Arizona Daily Star | Posted: Saturday, January 8, 2011 3:45 pm | Comments

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

*
*

The gunman, wearing a beanie and baggy clothes, approached Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords� meet-and-greet Saturday wanting to speak with her immediately, a witness says.

Alex Villec, a 19-year-old volunteer, organized the line of constituents outside the Safeway where a young man approached the line.

He said, �Can I talk to the congresswoman?�, or something to that effect, Villec said. He told the man to stand at the back of a line to wait for about 20 minutes.

�He went to the back of the line,� Villec said, �and didn�t seem too interested in what I had to say.�

Minutes later, the man left the back of the line and walked toward Giffords, who was with 20 to 25 constituents, employees and volunteers.

�He was intent,� Villec said. �He was intent when he came back � a pretty stone cold glance and glare.�

�I didn�t see his gun, but it was clear who he was going for. He was going for the congresswoman,� Villec said.

�A few staff members were caught in the crossfire �. His goal was the congresswoman.�

The shooter walked past Villec and to his left, past tables and toward Giffords. He raised his hand. Villec heard gunshots before ducking behind a pillar and later running across the Safeway parking lot to a bank for safety.

�It was bedlam,� he said. �People were getting down on the ground. They were screaming. I just did what I could to keep myself protected.�

Villec worked on Giffords� 2008 campaign and interned twice in the past year for her, both in Tucson and in Washington, D.C. The Catalina Foothills High School graduate volunteered Saturday in part to see old friends. He was set to return to Georgetown University on Sunday.

The weapon �sounded like a handgun.� He did not hear the shooter speak while firing; from behind a pillar, Villec heard someone cry, �Get down.� Villec did not see two men tackle the gunman, though spoke with one of the men afterward. That tackler, he said, was next in line to greet Giffords.

�It�s heroic,� Villec said.� I�m at a loss for words to describe the courage it takes to do a thing like that.�

At 10:19 a.m., Villec texted his mother, Anne Hoff.

�I�m safe and fine,� it read. �There was a shooting outside Safeway. I�m completely O.K.�

Hoff, who drove to the Safeway lot, said she was thankful for the pre-emptive text.

�I don�t know,� she said, �what makes someone lucky.�

Villec, who was still shocked about his close call, knew the gravity of what occurred outside the Safeway early Saturday.

�It�s clear that this is a contentious district. Passions run deep on these issues, so much so that somebody would be compelled to do something like this,� he said. �However, the kind of bickering that happens on a day-to-day basis never reaches physical violence.

�This is unprecedented � and it�s going to send shockwaves throughout the country.�


Originally Posted by rockchucker
i know they make the 33 rd 9mm.

some one state he used a glock 45. and i don't believe they make a 30 rounder for that.

I just put up a link for a twenty-five round .45 magazine awhile ago. I can't say about thirty, but I found the 25 rounder with only a quick search.
Given that the "Event as it unfolds" is kinda' important to a FEW,.....COULD SOMEONE please GO START A [bleep]' "Glock Magazine Capacity" thread ?

GTC
i dont know about glock magazine capacities, but the sheriff did say durring the news conference that the shooter was using an "extended capacity magazine"
Since it seems a certainty the shooter's ramblings will be taken offline, here's the text, given on a plain back background, the 1:10 minute video jumps between six different screens of text...

Screen 1: Hello, my name is... <gives his name>

Screen 2: This video is my introduction to you! My favorite activity is conscience dreaming; the greatest inspiration for my political business information. Some of you dont dream - sadly.

Screen 3: Firstly, the current government officials are in power for their currency, but I'm informing you for your new currency! If you're treasurer of a new money system, then you're responsible for the distribution of a new currency. We know now - the treasurer for a new money system is the distributor of the new currency. As a result, the people approve a new money system which is promising new information thats accurate, and we truly believe in a new currency. Above all you have your new currency, listener?

Screen 4: Secondly my hope is for you to be literate! If you're literate in English grammar, then you comprehend English grammar. The majority of people who reside in District-8, are illiterate - hilarious. I don't control your English grammar structure, but you control your English grammar structure.

Screen 5: Thirdly, I know who's listening: Government Officials and the People. Nearly all the People, who don't know this accurate information of a new currency, aren't aware of mind control and brainwash methods. If I had my Civil Rights, then this message wouldn't have happen.

Screen 6: In conclusion, my ambition - is for informing literate dreamers about a new currency; in a few days, you know I'm conscience dreaming! Thank you!


FYI

Birdwatcher


Originally Posted by ColeYounger
Originally Posted by rockchucker
i know they make the 33 rd 9mm.

some one state he used a glock 45. and i don't believe they make a 30 rounder for that.

I just put up a link for a twenty-five round .45 magazine awhile ago. I can't say about thirty, but I found the 25 rounder with only a quick search.


it's not really important.

it's just another schitty day in america.

it's amazing how a few schitt heads in america make all of as look bad to the rest of the world.

godspeed to the victims of this madness
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye


You may be right. I don't know.


Oughta be your answer for everything, your signature line, and your [bleep]' motto...
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by ColeYounger


Interesting. Thank ya kindly.

Brian.
Don't bother with them. Only the ones made by Glock are reliable.


No interest in owning a Glock or a high cap magazine. I had just never heard of such a large mag for a Glock.

Apologies for getting the thread off subject.

Brian.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Originally Posted by ColeYounger


Interesting. Thank ya kindly.

Brian.
Don't bother with them. Only the ones made by Glock are reliable.


No interest in owning a Glock or a high cap magazine. I had just never heard of such a large mag for a Glock.

Apologies for getting the thread off subject.

Brian.


me too
Whack job gets gun, shoots notable people. Unfortunately, the human tragedy will be lost in the shuffle. This is gonna be trouble. We all know where the "Brady" bill came from.
I'm just putting this stuff up in raw form,.....cause there are some SERIOUS problems recording it's co-ords at all, the "program" just keeps jumping from story to story,...and NO, there's nothing wrong with this devil-box, or my server.....

Here:



Link: http://azstarnet.com/article_91db5db4-1b74-11e0-ba23-001cc4c002e0.html

Here:

Home
Man linked to Giffords shooting rampage called 'very disturbed'

* Story
* Comments

Man linked to Giffords shooting rampage called 'very disturbed'

By Tim Steller, Arizona Daily Star Arizona Daily Star | Posted: Saturday, January 8, 2011 3:11 pm | Comments

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

*
*

buy this photo Mamta Popat/Arizona Daily Star Jared Loughner is the man identified by the Associated Press as the suspect in the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and slayings of U.S. District Judge John Roll and 5 others this morning in Tucson. Law enforcement is at house on Soledad Avenue that matches the address of the Jared Loughner who registered as a volunteer at the 2010 Tucson Festival of Books, where this photo was taken.
Related Video

'Introduction: Jared Loughner'
'Introduction: Jared Loughner'

Related Stories

* Related: What was in his head? YouTube reveals grievances on currencies, grammar, religion, Constitution

The man linked to the shooting today of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and others is 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner, the Associated Press reported.

Saturday afternoon, police surrounded a house at 7700 N. Soledad Ave., which is the address listed by a man with the same name on a variety of online accounts and in the volunteer registry for the 2010 Tucson Festival of Books. The home is near West Magee Road and North Thornydale Road on the northwest side, about five miles from the shooting scene.

Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik would not confirm Loughner is the suspected shooter. He said the person arrested for the shooting is uninjured and uncooperative.

The suspected shooter has made death threats before and been contacted by law-enforcement officers, but the threats weren't against Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Dupnik said. The suspect is unstable, Dupnik said, but the sheriff would not say he is "insane."

A former classmate of Loughner at Pima Community College said he was "obviously very disturbed."

"He disrupted class frequently with nonsensical outbursts," said Lynda Sorenson, who took a math class with Loughner last summer at Pima Community College's Northwest campus.

Sorenson doesn't recall if he ever made any threats or uttered political statements but he was very disruptive, she said. He was asked to leave the pre-algebra class several times and eventually was barred from class, said Sorenson, a Tucson resident.

Another Pima classmate, Lydian Ali, said Loughner would frequently laugh aloud to himself during the advanced-poetry class they attended. Only about 16 people were in the class, so Loughner's behavior stood out, Ali said.

"It almost seemed like he was on his own planet, because his comments would have nothing to do with what we were talking about," Ali said.

MySpace, YouTube and Facebook accounts maintained by Loughner suggest he has spent most of his life on the northwest side: His profile says he attended Thornydale Elementary, Tortolita Middle School, Mountain View High School

The online accounts also contain bizarre discussions of a new currency and literacy, as well as threatening and despairing messages.

"WOW! I'm glad i didn't kill myself. I'll see you on National T.v.! This is foreshadow .... why doesn't anyone talk to me?.." he posted on MySpace Dec. 14.

On Dec. 13, he wrote: "I don't feel good: I'm ready to kill a police officer! I can say it."

In a posting on YouTube, Loughner wrote repeatedly about a new currency.

"I'm thinking of creating a new currency," he wrote. "Therefore, I'm thinking of a design for my new coins size, shape, color, material, and image to start a new money system."

He also wrote repeatedly about literacy. In a written message on YouTube, Loughner said: "The majority of people, who reside in District-8 are illiterate - hilarious. I don't control your English grammar structure, but you control your English grammar structure."

In a message posted on his MySpace account, titled "Goodbye friends," Loughner said: "Dear friends...please don't be mad at me. The literacy rate is below 5%. I haven't talked to one person who is literate." It was unclear when it was posted.

In a MySpace profile, Loughner said "My favorite interest was reading, and I studied grammar. Conscience dreams were a great study in college."

He lists among his favorite books "Mein Kampf" and "The Communist Manifesto". But he also includes a broad variety of other titles, including: "Animal Farm," "Brave New World," "To Kill a Mockingbird," and "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest".

In another YouTube message, Loughner said: "I know who's listening: Government Officials, and the People. Nearly all the people, who don't know this accurate information of a new currency, aren't aware of mind control and brainwash methods. If I have my civil rights, then this message wouldn't have happen."

"In conclusion, my ambition - is for informing literate dreamers about a new currency; in a few days, you know I'm conscience dreaming! Thank you!"

In a YouTube video dated Dec. 15, titled "Introduction: Jared Loughner" the accused gunman describes himself as a U.S. military recruit who had applied to join the Army. The Army, however, said it rejected Lougher as a recruit in 2008.

In the video, Loughner makes a rambling mention of "MEPS in Phoenix" a reference to the Military Entrance Processing Station in the state capital that all Arizona recruits from every branch of service pass through before leaving for basic training.

"Every United States military recruit at MEPS in Phoenix is receiving one mini bible before the tests," it said. "Jared Loughner is a United States military recruit at MEPS in Phoenix. Therefore, Jared Loughner is receiving one mini bible before the tests.

"I didn't write a belief on my Army application and the recruiter wrote on the application: None."

First Sgt. Brian Homme, who oversees Army recruiting in Tucson, said Loughner applied to enlist in December 2008 and was sent to Phoenix to take a test and physical. But "he was found to be unqualified so he never joined the Army," Homme said.

He declined to say why Loughner was rejected, citing confidentiality laws.

Loughner has had at least two minor run-ins with police, according to on-line court records.

In October 2007, Loughner was cited by the Pima County Sheriff's Department for possession of drug paraphernalia, a charge that was dismissed in November 2007 when he completed a diversion program.

One year later, in October 2008, Loughner was charged with a "local charge" in Marana Municipal Court, that charge was also dismissed following the completion of a diversion program in March 2009.

Court records indicate the Marana case file is due to be purged in December 2013. It's unclear what the exact charge was.

Grant Wiens, 22, attended Mountain View High School with Loughner, although they were not in the same grade.

Wiens also took a class at Pima Community College with Loughner, where they occasionally talked, he said.

"He was a guy in high school who definitely had his opinions on stuff and didn't seem to care what people thought of him," Wiens said. "He did his own thing."

Ryan Miller, 19, was a sophomore at Mountain View when Loughner was a senior.

He said Loughner was seemed like a normal kid.

"I was in shock," he said, describing his reaction to the shooting. "I didn't know what possessed someone our age to do something like this."

Stay tuned to StarNet for updates



This is bad, very bad for our side.

Here is a young white man, obviously deranged, but not a Muslim who shoots a Liberal Democrat Congresswoman with a High cap semi-auto pistol, in gun friendly Arizona. Can't get much worse than that (for us), just hope he isn't an NRA member with a CCW.

This is the Liberal, gunbanners dream scenario, just stand back and watch the MSM go full bore on this and expect more restrictive gun laws.

The only good thing is that this didn't happen in California.
If you're done gloating,

.....PLEASE go back to bragging about your own good fortune and wealth.

GTC
Originally Posted by rockchucker
i know they make the 33 rd 9mm.

some one state he used a glock 45. and i don't believe they make a 30 rounder for that.



Glock makes a 33 rounder for the 9mm, a 22 rounder for the .40 and a 13 for the .45. Can't say what the aftermarkets are producing, but I can state that many aftermarket mags do not function and very few will drop free of the well when empty. That includes the Korean mags that have been popping up lately. Junk, as far as I'm concerned.
Just a sad friggin' day in America. frown

A tragedy.
Ditto that.
http://www.glock.com/english/index_magazines.htm

The news has been reporting it was a 9mm. So I take it the 33 plus 2 according to the glock website?

I can see a lawsuit heading Glocks way and the direction of whoever sold him the gun 3 days ago. (CNN reporting gun was bought 3 days ago)

My family headed into town this afternoon and the road was still closed. Guess its reopened now. Either way it didn't seem like a normal day in Tucson. Did notice there was less traffic out. I am just glad my in laws were not there(thank God for old age). It's just odd to think it happened in my state, my city, affected my neighbors and my community. Most never expect it in their town. I was wrong and I am asshamed because I shoulda known better. I never thought of it.
This situation wakes people up. It has for my family. Sad that this world has turned out so bad.

Kique
Originally Posted by denton
Fox reports that a bystander returned fire.


Not done reading all the posts but that's the best news I've heard yet!

I am not gloating, If you are not concerned about the implications of this event I refer you to Columbine and previous high profile shootings.

You may remember some unpleasantness back in the early 60's that led to some law in 1968 that many here do not like.

Go back to Bragging,...you do it WAY better.
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

I am not gloating, If you are not concerned about the implications of this event I refer you to Columbine and previous high profile shootings.

You may remember some unpleasantness back in the early 60's that led to some law in 1968 that many here do not like.



Thanks for the "History lesson", Spankojackoffalus.

I also remember some events SINCE 1968 like Ronald Reagan, after he was the victim of a nearly identical shooting, REPEALED some of the aspects of the GCA of '68.

What ant-gun legislation resulted from Columbine?
The liberal MSM trying to make hay out of a trajedy that had NOTHING to do with the behavior of the average gun owner does not automatically result in ant- gun legislation. It only HIGHLIGHTS the bogus arguments of the Anti gun crowd.

Other than Bill Clinton/ and Rosie O'Donnell trying to sir up schit -NOTHING happened after Columbine. Higher NRA membership and more guns sold. The assult weapons ban still sunsetted a few years later. More CCW states now than ever before. Pretty much only YOUR state's gun laws have steadily gone to hell in a hand basket since then. While you know doubt ,were sailing yachts with your anti-gun freinds.

Most Americans are SMART enough to know their rights should not be sacrificed due to the actions of a nut-job.
In Kalifornia, I am SURE your fellow members of the "Marin County Yacht club" support such bullschit, but here in the Heartland, not so much.

Thanks to the folks in "flyover country" as you call us,we now have a Republican controlled house. They will no doubt send their condolences to the victims BUT will not commit political suicide and hasten more of their membership into early retirement in 2012 by passing any stupid anti-gun legislation over this.

Did anybody notice ABC commie news tonight.

They reported that a reporter asked Gabby's father if she had any more know enemies, he replied,
"The TEA Party".

Damage done.

Of course the Tea Party did this to Gabby.
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Brian.
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Just a sad friggin' day in America. frown

A tragedy.


Yup,.....and I can't pull down and post stuff I can READ on my computer, which is strange.

Short takes......

"agents in FBI jackets milling about the location."

""We're getting out of here. We are freaked out,"

""He has kind of a troubled past, I can tell you that," Dupnik said. "(Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, and idiot with connections, and a prick with ears)

and THIS,....perhaps the lowest "BLOW" of all

"During his campaign effort to unseat Giffords in November, Republican challenger Jesse Kelly held fundraisers where he urged supporters to help remove Giffords from office by joining him to shoot a fully loaded M-16 rifle. Kelly is a former Marine who served in Iraq and was pictured on his website in military gear holding his automatic weapon and promoting the event.

"I don't see the connection," between the fundraisers featuring weapons and Saturday's shooting, said John Ellinwood, Kelly's spokesman. "I don't know this person, we cannot find any records that he was associated with the campaign in any way. I just don't see the connection."

..........We hosted Kelly at OUR range , too.

"Firepower Demonstrations" are Not about "Unseating" anybody, they are an old and revered American tradition.

Sad day indeed, and the Libs will lap this kinda' press up like dogs do with the chit from a scouring calf.

GTC
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Brian.


Oh,...Yah,....

between his bragging and razzing the board in general about his OWN personal good luck, and wealth.

Heads up,....this did NOT go down in California,...and if Arizona wants an opinion from California we'll goddam well ISSUE you one.

That post was ALL about gloating,...[bleep] "Chillin OUT"

GTC
So only Arizonans can talk about something that's national news?

Get off your high horse and go [bleep] yourself dude.

Brian.
now now. lets be reasonable here. Next thing I'm gonna read is you guys kissing and making up and then you guys [bleep] each other. This is not broke back mountain. It's 24hourcampfire. LOL

Sorry guys just had to change the mood a bit. Hope it helped.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
So only Arizonans can talk about something that's national news?

Get off your high horse and go [bleep] yourself dude.

Brian.


Spano says, "The only good thing is that this didn't happen in California."

Brilliant Statesmanship there,...

.... VERY sensitive "National News" attitude,.....it's almost overwhelming in it's clarity, and lack of bias.

GTC
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Yah; I'm amazed at the amount of ado about nothing.

The shooter is a bad guy, sure enough, because he shot up a bunch of regular folks and killed a kid.

But Giffords? Roll? It's just a politician and a judge, for Pete's sake. Why all the hoopla? Shouldn't government legislators and adjudicators expect to get shot at when they ignore the will of their subjects? Isn't that what the Second Amendment is about? I know government enforcers certainly expect to get shot at when they trample the will of the people: it's why they hide their identities, carry heavy firepower, wear vests, and ride in armored vehicles. Why should the other two branches of the State be any different?

"Congratulations: the computers say you won the election. So: here is the power to tax away our income. Here's the power to regulate away our livelihoods. Here's the power to throw us in prison for doing harmless things you disapprove of. Here's the power to conscript our children and use them up in pointless foreign wars. Here's the power to send thugs to break down our doors in the middle of the night and murder us in our sleep. Here's the power to make radical foreign terrorists so angry at us that they kill us by the thousands.

"Okay...got all that? Can you carry it? You okay? Great: good luck. See you on C-SPAN.

"Oh--wait. One more thing. Almost forgot. Here's a bullseye to wear on your back in case we decide you're getting a bit uppity in the way you use all those powers."

Sounds fair to me.
I don't think anyone wants a tragedy to happen in their locale. I wouldn't wish such a thing on anyone, anywhere.

Brian.
REPEAT!

""The only good thing is that this didn't happen in California."

...indefensible
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Yah; I'm amazed at the amount of ado about nothing.

The shooter is a bad guy, sure enough, because he shot up a bunch of regular folks and killed a kid.

But Giffords? Roll? It's just a politician and a judge, for Pete's sake. Why all the hoopla? Shouldn't government legislators and adjudicators expect to get shot at when they ignore the will of their subjects? Isn't that what the Second Amendment is about? I know government enforcers certainly expect to get shot at when they trample the will of the people: it's why they hide their identities, carry heavy firepower, wear vests, and ride in armored vehicles. Why should the other two branches of the State be any different?

"Congratulations: the computers say you won the election. So: here is the power to tax away our income. Here's the power to regulate away our livelihoods. Here's the power to throw us in prison for doing harmless things you disapprove of. Here's the power to conscript our children and use them up in pointless foreign wars. Here's the power to send thugs to break down our doors in the middle of the night and murder us in our sleep. Here's the power to make radical foreign terrorists so angry at us that they kill us by the thousands.

"Okay...got all that? Can you carry it? You okay? Great: good luck. See you on C-SPAN.

"Oh--wait. One more thing. Almost forgot. Here's a bullseye to wear on your back in case we decide you're getting a bit uppity in the way you use all those powers."

Sounds fair to me.
You got a point.
This was looking like NORMAL dialogue,....'til you showed up.

Later,

GTC
You're taking him out of context. This is what he said-

Quote
This is the Liberal, gunbanners dream scenario, just stand back and watch the MSM go full bore on this and expect more restrictive gun laws.

The only good thing is that this didn't happen in California.


Since it happened in fairly conservative Arizona, it's doubtful that a bunch of new gun laws will be passed there. If it happened in California, they'd be going door to door to take folk's handguns.

I don't think Spanokopitas meant anything more than that.

Brian.
One day we will be chatting about some of the folks who used to post here when they finally snap.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
You're taking him out of context. This is what he said-

Quote
This is the Liberal, gunbanners dream scenario, just stand back and watch the MSM go full bore on this and expect more restrictive gun laws.

The only good thing is that this didn't happen in California.


Since it happened in fairly conservative Arizona, it's doubtful that a bunch of new gun laws will be passed there. If it happened in California, they'd be going door to door to take folk's handguns.

I don't think Spanokopitas meant anything more than that.

Brian.
You're a fair man.
Point taken,....and I'm really sorry that our angst has attracted 2 of the "Trilogy",......

Cuz' NOTHING we have said up to now is as loony as what's just been posted by the Philosopher General......and it's NOT the sorta' chit I associate with, so I am History from this,....until they are gone.

I can't believe they let those two Corksockers near children, or incarcerated felons.

Hasta Luego

GTC
Quote
Not done reading all the posts but that's the best news I've heard yet!


Reported by Fox early on, but unfortunately, flatly denied by the eyewitness I heard later on. The shooter was apparently tackled and separated from his gun by a couple of men, and his weapon was unloaded by a woman.
Originally Posted by Enrique
http://www.glock.com/english/index_magazines.htm

The news has been reporting it was a 9mm. So I take it the 33 plus 2 according to the glock website?

I can see a lawsuit heading Glocks way and the direction of whoever sold him the gun 3 days ago. (CNN reporting gun was bought 3 days ago)

My family headed into town this afternoon and the road was still closed. Guess its reopened now. Either way it didn't seem like a normal day in Tucson. Did notice there was less traffic out. I am just glad my in laws were not there(thank God for old age). It's just odd to think it happened in my state, my city, affected my neighbors and my community. Most never expect it in their town. I was wrong and I am asshamed because I shoulda known better. I never thought of it.
This situation wakes people up. It has for my family. Sad that this world has turned out so bad.

Kique


My family headed into town this afternoon and the road was still closed. Guess its reopened now. Either way it didn't seem like a normal day in Tucson. Did notice there was less traffic out. I am just glad my in laws were not there(thank God for old age). It's just odd to think it happened in my state, my city, affected my neighbors and my community. Most never expect it in their town. I was wrong and I am asshamed because I shoulda known better. I never thought of it.
This situation wakes people up. It has for my family. Sad that this world has turned out so bad.

i think a lot of us feel that way
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Yah; I'm amazed at the amount of ado about nothing.

The shooter is a bad guy, sure enough, because he shot up a bunch of regular folks and killed a kid.

But Giffords? Roll? It's just a politician and a judge, for Pete's sake. Why all the hoopla? Shouldn't government legislators and adjudicators expect to get shot at when they ignore the will of their subjects? Isn't that what the Second Amendment is about? I know government enforcers certainly expect to get shot at when they trample the will of the people: it's why they hide their identities, carry heavy firepower, wear vests, and ride in armored vehicles. Why should the other two branches of the State be any different?

"Congratulations: the computers say you won the election. So: here is the power to tax away our income. Here's the power to regulate away our livelihoods. Here's the power to throw us in prison for doing harmless things you disapprove of. Here's the power to conscript our children and use them up in pointless foreign wars. Here's the power to send thugs to break down our doors in the middle of the night and murder us in our sleep. Here's the power to make radical foreign terrorists so angry at us that they kill us by the thousands.

"Okay...got all that? Can you carry it? You okay? Great: good luck. See you on C-SPAN.

"Oh--wait. One more thing. Almost forgot. Here's a bullseye to wear on your back in case we decide you're getting a bit uppity in the way you use all those powers."

Sounds fair to me.

anothe post by one of the resident idiot svants.
A man that professes to be a christian spreading the good work with loosers in prison, and can't see what he writes "just another politican and judge"
And because of his dicked up prejiduce doesn't think of a woman with two kids, and a judge with a family that didn't deserve what happened to them because they were just a politician and a judge.
Another graphic example of the idiots on this forum. The fact they were human beings doesnt count in barks world
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
Ya'll need to chill a bit. Spanokopitas is a good dude, and he's just offering his opinion here.

Yah; I'm amazed at the amount of ado about nothing.

The shooter is a bad guy, sure enough, because he shot up a bunch of regular folks and killed a kid.

But Giffords? Roll? It's just a politician and a judge, for Pete's sake. Why all the hoopla? Shouldn't government legislators and adjudicators expect to get shot at when they ignore the will of their subjects? Isn't that what the Second Amendment is about? I know government enforcers certainly expect to get shot at when they trample the will of the people: it's why they hide their identities, carry heavy firepower, wear vests, and ride in armored vehicles. Why should the other two branches of the State be any different?

"Congratulations: the computers say you won the election. So: here is the power to tax away our income. Here's the power to regulate away our livelihoods. Here's the power to throw us in prison for doing harmless things you disapprove of. Here's the power to conscript our children and use them up in pointless foreign wars. Here's the power to send thugs to break down our doors in the middle of the night and murder us in our sleep. Here's the power to make radical foreign terrorists so angry at us that they kill us by the thousands.

"Okay...got all that? Can you carry it? You okay? Great: good luck. See you on C-SPAN.

"Oh--wait. One more thing. Almost forgot. Here's a bullseye to wear on your back in case we decide you're getting a bit uppity in the way you use all those powers."

Sounds fair to me.
You got a point.

and another post by one of the other dumphucks on the eastern side of the country.
Quote
Cuz' NOTHING we have said up to now is as loony as what's just been posted by the Philosopher General......and it's NOT the sorta' chit I associate with, so I am History from this,....until they are gone.


+1
Ron,...we just need to turn this OVER to these two azzwholes,.....Talk about "painting Targets" on peoples back,.....this [bleep]' "Barak" azzwhole just carved "Drop an A-Bomb Here" into the 24Hour site,...with a [bleep]' DOZER.

Trh will be running around filling it with fluorescent paint.

Double dittos, Mike.

GTC
Quote
I can't believe they let those two Corksockers near children, or incarcerated felons.


Here's the thing about people who volunteer in prisons, not that I'm against it. They get a distorted view of inmates. Inmates are on their best behavior in front of these people. Yet these people will talk as experts and think I'm just a hard azz thug as a C/O, not realizing that I spend 8 hours + a day with those same inmates and know far more about them than they ever will.

Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.
Originally Posted by RoninPhx
A man that professes to be a christian spreading the good work with loosers in prison, and can't see what he writes "just another politican and judge"
And because of his dicked up prejiduce doesn't think of a woman with two kids, and a judge with a family that didn't deserve what happened to them because they were just a politician and a judge.

Hey--it's not as though they involuntarily became a politician and a judge through a random act of God. They both worked very hard at getting to where they were. Lots of deliberate time, effort, money, influence, and corruption to get to the point where they had enough power to piss off enough people that statistically they ran across one who would do something about it.

I'm sure it was very gratifying to them to be part of the ruling-class elite. Well, ruling-class elite sometimes get assassinated. Corruption has a price. They knew--or should have known--what they were getting into. Hopefully they provided for their families accordingly.

On the other hand, the disease of political ambition has been demonstrated to be at least partly genetic. If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.
This thread has brought out the worst in everyone.

Bottom line: the guy was a psycho, the incident was a tragedy no matter who was hurt, and the MSM and politicians will undoubtedly and despicably try to exploit the matter for their own benefit. Let's all move on- albeit saddened.
Barak, you are truly f-ucked up. Welcome to my ignore list.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by RoninPhx
A man that professes to be a christian spreading the good work with loosers in prison, and can't see what he writes "just another politican and judge"
And because of his dicked up prejiduce doesn't think of a woman with two kids, and a judge with a family that didn't deserve what happened to them because they were just a politician and a judge.

Hey--it's not as though they involuntarily became a politician and a judge through a random act of God. They both worked very hard at getting to where they were. Lots of deliberate time, effort, money, influence, and corruption to get to the point where they had enough power to piss off enough people that statistically they ran across one who would do something about it.

I'm sure it was very gratifying to them to be part of the ruling-class elite. Well, ruling-class elite sometimes get assassinated. Corruption has a price. They knew--or should have known--what they were getting into. Hopefully they provided for their families accordingly.

On the other hand, the disease of political ambition has been demonstrated to be at least partly genetic. If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.



[bleep] me Jesus, you are a complete nut job. Course since you are an autistic SOB, I shouldn't be bothered and I'm not.

Still a shame that train didn't come along the day you laid your head upon the rails to commit suicide. Figures you couldn't even do that.
His day will come
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.


First of all Skippy, get your "facts" straight.

WHAT actual information do you possess that lead you to believe the shooter was "right wing" ???

His Youtube videos showed an AMERICAN FLAG being burned.

He was REJECTED for service by the US Army (never served)

DOES THAT sound like a "right wing" nutcase?

It sounds to ME like some socialist [bleep] from Marin county or Berkley!

Maybe you should get a job as a reporter for CNN- you certainly bring a left wing slant to your 'facts".
Quote
a white rightwing




Tell me, exactly what right wing republican would call "Mein Kampf," the "Communist Manifesto," "Animal Farm" and "Brave New World." their favorite reads? Those are books about socialism and complete government control.
Originally Posted by crosshair
Here's the thing about people who volunteer in prisons, not that I'm against it. They get a distorted view of inmates. Inmates are on their best behavior in front of these people.

You're absolutely right. We always--almost always--get to be the good guys, and the COs have to be the bad guys. Occasionally we see or discover something unsavory about a prisoner, but more often our experience of them is all good and no bad. We get that.

Quote
Yet these people will talk as experts and think I'm just a hard azz thug as a C/O, not realizing that I spend 8 hours + a day with those same inmates and know far more about them than they ever will.

Expert what?

Certainly I have never represented myself to be an expert CO: I'm no kind of CO. I couldn't do what you do.

However, it's just as true that because you do what you do and know what you know, you could never do what I do.

We'll both get more productive work done if we each hold off a bit on running the other guy down and concentrate on the work that has been vouchsafed us.

And incidentally, I have no idea whether you're a hardass thug. Some COs are; some are pretty much regular folks; and a very few have such a gift for the job that everybody loves them, from the prisoners to the volunteers to the other COs clear on up to the warden. I've met two such in my twenty-some years of volunteering. As far as I know now, you could be in any of those categories.
Never read Mein Kampf or The Communist Manifesto, but have read Animal Farm and Brave New World. Clearly seemed like warnings of the left (communist) future, to me.

But then I don't think of myself as a left leaning schizophrenic and that might have warped my view if I was.

From what I heard the Judge was passing by on his way to the Safeway and stopped to take a look. Wrong place at the wrong time.

But, then I suppose that's enough reason for Barak to...
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by RoninPhx
A man that professes to be a christian spreading the good work with loosers in prison, and can't see what he writes "just another politican and judge"
And because of his dicked up prejiduce doesn't think of a woman with two kids, and a judge with a family that didn't deserve what happened to them because they were just a politician and a judge.

Hey--it's not as though they involuntarily became a politician and a judge through a random act of God. They both worked very hard at getting to where they were. Lots of deliberate time, effort, money, influence, and corruption to get to the point where they had enough power to piss off enough people that statistically they ran across one who would do something about it.

I'm sure it was very gratifying to them to be part of the ruling-class elite. Well, ruling-class elite sometimes get assassinated. Corruption has a price. They knew--or should have known--what they were getting into. Hopefully they provided for their families accordingly.

On the other hand, the disease of political ambition has been demonstrated to be at least partly genetic. If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.
................Hey Barack! Those wounded and killed today regardless of your warped analogy, did not deserve this! Whether you agree politically or disagree, human life is human life.

I notice that your user name happens to be the first name of that big spending marxist, socialist, anti-capitalist, anti free market and growth, anti Constitutionalist azz hole who happens to occupy the White House!!

How appropriate!!!



I don't think a pack of starving dogs would approach that bitch if she had a side of beef hanging from her neck.
As another member pointed out to me in a PM, there's an interesting dynamic going on here.

Lots of folks here believe that the State will eventually push decent folks far enough that violence will become the only viable option, and it's one of the reasons many of us have as many guns as we do.

However, that being said, there does seem to be a surprisingly strong knee-jerk reflex around here to squirt instant sympathy for any State figure or entity that can be successfully portrayed by the State's intellectuals as a victim.

I wonder how those two attitudes will play out when the time comes.
Originally Posted by jim62
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.


First of all Skippy, get your "facts" straight.

WHAT actual information do you possess that lead you to believe the shooter was "right wing" ???

His Youtube videos showed an AMERICAN FLAG being burned.

He was REJECTED for service by the US Army (never served)

DOES THAT sound like a "right wing" nutcase?

It sounds to ME like some socialist [bleep] from Marin county or Berkley!

Maybe you should get a job as a reporter for CNN- you certainly bring a left wing slant to your 'facts".


If you wish to address me in a respectful manner I will return the favor, otherwise I shall ignore your insolence.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
[Linked Image]


I have seen dead people not look as bad as that nasty thing.

Dink
Its a damn shame no doubt. call me an idealist but I believe those who step up to become politicians/State Representatives do so with the intent to serve the people and their Country.
She sure as heck didnt deserve this.

The question that now comes to mind is how this guy with a known/documented mental case could have bought a firearm.
With California's 10 day wait/DOJ back round check, I doubt this guy would have been able to buy.
Barak's portrayal of the victims being deserving and the shootings being a rational reaction to today's political environment is beyond astounding... That he is allowed to remain here with his uncomprehendable dialog is more astounding.

Kent
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas
Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.

I think the politicians and the media are gonna have a hard time dealing the spin on this one actually. Although she has liberal views on some issues, she supported more border security and was one of the stronger 2nd amendment democrats. In a way, she was the kind of democrat, that the democrats love to hate. The irony is that they will use her anyway to try and push their anti gun law agenda. You can't make this stuff up.
Barack,
The shooter was crazier than a chit house rat. His motivation was born out of his sickness, not his political beliefs.

Brian.
Barak's already painting him as a patriot.
Barak

What would you be thinking right now if your wife had been an innocent bystander and had been killed in a similar incident? Would you just say "Oh well, things like that happen in these times"?
Originally Posted by bigsqueeze
Hey Barack! (...) Whether you agree politically or disagree, human life is human life.

True, but politicians are only politicians.

Quote
I notice that your user name happens to be the first name of that big spending marxist, socialist, anti-capitalist, anti free market and growth, anti Constitutionalist azz hole who happens to occupy the White House!!

Not quite. The word sounds very similar in Hebrew and Arabic; it means "lightning." Of course, it looks very different, because Hebrew and Arabic have wildly different alphabets. But when the word is transliterated into English from Hebrew, it's traditionally spelled "barak," and when it's transliterated from Arabic, it's traditionally spelled "barack."

Hence the spelling difference.

But of course I've been using this screen name since long before anyone knew who Barack Obama (or Ehud Barak, for that matter) was.

And if you're seriously comparing me politically to Obama, you need to stick around and read a post or two. The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist. The rest of it is dead wrong.
Originally Posted by RDFinn
Barak's already painting him as a patriot.


Careful, careful--your credibility's all you have on the Internet; if you lose that, you're in bad shape. Here's what I actually said about him:

Originally Posted by Barak
The shooter is a bad guy, sure enough, because he shot up a bunch of regular folks and killed a kid.
Originally Posted by Idared
Barak

What would you be thinking right now if your wife had been an innocent bystander and had been killed in a similar incident? Would you just say "Oh well, things like that happen in these times"?

Of course not.

Me reading what you write doesn't do any good if you don't read what I write.
Anytime you wish to compare my credibility to yours here, feel free to post a survey.
Originally Posted by RDFinn
Sounded a little like Hawkeye or similar
I read what you write.

What makes it right for a judge or a congressman to get shot but not your wife? Somebody loves them as much or more than you do your wife.
Originally Posted by Idared
I read what you write.

What makes it right for a judge or a congressman to get shot but not your wife? Somebody loves them as much or more than you do your wife.

My wife does not hunger after coercive power over others. She does not claim a monopoly over the initiation of force. She does not commit acts that would be instantly identified as crimes if they came from any source other than government. She does useful things for which she is voluntarily compensated by people who freely choose to hire her.

In short, she is not a politician.

She is morally superior to a politician.

(A tapeworm is morally superior to a politician: it does survive parasitically on its host's essence, the same way a politician does, but at least it's not corrupt.)

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas
Originally Posted by jim62
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.


First of all Skippy, get your "facts" straight.

WHAT actual information do you possess that lead you to believe the shooter was "right wing" ???

His Youtube videos showed an AMERICAN FLAG being burned.

He was REJECTED for service by the US Army (never served)

DOES THAT sound like a "right wing" nutcase?

It sounds to ME like some socialist [bleep] from Marin county or Berkley!

Maybe you should get a job as a reporter for CNN- you certainly bring a left wing slant to your 'facts".


If you wish to address me in a respectful manner I will return the favor, otherwise I shall ignore your insolence.
He was addressing you respectfully.

We will all have to wait and see what his background was. I'm sure the MSM will give us an objective look in the coming days. From the limited stuff I've seen posted so far, he looks a lot closer to a left-wing nutcase than any right-winger. Right wingers don't have the Communist Manifesto as one of their favorite books. Mein Kampf either.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Idared
I read what you write.

What makes it right for a judge or a congressman to get shot but not your wife? Somebody loves them as much or more than you do your wife.

My wife does not hunger after coercive power over others. She does not claim a monopoly over the initiation of force. She does not commit acts that would be instantly identified as crimes if they came from any source other than government. She does useful things for which she is voluntarily compensated by people who freely choose to hire her.

In short, she is not a politician.

She is morally superior to a politician.

(A tapeworm is morally superior to a politician: it does survive parasitically on its host's essence, the same way a politician does, but at least it's not corrupt.)

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


When in a deep hole, it is often advisable to quit digging. If not, sooner or later the sides will cave in.
The guy who committed these unspeakable acts today was just a little further down the road, that's all. You just have to hope that when they finally blow you're nowhere near them.
Originally Posted by Barak

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


In other words you are saying it is more justifiable to shoot a congress person or a judge than a bystander?
Originally Posted by Barak

(A tapeworm is morally superior to a politician: it does survive parasitically on its host's essence, the same way a politician does, but at least it's not corrupt.)

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


Easy there Seabiscuit.

Might be time to just walk away from the computer and call it a night.

Brian.
Originally Posted by Barak

On the other hand, the disease of political ambition has been demonstrated to be at least partly genetic. If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.


That has to be the most vile thing I've ever read here.
Originally Posted by RDFinn

That has to be the most vile thing I've ever read here.


I'd have to agree. Outrageous.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit


Might be time to just walk away from the computer and call it a night.

Brian.


That's good advice Brian. I am going to take it also before I say something I'll be sorry for later.
Quote
However, it's just as true that because you do what you do and know what you know, you could never do what I do.


Don't be too sure of that. Fact is if I get a chance to speak of Christ I do. I also make sure there is a bible provided when the inmate asks for it when I'm working the hole. But I don't let them play games, step across the line and the hammer drops, no matter who they are. When you establish reputation you can do that.

Quote
And incidentally, I have no idea whether you're a hardass thug. Some COs are; some are pretty much regular folks; and a very few have such a gift for the job that everybody loves them, from the prisoners to the volunteers to the other COs clear on up to the warden. I've met two such in my twenty-some years of volunteering. As far as I know now, you could be in any of those categories.





I think you do, I used to have the tag GarryC here. We have conversed many times about these matters.
Me too.
Originally Posted by Barak
As another member pointed out to me in a PM, there's an interesting dynamic going on here.

Lots of folks here believe that the State will eventually push decent folks far enough that violence will become the only viable option, and it's one of the reasons many of us have as many guns as we do.

However, that being said, there does seem to be a surprisingly strong knee-jerk reflex around here to squirt instant sympathy for any State figure or entity that can be successfully portrayed by the State's intellectuals as a victim.

I wonder how those two attitudes will play out when the time comes.



It just goes to show you how full of schitt most folks are.





Good Lord, one less politician and judge in the world. I'll be crying for weeks over this.
Quote
We will all have to wait and see what his background was. I'm sure the MSM will give us an objective look in the coming days. From the limited stuff I've seen posted so far, he looks a lot closer to a left-wing nutcase than any right-winger. Right wingers don't have the Communist Manifesto as one of their favorite books. Mein Kampf either.



I predict they won't mention his political motivations and will focus on the gun.

Remember the Uni-Bomber. He was an ecoterrorist. I bet that really po'd the press who hoped it would be a white supremacist, a McVey type.
Originally Posted by crosshair
Quote
We will all have to wait and see what his background was. I'm sure the MSM will give us an objective look in the coming days. From the limited stuff I've seen posted so far, he looks a lot closer to a left-wing nutcase than any right-winger. Right wingers don't have the Communist Manifesto as one of their favorite books. Mein Kampf either.
I predict they won't mention his political motivations and will focus on the gun.

Quote from the sheriff:
Quote
"When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous," he said. "And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become the capital. We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry."

In other words, it's those evil, hate filled bigoted people from Arizona that pushed him over the edge. Sheesh, give me a break. Maybe they're tired of being invaded by illegal occupiers?

From the same AP article:
Quote
A gunman targeted Rep. Gabrielle Giffords as she met with constituents outside a busy supermarket Saturday, wounding the Democrat and killing Arizona's chief federal judge and five others in an attack that left Americans questioning whether divisive politics had pushed the suspect over the edge.

Yep, that's it. We need to shut our mouths and bow down to Obama's every wish. Then the killings will stop.
The hate and vitriol spewed by the anti-1070 crowd is probably what this dude was fueled by. Again, it will only be by the most violent spinning that he can be characterized as anything but far-left, from what I've seen.
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
The hate and vitriol spewed by the anti-1070 crowd is probably what this dude was fueled by.


The dude was fueled by his extreme mental illness. Nothing more, nothing less.

Brian.
You real sure you don't want to run with "White and Right Wing" ?

GTC
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Idared
I read what you write.

What makes it right for a judge or a congressman to get shot but not your wife? Somebody loves them as much or more than you do your wife.

My wife does not hunger after coercive power over others. She does not claim a monopoly over the initiation of force. She does not commit acts that would be instantly identified as crimes if they came from any source other than government. She does useful things for which she is voluntarily compensated by people who freely choose to hire her.

In short, she is not a politician.

She is morally superior to a politician.

(A tapeworm is morally superior to a politician: it does survive parasitically on its host's essence, the same way a politician does, but at least it's not corrupt.)

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


I really HOPE that folks here will have common sense enough to just clearly file you away as "The Enemy", based on this little verbal/text/oral defecation.

I mean FILE THIS SOMEWHERE folks.

You are a [bleep]' sicko, and have nothing of any particular value , or substance to contribute here,......

I'd just like that to be on record, in these troubled times.
If I were you,...I'd avoid me, and my ilk. We're not "of like mind"

GTC



What I find incredulous is that a Congresswoman would hold a Town Hall meeting in an open air parking lot. True, she should have been able to hold a meeting anywhere she desired and remained safe, but that just isn't the reality in this day of terrorism. We have seen that terror attacks are just as likely to involve mentally ill individuals, such as today's events, or those at Virginia Tech, Fort Hood, or an Omaha high school, as they are radical Islamic terrorists.

I am shocked by the carnage and completely at a loss to understand why the good Congresswoman chose her venue without regard to security. Such meetings are safer when held in meeting halls with controlled entrances where attendees can be screened for weapons. I appreciate that Congresswoman Giffords desired to be close to her constituents, a desire that embodies the highest principles of public service, yet I hope that all future meetings will pay proper diligence to security. No one should suffer murder or mayhem for the sake of public discourse, such heinous crimes go against everything our country was established to eliminate in society.

I pray that Congresswoman Giffords recovers fully without any deficit and is able to return to her duties as soon as possible. I also pray that Almighty God provides comfort and solace to the families of those who perished, and places His healing spirit upon those who are wounded in body and soul.

These are trying times. A time when a prayer for wisdom and divine guidance is our best defense against the powers arrayed against our nation.
Trying times indeed,

here's a clip of a "Town Hall",...Douglas Az, last July 10

Link: http://americanpatrol.com/WMV/GiffordsTWDouglas.wmv
Long Day, here in the land of "The Dry Heat"

Here's a synopsis,and a damned good look at the Media version of Von Claussvitz's "Fog of War" .....some are linked, and can be opened at:

www.americanpatrol.com


Chronologically read from the bottom up....sorry, just did not feel compelled to "Flip them", this will all be there tomorrow.

GTC

Capitol News Connection sc
Giffords shooting shocks lawmakers, staff
Washington -- Lawmakers and other workers on Capitol Hill are dismayed after a shooting rampage in Arizona Saturday morning that killed at least six people and wounded more than a dozen others, including Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. -- Soon after the news broke, someone dropped off a small bouquet of yellow flowers outside Giffords' Congressional office in the Longworth House Office Building...

Arizona Republic -- Phoenix
Witnesses recount 'chaos' at scene of Tucson shooting
It was supposed to be an informal event outside a Tucson supermarket to meet and chat with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords about any concerns constituents might have about the federal government. -- Giffords had held many of these Town Hall-style events in the past, but this was her first "Congress on Your Corner' of the New Year...

East Valley Tribune -- Phoenix
Reaction to attack on Gabrielle Giffords
U.S. House Speaker John Boehner: "I am horrified by the senseless attack on Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and members of her staff. An attack on one who serves is an attack on all who serve. Acts and threats of violence against public officials have no place in our society..."

KTVK-TV -- Phoenix sc
Vigil held at State Capitol for Rep. Giffords, other victims of Tucson shooting
About 200 people took part in a candlelight vigil for Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and the other victims of a mass shooting in Tucson Saturday morning. -- The vigil was held at the State Capitol less than 12 hours after the shooting that killed six people, including a 9-year-old girl and a federal judge, and wounded 13 others...

KNXV-TV -- Phoenix
Giffords among lawmakers threatened last year
The wounding of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in a Tucson, Ariz., shooting spree that killed at least five people, including one of her aides and a federal judge, follows a dramatic increase in threats against members of Congress over the past year. -- In the first three months of 2010 alone, officials reported 42 threats to federal lawmakers...

Globe and Mail -- Toronto, Ont.
Dupnik: Second male sought in connection with Tucson shooting
Gabrielle Giffords, an outspoken Democrat congresswoman was gravely wounded after an assassin opened fire with a semi-automatic pistol at grocery store in Tucson Ariz., on Saturday. -- Police identified the suspected gunman as Jared Lee Loughner, 22. In a news conference on Saturday, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said he has "a troubled past"...

Detroit Free Press
Lawmakers, aides urged to take safety precautions
The U.S. Capitol Police force is advising members of the House and their aides to "take reasonable and prudent precautions" about their own security in the wake of a congresswoman's shooting in Arizona. -- In an e-mail obtained by The Associated Press, the Capitol Police say they are directly involved in the investigation of the shooting in Tucson, Ariz., of Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords...

U.S. Customs and Border Protection
CBP Commissioner issues statement concerning shootings in Tucson
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection family expresses our sadness after learning of the shooting involving U. S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, Chief U.S. District Judge John M. Roll and others in Tucson today. Rep. Giffords has been a champion for border issues during her career, working side-by-side with CBP on many fronts...

KVOA-TV -- Tucson
Suspicious package found at Giffords' office
Tucson -- Police have confirmed that a suspicious package has been found outside Gabrielle Giffords' office, and a bomb squad is being called in to investigate. -- People holding a vigil outside the office have been pushed well away from the area, while the investigation determines the nature of this package, and what threat it may cause...

Associated Press
Sheriff: Shooter targeted Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords
Tucson -- Law enforcement officials believe Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords was the intended target of an armed attack in Tucson. -- Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said at a Saturday evening news conference that "I don't have information about whether she was the first person shot, but yes, I believe she was the target."

Reuters sc
Giffords had faced threats, vandalism previously
Representative Gabrielle Giffords, the lawmaker shot by a gunman in her Arizona district on Saturday, had previously warned that overheated political rhetoric had prompted violent threats against her and vandalism at her office. -- "It's important for all leaders... to say, 'Look, we can't stand for this," Giffords told MSNBC last March...

Sky News
U.S. Congresswoman critical after shooting
US Democratic congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords has been shot in the head during an event in Tucson, Arizona and is in a critical condition in hospital. -- Earlier there had been reports she died as a result of her injuries but a doctor at University Medical Centre confirmed she was alive and was "very optimistic of recovery"...

American Patrol Report
Video: Giffords at town hall meeting
U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords shown here at meeting in Douglas, Arizona on July 10, 2010.

American Patrol Report
Shooting suspect identified
1:00 PM PST -- Fox News has announced that the name of the suspect is Jared Loughner, age 22. He is reportedly a white male. Also Judge Roll is the judge who ruled in favor of illegal aliens who sued a southeast Arizona rancher not long ago, according to Fox. -- A doctor at UMC, Tucson, reports that the congresswoman's prognosis is very optimistic.

Washington Post
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in critical condition after Tucson shooting
Arizona Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot and critically wounded Saturday morning while hosting an event outside a Tucson grocery store, according to local news reports, a tragic turn of events after an unusually heated campaign season...

American Patrol Report
Federal judge also shot dead at Tucson event
12:50 PM PST -- Fox News is reporting that Judge John Roll was shot and killed at the 'Congress on the Corner' event in northwest Tucson where U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot in the head and gravely wounded. Several others also have been reported killed by the gunman. UPDATE: 12:53 PM: The death of Judge Roll has not been confirmed. -- UPDATE at 1:10 PM: The death of Judge Roll has been confirmed.

London Telegraph
Obama says Gabrielle Giffords shooting 'an unspeakable tragedy'
Miss Giffords, 40, a Democrat congresswoman, was shot in the head at a public event in Tucson, Arizona. An aide to Miss Giffords was killed and at least ten people injured. -- A lone gunman described as a white man in his late teens or early twenties opened fire at a "Congress on Your Corner" event outside a supermarket in the city...

American Patrol Report
Update from Tucson on shooting of Rep. Giffords
12:15 PM PST -- According to KVOA-TV in Tucson, not only in Giffords alive, she was talking when she went into surgery. This report reached KVOA from a friend of Giffords who is at the hospital where she is being treated.

KGUN-TV -- Tucson
Conflicting reports in Giffords shooting
11:42 AM PST -- Channel 9, Tucson, just reported that Gabrielle Giffords is alive and in critical condition.

KVOA-TV -- Tucson
Reports indicate 6 were killed, 12 injured at Tucson event
11:25 AM PST -- Sources tell News 4 that 13 people are shot, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, and six people are dead after a man opened fire at a northside political event held by the Tucson congresswoman. -- No confirmation on Giffords' condition at this time [update on this], but sources at the scene confirm that the shooter is in custody...

Mediaite
Report: Rep. Gabrielle Giffords killed after point-blank shooting In Tucson
11:16 AM PST -- After being shot "point-blank" in the head by a gunman at a public constituent event, Rep. Gabrielle Giffords has passed away, according to NPR. Giffords represented the 8th District of Arizona and was known as a moderate Democrat particularly involved in the border control issues...

KVOA-TV -- Tucson
Update on Gabrielle Giffords shooting situation
11:05 AM PST -- Seven people, including Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords have been injured during shooting at a Northwest side grocery store. -- It happened this morning at the Safeway near Oracle and Ina Roads. News 4 has a crew on the scene and we are gathering information at this time...

Breaking News
U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords shot at N. Tucson event
10:31 AM PST -- This per the Fox News Channel. Three staff members were also reportedly shot at a Safeway store at Oracle and Ina Roads in Tucson. [Related video]
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas
Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.


What you say has nothing to do with the facts : the shooter has been clearly identified as a strong leftist.

The strategy you recommend is dangerously absurd.
Originally Posted by Idared
Originally Posted by Barak

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


In other words you are saying it is more justifiable to shoot a congress person or a judge than a bystander?

Why? Is it your position that it's more justifiable to shoot the bystander? If he'd missed the politicians but shot a bunch of other folks and the little girl, would your reaction be, "Whew! Terrible thing, but at least the public officials are okay!"?

Gah.
Are you one of the bystanders? That would certainly change my view of it.
Originally Posted by crosshair
I think you do, I used to have the tag GarryC here. We have conversed many times about these matters.

Hey--I didn't know that. I had wondered where garryc had gotten off to. I feel like saying, "It's nice to see you back," even though of course you haven't gone anywhere.

Originally Posted by crosshair
Quote
However, it's just as true that because you do what you do and know what you know, you could never do what I do.


Don't be too sure of that. Fact is if I get a chance to speak of Christ I do. I also make sure there is a bible provided when the inmate asks for it when I'm working the hole.

I wasn't questioning your witness.

But I'll bet that as a CO you can't let yourself develop a close relationship with a prisoner or become personally involved in his life the way we can. As I understand things, it'd be a dereliction of your duty, as well as physically dangerous to you, as well as practically impossible in at least a few cases (which would probably turn out to be the most important ones), given what you know about the prisoners.

Now, in defense of your point, I know of at least one active-duty CO, an active-duty warden, a retired warden, and an active-duty deputy warden who have been Kairos volunteers--and reasonably effective ones--but never at their own prisons.

Even the two super-COs I mentioned earlier wouldn't dare volunteer at their own prisons.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Are you one of the bystanders?

Spend my time, go out in the cold, stand around in a parking lot somewhere, all to listen to a politician?

Surely you can't be serious.
But, were Loughner the speaker.....
Sheesh!

Now we know beyond any faint glimmer of doubt that no post, no subject, is immune from inane argument, condemnation, and cheap shots.
Originally Posted by Barak
My wife does not hunger after coercive power over others. She does not claim a monopoly over the initiation of force. She does not commit acts that would be instantly identified as crimes if they came from any source other than government. She does useful things for which she is voluntarily compensated by people who freely choose to hire her.

In short, she is not a politician.

She is morally superior to a politician.

(A tapeworm is morally superior to a politician: it does survive parasitically on its host's essence, the same way a politician does, but at least it's not corrupt.)

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.


Wow. That's [bleep] up.
Being a politician does not make you more important than a bystander. Being a bystander does not make you more important than a politician. A human life is a human life. one is not more justifiable then the other. For you(Barak) to hint that one is more justafiable then the other is sad. Read the word and understand it. Jesus would not have acted in this manner or would want you to act in this manner.
Maybe we are all taking your words out of context, maybe you need to correct them. However you seem to be sticking to your guns so I doubt we have taken your words out of context.
It is sickening to see you right those words. Sure Gabby was a politician, sure she knew the risk, sure we all know she isn't perfect, but she is still a daughter, a mother and most of all one of God's creation. She was a victim of a crime. Regardless of what she is or has done,she didn't deserve to be shot, judge Roll didn't deserve to be killed. The public and others involved didn't deserve this. The little girl that still had her whole life in front of her didn't deserve this. None is more important than the other. They are equally important. It is sad to see you say that someone deserved this. No one did!

I've never had an issue with you, but I do have an issue with how you are coming off in this thread. You are wrong and in a sense just as bad as the dirt bag that committed this crime because you are justifying part of his actions.

Kique
Quote
But I'll bet that as a CO you can't let yourself develop a close relationship with a prisoner or become personally involved in his life the way we can. As I understand things, it'd be a dereliction of your duty, as well as physically dangerous to you, as well as practically impossible in at least a few cases (which would probably turn out to be the most important ones), given what you know about the prisoners.

Now, in defense of your point, I know of at least one active-duty CO, an active-duty warden, a retired warden, and an active-duty deputy warden who have been Kairos volunteers--and reasonably effective ones--but never at their own prisons.


The best I can do is a nudge. Sharing his pain isn't an option. Ministering to him isn't an option. Praying with him is not an option. Just an occasional word, a flicker of light.

Of course if he later gets stupid it's a face full of pepper gas and a trip to the floor. Don't cross the line, the inmate makes the choice of dealing with Mr. Crosshair or officer Crosshair. Even my snitches know I won't give them slack.

Originally Posted by Enrique
Being a politician does not make you more important than a bystander. Being a bystander does not make you more important than a politician. A human life is a human life. one is not more justifiable then the other. For you(Barak) to hint that one is more justafiable then the other is sad. Read the word and understand it. Jesus would not have acted in this manner or would want you to act in this manner.
Maybe we are all taking your words out of context, maybe you need to correct them. However you seem to be sticking to your guns so I doubt we have taken your words out of context.
It is sickening to see you right those words. Sure Gabby was a politician, sure she knew the risk, sure we all know she isn't perfect, but she is still a daughter, a mother and most of all one of God's creation. She was a victim of a crime. Regardless of what she is or has done,she didn't deserve to be shot, judge Roll didn't deserve to be killed. The public and others involved didn't deserve this. The little girl that still had her whole life in front of her didn't deserve this. None is more important than the other. They are equally important. It is sad to see you say that someone deserved this. No one did!

I've never had an issue with you, but I do have an issue with how you are coming off in this thread. You are wrong and in a sense just as bad as the dirt bag that committed this crime because you are justifying part of his actions.

Kique



From the reading I've done it seems that her positions on boarder security were spot on. Not as aggressive as I would like to see, but not typical DP positions.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Sheesh!

Now we know beyond any faint glimmer of doubt that no post, no subject, is immune from inane argument, condemnation, and cheap shots.


Agreed.

The cheap shots are particularly annoying and distasteful.
Originally Posted by RDFinn
The guy who committed these unspeakable acts today was just a little further down the road, that's all. You just have to hope that when they finally blow you're nowhere near them.

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.

But my perspective is considerably more mature now, because of two points that were revealed to me.

First, it's not useful to be angry at politicians for being corrupt human trash, any more than it would be useful to be angry at fish for swimming or birds for flying. They're politicians; it's who they are and what they do. Anger stems from unmet expectations, and anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

Second, when a politician is assassinated, three things happen: he becomes a martyr, with everybody saying how great he was and how sad it is that he's dead (you can see that right here on this thread); and he simply gets replaced with another politician. The depravity of human nature assures that there will always be more garbage standing in line to take his place. Then, of course, the martyr-worshipers beg the State to take more of their liberties away so that their rulers can be safer.

So no, I won't be flying into any rages and killing any politicians. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.
Hitler had his Reichsstag fire for slaughtering the Communists and the Lib/Progressives will try to make Rep. Gifford's wounding
serve their purposes.

Jim
I'm surprised that anyone would expect anything different from Barak on this subject.

It doesn't take long, if you're paying attention, to realize that Barak is nowhere close to mentally right.

Perhaps now some other folks will start seeing more of his true colors.

Wait until he latches onto the fact the Rep. Giffords is married to an active-duty military officer as well.

As for the real subject of this thread (before it started getting hijacked to Barakistan and lunacy), I continue to pray that Mrs. Giffords and all the victims of this incident, have a full and speedy recovery; that the dead are mourned and their families consoled; and that the perpetrator meets swift justice.

Beyond that, I hope that we as a people can recognize this as the actions of a lunatic, nothing more than that; and that we do not kid ourselves about being protective of liberties instead of more quickly moving to indentify such lunatics among us, for their protection and our own.
+1 the man who did this was a drug user and insane, I don't know if he had a criminal record. I prefer to focus on the hope that perhaps the congress woman will make a complete recovery and offer my absolute condolences to the families that lost their loved ones. For the man that did it, if a criminal how did he get a pistol in the first place? Then justice and execution for murdering all of these people no matter who they were.
Haven't read, nor have the time to read, all the above posts.. But IMHO Barak has gotten to the point of either borderline madness or intentional board provocation.. In any case, as I stated a few weeks ago, I had at one time some respect for him.. That's history and he's best ignored and not responded to..

That said, in one way I'm sort of surprised it's taken this long to have a shooting event like this.. When you have an unheeding, uncaring out-of-control leftist, socialist government that is ON RECORD as legislating in full disregard of the majority of their consituents, why is the outcome so surprising??

IMVHO, this tragedy rests directly on the shoulders of Pelosi, Reid and especially the Liar In Chief himself. I will bet a million to one that not one of those three will 'man up' and take responsibility..

Off to church now and pray for those poor souls in AZ...
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

Damn, this sure brought out the loonies.

This, and other events of the nature, are more damaging to the right of lawful citizens to bear arms than all the rantings of the myriad anti-gun cabals. Let us hope he is not an NRA member with a CCW.

What we have here is a perfect storm: a white rightwing nutcase attacks a liberal Congresswoman using a handgun with a high cap magazine in gun friendly Arizona. This is what the Antis live for. Stand back and brace for recoil.

Best thing we can do is to loudly condemn the shooter as a deranged rightwing nutcase, another Timothy MacVeigh.

This is not going to be pretty.
I typically just skim most of your stuff because quite frankly, it's not worthwhile. I missed your next-to-last sentence earlier. From every piece of evidence I've seen, the guy was a Left-Wing whacko. Spinning him as any sort of right-winger would be dishonest, not to mention damaging to our cause. You are a dangerous idiot.
Barak.....you need to seriously consider some psychiatric counselling and possible treatment. To post the first paragraph you wrote, on a open forum, was dangerously stupid and to believe your follow-up self serving comments as to a new found maturity has somehow ameliorated your psychotic delusions and paranoia is even more troubling.

Get some help or separate yourself from the normal, innocents in your family.
A homicidal psychopath murdering innocents turns my stomach. NONE of the victims deserved this. I am deeply sympathetic to the familes of the victims and have no inclination towards mercy for the murdering swine who did it.
Originally Posted by isaac
Barak.....you need to seriously consider some psychiatric counselling and possible treatment. To post the first paragraph you wrote, on a open forum, was dangerously stupid and to believe your follow-up self serving comments as to a new found maturity has somehow ameliorated your psychotic delusions and paranoia is even more troubling.

Get some help or separate yourself from the normal, innocents in your family.


The ONLY change I'd make to that would be to add "and society" to the last request.

+1.
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
A homicidal psychopath murdering innocents turns my stomach. NONE of the victims deserved this. I am deeply sympathetic to the familes of the victims and have no inclination towards mercy for the murdering swine who did it.
Yahoo is now saying they are searching for a second guy.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Sure Gabby was a politician, sure she knew the risk, sure we all know she isn't perfect, but she is still a daughter, a mother and most of all one of God's creation.

I can see how your argument would hang together for somebody who believes that "politician" is just another job like "plumber" or "farmer" or "doctor."

I don't believe that, though.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. (They'll claim they help people, and they'll produce people who will swear they've been helped, but they can only ever help one person by hurting another person more.) Politicians do the same sorts of things that the State locks private criminals away for; but politicians get away with it because being part of the State makes them special.

Most folks would say that in a situation involving a child, a single mother, and an armed robber escaped from prison, the most important thing is that the child and the mother survive. It'd be better if the armed robber survives too, but if it works out that he doesn't, it's less loss than it would be if the mother or child hadn't made it.

I'm only saying the same thing. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.
Originally Posted by WheelchairBandit
The dude was fueled by his extreme mental illness. Nothing more, nothing less.

Brian.


Exactly. The real travesty is when people (and I use that term loosely) try to use a tragedy such as this to make a political point.

Originally Posted by VAnimrod
As for the real subject of this thread (before it started getting hijacked to Barakistan and lunacy), I continue to pray that Mrs. Giffords and all the victims of this incident, have a full and speedy recovery; that the dead are mourned and their families consoled; and that the perpetrator meets swift justice


Well said, VA, +1.
Quote
Barak.....you need to seriously consider some psychiatric counselling and possible treatment. To post the first paragraph you wrote, on a open forum, was dangerously stupid and to believe your follow-up self serving comments as to a new found maturity has somehow ameliorated your psychotic delusions and paranoia is even more troubling.

Get some help or separate yourself from the normal, innocents in your family.



Others here have been saying this better than I could find the words for.

Barak, what you posted is at best enormously stupid, or perhaps indicative of a fundamental flaw in your perceptions.

This is the most alarming thing I have seen you post since the time you argued that those founding their own self-governing communities (a la "Barakistan") should have the freedom to abuse their own children if that is what they decide to do.

Birdwatcher

Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Barak, what you posted is at best enormously stupid, or perhaps indicative of a fundamental flaw in your perceptions.

Go ahead: I'm listening.
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
This is terrible but I'll say this, when our politicians repeatedly show themselves to not only be unresponsive but downright hostile to the will of the people, this is the kind of thing that will happen. There are lots and lots of crazy people out there and politics will make them even crazier.

Attributing evil motivation to all "them" of the other persuasion, and only then "assessing" their involvement, automatically and always leads to easy conclusions and assumptions of "their" involvement and culpability in nefarious acts. Consigning evil before-hand inevitably leads to condemnation. Consigning innocence before-hand inevitably leads to exoneration.

Those whom we approve never do anything bad. Everything that the others do is evil. Every evil act has to be "their" doing.

(For example, like attributing this shootiing to the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, alien invaders, liberals, Democrats, Republicans, conservatives, gun-owners, drug-smugglers, disgruntled voters, ?-wing conspiracies, etc.)

Within seconds and long after JFK was shot, Texans, Southerners, conservatives, gun-owners, right-wingers were assumed responsible. No such collective condemnation followed the discovery that Oswald was a leftist.

Get the facts, then opine and guess.

IMHO, any collective culpability belongs to those among us who cherish and promote discord as somehow admirable, desirable, or delicious. Leave it to kooks to take any consensus to an extreme.
Cole, I have been trying to follow that. IF as described the other suspect is an OLDER man, it smells like a "mentor/student" type of arrangement. That would mean somebody found a homicidal psychopath to do his dirty work. Even going so far as to lay the foundation for an insanity defense.
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
Cole, I have been trying to follow that. IF as described the other suspect is an OLDER man, it smells like a "mentor/student" type of arrangement. That would mean somebody found a homicidal psychopath to do his dirty work. Even going so far as to lay the foundation for an insanity defense.


Which does go DIRECTLY toward doing better, working harder, and not kidding ourselves about threats when identifying lunatics within our midst.
Originally Posted by Redneck
Haven't read, nor have the time to read, all the above posts.. But IMHO Barak has gotten to the point of either borderline madness or intentional board provocation.. In any case, as I stated a few weeks ago, I had at one time some respect for him.. That's history and he's best ignored and not responded to..

That said, in one way I'm sort of surprised it's taken this long to have a shooting event like this.. When you have an unheeding, uncaring out-of-control leftist, socialist government that is ON RECORD as legislating in full disregard of the majority of their consituents, why is the outcome so surprising??

IMVHO, this tragedy rests directly on the shoulders of Pelosi, Reid and especially the Liar In Chief himself. I will bet a million to one that not one of those three will 'man up' and take responsibility..

Off to church now and pray for those poor souls in AZ...
there isnt really anything to add to this except that i couldnt agree more with redneck,i lurked here at the fire for a while before i joined and one of the first discussions i got into involved barak and said right away that he was a loose cannon with a fuse half lit and so i said so and immediately got told to go shove it by him and his supporters, my point is i hope every one can now see that this dude is NUCKING FUTS and would probably be best if was in a straight jacket and a padded room
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
Cole, I have been trying to follow that. IF as described the other suspect is an OLDER man, it smells like a "mentor/student" type of arrangement. That would mean somebody found a homicidal psychopath to do his dirty work. Even going so far as to lay the foundation for an insanity defense.
...or Handler.
To in any way validate an individual taking a life because that person is a politician is sheer lunacy. The people shot, killed or wounded, have no more or less value than anyone else. The fact is, the value of the life, and the right to that life, of the little girl, the judge, the staffer and the congresswoman are all exactly the same.

The guy that did this used a right in order to take away the rights of another. This mass shooting, no better or worse than any other, the shooter should face severe repercussions. After trial, being found guilty, he should be put to death. No different than any other like situation, involving politicians or not.
Hitler had his Reichstag fire to as an excuse for slaughtering Communists. The Lib/Progressives will use this crime to blacken the reputations and motives of any Conservative. This administration does not like any disaster to go to waste, when it can be used for political gain.

Jim

Despite your normally articulate posts Barak, you probably could've worded your thoughts better on this one, my man. You're out on a limb here...

I mean, I don't put politicians on a pedestal either.........


Casey


Originally Posted by Barak
I can see how your argument would hang together for somebody who believes that "politician" is just another job like "plumber" or "farmer" or "doctor."

I don't believe that, though.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. (They'll claim they help people, and they'll produce people who will swear they've been helped, but they can only ever help one person by hurting another person more.) Politicians do the same sorts of things that the State locks private criminals away for; but politicians get away with it because being part of the State makes them special.

Most folks would say that in a situation involving a child, a single mother, and an armed robber escaped from prison, the most important thing is that the child and the mother survive. It'd be better if the armed robber survives too, but if it works out that he doesn't, it's less loss than it would be if the mother or child hadn't made it.

I'm only saying the same thing. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.
insanity is running rampant here today
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
This is terrible but I'll say this, when our politicians repeatedly show themselves to not only be unresponsive but downright hostile to the will of the people, this is the kind of thing that will happen. There are lots and lots of crazy people out there and politics will make them even crazier.

Attributing evil motivation to all "them" of the other persuasion, and only then "assessing" their involvement, automatically and always leads to easy conclusions and assumptions of "their" involvement and culpability in nefarious acts. Consigning evil before-hand inevitably leads to condemnation. Consigning innocence before-hand inevitably leads to exoneration.

It's true what you say. I think it fits right in with the point Cossatotjoe_redux was making, though. Partisanship is a normal everyday human reflex, whether it makes sense or not. Once it gets pushed to the point of violence, every member of a targeted group is at risk, regardless of his individual specifics, simply because he's a member of the group.

I suspect there are some partisan Democrats who think this was a Tea Party job who are making calls and changing plans right this minute because of it, in fact.
Be rest assured the insanity defense will be asserted as a affirmative defense,and rather soon, I might add. I am not familiar enough with AZ statutes or case law to know of any precedence in regards these asserted defenses,though.

If this third guy played a integral role in this tragedy, it should be quickly ascertained through a look at the guy's computer hard drive and other documentary materials being found during what I suspect is a ongoing "tear it apart" search right now.
Originally Posted by VAnimrod

Which does go DIRECTLY toward doing better, working harder, and not kidding ourselves about threats when identifying lunatics within our midst.



Who is going to define "nuts"?--The government?

I mean, given some of the suggestive rhetoric here at the 'fire directed towards Demos/liberals/Obama/Pelosi/Reid......there would be a fair number of 'fire denziens who could be "diagnosed" with a politically driven definition of nuts........

Not one person at that rally packing heat apparently......



Casey
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Despite your normally articulate posts Barak, you probably could've worded your thoughts better on this one, my man. You're out on a limb here...

Out on a limb in what way?
Originally Posted by Idared
In other words you are saying it is more justifiable to shoot a congress person or a judge than a bystander?
I believe he meant that it is less reprehensible and more understandable (not justifiable), from his radical anarchist perspective. From a standard libertarian perspective, one might say rather that most politicians are of a sort that it would be more understandable why certain folks would be pissed off enough to blow their tops and try and eliminate them, but understandable is not justification. Justification for shooting someone is only in actual imminent self-defense. You must understand the difference between someone saying X was justified and X's actions were understandable. The latter simply means that it was predictable based on available facts.

If the Godfather sends out his goons to all the local businesses threatening to break people's legs if they don't pay for their "protection" services and garbage pickup, it's predictable that lots of folks would be angry, and some angry enough to seek out the Godfather to do him in, even though that would not be justified morally or criminally (Although, shooting the goons in self-defense would be, should they actually attempt to carry out their threat).

Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains. At least that's the standard libertarian view, but the radical anarchist view would be that ALL politicians are equal to the Godfather, and therefore it is equally understandable (though still not justifiable) that one of their victims might seek to do them physical harm at some point. It would also be less reprehensible for said victim to do harm to the Godfather than to do harm to an innocent bystander, which is also what Barak said.

Barak is a radical anarchist of the anarcho-capitalist bent.
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Despite your normally articulate posts Barak, you probably could've worded your thoughts better on this one, my man. You're out on a limb here...

Out on a limb in what way?


Did you see the thread on the ultimate fighter who made joking public statements concerning being in the ring with the President? It got him a quick visit from the Secret Service. If you're looking for extraordinary attention, keep this up. You'll probably get it, First Amendment right or not. That's the kind of limb you're on.
Barak is a nut job. It's a fact that he's autistic and autistic folks are about as emotionless/detached as they come involving others. I'm sure he could give a [bleep] about anyone, as it's obvious he doesn't about himself since he had previously attempted to commit suicide.

It's also apparent that he is such a screw-up that we wasn't even able to pull off killing himself, which we now all have to suffer from his ineptitude.

Is it really a wonder he's a computer guy (requires little human interaction, which he sucks at). Of course he deals with prisoners also, because where the heck can they run to.

Originally Posted by Barak
Out on a limb in what way?



In that under the circumstances being a bit more circumspect in our thoughts/beliefs directed at our leaders/politicians/fellow humans......(at the risk of sounding like Gus).


Casey
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
Yahoo is now saying they are searching for a second guy.


I am very suspicious of the second man hypothesis.

I am concerned by the fact that, having on their hands a shooter who is a confirmed far-leftist is an embarrassment for some and they may want to find a fall-guy that could be painted as "right-wing" or better still "Tea Partier" and "terrorist master-mind" of the whole story...
Originally Posted by Barak
Out on a limb in what way?


I'll take a stab. Verbalizing an untenable position?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idared
In other words you are saying it is more justifiable to shoot a congress person or a judge than a bystander?
I believe he meant that it is less reprehensible and more understandable (not justifiable), from his radical anarchist perspective. From a standard libertarian perspective, one might say rather that most politicians are of a sort that it would be more understandable why certain folks would be pissed off enough to blow their tops and try and eliminate them, but understandable is not justification. Justification for shooting someone is only in actual imminent self-defense. You must understand the difference between someone saying X was justified and X's actions were understandable. The latter simply means that it was predictable based on available facts.

If the Godfather sends out his goons to all the local businesses threatening to break people's legs if they don't pay for their "protection" services and garbage pickup, it's predictable that lots of folks would be angry, and some angry enough to seek out the Godfather to do him in, even though that would not be justified morally or criminally (Although, shooting the goons in self-defense would be, should they actually attempt to carry out their threat).

Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains. At least that's the standard libertarian view, but the radical anarchist view would be that ALL politicians are equal to the Godfather, and therefore it is equally understandable (though still not justifiable) that one of their victims might to seek to do them physical harm at some point. It would also be less reprehensible for said victim to do harm to the Godfather than to do harm to an innocent bystander, which is also what Barak said.

Barak is a radical anarchist of the anarcho-capitalist bent.


Barak is a [bleep]' fruitcake, and you gladly go right along behind him down the rabbit hole.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by VAnimrod

Which does go DIRECTLY toward doing better, working harder, and not kidding ourselves about threats when identifying lunatics within our midst.



Who is going to define "nuts"?--The government?

I mean, given some of the suggestive rhetoric here at the 'fire directed towards Demos/liberals/Obama/Pelosi/Reid......there would be a fair number of 'fire denziens who could be "diagnosed" with a politically driven definition of nuts........

Not one person at that rally packing heat apparently......



Casey


I don't think you'd have to look far to start seeing some lunatics, if you chose to do so.
Insane people are insane and may not be totally responsible for their acts, yet be able to think of ways to create mayhem. In this case, I heard on the news that this guy has a long troubled history of irrational acts.

At Pima Community College, the police responded 5 times to calls regarding his behavior; he was rejected by the Army for unspecified reasons; others have noted (after the fact, of course) that he did not make sense when talking of asking questions. He also allegedly had a drug problem earlier.

Yet, no one did much to ascertain his real condition (just let him go away). He obtained a firearm (legally or illegally, from a dealer or private purchase? - yet to be publically known).

Unfortunately for us, there will probably be repercussions in the form of tighter gun control.
Unless the thread is completely apolitical and his post is about the size of yours or smaller, I generally skip Barak's stuff. I don't have anybody on Ignore, because I don roll that way, but Barak gets incredibly long-winded and tedious.

Any way a person looks at it, this whole shooting incident is a terrible tragedy for the Judge and all involved.
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.



Not to get too far off point on this tragedy, but if if plenty of folks were armed in everyday fashion, being armed at a political event would not be so unusual.........

And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones.


Casey
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
� Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains. �

That's the difference between a politician and a statesman � in Twain's words, the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.
Shades of Virginia Tech.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.



Not to get too far off point on this tragedy, but if if plenty of folks were armed in everyday fashion, being armed at a political event would not be so unusual.........

And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones.

Casey


"And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones."

I totally agree with you here, but the bad/kooky ones cause untold damage to others and the good/sane ones are left with the fallout.

Originally Posted by Barak
Most folks would say that in a situation involving a child, a single mother, and an armed robber escaped from prison, the most important thing is that the child and the mother survive. It'd be better if the armed robber survives too, but if it works out that he doesn't, it's less loss than it would be if the mother or child hadn't made it.

I'm only saying the same thing. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.
Knowing you, and reading your post with ordinary care, I perfectly understood what you said, Barak. Lots of folks here are looking to spin it into something you didn't say.


Easy Steelie......





Casey
When guns are eliminated, killers will use bombs.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Barak
Most folks would say that in a situation involving a child, a single mother, and an armed robber escaped from prison, the most important thing is that the child and the mother survive. It'd be better if the armed robber survives too, but if it works out that he doesn't, it's less loss than it would be if the mother or child hadn't made it.

I'm only saying the same thing. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.
I perfectly understood what you said, Barak. Lots of folks are looking to spin it into something you didn't say.


No, most folks see EXACTLY what he said clearly, and that he's a nutjob.

You, as a fellow nutjob, can't/won't see it that way.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.



Not to get too far off point on this tragedy, but if if plenty of folks were armed in everyday fashion, being armed at a political event would not be so unusual.........

And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones.


Casey
I agree and while I am all for us modeling good behaviors to others I value being a father and husband enough that this is one area where I am going to err on the side of caution. If you want to pack at such events, it's your own business, but I'm not going to.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I believe he meant that it is less reprehensible and more understandable (not justifiable), from his radical anarchist perspective.

Thanks for trying to stick up for me.

Radical, huh? You think I'm radical? Interesting. All I did was accept the premise "Everyone owns himself" and try to follow it to its logical conclusions. Maybe that is radical.

Quote
If the Godfather sends out his goons to all the local businesses threatening to break people's legs if they don't pay for their "protection" services and garbage pickup, it's predictable that lots of folks would be angry, and some angry enough to seek out the Godfather to do him in, even though that would not be justified morally or criminally (Although, shooting the goons in self-defense would be, should they actually attempt to carry out their threat).

In my world, if somebody commits a crime (initiates force) against you, you're the only one who's qualified to determine what retaliation is justified. I have no standing to decide, because the crime wasn't committed against me. The State has no standing to decide, because the crime wasn't committed against it.

Of course, if you decide to delegate that decision to somebody who makes a profession of those decisions and is much more likely than you are to come up with a solution that will address the problem without completely screwing up the rest of your life, that's your prerogative. But the decision should be ultimately yours, if you're the victim.

It's just like hiring a plumber. If your pipe freezes and breaks, nobody should say you're not allowed to try to fix it yourself. It's your pipe, your house, your problem, and you have every right to do what you think is appropriate. Lots of people, though, will decide to hire a plumber to take care of it, because they believe his solution will be better and more professional than their own.

Quote
Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains.

That's what they say, for sure. It's interesting, though, how they finance their efforts with the very same sort of extortion that every other politician uses. Also, notice how they always conveniently fail, so that they don't actually have to give up any power.

Quote
Barak is a radical anarchist of the anarcho-capitalist bent.

And The_Real_Hawkeye is a minarchist libertarian.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
� Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains. �

That's the difference between a politician and a statesman � in Twain's words, the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.


Ken, thanks for the reminder; I had come to the point where I though the word statesman had become completely obsolete...
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Barak is a nut job. It's a fact that he's autistic and autistic folks are about as emotionless/detached as they come involving others. I'm sure he could give a [bleep] about anyone, as it's obvious he doesn't about himself since he had previously attempted to commit suicide.

It's also apparent that he is such a screw-up that we wasn't even able to pull off killing himself, which we now all have to suffer from his ineptitude.

Is it really a wonder he's a computer guy (requires little human interaction, which he sucks at). Of course he deals with prisoners also, because where the heck can they run to.



EXACTLY so.

I wholeheartedly agree.

Saying this, this way, or agreeing with it, might make Steelhead/me/you an azzhole for being so blunt with the facts. However, that does not change the factual content of what he said.

He pegged Barak squarely.
Off into Barakistan we go, as the Barakian attention-whore twists this thread right down the rabbit hole with him.
or cars, what if he would of driven a legally purchased car at high speed into the crowd? would they be crying to outlaw cars?
Originally Posted by djs


I totally agree with you here, but the bad/kooky ones cause untold damage to others and the good/sane ones are left with the fallout.




Short of banning firearm ownership and becoming a Soviet style police state, there will always be firearms, and there will always be kooks.

And the disgruntled/kooks still choose places where firearms in the hands of good Americans are unlikely......whether it be a school, university, an intentionally disarmed military building, liberal political event, or commercial airliner.

Let some kook try this at some of the Tea Party events I attended here in Colorado this summer........where 10% of the attendees were openly packing.......felt pretty safe from any assasins or kooks.....



Casey
CBS News is now reporting:
The gunman used a Glock with an extended magazine.

My wife even questioned the reports last night, saying
he must have reloaded. I guess a 30 rnd mag would explain that.
Originally Posted by Barak
Out on a limb in what way?


Originally Posted by mike762
Did you see the thread on the ultimate fighter who made joking public statements concerning being in the ring with the President? It got him a quick visit from the Secret Service. If you're looking for extraordinary attention, keep this up. You'll probably get it, First Amendment right or not. That's the kind of limb you're on.


Originally Posted by alpinecrick
In that under the circumstances being a bit more circumspect in our thoughts/beliefs directed at our leaders/politicians/fellow humans......(at the risk of sounding like Gus).

That's pretty much what I thought you'd say. Thanks for looking out for me.

Originally Posted by smokepole
I'll take a stab. Verbalizing an untenable position?

That surprises me, though. Which position do you find untenable?
Barak,

Politicians and you are a lot alike. You feel what you are saying is correct and politician feel what they say and do is correct. Politicians do what they feel is best for the country not what they know is best for the country. No one is perfect, read the bible, you'll learn we all have flaws. God the father, Jesus the son, and the Holy spirit are perfect, we on earth are not. Politicians make mistakes just like you and I make mistakes.

You said they are a step or two below a armed robber, You are a step or two above a nut job.
In no way shape or form were any of the victims doing anything to harm anyone. There is no justification for that mans action. She was holding a meeting to hear the people she represents. I don't see how that is/was hurting anyone.

Like I said I have never had an issue with you, but saying it is ok to kill innocent people (yes politicians and judges are innocent people in this case)is crazy! If they do something wrong you vote them out (their punishment) not kill them and people around them.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.



Not to get too far off point on this tragedy, but if if plenty of folks were armed in everyday fashion, being armed at a political event would not be so unusual.........

And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones.


Casey
+1, though I understand Cole Younger's point too.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
I can tell you there are very good reasons for not packing at a political event. I certainly wouldn't. Good way to get Oswalded.

There are plenty of crazoids running loose nowadays and if one of them decides to shoot a politician, I don't wanna even be near a gun lest some pusssy liberal screech that I did it. I can easily let the government be responsible for security at such an event and if I feel like I just gotta go, I will take my chances unarmed.



Not to get too far off point on this tragedy, but if if plenty of folks were armed in everyday fashion, being armed at a political event would not be so unusual.........

And I adamantly believe there are FAR more good Americans out there than bad/kooky ones.


Casey
+1, though I understand Cole Younger's point too.


Speaking of the kooky ones...
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
� Not all politicians, however, are like the Godfather, since some of them are actually working to place government back into its constitutional chains. �

That's the difference between a politician and a statesman � in Twain's words, the difference between the lightning bug and the lightning.
Well said.
He's attempted suicide and is autistic, in short why waste time arguing with a mentally unstable retard?
Originally Posted by Enrique
Barak,

Politicians and you are a lot alike. You feel what you are saying is correct and politician feel what they say and do is correct. Politicians do what they feel is best for the country not what they know is best for the country. No one is perfect, read the bible, you'll learn we all have flaws. God the father, Jesus the son, and the Holy spirit are perfect, we on earth are not. Politicians make mistakes just like you and I make mistakes.

You said they are a step or two below a armed robber, You are a step or two above a nut job.
In no way shape or form were any of the victims doing anything to harm anyone. There is no justification for that mans action. She was holding a meeting to hear the people she represents. I don't see how that is/was hurting anyone.

Like I said I have never had an issue with you, but saying it is ok to kill innocent people (yes politicians and judges are innocent people in this case)is crazy! If they do something wrong you vote them out (their punishment) not kill them and people around them.
This whole thing is a terrible tragedy for the victim's and their families. Just no other way to look at it. I always enjoy your posts Enrique.
Loughner scheduled to be arraigned at 11 am. IF anyone knows,is the jail part of the court complex or are the inmates housed in a separate facility separate from the courthouse?

Is vehicle transport necessary?
I think that I know now what a cauterized conscience is.
Superb choice of words.
Originally Posted by Barak
That surprises me, though. Which position do you find untenable?


I won't even get into a discussion of the worth of a politican's life vs. another human being--I disagree with you completely, but arguing the point with you won't do any good.

What's untenable is your attempt to assign some kind of rationale or justification for the gunman's selection of his victims. Because there is none.

The guy is insane, and I'm sure this will come out at trial. He had no reason to choose to kill a politician, judge, or little girl, he just wanted to kill someone.

Only an idiot would attempt to rationalize it. Or someone completely out of touch with reality.
One thing that can be pointed out is this:
People want what they can't have. When Clinton in the 90's issued his ban on certain weapons the value and want for those guns went up. Extended mags were sought. After the ban everyone that wanted one got one. Companies that seen how they could capitalize on it did. A handgun with a 33 round mag is not needed. At least I don't. If I can't defend myself and end a threat with a few shots, I doubt I am gonna have enough time to unload 33 rounds down the range.
It is my belief that extended mags, more people with military style weapons and the likes are all the effect of gun control and the fault of Clinton.
Look at Mexico, people can't have guns their without a permit. very few own guns because of the cost and fees. That leaves the population at the mercy of law enforcement/government and criminals. Proof that gun control does not work.

Someone described Barak as a retarded pitbull with lockjaw a few years back; attacked an issue without understanding it, grabbed it from the wrong end, too stupid to realize that he's got it by the wrong end, and completely incapable of letting it go.

To compound those problems, he's becoming more and more unstable as time goes on, with further and continuing advocations and condonations of lawlessness, usurpations of power, and violence.

He's been mentally unstable as to comprehensions of reality. He's becoming mentally unstable as to actions toward reality and certain segments of the population.

Res ipsa loquitur; "the thing speaks for itself".

It doesn't take much research or comprehension of what Barak has been saying, and where he's been going with it, to figure out that he's got serious problems and that they are getting worse.

Originally Posted by isaac
Superb choice of words.


Absolutely superb.
I believe there is NO explaining the irrational.
Originally Posted by Enrique
One thing that can be pointed out is this:
People want what they can't have. When Clinton in the 90's issued his ban on certain weapons the value and want for those guns went up. Extended mags were sought. After the ban everyone that wanted one got one. Companies that seen how they could capitalize on it did. A handgun with a 33 round mag is not needed. At least I don't. If I can't defend myself and end a threat with a few shots, I doubt I am gonna have enough time to unload 33 rounds down the range.
It is my belief that extended mags, more people with military style weapons and the likes are all the effect of gun control and the fault of Clinton.
Look at Mexico, people can't have guns their without a permit. very few own guns because of the cost and fees. That leaves the population at the mercy of law enforcement/government and criminals. Proof that gun control does not work.

Some great points.
Barak, I meant you were a radical in the sense of occupying the most extreme position on the libertarian scale. No offense was intended.

As for my being a minarchist libertarian, if that's the same as being a conservative in the tradition of US Senator Robert Taft, I'll accept the nomenclature. Libertarianism is at the heart of authentic conservatism, but the difference is only that a conservative seeks to conserve (or, where necessary, restore) those factors which have a historical track record of promoting and preserving liberty rather than ignoring history and shooting directly for liberty based on untested theories.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
I think that I know now what a cauterized conscience is.


Originally Posted by isaac
Superb choice of words.


Stunningly so.
Originally Posted by Enrique
In no way shape or form were any of the victims doing anything to harm anyone.

Giffords and Roll: how were they paid? Do you know where their salaries came from? One group of people, or its delegates, put them in office over the protests of another group of people, yet the second group of people is still extorted by the State to pay their salaries.

Completely ignoring any and all other offenses they may have committed while in office, that right there qualifies as doing something to harm someone. Extortion is a crime. (When the government does it, it's called taxation rather than extortion, but it's still an initiation of force, therefore a crime.)
Originally Posted by Barak

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.

But my perspective is considerably more mature now, because of two points that were revealed to me.

First, it's not useful to be angry at politicians for being corrupt human trash, any more than it would be useful to be angry at fish for swimming or birds for flying. They're politicians; it's who they are and what they do. Anger stems from unmet expectations, and anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

Second, when a politician is assassinated, three things happen: he becomes a martyr, with everybody saying how great he was and how sad it is that he's dead (you can see that right here on this thread); and he simply gets replaced with another politician. The depravity of human nature assures that there will always be more garbage standing in line to take his place. Then, of course, the martyr-worshipers beg the State to take more of their liberties away so that their rulers can be safer.

So no, I won't be flying into any rages and killing any politicians. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.


You are living proof that we live in a free society.
We just yesterday witnessed indefensible actions by an incomprehensible, mentally unstable, lunatic whose ramblings about creating new currencies, realities, societies, etc., were clear warning signs.

Just because a mentally unstable lunatic whose ramblings about creating new currencies, realities, societies, etc., are comprehensible does not mean that they are not clear warning signs.

Originally Posted by Enrique
A handgun with a 33 round mag is not needed. At least I don't. If I can't defend myself and end a threat with a few shots, I doubt I am gonna have enough time to unload 33 rounds down the range.



It was designed for the Glock 18, a fully automatic version of the 17, made for protection details. 33 rounds goes fast at a cyclic rate of 1300 rpm.

They're also pretty handy when using a Mech Tech carbine.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Enrique
In no way shape or form were any of the victims doing anything to harm anyone.

Giffords and Roll: how were they paid? Do you know where their salaries came from? One group of people, or its delegates, put them in office over the protests of another group of people, yet the second group of people is still extorted by the State to pay their salaries.

Completely ignoring any and all other offenses they may have committed while in office, that right there qualifies as doing something to harm someone. Extortion is a crime. (When the government does it, it's called taxation rather than extortion, but it's still an initiation of force, therefore a crime.)

=================

A fool and his words!
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Barak
That surprises me, though. Which position do you find untenable?

What's untenable is your attempt to assign some kind of rationale or justification for the gunman's selection of his victims. Because there is none.

The guy is insane, and I'm sure this will come out at trial. He had no reason to choose to kill a politician, judge, or little girl, he just wanted to kill someone.

From what I've read, he seemed pretty intent on getting to Giffords specifically. If he really didn't care whom he killed, why would he have been so discriminating at the beginning?

Sounds to me like he didn't mind creating a generalized mess, but he wanted to get Giffords first.

Saying "It wasn't Giffords, it couldn't have been Giffords, nothing she said or did could possibly have had anything to do with it, he was just insane" seems to prematurely eliminate a lot of possibilities.
This surprised me a little. I thought it would immediately focus on gun control, but it does look like they are focusing more on the anger about recent politics.

I had high hopes for this article MSNBC Story , but they lost me with this tag line at the beginning and I refused to read it. Typical MSNBC/NYT.



'Pretty soon we're not going to be able to find reasonable, decent people willing to subject themselves to serve in public office'
I think that some of them realize that the gun issue is a loser no matter the circumstances, and look to focus our attention on the "right wing white haters" that they think populate the Tea Party/Republican Party, totally ignoring this whack job's political leanings.

After reading Krugman's swill in the NYT, I have stopped reading or listening to most things that the MSM puts out, especially involving this subject.
Originally Posted by smokepole
... What's untenable is your attempt to assign some kind of rationale or justification for the gunman's selection of his victims. Because there is none.

The guy is insane, and I'm sure this will come out at trial. He had no reason to choose to kill a politician, judge, or little girl, he just wanted to kill someone.

Only an idiot would attempt to rationalize it. Or someone completely out of touch with reality.


Credible witness makes it certain that Gilffords was the target of the man.
There won't be any more gun control other than that which would be permitted by the SC under their ulitimate SC ruling as to scrutiny. For quick example,I seriously doubt this SC will rule that a localities prohibition against magazines containing more than,let's say 15 rounds, would be unconstitutional.

To think this tragedy will undo Heller or McDonald is paranoia!

Forgive the side-track but it's now been brought up 5 times, twice by one of our prolific libbers.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Sheesh!

Now we know beyond any faint glimmer of doubt that no post, no subject, is immune from inane argument, condemnation, and cheap shots.


I wanted to reply to this when I read it just to bump those wise words back to the top, but rather decided to wade thru another 5 pages of crap instead .
As I felt yesterday , my prayers are still with the victims and thier families .
My sincere wishes are that justice is done . Whether just the one loony or more connected if there are any.
And a pox on anyone using this tragic event to spout thier own agenda w/ vitriol from either side ( left or right ) without having the whole story .
[bleep] us again isaac.
I can't decide who I'd rather have STFU on this one: Barak/TRH, or isaac...
Again I will say:

"It is a damn shame, I don't care what her politics are. She is also a wife and mother.

Prayers for all the victims & their families."
isaac, if just one Justice changes his or her mind, Heller and/or McDonald can be reversed. Who knows how the shooting of a federal judge will impact future Supreme Court decisions. Probably not for the better as far as I am concerned. Rick
Originally Posted by T LEE
Again I will say:

"It is a damn shame, I don't care what her politics are. She is also a wife and mother.

Prayers for all the victims & their families."


Dayum straight!

And to the others harmed and killed as well. Senseless and pathetic.
I was out last evening and figured I would check in and see what the fire had to say about the shooting. My worst fears... a 40+ page [bleep] flinging exercise where some unbalanced nutjob decides to defend the evil of another unbalanced nutjob.

At least that is not the consensus opinion.

Democracy can be messy. It can be maddening. Sometimes it can be futile. But IF we are going to be a nation where we govern ourselves, the foundation it must be founded on is that political arguments are settled politically. You cannot grab a pistol and blow someone's brains out because you disagree with their politics.

If you can't get your arms around that one we cannot have a democracy or a republic. Take a good long look at Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Middle East, large swaths of Africa and Asia. These are places where this kind of violence rules or has allowed dictatorships and despots to come to power.

Will
Originally Posted by isaac
There won't be any more gun control other than that which would be permitted by the SC under their ulitimate SC ruling as to scrutiny. For quick example,I seriously doubt this SC will rule that a localities prohibition against magazines containing more than,let's say 15 rounds, would be unconstitutional.

To think this tragedy will undo Heller or McDonald is paranoia!

Forgive the side-track but it's now been brought up 5 times, twice by one of our prolific libbers.


Good Morning, there is not much of anything NEW this AM, ...just more talking head photo ops.

That damned "Spin" that Spanoid put on this is almost incomprehensible, and in view of everything thus far released, somewhere VERY close to outright LYING.

Barak,......to much of a puzz to leave his head on the tracks,
I suggest that he wash his mouth out with a revolver,.....that [bleep] went off the edge a LONG time ago,.....and I'd thought his crap could not get any worse,.....I was wrong, the man IS "The Enemy",...and this here site does NOT need his language posted.

TRH,......same......

Repellent, neither one of these lunatics has a clue (apparently) as to what a threat their self indulgent, fantasy driven text could become to this VERY open forum.

GTC

Being a politician is an unforgivable sin, punishable by immediate death, at anyone's hands, with no necessity for a trial, accusation, or warning. No due process, just a do act.

Takes care of every possible problem this side of Eden.

Simple.

Quick.

It's so logical, so obvious, that po' stupid me simply missed it. I'm so ashamed! I'm so embarrassed! How fortunate we are to have an omniscient among us!
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?



Myself, it's just a politician so I only give it half a shrug. If a meteor came down and hit congress while in session, I'd give it a shrug and a half.

I guess I just have little empathy for politicians and couldn't care less what happens to the lot of them(of course I wouldn't go out of my way to make something happen).

The operative words in Isaac's post are, "...this SC". No telling what happens once BHO appoints a Liberal.

Originally Posted by Penguin
Democracy can be messy. It can be maddening. Sometimes it can be futile. But IF we are going to be a nation where we govern ourselves, the foundation it must be founded on is that political arguments are settled politically. You cannot grab a pistol and blow someone's brains out because you disagree with their politics.

If you can't get your arms around that one we cannot have a democracy or a republic. Take a good long look at Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Middle East, large swaths of Africa and Asia. These are places where this kind of violence rules or has allowed dictatorships and despots to come to power.

Will


Nobody said anything to the contrary.
Ignoring mentally unstable lunatics, whether they be comprehensible or incomprehensible, is what got us this situation yesterday; it's what got us the unabomber; it's what got us UBL; it's what got us Manson, it's what got us Hitler...

You'd think that we'd learn that ignoring them, pacifying them, placating them, only gets us more of the same.

The question is, what do you do with them, how, and when, once they are identified?
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

The operative words in Isaac's post are, "...this SC". No telling what happens once BHO appoints a Liberal.



Another one...

But, to replace whom?
Barak,
You stated:
"Giffords and Roll: how were they paid? Do you know where their salaries came from? One group of people, or its delegates, put them in office over the protests of another group of people, yet the second group of people is still extorted by the State to pay their salaries.

Completely ignoring any and all other offenses they may have committed while in office, that right there qualifies as doing something to harm someone. Extortion is a crime. (When the government does it, it's called taxation rather than extortion, but it's still an initiation of force, therefore a crime.)"


Whether you agree with the government or not it is still your Government. For one who knows the Bible, it is clear in the words Jesus spoke "give unto Ceasar what is Ceasar's" this was said when Jesus was asked about taxes and he asked those who tried to trap him "who's face is on the coin you are holding?". And he responded.
In saying that, whether you like it or not it is far from extortion it is paying your taxes just like you are supposed to do.

Kique
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?



Myself, it's just a politician so I only give it half a shrug. If a meteor came down and hit congress while in session, I'd give it a shrug and a half.

I guess I just have little empathy for politicians and couldn't care less what happens to the lot of them(of course I wouldn't go out of my way to make something happen).


Yes.

The meteor line of thinking is not analogous, unless you or someone else has figured out how to install human control on a meteor.
Originally Posted by T LEE
Again I will say:

"It is a damn shame, I don't care what her politics are. She is also a wife and mother.

Prayers for all the victims & their families."
+1
Originally Posted by Steelhead
He's attempted suicide and is autistic, in short why waste time arguing with a mentally unstable retard?


autistic = retard?
My 13 yo is autistic,and is on the honor roll.So blow me.(note,Im not defending Barack)
How's that appointed liberal getting through both Houses? You guys are paranoid and, FlaRick,my man, don't forget the rule of Stare-Decisis.

Like always, in two weeks, after the shock,awe and blame game has minimized to normal levels, gun control will only be the chatter inside the blogs of the usual,harmless suspects.
Originally Posted by deersmeller
Originally Posted by smokepole
... What's untenable is your attempt to assign some kind of rationale or justification for the gunman's selection of his victims. Because there is none.

The guy is insane, and I'm sure this will come out at trial. He had no reason to choose to kill a politician, judge, or little girl, he just wanted to kill someone.

Only an idiot would attempt to rationalize it. Or someone completely out of touch with reality.


Credible witness makes it certain that Gilffords was the target of the man.


Misses the point entirely.

John Hinckley was intent on shooting Ronald Reagan--to impress Jody Foster, or rather, a movie character.

Mark David Chapman was intent on shooting John Lennon.

Ascribing some sort of rationale to their actions or intent is idiotic.

At best.
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Ignoring mentally unstable lunatics, whether they be comprehensible or incomprehensible, is what got us this situation yesterday; it's what got us the unabomber; it's what got us UBL; it's what got us Manson, it's what got us Hitler...

You'd think that we'd learn that ignoring them, pacifying them, placating them, only gets us more of the same.

The question is, what do you do with them, how, and when, once they are identified?


Good point. Lunatics are supposed to identify themselves when purchasing a handgun. What crazy person thought that would work?
At least Barak is part of the Kairos Prison Ministry and spreading the good word of God.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
At least Barak is part of the Kairos Prison Ministry and spreading the good word of God.


Among what other "teachings", is a far better question.
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
He's attempted suicide and is autistic, in short why waste time arguing with a mentally unstable retard?


autistic = retard?
My 13 yo is autistic,and is on the honor roll.So blow me.(note,Im not defending Barack)



Sweet Jesus dude. If I call my wife a bitch does that make your wife a bitch?

Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
He's attempted suicide and is autistic, in short why waste time arguing with a mentally unstable retard?


autistic = retard?
My 13 yo is autistic,and is on the honor roll.So blow me.(note,Im not defending Barack)



Sweet Jesus dude. If I call my wife a bitch does that make your wife a bitch?

just wanted to point that out.
In fact fluffy, why don't you take it further and connect all the dots. Most everyone here is calling Barak a nut job, Barak is autistic so then by default that must make all autistic nut jobs.

It's a LEAP and I'm thinking you are taking it all wrong. I was speaking about Barak. If I call him a nut job I'm not calling your son a nut job.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Being a politician is an forgivable sin, punishable by immediate death, at anyone's hands, with no necessity for a trial, accusation, or warning. No due process, just a do act.

Did you mean "unforgivable sin?"

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.

But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.

Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion. There aren't many offices you can get into these days without giving your integrity to somebody.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
In fact fluffy, why don't you take it further and connect all the dots. Most everyone here is calling Barak a nut job, Barak is autistic so then by default that must make all autistic nut jobs.

It's a LEAP and I'm thinking you are taking it all wrong. I was speaking about Barak. If I call him a nut job I'm not calling your son a nut job.


I told barack he was an idiot several months ago.
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
He's attempted suicide and is autistic, in short why waste time arguing with a mentally unstable retard?


autistic = retard?
My 13 yo is autistic,and is on the honor roll.So blow me.(note,Im not defending Barack)



Sweet Jesus dude. If I call my wife a bitch does that make your wife a bitch?

just wanted to point that out.



I don't need anything pointed out as I am able to reason. I know what I say about one doesn't pertain to another. Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.
Regardless of politics or views, this was a horrible act. This shooting was a cowardly attack. It was perpetrated upon innocents. IMHO, this monster should be put away, in the most horrible prison, for the rest of his pitiful life! After, mind you, an appropriatly fair trial an sentencing. I, for one, would not be against a good tuning up by the family members that have been hurt or have lost a loved one in this heinous attack! MTG
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
In fact fluffy, why don't you take it further and connect all the dots. Most everyone here is calling Barak a nut job, Barak is autistic so then by default that must make all autistic nut jobs.

It's a LEAP and I'm thinking you are taking it all wrong. I was speaking about Barak. If I call him a nut job I'm not calling your son a nut job.


I told barack he was an idiot several months ago.



Do you think his autism factors in at all in regards to his detached feelings and lack of empathy? If so does calling him an idiot then make your son one? Of course not.
violent rhetoric from the bolshies..... https://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbth...olent_rhetoric_from_the_bols#Post4798999

Originally Posted by deersmeller
Originally Posted by Steve_NO
with all the ridiculous attempts to tie the shootings by a psycho leftie to Sarah Palin, this is a good roundup and reality reminder of who is actually throwing around violent rhetoric.

Gifford voted against Pelosi for speaker, which apparently is a capital offense amongst the moron class.

http://theblogprof.blogspot.com/2011/01/figures-man-who-shot-az-congresswoman.html


That may well be the mental trigger that was missing.
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas

The operative words in Isaac's post are, "...this SC". No telling what happens once BHO appoints a Liberal.



Another one...

But, to replace whom?


That is the question, let us hope that none leave before he is voted out, or a Liberal leaves.
The hell he didn't. That's what this thread is all about: rationalizing evil.

He is trying to come up with a valid reason as to 'why' this unstable lunatic was justified in shooting one of OUR elected representatives. Notice the supposed crimes she is guilty of in his mind? Stealing, extortion, unjustified use of force to access tax money.

No, in the minds of Barak and more than a few other anarchists this evil is not evil at all. And if they cannot change course then they become the enemy of self governance. Then they become MY enemy.

Will
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Being a politician is an forgivable sin, punishable by immediate death, at anyone's hands, with no necessity for a trial, accusation, or warning. No due process, just a do act.

Did you mean "unforgivable sin?"

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.

But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.

Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion. There aren't many offices you can get into these days without giving your integrity to somebody.


Res ipsa loquitur.
Originally Posted by MTGunner
I, for one, would not be against a good tuning up by the family members that have been hurt or have lost a loved one in this heinous attack! MTG

+1
News reports this morning say authorities had this guy on the radar due to a previous encounter. In fact, one involving the same killer and Giffords. Also, they are now seeking a second person of interest. So NOW what's wrong with this picture? Who missed the red blinking danger light several years ago?
Shooter must have been using 9 mm FMJ.
To cause a through and through head wound and not kill her.
That plus immediate intense trauma care.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.
I havent had any coffee yet today.
You worked your way throught it. I gotta wife who's still crying over being called a hog.
Posted By: RoninPhx giffords/roll - 01/09/11
a few things should be pointed out concerning the above, pointed out in the statewide azzwipe:
Giffords is attributed to owning a glock and has been a strong support of the 2nt amendment and gun rights.
Which isn't surprising at all given the district she represents.

Contrary to other parts of the country, it is considered pretty normal for politicians to meet people in their district in public venues. She was NOT their to give speeches, and none were given, she was their to LISTEN to people in her district. Just because your politicians don't do that, doesn't mean that ours don't.
Judge Roll was appointed by Bush, and is a life long conservative republican, respected on both sides of the fence as to judicial mine.

people are going to use this tragedy to spin their own arguments in a lot of different areas.
Quoting the sheriff there as talk radio etc is contributory, is spinning, for his own political purpose.

And we unfortunately will have the idiot savant and his minions posting bullsh*t on the net.
Anybody that can't see the tragedy in unneeded loss of human life and even on this forum spinning and using this sad story to promulgate their own political view is proof of the idiot savant label.
I have a long term friendship with a guy in the midwest is as to liberal as i am to conservative. We exchange bantor all the time. He is a gun owner too by the way. He has emailed me periodically about the right wing loonies. I have always said they are more on the left. I just wrote him an email apologizing, that there are loonies all over the place, certainly on this forum, including the resident anarchist.
40pages of tripe for the most part, discussions about hi cap mags, blah blah blah.
We have degraded to a poor society when the respect for human life is so trivial among some.
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.
I havent had any coffee yet today.


We cool?
Originally Posted by Penguin
The hell he didn't. That's what this thread is all about: rationalizing evil.

He is trying to come up with a valid reason as to 'why' this unstable lunatic was justified in shooting one of OUR elected representatives. Notice the supposed crimes she is guilty of in his mind? Stealing, extortion, unjustified use of force to access tax money.

No, in the minds of Barak and more than a few other anarchists this evil is not evil at all. And if they cannot change course then they become the enemy of self governance. Then they become MY enemy.

Will


Exactly.

The fact is that the mental instability and delusional reality of someone caused yesterday; it caused Reagan's shooting; it caused the unabomber; it caused the Holocaust; it caused the triggering of WWI; it caused a myriad similar incidents throughout history.

Mental instability and delusional realities can become VERY dangerous.

The questions that now stand before us as a society (and on smaller scales) again are: when do we identify them as exactly that, and what do we do about them once identified?

I don't believe that we have to look very far to find some examples that we really should examine more closely with exactly those questions in mind, taking off the blinders, and truly looking at them.
Originally Posted by Penguin
He is trying to come up with a valid reason as to 'why' this unstable lunatic was justified in shooting one of OUR elected representatives.

Oh, give it a rest. Have you really seen anybody--not just me, anybody--try to justify any of the shootings, even the politicians?

Of course not.

Quote
No, in the minds of Barak and more than a few other anarchists this evil is not evil at all.

The shooter is an evil man who did an evil thing. The reasons he did it are of only academic interest. He should be handed over to his victims and their families; beyond that what happens to him should be between them and him.

Quote
And if they cannot change course then they become the enemy of self governance. Then they become MY enemy.

Lots of drama there.

My objective is self governance, although when I say it I mean "governing myself" rather than "having politicians govern me."
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?


I for one would be, this is not the way to run a railroad, that and the fact innocent bystanders were also killed or injured.

This IS NOT the way a republic is run. It IS the way 3rd world chit holes are.
Originally Posted by isaac
How's that appointed liberal getting through both Houses? You guys are paranoid and, FlaRick,my man, don't forget the rule of Stare-Decisis.

Like always, in two weeks, after the shock,awe and blame game has minimized to normal levels, gun control will only be the chatter inside the blogs of the usual,harmless suspects.


I'm no lawyer but I thought SC nominees only needed Senate approval. I could be wrong...
Originally Posted by isaac
How's that appointed liberal getting through both Houses? You guys are paranoid and, FlaRick,my man, don't forget the rule of Stare-Decisis.

Like always, in two weeks, after the shock,awe and blame game has minimized to normal levels, gun control will only be the chatter inside the blogs of the usual,harmless suspects.


isaac, don't lawyers have a saying about bad facts make for bad law? Judicial devotion to Stare-Decisis seems to come and go. Rick
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas
Originally Posted by isaac
How's that appointed liberal getting through both Houses? You guys are paranoid and, FlaRick,my man, don't forget the rule of Stare-Decisis.

Like always, in two weeks, after the shock,awe and blame game has minimized to normal levels, gun control will only be the chatter inside the blogs of the usual,harmless suspects.


I'm no lawyer but I thought SC nominees only needed Senate approval. I could be wrong...


I believe you are right.
Again Barak taxes is not extortion. Read the Bible again or does Jesus' words pertaining to taxes not apply to you?
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?


Yes, actually I would. This type of action isn't warranted and only makes our case IRT firearms ownership, and liberty in general, harder to defend. It opens too many doors justifying increased scrutiny and limits on the people in an era that has seen too many abrogations of our freedom already. We have a method for changing things, and it was given good use this November, but it seems too slow and in the wrong direction for some. Newton's Third Law applies here, and the reaction to this incident may be very detrimental to our freedoms.
Barak,

Then come right out and say you were wrong and that there is NO justification for taking a pistol and blowing this woman's brains out. None.

The exercise of her constitutional duty to collect and spend tax money? No. The use of the rule of law to collect tax money? No.

You can't have it both ways Barak. Either this is evil from an unbalanced mind or it is not. There is no justification for evil and you have repeatedly tried to come up with one.

Will
Originally Posted by Enrique
Again Barak taxes is not extortion. Read the Bible again or does Jesus' words pertaining to taxes not apply to you?

I read it again. Where does he say it's not extortion?
Originally Posted by Steelhead
� Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.

� while so many others have become so proud of being insensitive �

+1. Could not have said it better. Look for all manner of proposed new gun restrictions at the Federal level. Please note I said proposed.
Where does he say it is?
He said pay your taxes. He didn't say pay your taxes only if you agree with government.
Originally Posted by mike762
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?

Yes, actually I would. �

So would I.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Originally Posted by fluffy
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.
I havent had any coffee yet today.


We cool?
yep [Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Steelhead
� Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.

� while so many others have become so proud of being insensitive �




That would be me. I take a certain pride in not giving a dam about what befalls a politician.


Innocent bystanders,..yes. Politicians,..not so much.


Of course, people in general usually jade me which is why I live back in the woods.
Fox just interviewed a Dr that helped restrain the shooter. Sounded to me like the shooter was trying to change magazines when they restrained him. A woman grabbed the gun and magazine from his as three guys were on top of him.

He was shooing into a tight group of people.

Also heard that it was a Glock 19.

FWIW...
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Steelhead
� Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.

� while so many others have become so proud of being insensitive �


Some are just more subtle about it, makes them no less insensitive and perhaps more of a snake. Can't abide a snake
Originally Posted by Penguin
Barak,

Then come right out and say you were wrong and that there is NO justification for taking a pistol and blowing this woman's brains out. None.

I'll say there was no justification, but I won't say that I was wrong, because I never said there was justification.

Quote
You can't have it both ways Barak. Either this is evil from an unbalanced mind or it is not. There is no justification for evil and you have repeatedly tried to come up with one.

Go back and read some more.

I said very little at all about the shooter. The thing I said that took this whole thread off to the races was that the injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. The shooter didn't enter into that argument. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

My fictional support for the shooter was manufactured out of whole cloth as the quality folks all struggled desperately to be seen loudly condemning me for showing insufficient deference to the Almighty State (pbui).
Originally Posted by rrroae
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Steelhead
� Gotta wonder how people have become so sensitive.

� while so many others have become so proud of being insensitive �




That would be me. I take a certain pride in not giving a dam about what befalls a politician.


Innocent bystanders,..yes. Politicians,..not so much.


Of course, people in general usually jade me which is why I live back in the woods.


What other folks do you put in the sub-human category?
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by mike762
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?

Yes, actually I would. �

So would I.

Me too.
Matthew 22:15-22

Originally Posted by VAnimrod
... and what do we do about them once identified?


Well, they're not going to be locked up in mental institutions, like they used to be.

That would cost money, more money than it costs for Medicaid to pay for the meds that lunatics like Loughner take or choose not to take, depending on how they wish to exercise their presumed right to an independent lifestyle.

Locking them up isn't going to happen for the same reason we're not keeping career felons locked up for their entire sentences. Taxpayers do not want to spend money on it.

Taxpayers - not the usual run of folk who drop by the 'Fire, of course - would rather piss and moan and complain about atrocities such as this, than do the ONE THING that would truly make a difference, not just to the congresswoman, but thousands of other families each year, and that is ...

Open up their frigging checkbooks and PAY for institutionalization of the dangerously unstable.

Americans as a whole are just too cheap to do it.

- Tom
Originally Posted by FlaRick


What other folks do you put in the sub-human category?




Lawyers, judges, kids who wear their pants halfway off their azz, rappers,.....


Oh the humanity!!!
Some of you may have been just as mad if had been Pelosi and the like, but you made downright fools of yourselves cheering when Ted Kennedy died an excruciating death of brain cancer.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by mike762
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?

Yes, actually I would. �

So would I.

Me too.




Me,...not so much.


Don't condone it but I certainly won't lose any sleep over it.
Matthew 22:15-22
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. "Teacher," they said, "we know you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren't swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, "You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax." They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, "Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?"

"Caesar's," they replied.

Then he said to them, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."

Nowhere did Jesus say it was or was not extortion. So your words of justification have no backing.

I agree with you about the Ted thread.
On a swing through Sierra Vista, not long after the elections, she was over at Trail Boss Guns and Gear on Fry blvd. looking for a holster for her Pistola.

Lots of our Az. elected reps PACK.

GTC

I dunno. Maybe because Ted WAS a murderer himself and his horrible death was delayed justice?? Works for me.
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
Some of you may have been just as mad if had been Pelosi and the like, but you made downright fools of yourselves cheering when Ted Kennedy died and excruciating death of brain cancer.



Apparently that was different.


Can't help but snicker when I read some of this stuff.
There is that also.
Barak has put himself beyond the Pale with his comments on this.

Originally Posted by mike762
Originally Posted by rrroae
Would folks be as upset about this incident if it had been Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Clinton or Obama who had gotten hit?


Yes, actually I would. This type of action isn't warranted and only makes our case IRT firearms ownership, and liberty in general, harder to defend. It opens too many doors justifying increased scrutiny and limits on the people in an era that has seen too many abrogations of our freedom already. We have a method for changing things, and it was given good use this November, but it seems too slow and in the wrong direction for some. Newton's Third Law applies here, and the reaction to this incident may be very detrimental to our freedoms.

Yes. Very well said. The totality of the circumstances of this tragic event pose a significant threat to our liberties. In fact, short of assassination of a president, I can't think of a situation that could creat a greater emotional and political perfect storm for acceptance of further restrictions on individual freedom.

Collateral damage will be further stigmatization of the general population of persons with some form of mental illness, who will be lumped with the very small percentage of violent "nut jobs", and considered dangerous.

Paul
Originally Posted by Enrique
Matthew 22:15-22
Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. "Teacher," they said, "we know you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren't swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"
But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, "You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax." They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, "Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?"

"Caesar's," they replied.

Then he said to them, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."

Nowhere did Jesus say it was or was not extortion. So your words of justification have no backing.

I believe it was you who claimed the Bible proved your point that taxation is not extortion, therefore the onus is on you to provide the verse which says it is not.
Originally Posted by tjm10025

Originally Posted by VAnimrod
... and what do we do about them once identified?


Well, they're not going to be locked up in mental institutions, like they used to be.

That would cost money, more money than it costs for Medicaid to pay for the meds that lunatics like Loughner take or choose not to take, depending on how they wish to exercise their presumed right to an independent lifestyle.

Locking them up isn't going to happen for the same reason we're not keeping career felons locked up for their entire sentences. Taxpayers do not want to spend money on it.

Taxpayers - not the usual run of folk who drop by the 'Fire, of course - would rather piss and moan and complain about atrocities such as this, than do the ONE THING that would truly make a difference, not just to the congresswoman, but thousands of other families each year, and that is ...

Open up their frigging checkbooks and PAY for institutionalization of the dangerously unstable.

Americans as a whole are just too cheap to do it.

- Tom


I'm not sure I want to agree with you in that I'm not sure I want to pay for it either. But I will agree from past experience in trying to get things done for clients and the like, that there are just not very many viable options for taking care of people who are mentally ill in a dangerous way BEFORE they do something like this.

I've seen guys go out and do something crazy (maybe not to this scale)get sent to prison, get medicated, and in a year or two he is perfectly normal.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
I agree with you about the Ted thread.


Same here. That one ran some good folk off.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Where does he say it is?
He said pay your taxes. He didn't say pay your taxes only if you agree with government.

Extortion is when you force somebody to give you something of his, even if he doesn't want to, under threat of violence.

Taxation is when the State forces somebody to give it something of his, even if he doesn't want to, under threat of violence.

Same-same--except that the State gets away with it, because it's the State.

Did you read the link? Jesus isn't saying that the government had a right to demand the tax under consideration. As a matter of fact, he's saying precisely the opposite. Don't miss verse 26. But he thought that paying it wouldn't do any significant damage, and refusing to pay it would lead to unnecessary and unproductive trouble.
Originally Posted by Steve_NO
Barak has put himself beyond the Pale with his comments on this.

Well, the fictional portrayal of what he said is certainly beyond the pale. A reading of his actual posts utilizing ordinary care shows no such thing.
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
I dunno. Maybe because Ted WAS a murderer himself and his horrible death was delayed justice?? Works for me.


She voted for the health care bill. I've seen lots of the people on this thread who claim to be outraged at this killing, railing against the injustice of the health care bill with its "DEATH PANELS" because they believe it will result in bad medical care, premature deaths, and possibly state sanctioned murder.

I still think this whole deal is a trajedy, I'm just trying to get a handle on whose death this board says it is okay to cheer. It seems a little inconsistent.
TRH/Barak,

read Matthew 22:15-22 The answer is there. If he is saying to pay your taxes, then how is it extortion?
I read Barak's verse and understand it. Read mine and you'll see that he said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." Nowhere did he say if you want to and nowhere did he say pay it but its extortion.
I was directing my comment to your statement about Ted Kennedy. You went to an apples or oranges tack,not me.
BTW Barak, did you read my verse?
Originally Posted by Barak
� the injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. �

That in itself relegates the politicians to the status of subhumans and directly implies that they're less entitled to the same God-given rights as humans � which therefore implies that anyone who "violates" any of those rights is justified in doing so.

An odd way, indeed, to love your neighbor as yourself.

Tunnel vision is unwise enough. Watching the world through a hypodermic needle is even less realistic.
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH/Barak,

read Matthew 22:15-22 The answer is there. If he is saying to pay your taxes, then how is it extortion?
I read Barak's verse and understand it. Read mine and you'll see that he said "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's." Nowhere did he say if you want to and nowhere did he say pay it but its extortion.
Jesus also instructed us not to resist robbers, but he did not imply by this that robbery was not robbery.
Here's something fresh, Wonder where this'll go...a still photo of a guy on a store security camera,.....

GTC


Link: http://azstarnet.com/news/local/51bb5006-1bd6-11e0-9fec-001cc4c002e0.html


Police release photo of man 'possibly associated' with suspect

Posted: Sunday, January 9, 2011 2:44 am


Police are seeking a man who was seen at the shopping center where Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was shot and may possibly be associated with the suspect who is in custody.

He is described as Caucasian, 40 to 50 years old, dark hair and was wearing blue jeans and a dark blue jacket, according to the police media release.

Anyone with information is asked to contact 911, 88-CRIME or the FBI at 791-6974.

Originally Posted by EvilTwin
I was directing my comment to your statement about Ted Kennedy. You went to an apples or oranges tack,not me.


She voted to implement state sanctioned murder, no? Or I mean at least that is what a lot of you have said previously about the health care reform bill. Is getting drunk and having a wreck that results in the death of a young lady somehow worse than consciously voting for a bill that over 70% of your constituents WERE AGAINST that will result in the deaths of thousands if not millions of people?

Once again, I think it is a trajedy all the way around. I'm just trying to figure out whose death the board says that I can cheer, and whose death is a trajedy.
How is it robbery if he instructed us to pay taxes?

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2022:15-22&version=NIV
Same location barak posted his verse from so you guys don't think I am lying or something.

Either way no justification that the judge and congresswoman were less important than the others at the crime like Barak is suggesting. everyone was equally important in this. If there is one that is more important is that poor little girl that still ahd the world infront of her.
No justification buddy for anyone to have died.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
� the onus is on you to provide the verse which says it is not.

's
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by bigsqueeze
Hey Barack! (...) Whether you agree politically or disagree, human life is human life.

True, but politicians are only politicians.

Quote
I notice that your user name happens to be the first name of that big spending marxist, socialist, anti-capitalist, anti free market and growth, anti Constitutionalist azz hole who happens to occupy the White House!!

Not quite. The word sounds very similar in Hebrew and Arabic; it means "lightning." Of course, it looks very different, because Hebrew and Arabic have wildly different alphabets. But when the word is transliterated into English from Hebrew, it's traditionally spelled "barak," and when it's transliterated from Arabic, it's traditionally spelled "barack."

Hence the spelling difference.

But of course I've been using this screen name since long before anyone knew who Barack Obama (or Ehud Barak, for that matter) was.

And if you're seriously comparing me politically to Obama, you need to stick around and read a post or two. The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist. The rest of it is dead wrong.
...........Not comparing you politically to Obama. I was comparing your user name to him.
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
I dunno. Maybe because Ted WAS a murderer himself and his horrible death was delayed justice?? Works for me.



So you're appointing yourself judge, jury and executioner?


lol


Folks will justify anything when it suites them. No one can say with 100% certainty that 'ol Teddy murdered that girl but they have no problem calling for him to befall a horrible death because he's a Kennedy and a liberal so therefore he must be guilty.


As others have pointed it is somewhat fascinating seeing all the empathy for a politician by many of the same folks who not so subtly called for an open season on liberals and moderates.


As for 'ol Ted,....he didn't rate half a shrug.
Interesting debate.

Just curious, had Elser, Stauffenberg, Tresckow et al been successful in their attempts to kill Hitler and saved several million lives..... would those suggesting that assassination attempts are always wrong, still hold that opinion?

Obviously Giffords isn't Hitler, the question is only as to the opinions that it wouldn't matter even if it was Pelosi or Obama.

So is it the individual act you all are condemning or is it a subjective judgment as to whether the target was deserving?


And if individual acts are always wrong, exactly how do you fellas figure you would stop a tyrant if we ever had one? Voting is done away with or reached a point of charade.... Protesting and forming of militias will, under a tyrant, be illegal and met with force either overtly or Gestapo/Stasi/NKVD style.

So how do you fellas gauge what is an acceptable act and what is not?
Here's our former Surgeon General, Dr. Richard Carmona. Years back this fellow was on his way to work, and in busy Tucson traffic (around Grant and Oracle).....came upon a crime in progress, classic "Loonie with a Gun" scenario.

He exited his car, and dropped the loonie with one well placed shot from his sidearm.

Some other attendent video in this .....

Link: http://azstarnet.com/online/video/vmix_a1ab5f92-1ba0-11e0-b637-001cc4c03286.html

Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Barak
� the injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. �

That in itself relegates the politicians to the status of subhumans and directly implies that they're less entitled to the same God-given rights as humans � which therefore implies that anyone who "violates" any of those rights is justified in doing so.

No, I think you're making too big a leap there. A horse, for example, is pretty uncontroversially subhuman, but that doesn't imply that anyone who kills a horse is justified in doing so. There are good reasons to kill a horse and bad reasons to kill a horse, and in general somebody who kills a horse for a bad reason should expect hard times ahead.

Nevertheless, a situation where a human dies and a horse survives is more tragic than a situation where a horse dies and a human survives.

As to whether politicians are subhuman or not...it's an interesting question. If they are simply fundamentally incapable of restraining themselves, then they don't bear any moral responsibility for the death and devastation they cause, but they're also pretty undeniably subhuman.

On the other hand, if they're fully human, it means that they've chosen to commit the crimes they've committed, when they could have made different choices instead, and are therefore fully responsible for them.

Quote
An odd way, indeed, to love your neighbor as yourself.

I'll admit that it'd be awfully difficult for me to love a politician. Much easier to love an armed robber.

Say--if it works out that they're subhuman, does that mean they don't count as neighbors?
A FIRST person murder vs something that has yet to occur??? Hell if Barney Fwanks should get AIDS as a result of his homosexual BEHAVIOR and ACTS and die horribly, I wouldn't waste my time on sympathy for him either. Gabrielle Giffords and the other folks had done nothing that would call for such a fierce retribution. So cut the Kunstler/Kuby approach.
"So how do you fellas gauge what is an acceptable act and what is not?"

On a case to case basis,...like any REAL Conservative does, after thorough examination of conscience.

Most CERTAINLY not by paying attention to some of the diseased weirdos posting here.

GTC
Originally Posted by Foxbat
Interesting debate.

Just curious, had Elser, Stauffenberg, Tresckow et al been successful in their attempts to kill Hitler and saved several million lives..... would those suggesting that assassination attempts are always wrong, still hold that opinion?

Obviously Giffords isn't Hitler, the question is only as to the opinions that it wouldn't matter even if it was Pelosi or Obama.

So is it the individual act you all are condemning or is it a subjective judgment as to whether the target was deserving?


And if individual acts are always wrong, exactly how do you fellas figure you would stop a tyrant if we ever had one? Voting is done away with or reached a point of charade.... Protesting and forming of militias will, under a tyrant, be illegal and met with force either overtly or Gestapo/Stasi/NKVD style.

So how do you fellas gauge what is an acceptable act and what is not?

+2
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?
Originally Posted by Enrique

No justification buddy for anyone to have died.
It would seem, then, that we are all in agreement on that point.
Originally Posted by Spanokopitas
Originally Posted by isaac
How's that appointed liberal getting through both Houses? You guys are paranoid and, FlaRick,my man, don't forget the rule of Stare-Decisis.

Like always, in two weeks, after the shock,awe and blame game has minimized to normal levels, gun control will only be the chatter inside the blogs of the usual,harmless suspects.


I'm no lawyer but I thought SC nominees only needed Senate approval. I could be wrong...

==================

Sorry fellas, meant to say the Senate Judiciary Committee rather than HOR. Of course, such committee is now chaired by the GOP.Plus,in the very unlikely event the top 4 conservative Justices or Kennedy were subject to being replaced, Senate confirmation of a lib Justice would be very unlikely given the current make-up of the Senate coupled with cloture and filibuster options. To think another SOTO or Kagan is going to happen on this watch only gives you props for a very,vivid imagination.So, you're still paranoid.
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
A FIRST person murder vs something that has yet to occur??? Hell if Barney Fwanks should get AIDS as a result of his homosexual BEHAVIOR and ACTS and die horribly, I wouldn't waste my time on sympathy for him either. Gabrielle Giffords and the other folks had done nothing that would call for such a fierce retribution. So cut the Kunstler/Kuby approach.



And there you have it.


We rate our compassion for politicians based on their record.
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?

Yes, but not particularly well. (Me, anyway; I don't know about The_Real_Hawkeye.) I'm more of a shooter than I am a hunter. So far I've always made good kill shots--never wounded an animal--but I suck at things like analyzing the terrain and walking quietly through the woods. I also eat what I shoot and I've never collected trophies or posed for pictures...it's always seemed a bit ghoulish to me.

Does that help?
Why not?? I based my compassion for Ted Bundy on HIS behavioral record.
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?
Whenever I get a chance on private land. Will not do so on public land, though, since too many kooks out there.
No,their personal actions. How else do you rate someone's worthiness to you?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?
Whenever I get a chance on private land. Will not do so on public land, though, since too many kooks out there.

==========================

It took courage for you to go there.
http://azstarnet.com/article_91db5db4-1b74-11e0-ba23-001cc4c002e0.html

You guys are arguing over a mute point i could care less about . This is just more fuel for the Anti gunners and i do care about that.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
since too many kooks out there.

I'd agree if you and barak were on the same piece of public land.
Originally Posted by rrroae
Originally Posted by EvilTwin
A FIRST person murder vs something that has yet to occur??? Hell if Barney Fwanks should get AIDS as a result of his homosexual BEHAVIOR and ACTS and die horribly, I wouldn't waste my time on sympathy for him either. Gabrielle Giffords and the other folks had done nothing that would call for such a fierce retribution. So cut the Kunstler/Kuby approach.



And there you have it.


We rate our compassion for politicians based on their record.

Speak for yourself.

I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.
Medical condition update on Fox now.
Originally Posted by bea175
http://azstarnet.com/article_91db5db4-1b74-11e0-ba23-001cc4c002e0.html

You guys are arguing over a mute point i could care less about . This is just more fuel for the Anti gunners and i do care about that.
All points are mute until someone with the ability to speak gives voice to them.
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Barak is a nut job. It's a fact that he's autistic and autistic folks are about as emotionless/detached as they come involving others. I'm sure he could give a [bleep] about anyone, as it's obvious he doesn't about himself since he had previously attempted to commit suicide.

It's also apparent that he is such a screw-up that we wasn't even able to pull off killing himself, which we now all have to suffer from his ineptitude.

Is it really a wonder he's a computer guy (requires little human interaction, which he sucks at). Of course he deals with prisoners also, because where the heck can they run to.



Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Off into Barakistan we go, as the Barakian attention-whore twists this thread right down the rabbit hole with him.



Coming from two guys who have 10's of thousands of posts on an internet forum betwen them, calling somebody else a nut and attention whore is rather strange in and of itself........


Oh yeah, that's right, this thread is about an elected official and a score of other Americans who have been killed and wounded.......


Casey
Originally Posted by Barak


I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.



As do I.
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
I'd agree if you and barak were on the same piece of public land.
grin Chuckling, here.
Originally Posted by isaac
Medical condition update on Fox now.
Keep us informed.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?

Yes, but not particularly well. (Me, anyway; I don't know about The_Real_Hawkeye.) I'm more of a shooter than I am a hunter. So far I've always made good kill shots--never wounded an animal--but I suck at things like analyzing the terrain and walking quietly through the woods. I also eat what I shoot and I've never collected trophies or posed for pictures...it's always seemed a bit ghoulish to me.

Does that help?


I'd venture to say that ANY animal with normal animal senses goes to full red alert within 5-600 yards of your [bleep] up personna.

Hell, I'd BET on it.

My gentlest of dogs alerts, barks and growls at creeps,.....as I am sure she would at YOU.

GTC
Rather pathetic and extraordinarily lazy.
Originally Posted by isaac
Medical condition update on Fox now.




Fingers crossed!!!





I've got the tobasco ready just in case I need to dab some in the eyes for a good fake cry.
Originally Posted by isaac
Rather pathetic and extraordinarily lazy.



Don't worry, I judge attorneys by the same standards.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by djs


I totally agree with you here, but the bad/kooky ones cause untold damage to others and the good/sane ones are left with the fallout.




Short of banning firearm ownership and becoming a Soviet style police state, there will always be firearms, and there will always be kooks.

And the disgruntled/kooks still choose places where firearms in the hands of good Americans are unlikely......whether it be a school, university, an intentionally disarmed military building, liberal political event, or commercial airliner.

Let some kook try this at some of the Tea Party events I attended here in Colorado this summer........where 10% of the attendees were openly packing.......felt pretty safe from any assasins or kooks.....

Casey


Regardless of how many are packing, the initiative will always go to the one (in this case, the nut job) who draws and shoots first. 30 years ago, I had a neighbor who a Secret Service agent and he once told me that even with the extensive training they go through, he believed that a committed gunman with minimal training could get off 7-8 shots before they could effectively respond.

This was before the John Hinckley/Ronald Regan incident. Hinckley used a cheap revolver and was not very practiced and yet he got off 5-6 shots and hit the President, Brady and a Secret Service Agent before he was subdued.

Also recall the 1998 US Capital shooting in which 2 Capitol Police Officers were killed before the shooter could be shot. He also missed with several bullets. My wife was in the Capital Credit Union when one bullet struck a door frame that she had just walked through.

Armed Tea Party Rally or not, innocent folks get hurt and we feel the consequences.
Originally Posted by Barak
Saying "It wasn't Giffords, it couldn't have been Giffords, nothing she said or did could possibly have had anything to do with it, he was just insane" seems to prematurely eliminate a lot of possibilities.


The thing that bothers me most is that you seem to revel in those possibilities.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?

Yes, but not particularly well. (Me, anyway; I don't know about The_Real_Hawkeye.) I'm more of a shooter than I am a hunter. So far I've always made good kill shots--never wounded an animal--but I suck at things like analyzing the terrain and walking quietly through the woods. I also eat what I shoot and I've never collected trophies or posed for pictures...it's always seemed a bit ghoulish to me.

Does that help?


I'd venture to say that ANY animal with normal animal senses goes to full red alert within 5-600 yards of your [bleep] up personna.

Hell, I'd BET on it.

My gentlest of dogs alerts, barks and growls at creeps,.....as I am sure she would at YOU.

GTC


Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?

Then the Pharisees went out and laid plans to trap him in his words. They sent their disciples to him along with the Herodians. "Teacher," they said, "we know you are a man of integrity and that you teach the way of God in accordance with the truth. You aren't swayed by men, because you pay no attention to who they are. Tell us then, what is your opinion? Is it right to pay taxes to Caesar or not?"

But Jesus, knowing their evil intent, said, "You hypocrites, why are you trying to trap me? Show me the coin used for paying the tax." They brought him a denarius, and he asked them, "Whose portrait is this? And whose inscription?"

"Caesar's," they replied.

Then he said to them, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's."

When they heard this, they were amazed. So they left him and went away.

In Romans 13:1, Paul brings further clarification to this concept, along with an even broader responsibility to Christians:

"Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God."

Therefore, we can conclude from this verse, if we don't pay taxes we are rebelling against the authorities established by God.

Romans 13:2 gives this warning:

"Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."

And finally, regarding the paying of taxes, Paul couldn't make it any clearer in Romans 13:5-7:

Therefore, it is necessary to submit to the authorities, not only because of possible punishment but also because of conscience. This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God's servants, who give their full time to governing. Give everyone what you owe him: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.
Barak is an anarchist. He has this fantasy that the total lack of government is utopia. He will not acknowledge history and that fact that someone will be in power, even if that is a feudal lord. It would not be all peace and love. As a stated christian he should know that.
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux


Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?



rut roh----now you done gone and done it. hold-on!
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
� I'm just trying to get a handle on whose death this board says it is okay to cheer. �

That's easy � never applaud any death, no matter what the haters and the vengeful may say about it, and no matter how justified it may be. (Hitler, Manson, and McVeigh come to mind.) Every human death is a human tragedy, even those that include blessed relief.

Even those who die in agony from natural causes leave achy voids while they themselves attain painless peace. I don't want anyone to grieve over my death, and I don't want anyone to applaud it.
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by Steelhead
Barak is a nut job. It's a fact that he's autistic and autistic folks are about as emotionless/detached as they come involving others. I'm sure he could give a [bleep] about anyone, as it's obvious he doesn't about himself since he had previously attempted to commit suicide.

It's also apparent that he is such a screw-up that we wasn't even able to pull off killing himself, which we now all have to suffer from his ineptitude.

Is it really a wonder he's a computer guy (requires little human interaction, which he sucks at). Of course he deals with prisoners also, because where the heck can they run to.



Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Off into Barakistan we go, as the Barakian attention-whore twists this thread right down the rabbit hole with him.



Coming from two guys who have 10's of thousands of posts on an internet forum betwen them, calling somebody else a nut and attention whore is rather strange in and of itself........


Oh yeah, that's right, this thread is about an elected official and a score of other Americans who have been killed and wounded.......


Casey



You certainly prove that post count has nothing to do with smarts. Course you are pretty good at the victim yourself, bitch.
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by wisturkeyhunter
Barak and TRH do you guys hunt?

Yes, but not particularly well. (Me, anyway; I don't know about The_Real_Hawkeye.) I'm more of a shooter than I am a hunter. So far I've always made good kill shots--never wounded an animal--but I suck at things like analyzing the terrain and walking quietly through the woods. I also eat what I shoot and I've never collected trophies or posed for pictures...it's always seemed a bit ghoulish to me.

Does that help?




I'd venture to say that ANY animal with normal animal senses goes to full red alert within 5-600 yards of your [bleep] up personna.

Hell, I'd BET on it.

My gentlest of dogs alerts, barks and growls at creeps,.....as I am sure she would at YOU.

GTC


Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?



Is that addressed to me ? If it is you are a lying co$ksucker, and I DEFY you to post ONE example of any text I've written endorsing that approach

[bleep] you Pal, and your entire lineage.

GTC
I bet if this Congress Woman lives and she is functional she will become the new replacement for Sarah Brady.
Originally Posted by isaac
But, if your own self worth is elevated in your mind by you believing you can make 2-3 certifiable whack-jobs atta-boy you,then I think you should go with what works for you.



Works for me.
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
� I'm just trying to get a handle on whose death this board says it is okay to cheer. �

That's easy � never applaud any death, no matter what the haters and the vengeful may say about it, and no matter how justified it may be. (Hitler, Manson, and McVeigh come to mind.) Every human death is a human tragedy, even those that include blessed relief.

Even those who die in agony from natural causes leave achy voids while they themselves attain painless peace. I don't want anyone to grieve over my death, and I don't want anyone to applaud it.


I doubt I ever said or thought anything different. I just want to know whose death the board says it is alright to cheer. Lots of people seem willing to justify some and condemn others. And then condemn those who appear to use the same logic. It is all very confusing.
Originally Posted by rrroae

Folks will justify anything when it suits them.


Yep.

No habit or quality is more easily acquired than hypocrisy.

Originally Posted by bea175
I bet if this Congress Woman lives and she is functional she will become the new replacement for Sarah Brady.


Brain damage can do that to a person....
Originally Posted by isaac
Originally Posted by rrroae
Originally Posted by isaac
Rather pathetic and extraordinarily lazy.



Don't worry, I judge attorneys by the same standards.

===========

Worry about your thoughts?? You've got to be kidding!!



As is quite evident given how thoroughly you follow me around like the ambulance chaser you are.
"It is all very confusing."

You SOUND confused Dic$head,

.....I repeat, was that CHIT about shooting Mexicans directed towards me ?

GTC
Quote
Quote
Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?
Quote
Is that addressed to me ? If it is you are a lying co$ksucker, and I DEFY you to post ONE example of any text I've written endorsing that approach



That sounds more like me than crossfire. And I only say shoot them if they run or give armed resistance.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
I'd venture to say that ANY animal with normal animal senses goes to full red alert within 5-600 yards of your [bleep] up personna.

Well, if that's the case, then I'm here to tell you that animals without normal animal senses still taste pretty stinkin' good.

In case you were wondering, I mean.
Nothing to wonder about,.....you HAVE defined yourself more then adequately.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
"It is all very confusing."

You SOUND confused Dic$head,

.....I repeat, was that CHIT about shooting Mexicans directed towards me ?

GTC


English? Oh wait, I wouldn't want anyone to think that I have a problem with poor English grammar. That ante seems to have been upped on that particular pet peeve.
Quote
Medical condition update on Fox now


Pretty much as I expected. Knew of a guy who lost the side of his head when a grinding wheel on a crankshaft grinder blew up, a chunk of the wheel struck him on the side of his head. He was in a coma for a few months. Last I heard they had to teach him how to walk, talk and feed himself again...
Quote
In Romans 13:1, Paul brings further clarification to this concept, along with an even broader responsibility to Christians:

"Everyone must submit himself to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established. The authorities that exist have been established by God."

Therefore, we can conclude from this verse, if we don't pay taxes we are rebelling against the authorities established by God.


This has been posted before.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/case/case35.1.html


Quote
Romans 13:2 gives this warning:

"Consequently, he who rebels against the authority is rebelling against what God has instituted, and those who do so will bring judgment on themselves."


I'll take my chances.

I believe that scripture, in this area/topic, is deliberately misapplied. The reasons why should be obvious.

"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." Thomas Jefferson.


Originally Posted by crosshair
Quote
Quote
Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?
Quote
Is that addressed to me ? If it is you are a lying co$ksucker, and I DEFY you to post ONE example of any text I've written endorsing that approach



That sounds more like me than crossfire. And I only say shoot them if they run or give armed resistance.


This guy is a spin-doctorin', word twisting piece of cowardly chit.

GTC
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
"It is all very confusing."

You SOUND confused Dic$head,

.....I repeat, was that CHIT about shooting Mexicans directed towards me ?

GTC


English? Oh wait, I wouldn't want anyone to think that I have a problem with poor English grammar. That ante seems to have been upped on that particular pet peeve.


Repeat,...YOU are a lying, spin doctoring piece of shidt, mister.

GTC
Ending World War Two was worthy of global applause.

Assassinating Hitler to do it, however justifiiable or necessary that may have been, would not have been worthy of the same applause.

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved tens of millions more lives than it took � thunderous applause and woeful tragedy, not an either-or matter at all. Neither one alone nor the other alone.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by crosshair
Quote
Quote
Just so I understand you, It's okay to shoot illegal aliens who may be nothing more than men, women, and children looking for a better life, but politicians are off limits?

That's your position, right?
Quote
Is that addressed to me ? If it is you are a lying co$ksucker, and I DEFY you to post ONE example of any text I've written endorsing that approach



That sounds more like me than crossfire. And I only say shoot them if they run or give armed resistance.


This guy is a spin-doctorin', word twisting piece of cowardly chit.

GTC


Well, IIRC, he is a lawyer so that's all redundant. He isn't worth the stress/time bro.

George
Hey now!!!
grin
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by Cossatotjoe_redux
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
"It is all very confusing."

You SOUND confused Dic$head,

.....I repeat, was that CHIT about shooting Mexicans directed towards me ?

GTC


English? Oh wait, I wouldn't want anyone to think that I have a problem with poor English grammar. That ante seems to have been upped on that particular pet peeve.


Repeat,...YOU are a lying, spin doctoring piece of shidt, mister.

GTC


If that is YOUR opinion of me, I must be doing something right.
Originally Posted by crosshair
Barak is an anarchist.

Yes.

Quote
He has this fantasy that the total lack of government is utopia.

No. Kind of by definition. Have you read Utopia? That's kind of like saying, "The darkest possible shade of black is white."

I do believe that a free society would be better than the one we have now. That's all.

Quote
He will not acknowledge history and that fact that someone will be in power, even if that is a feudal lord. It would not be all peace and love.

On the contrary, I do acknowledge history. I may have found some bits and pieces of it that are generally withheld from most people during their compulsory government confinement schooling.

However, that's not my main issue: it's secondary, perhaps even tertiary. If you could prove to me beyond the shadow of a doubt that a free society could never be anything but an unmitigated disaster, I'd still be an anarchist, because I'm much more a moralist than I am a utilitarian. (Libertarians tend to that.) I think government as we know it today is morally reprehensible at its very foundations, and that it cannot be reformed into anything that isn't reprehensible and can still be called government. Therefore, I'm agin' it. Period.
Originally Posted by Pete E
Originally Posted by bea175
I bet if this Congress Woman lives and she is functional she will become the new replacement for Sarah Brady.


Brain damage can do that to a person....


Pete, you have missed my brief post earlier, it's lost back there mixed into a sewer of "Anarchist-Azzwhole Gibberish"

Gabriel dropped by our local Emporium , Trail Boss Guns and Gear, and shopped for a holster for her Glock, talked with the customers and staff, and IIRC ,....bought some ammo.

As much as I dislike some of her platforms, and associates, I DON'T see her going the way of Janet Brady,...no way.

GTC
"If that is YOUR opinion of me, I must be doing something right."

Yup,...and thanks for the heads up, it's nice to know when vermin are about.

GTC

Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Someone described Barak as a retarded pitbull with lockjaw a few years back; attacked an issue without understanding it, grabbed it from the wrong end, too stupid to realize that he's got it by the wrong end, and completely incapable of letting it go.

To compound those problems, he's becoming more and more unstable as time goes on, with further and continuing advocations and condonations of lawlessness, usurpations of power, and violence.

He's been mentally unstable as to comprehensions of reality. He's becoming mentally unstable as to actions toward reality and certain segments of the population.

Res ipsa loquitur; "the thing speaks for itself".

It doesn't take much research or comprehension of what Barak has been saying, and where he's been going with it, to figure out that he's got serious problems and that they are getting worse.




Next thing you know, Barak will be threatening to beat up anybody on the Campfire who doesn't agree with his thinking,.......all while hiding behind the skirts of the internet......



Casey
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's a fact that he's autistic


Scott, are you sure that's the case? If so, it's news to me.

I don't typically follow these daytime dramas on the Hunter's Fire, but if it's the case he's autistic why in the world would anyone bother with arguing any of this with Barak?

Originally Posted by Steelhead
I believe there is NO explaining the irrational.



Next thing you know, Barak will be leaving the Campfire, asking Rick to remove his account.........then come slinking back a month or two later under a psuedonym.......



Casey


Now, you two bozos carry on throwing rocks in your glass houses for the rest of the day............




Casey
An interesting update from ABP,
GTC

Exploiting a Tragedy
The Left Will Stop at Nothing
Glenn Spencer -- American Patrol Report -- January 9
"There is no direct connection, but a strong suspicion that the shooter was influenced by American Renaissance." WATCH
Gabrielle Giffords Shooting - Lessons Learned
"It was horrible to see fellow human beings gunned down by a deranged killer" -- Dr. Steve Rayle - a physician who came to aid of shooting victims.
As the story of the Tucson shootings unfolds, it is becoming clear that Jared Loughner was a mental case. He dropped out of high school. He was enrolled in a community college but was kicked out for violating a code of contact five times. The college said he couldn't come back until he got mental help to prove he wasn't a threat to others or himself. (See Fox News). His ramblings on the Internet make no sense and point to no single issue, including race, as the primary cause for his outrageous madness.
Yet, many on the left are trying to use this terrible event as a lever to advance a political agenda. Speaking of Arizona, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said: "We have become the capital, the mecca for prejudice and bigotry."
As I stood at the candlelight vigil outside Gabrielle Giffords' office last evening, a woman standing next to me, who identified herself as a lawyer, said: "Hate speech is not protected by the First Amendment." Where is the evidence that hate speech led to this attack?
Now we hear that the Department of Homeland Security is attempting to link Loughner to American Renaissance and anti-immigration sentiments. This reminds me of the attack on Americans following a meeting I sponsored in Sierra Vista ten years ago.
There is no doubt that Morris Dees and his many followers in the DHS are moving quickly to exploit the Arizona shooting as a means of silencing anyone who speaks out against illegal immigration. (See Fox News)
I told the small crowd gathered at Giffords' office last evening: "There are lessons to be learned from this terrible incident - let's make sure we learn the right ones." One lesson we have learned is that the left is attempting to link Americans who speak out against illegal immigration to this horrific act: once again proving that they would never pass up on an opportunity to demonize their opponents. But we already knew that.

Update: 08:35 Pacific Time -- Fox News reports having spoken with Jared Taylor of American Renaissance who said his organization has had absolutely no connection with Loughner. He said DHS's description of his organization was "scurrilous."
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's a fact that he's autistic


Scott, are you sure that's the case? If so, it's news to me.

I don't typically follow these daytime dramas on the Hunter's Fire, but if it's the case he's autistic why in the world would anyone bother with arguing any of this with Barak?




Because even in his allegedly autistic state, Barak still is smarter than the two bozos combined....and they can't stand it.




Casey
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's a fact that he's autistic


Scott, are you sure that's the case? If so, it's news to me.

I don't typically follow these daytime dramas on the Hunter's Fire, but if it's the case he's autistic why in the world would anyone bother with arguing any of this with Barak?



It's a fact.
Originally Posted by bea175
I bet if this Congress Woman lives and she is functional she will become the new replacement for Sarah Brady.

Maybe or maybe not, but it will be very significant in any event. Undoubtedly she will come under intense pressure from the anti-gun groups to support their agenda.

It is interesting to look at the conduct of other public figures who have been shot, or whose relatives have been victims. In general, it seems that liberals use their victimhood to promote restrictions on gun rights, while conservatives do not. The Bradys come first to mind, although the shooting may have led to an idealogical flip. I don't know if they were that conservative to begin with. Then there is Carolyn McCarthy who used her husband's shooting death as a springboard to election to the HoR on an anti-gun platform. The assassinations of JFK and RFK led to GCA 1968, and Teddy was known to be a rabid antigunner.

On the conservative side, President Reagan and his family and supporters never used his shooting by John Hinkley to lobby for gun controls. Neither did President Ford, who was shot at by a would-be assassin, nor did Gov. George Wallace who was gravely injured when he was shot.

I don't mean to go too far with this line of thinking, but I would speculate that liberals are more likely to employ appeals to emotion to further their agendas than are conservatives. Note my use of "more"; I'm not claiming that conservatives are immune to emotional appeals and justifications either.

Paul
Huh.

Well then, he doesn't need to be flogged, he needs to be ignored on this subject.


[Linked Image]

Meet Daniel Hernandez, the intern who likely saved Gabrielle Giffords� life
By Holly Bailey

By Holly Bailey � 1 hr 24 mins ago

Daniel Hernandez had only been Rep. Gabrielle Giffords' intern for five days, and on Saturday, he may have saved her life.

The University of Arizona junior was standing 30 feet away from the Democratic congresswoman when she was shot in the head at a meet-and-greet event in her district, and he immediately rushed to her side. As everyone on hand waited for emergency medical support to arrive, Hernandez held Giffords's head in his lap and applied pressure to her wound.

At the same time, Hernandez advised others on providing help for the other 20 others injured and killed in the attack—and that quick thinking has led many to label him a hero in Saturday's horrific event.

"When I heard gunshots, my first instinct was to head toward the congresswoman to make sure that she was okay," Hernandez said in an interview with ABC's Christine Amanpour Sunday. "Once I saw that she was down, and there were more than one victim, I went ahead and started doing the limited triage that I could with what I had."

Hernandez, who is 20, told ABC that he simply "shut off all emotion." "I knew I wouldn't be good to anyone if I had a breakdown," he recalled. He noted that he went to help because he had "limited experience in triage and training."

He lifted up Giffords' head, because he feared she might choke on her own blood, and used smocks from the grocery store's meat department as a makeshift bandages for her and other victims.

Giffords, he says, was alert, but couldn't talk.

"'Just grab my hand to let me know that you're okay,'" he recalls telling the injured lawmaker.

According to Hernandez, she squeezed his hand, and he didn't let go, riding with her in the ambulance to the hospital, where she was rushed into emergency surgery.

"It was probably not the best idea to run toward the gunshots," he told the Arizona Republic. "But people needed help."

(Photo of Hernandez and Giffords: James Palka/AP)
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Originally Posted by Brad
Originally Posted by Steelhead
It's a fact that he's autistic


Scott, are you sure that's the case? If so, it's news to me.

I don't typically follow these daytime dramas on the Hunter's Fire, but if it's the case he's autistic why in the world would anyone bother with arguing any of this with Barak?




Because even in his allegedly autistic state, Barak still is smarter than the two bozos combined....and they can't stand it.
==============





Casey

=========================

Some are content by just knowing their significant limitations rather than proving them every chance they get. You've defined very well your lap dog abilities but try not to over-step your skill set and embarrass yourself further with such sophomoroic "atta boy" fellatio of a man constrained by delusion and paranoia. You'd have thought you would have learned your lesson after having had your ass handed to you so many times thinking you could play lawyer.
This thread sure turned into a piece of crap.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Steve_NO
Barak has put himself beyond the Pale with his comments on this.

Well, the fictional portrayal of what he said is certainly beyond the pale. A reading of his actual posts utilizing ordinary care shows no such thing.


Any readings of Barak's lunacy, his increasing mental instability, and his volatility, with any degree of care shows the opposite.

He's mentally unstable, increasingly volatile, and the ONLY two differences between him and the nutjob in Arizona yesterday are that Barak's delusional ramblings are comprehensible (though still delusional) and that he hasn't snapped, yet.

And, anyone who thinks that this kind of psychosis is not going to be subject to increased, and likely quite proper, data mining and meta-crawling is fooling themselves.

Once it's pinpointed, it'll get FAR closer scrutiny.

And, I'd suspect that'd be met with more home-based scrutiny, whether in central Carolina, northern Florida, Springfield, Illinois, Peoria, Sacramento, or BFE, Idaho.

I doubt Giffords will become the next Sarah Brady; more likely, and more accurately, she and others will concentrate very heavily on those with known mental issues, delusional ramblings on websites, imaginings of alternate societies, currencies, etc.

If that causes someone here to think twice about their own postings, or perhaps question those of another, well... think about that.

As an aside; several months ago when the guy flew a small, private plane into the tax building, how many of us had a first or very quick thought as to who it might be, and one person in specific?

That should start putting some things in context, if it hasn't already.
Laffin' here...
You guys remember the freeway story he had way back in the day? I'm talking 7 or 8 years ago. The guy is clearly not all there.

Originally Posted by Brad
Huh.

Well then, he doesn't need to be flogged, he needs to be ignored on this subject.


No, he needs help.

Not for his autism, but for the rest.
Originally Posted by Calvin
You guys remember the freeway story he had way back in the day? I'm talking 7 or 8 years ago. The guy is clearly not all there.



Not being all there is one thing.

When it starts becoming another, is something very different.
I agree,

Do you think a "Local Updates / Az." thread is a better idea then wallowing around in alla' this hooey.....?

What would keep the "Anarch-Holes" from shifting over and degrading IT ?

I DO think that some of this local stuff will not be seen nationally, and don't mind putting it up as it rolls by.....

Best Regards,

GTC

Originally Posted by Barak
Laffin' here...

==================

What a coincidence. When I saw who wrote it and what it was about, I began laffin',too! What other response could it evoke,considering?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
I agree,

Do you think a "Local Updates / Az." thread is a better idea then wallowing around in alla' this hooey.....?


Yes.

Originally Posted by crossfireoops

What would keep the "Anarch-Holes" from shifting over and degrading IT ?


Nothing.

Originally Posted by crossfireoops

I DO think that some of this local stuff will not be seen nationally, and don't mind putting it up as it rolls by.....

Best Regards,

GTC


Thanks.
Ah, c'mon, it was funny. Don't be such an old poop.
At the risk of getting atacked by Crossfireopps.

IN MY OPINION

This is a great tradity for the whole country.

If you look at history it is the fanatic liberals that are the most violent. They do the bombings against the abortion doctors , they are the ones that break into the poloticains offices , they are the ones that atack the police and riot at any chance that they can get like sporting events or demonstrations (FOR THE MOST PART). Conservitive Republicans protest by Yelling and screaming some times but you do not here of them tipping over cars and setting them on fire.

This event is not unlike the suicide bombers. You have some self apointed big shot (usualy deranged himself)some where that finds some easilly manipulated lacky that will do his dirty work for him.

This is a tragic situation that has happend but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becouse they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

Unfortunatly I think that untill our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaple like the way they are trying to do is not the way.
Greg---that photo really set me back. Certainly puts this whole CF into a reality bites situation.

sse you are correct. Gone to crap but also many of the posts have been extremely revealing of some if not many.
Originally Posted by funshooter
At the risk of getting atacked attackedby CrossfireoppsCrossfireoops.

IN MY OPINION

This is a great traditytragedy for the whole country.

If you look at history it is the fanatic liberals that are the most violent. They do the bombings against the abortion doctors , they are the ones that break into the poloticainspolitician's offices , they are the ones that atackattack the police and riot at any chance that they can get like sporting events or demonstrations (FOR THE MOST PART). ConservitiveConservative Republicans protest by Yelling and screaming some times but you do not here of them tipping over cars and setting them on fire.

This event is not unlike the suicide bombers. You have some self apointedself-appointed big shot (usualyusually deranged himself)some where that finds some easillyeasily manipulated lackylackey that will do his dirty work for him.

This is a tragic situation that has happendhappened but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrectiondirection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becousebecause they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

UnfortunatlyUnfortunately, I think that untilluntil our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaplepeople like the way they are trying to do is not the way.


Might we recommend spell check?
I keep having this fantasy image of Barak as a Sioux or Lakota back in the old days, and lecturing the tribal leaders on his individual rights, just before the dog soldiers carry him away to take care of business.

Point being, even primitive societies have some form of government and a system of laws, and consequences for refusal to conform. I suppose a "citizen" would have the option of going off on his own into the prairie or jungle to fend for himself, if he didn't want to be part of the society.

Paul
Originally Posted by isaac

Some are content by just knowing their significant limitations rather than proving them every chance they get. You've defined very well your lap dog abilities but try not to over-step your skill set and embarrass yourself further with such sophomoroic "atta boy" fellatio of a man constrained by delusion and paranoia. You'd have thought you would have learned your lesson after having had your ass handed to you so many times thinking you could play lawyer.



And some are content just following the herd of their choice.

But coming from somebody who has now stooped to starting threads by calling folks out in the increasingly lowbrow 'fire fashion, your opinion dosn't count for as much as it used too, Bob.


Just sticking with the Campfire theme of things this morning wink



Casey
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by funshooter
At the risk of getting atacked attackedby CrossfireoppsCrossfireoops.

IN MY OPINION

This is a great traditytragedy for the whole country.

If you look at history it is the fanatic liberals that are the most violent. They do the bombings against the abortion doctors , they are the ones that break into the poloticainspolitician's offices , they are the ones that atackattack the police and riot at any chance that they can get like sporting events or demonstrations (FOR THE MOST PART). ConservitiveConservative Republicans protest by Yelling and screaming some times but you do not here of them tipping over cars and setting them on fire.

This event is not unlike the suicide bombers. You have some self apointedself-appointed big shot (usualyusually deranged himself)some where that finds some easillyeasily manipulated lackylackey that will do his dirty work for him.

This is a tragic situation that has happendhappened but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrectiondirection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becousebecause they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

UnfortunatlyUnfortunately, I think that untilluntil our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaplepeople like the way they are trying to do is not the way.


Might we recommend spell check?


Thats what being sick will do to your brain. My head is pritty f'ed up right now
Originally Posted by funshooter

This is a tragic situation that has happend but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becouse they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

Unfortunatly I think that untill our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaple like the way they are trying to do is not the way.

+1
Originally Posted by byc
Greg---that photo really set me back. Certainly puts this whole CF into a reality bites situation.

sse you are correct. Gone to crap but also many of the posts have been extremely revealing of some if not many.


Yup, that IS a powerful Photo, Scouting for more "Local" stuff,....new thread launched.

Hope the trash continues to get dumped here.

GTC
Originally Posted by byc
� many of the posts have been extremely revealing of some if not many.

� like revealing that Ken Howell (that "miserable old bastard who refuses to die") is indeed a stodgy ol' fart. grin
Originally Posted by VAnimrod

Any readings of Barak's lunacy, his increasing mental instability, and his volatility, with any degree of care shows the opposite.

He's mentally unstable, increasingly volatile, and the ONLY two differences between him and the nutjob in Arizona yesterday are that Barak's delusional ramblings are comprehensible (though still delusional) and that he hasn't snapped, yet.

And, anyone who thinks that this kind of psychosis is not going to be subject to increased, and likely quite proper, data mining and meta-crawling is fooling themselves.

Once it's pinpointed, it'll get FAR closer scrutiny.

And, I'd suspect that'd be met with more home-based scrutiny, whether in central Carolina, northern Florida, Springfield, Illinois, Peoria, Sacramento, or BFE, Idaho.

I doubt Giffords will become the next Sarah Brady; more likely, and more accurately, she and others will concentrate very heavily on those with known mental issues, delusional ramblings on websites, imaginings of alternate societies, currencies, etc.

If that causes someone here to think twice about their own postings, or perhaps question those of another, well... think about that.

As an aside; several months ago when the guy flew a small, private plane into the tax building, how many of us had a first or very quick thought as to who it might be, and one person in specific?

That should start putting some things in context, if it hasn't already.


Just one question: Would threatening to beat up somebody on the Campfire qualify as volatile?..........



Casey

"Thats what being sick will do to your brain. My head is pritty f'ed up right now"

You were a guest here in my community. Some of the folks that I introduced you to have READ the crap you're posting.

They are UP for doing a brief video interview about their impressions of you,.......and I'd note that I've said NOTHING about the way you treated the hospitality here, both at my place and theirs.

Keep [bleep]' with this,.....make a nice smelly bed to lay in,...and I WILL come turn the covers down.

Our very own "Armed to the Teeth SURVIVOR",.....the thirsty one, that's going to "STEEL" water in Az. when "SHTF"

don't poke a bear in it's lair,....young man,.....if you are going to use my name,....do it with a little respect.

GTC
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
We just yesterday witnessed indefensible actions by an incomprehensible, mentally unstable, lunatic whose ramblings about creating new currencies, realities, societies, etc., were clear warning signs.

Just because a mentally unstable lunatic whose ramblings about creating new currencies, realities, societies, etc., are comprehensible does not mean that they are not clear warning signs.




I wonder if he threatened to beat up anybody via the internet?.....

Could be a sign, you know......



Casey
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Just one question: Would threatening to beat up somebody on the Campfire qualify as volatile?

Yer on a roll today, my friend...
Originally Posted by AJ300MAG
Quote
Medical condition update on Fox now


Pretty much as I expected. Knew of a guy who lost the side of his head when a grinding wheel on a crankshaft grinder blew up, a chunk of the wheel struck him on the side of his head. He was in a coma for a few months. Last I heard they had to teach him how to walk, talk and feed himself again...
Tragic. I hope her recovery isn't that bad, but it doesn't look good.
Originally Posted by sse
This thread sure turned into a piece of crap.




Finally, a post I can comment upon, I agree wholeheartedly.
Part of your problem is you think more than a few give a schit about your disenfranchised,whiney-assed opinions!! Have you ever once commented on anything which would have manifested some sort of optimism or an acknowledgement of light at the end of the tunnel? Your posts reek of the commiseration of misery.

I'll follow the "herd",as you like to call it, of normal,hard working men who follow the rules and are motivationally driven over lightweights who incessantly complain over the internet of all things bad, while content in just getting by and doing nothing further to improve their situations and attitude, any day of the week,sport. I'm weird that way!

Were I you, I'd discount that opinion, as well.
Originally Posted by Barak
Saying "It wasn't Giffords, it couldn't have been Giffords, nothing she said or did could possibly have had anything to do with it, he was just insane" seems to prematurely eliminate a lot of possibilities.

Her politics may have had absolutely nothing to do with this incident. This gathering could have just been the high visibility event to get the shooter the infamy he was probably seeking.
Casey;

I offered to meet Bristoe to let him have a chance to back up his words, "work out differences", bust him the mouth, what have you.

Offer still stands.

And, it's completely irrelevant to the issue at hand on this thread, or in context to Barak.

Nice try, though.
Originally Posted by Barak
Laffin' here...

John 13:34-35
A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.



By this I know you're NOT a disciple of Christ
I just watched the FBI official on Fox News decry the widespread carry of firearms by American citizens, and suggest that this expression of liberty was somehow responsible for this shooting. So it begins. How can that be the case, though, unless you believe that outlaws obey laws against carrying firearms in public? The left, it seems, are immune to logic and facts.

PS I think the course the left are going to take on this is, at least partially, to attempt to crack down on the freedom of speech, particularly on the Internet, i.e., strictly control the Internet in terms of who is allowed to communicate publicly on it, and what they are allowed to say.
Originally Posted by FlaRick
isaac, if just one Justice changes his or her mind, Heller and/or McDonald can be reversed. Who knows how the shooting of a federal judge will impact future Supreme Court decisions. Probably not for the better as far as I am concerned. Rick

Unfortunately, this will have an impact on the AZ immigration case in particular. That particular judge was one of the more conservative in the district. This could possibly have flipped one vote on the case. And in that district, a one shot victory was probably the best case scenario the folks in AZ could have expected. In some dark rooms around America, there are some progressives salivating over the prospect of an even more liberal district 8, instead of the fact that these people were killed.
The deceased, from a lunatic's actions - a federal judge who happened to stop by at the wrong time, a 9-year-old child, born on 9/11, a man who'd recently become engaged, a husband shielding his wife...

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/09/arizona-shooting-latest-developments/?hpt=T2

In addition to the 12 people wounded in the shooting, the following six were killed:

� John Roll, 63. A native of Pennsylvania, Roll was a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona who had served the legal system for nearly 40 years. He began his career as a bailiff in Pima County Superior Court and rose to be chief judge for the District of Arizona, a position he held since 2006.

He received death threats two years ago after he ruled that a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit filed by illegal immigrants against a rancher in the state could proceed. He had been assigned to hear the ethnic studies ban case out of Tucson that involves a new law banning certain ethnic studies programs in public schools, according to the lead attorney on the case, Richard Martinez. Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts called Roll's death a tragic loss.

� Christina Taylor Greene, 9. She was born on September 11, 2001, according to CNN affiliate KVOA. Family members described her as "excited" about the political process, and said the desire to learn more about it had motivated her to go to the Gifford event, the affiliate said. Christina had just been elected to the student council at her school, the Arizona Republic reported. She died at a hospital, and not at the scene like the other five.

� Gabe Zimmerman, 30. A Tucson native who was engaged to be married, Zimmerman was the director of community outreach for the congresswoman.

� Dorwin Stoddard, 76. Dory, as his family calls him, was a retired construction worker, said Pastor Mike Nowak at Mount Avenue Church of Christ in Tucson. Witnesses told CNN that Stoddard tried to shield his wife, Mavy, was shot in the head and fell on her. The wife was shot three times in her legs; the bullets were removed and she is expected to make a full recovery.

� Dorothy Morris, 76

� Phyllis Scheck, 79
Originally Posted by crossfireoops

"Thats what being sick will do to your brain. My head is pritty f'ed up right now"

You were a guest here in my community. Some of the folks that I introduced you to have READ the crap you're posting.

They are UP for doing a brief video interview about their impressions of you,.......and I'd note that I've said NOTHING about the way you treated the hospitality here, both at my place and theirs.

Keep [bleep]' with this,.....make a nice smelly bed to lay in,...and I WILL come turn the covers down.

Our very own "Armed to the Teeth SURVIVOR",.....the thirsty one, that's going to "STEEL" water in Az. when "SHTF"

don't poke a bear in it's lair,....young man,.....if you are going to use my name,....do it with a little respect.

That go's both ways

GTC
Originally Posted by funshooter
At the risk of getting atacked by Crossfireopps.

IN MY OPINION

This is a great tradity for the whole country.

If you look at history it is the fanatic liberals that are the most violent. They do the bombings against the abortion doctors , they are the ones that break into the poloticains offices , they are the ones that atack the police and riot at any chance that they can get like sporting events or demonstrations (FOR THE MOST PART). Conservitive Republicans protest by Yelling and screaming some times but you do not here of them tipping over cars and setting them on fire.

This event is not unlike the suicide bombers. You have some self apointed big shot (usualy deranged himself)some where that finds some easilly manipulated lacky that will do his dirty work for him.

This is a tragic situation that has happend but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becouse they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

Unfortunatly I think that untill our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaple like the way they are trying to do is not the way.


On 12-17-10 you posted this:

"I have been watched for over 5 years now no big deal ....."

Now isn't THAT interesting?

I think you may have found a new soulmate, in Barak,....Ace.

GTC
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
The deceased, from a lunatic's actions - a federal judge who happened to stop by at the wrong time, a 9-year-old child, born on 9/11, a man who'd recently become engaged, a husband shielding his wife...

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2011/01/09/arizona-shooting-latest-developments/?hpt=T2

In addition to the 12 people wounded in the shooting, the following six were killed:

� John Roll, 63. A native of Pennsylvania, Roll was a federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona who had served the legal system for nearly 40 years. He began his career as a bailiff in Pima County Superior Court and rose to be chief judge for the District of Arizona, a position he held since 2006.

He received death threats two years ago after he ruled that a $32 million civil-rights lawsuit filed by illegal immigrants against a rancher in the state could proceed. He had been assigned to hear the ethnic studies ban case out of Tucson that involves a new law banning certain ethnic studies programs in public schools, according to the lead attorney on the case, Richard Martinez. Chief Justice of the United States John Roberts called Roll's death a tragic loss.

� Christina Taylor Greene, 9. She was born on September 11, 2001, according to CNN affiliate KVOA. Family members described her as "excited" about the political process, and said the desire to learn more about it had motivated her to go to the Gifford event, the affiliate said. Christina had just been elected to the student council at her school, the Arizona Republic reported. She died at a hospital, and not at the scene like the other five.

� Gabe Zimmerman, 30. A Tucson native who was engaged to be married, Zimmerman was the director of community outreach for the congresswoman.

� Dorwin Stoddard, 76. Dory, as his family calls him, was a retired construction worker, said Pastor Mike Nowak at Mount Avenue Church of Christ in Tucson. Witnesses told CNN that Stoddard tried to shield his wife, Mavy, was shot in the head and fell on her. The wife was shot three times in her legs; the bullets were removed and she is expected to make a full recovery.

� Dorothy Morris, 76

� Phyllis Scheck, 79
This makes me sick to my stomach...

I just can't get my head around these sensless acts of extreme violence.
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by funshooter
At the risk of getting atacked by Crossfireopps.

IN MY OPINION

This is a great tradity for the whole country.

If you look at history it is the fanatic liberals that are the most violent. They do the bombings against the abortion doctors , they are the ones that break into the poloticains offices , they are the ones that atack the police and riot at any chance that they can get like sporting events or demonstrations (FOR THE MOST PART). Conservitive Republicans protest by Yelling and screaming some times but you do not here of them tipping over cars and setting them on fire.

This event is not unlike the suicide bombers. You have some self apointed big shot (usualy deranged himself)some where that finds some easilly manipulated lacky that will do his dirty work for him.

This is a tragic situation that has happend but the media and the poloticians will spin it in the wrong dirrection for there own agenda instead of looking into slowing down situations like this. they will never be able to stop the loons but this kid was being watched becouse they new he was a loon and they still could not stop him. If the system worked they would have been able to stop him and catch the guy putting him up to it.

Unfortunatly I think that untill our government starts doing what the peaple want these things are only going to happen more often and get more violent than this instance.

Controlling the peaple like the way they are trying to do is not the way.


On 12-17-10 you posted this:

"I have been watched for over 5 years now no big deal ....."

Now isn't THAT interesting?

I think you may have found a new soulmate, in Barak,....Ace.

GTC


The only reason they leave me alone is that I keep my nose clean and I do not Associate with peaple like you.
Originally Posted by isaac
Part of your problem is you think more than a few give a schit about your disenfranchised,whiney-assed opinions!! Have you ever once commented on anything which would have manifested some sort of optimism or an acknowledgement of light at the end of the tunnel? Your posts reek of the commiseration of misery.

I'll follow the "herd",as you like to call it, of normal,hard working men who follow the rules and are motivationally driven over lightweights who incessantly complain over the internet of all things bad, while content in just getting by and doing nothing further to improve their situations and attitude, any day of the week,sport. I'm weird that way!

Were I you, I'd discount that opinion, as well.



You need to follow the Campfire herd and start a thread by calling somebody out......you'll feel better then......

Oh, and you forgot to call me "bitter"........



Casey
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by RDFinn
The guy who committed these unspeakable acts today was just a little further down the road, that's all. You just have to hope that when they finally blow you're nowhere near them.

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.

But my perspective is considerably more mature now, because of two points that were revealed to me.

First, it's not useful to be angry at politicians for being corrupt human trash, any more than it would be useful to be angry at fish for swimming or birds for flying. They're politicians; it's who they are and what they do. Anger stems from unmet expectations, and anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

Second, when a politician is assassinated, three things happen: he becomes a martyr, with everybody saying how great he was and how sad it is that he's dead (you can see that right here on this thread); and he simply gets replaced with another politician. The depravity of human nature assures that there will always be more garbage standing in line to take his place. Then, of course, the martyr-worshipers beg the State to take more of their liberties away so that their rulers can be safer.

So no, I won't be flying into any rages and killing any politicians. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.


DITTOS +1,000,000

Been there, done that, think the same way.
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
Originally Posted by Barak
Saying "It wasn't Giffords, it couldn't have been Giffords, nothing she said or did could possibly have had anything to do with it, he was just insane" seems to prematurely eliminate a lot of possibilities.

Her politics may have had absolutely nothing to do with this incident. This gathering could have just been the high visibility event to get the shooter the infamy he was probably seeking.

Possibly.

On the other hand, it doesn't sound as though it was particularly high-visibility. No cameras, no live news coverage--if he was looking chiefly for a splash, doesn't it make sense that he'd wait for something showier?
Originally Posted by Barak
I think government as we know it today is morally reprehensible at its very foundations, and that it cannot be reformed into anything that isn't reprehensible and can still be called government. Therefore, I'm agin' it. Period.
Government is by nature evil, but it's less evil than any practical alternative (i.e., various forms of the unrestrained state), so the best approach to this dilemma would be to institute government in such a way as to maximize liberty and minimize the concentration of state power (thus minimizing the potential for corruption). Government, at least in part, constitutes an effort to restrain the state by application of law for the purpose of maximizing liberty. That is how (by and large) the Founding Fathers understood it, and I agree.
A handful of you are always calling your own selves out. Consider that insight!!
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
Quote
It doesn't take much research or comprehension of what Barak has been saying, and where he's been going with it, to figure out that he's got serious problems and that they are getting worse.
Next thing you know, Barak will be threatening to beat up anybody on the Campfire who doesn't agree with his thinking,.......all while hiding behind the skirts of the internet......



Casey
laugh Oh, the irony.
Originally Posted by derby_dude
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by RDFinn
The guy who committed these unspeakable acts today was just a little further down the road, that's all. You just have to hope that when they finally blow you're nowhere near them.

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.

But my perspective is considerably more mature now, because of two points that were revealed to me.

First, it's not useful to be angry at politicians for being corrupt human trash, any more than it would be useful to be angry at fish for swimming or birds for flying. They're politicians; it's who they are and what they do. Anger stems from unmet expectations, and anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

Second, when a politician is assassinated, three things happen: he becomes a martyr, with everybody saying how great he was and how sad it is that he's dead (you can see that right here on this thread); and he simply gets replaced with another politician. The depravity of human nature assures that there will always be more garbage standing in line to take his place. Then, of course, the martyr-worshipers beg the State to take more of their liberties away so that their rulers can be safer.

So no, I won't be flying into any rages and killing any politicians. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.


DITTOS +1,000,000

Been there, done that, think the same way.


So, Barak and derby claim to be further gone lunatics than the idiot in Arizona yesterday?

Classic.

By setting your affairs in order, Barak(Ed), what would that mean? Perhaps something like settling a significant tax or debt liability, or transferring property to a loved one as a gift?

Something like that, perhaps?
Originally Posted by KevinGibson
Originally Posted by Barak
Laffin' here...

John 13:34-35
A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.



By this I know you're NOT a disciple of Christ

Laughing at a funny post--one intended to be funny--is what? An insult to your sense of humor? And insulting your sense of humor is less than loving? Is that how you're thinking?

Did you read alpinecrick's post?
Can you imagine what Barak is doing to the inmates he visits? he is like a Jehova Witness, only preaches what he knows and avoids scriptures other present to him as proof that his thinking is flawed.
Many scriptures pertaining to government and taxes and other matters have been posted and he refuses to acknowledge them.

I am not perfect, I have many flaws, but I do believe in the bible and forgiveness. I do my best to live by it and try to understand it.


This thread went downhill for me when Barak mentioned it wasn't so bad for a member of congress to be shot and a judge killed because they commit extortion on all tax payers that don't agree with them. That is my issue and my reasoning for bickering. Everyone is Human and one of the 10 commandments says tho shall not murder. Yet its ok for some to be murdered according to Barak.
That is my issue and that is when it went south for me.

Kique
Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Being a politician is an unforgivable sin, punishable by immediate death, at anyone's hands, with no necessity for a trial, accusation, or warning. No due process, just a do act.

I think this goes to the heart of the matter. People here will disagree about the relative "value" of the victims' lives and whether politicians deserve the punishment they get. But at the end of the day, this guy was some punk loser, who lived in his mother's basement, who couldn't hold a job, spending his day smoking weed, and he went out and committed a vicious crime. He is not judge, jury and executioner. And in the process, he put another scar on the fortitude of the 2nd amendment. And if this had been Reid, Pelosi, or Obama, yes, I would FEEL differently. But the act would have been just as wrong.
Agree. As a long time member of the Fire these sort of rants do nothing to project the image of sitting around the campfire discussing guns, hunting, & yes, even politics. Its amazing to read some of these comments which makes me want to puke. What a disgrace.
Originally Posted by Brad
Huh.

Well then, he doesn't need to be flogged, he needs to be ignored on this subject.
The IQ of those diagnosed with autism runs the gambit. Barak's IQ happens to be about two standard deviations above the mean (maybe three). Doesn't sound to me like a reason, in itself, to ignore his opinions and arguments.
He's sure "Laffin'" a lot this AM, ....ain't he ?

....the sick little [bleep].

GTC
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
But coming from somebody who has now stooped to starting threads by calling folks out in the increasingly lowbrow 'fire fashion, your opinion dosn't count for as much as it used too, Bob.
+1
Originally Posted by alpinecrick
I wonder if he threatened to beat up anybody via the internet?.....

Could be a sign, you know......



Casey
Bwahahahaha! You're on a roll, man. laugh
Originally Posted by Barak
No cameras, no live news coverage--if he was looking chiefly for a splash, doesn't it make sense that he'd wait for something showier?


Sure, let's assume he was rational, operating with a full deck. Still trying to rationalize the acts/intent of an insane homicidal dirtbag. Sheesh
These are not the ramblings of a different person, but of a sick one. The ramblings of one who believes that one life is more important than another, simply by what they do in life, and that he has the power to judge and stratify them.
Unbelievable.
Seek some psychiatric care fella, before you hurt someone.

Originally Posted by barak


If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.

The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist.

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.

There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.

In my world, if somebody commits a crime (initiates force) against you, you're the only one who's qualified to determine what retaliation is justified. The decision should be ultimately yours, if you're the victim.

Anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.
But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.
Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion.

The injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

As to whether politicians are subhuman or not...it's an interesting question. If they are simply fundamentally incapable of restraining themselves, then they don't bear any moral responsibility for the death and devastation they cause, but they're also pretty undeniably subhuman.
On the other hand, if they're fully human, it means that they've chosen to commit the crimes they've committed, when they could have made different choices instead, and are therefore fully responsible for them.
I'll admit that it'd be awfully difficult for me to love a politician. Much easier to love an armed robber.

I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.




Sorry if I offended you in any way tbear!
However I am not gonna let some punk justify this crime in any way shape or form. A lot of people got killed and hurt and some wannabe with a lack of understanding wants to say how it was ok for some to get hurt and killed and not ok for others.
I don't understand it or accept it.

Again sorry buddy but I can't let this punk spew off at the mouth when he claims to have a ministry and claims to know the Bible. Especially when a innocent little girl in my community, my congresswoman (whether I agree with her or not), the judge in my town, an alderly woman lost her husband and she was also wounded and the others affect by this are members of my community.

Kique
Originally Posted by isaac
A handful of you are always calling your own selves out. Consider that insight!!



....?.....






Casey
Originally Posted by Barak
On the other hand, it doesn't sound as though it was particularly high-visibility. No cameras, no live news coverage--if he was looking chiefly for a splash, doesn't it make sense that he'd wait for something showier?

Just because the event itself wasn't live on TV doesn't mean anything. Look at the visibility of the results.
Originally Posted by derby_dude
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by RDFinn
The guy who committed these unspeakable acts today was just a little further down the road, that's all. You just have to hope that when they finally blow you're nowhere near them.

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.

But my perspective is considerably more mature now, because of two points that were revealed to me.

First, it's not useful to be angry at politicians for being corrupt human trash, any more than it would be useful to be angry at fish for swimming or birds for flying. They're politicians; it's who they are and what they do. Anger stems from unmet expectations, and anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

Second, when a politician is assassinated, three things happen: he becomes a martyr, with everybody saying how great he was and how sad it is that he's dead (you can see that right here on this thread); and he simply gets replaced with another politician. The depravity of human nature assures that there will always be more garbage standing in line to take his place. Then, of course, the martyr-worshipers beg the State to take more of their liberties away so that their rulers can be safer.

So no, I won't be flying into any rages and killing any politicians. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.


DITTOS +1,000,000

Been there, done that, think the same way.



you two deserve each other
Originally Posted by Enrique
Can you imagine what Barak is doing to the inmates he visits? he is like a Jehova Witness, only preaches what he knows and avoids scriptures other present to him as proof that his thinking is flawed.

To tell the honest truth, the vast majority of what I preach to the inmates goes like this:

"You can use a do/while loop as an abortable straightline. As a matter of fact, that may well be its best and highest purpose."

"No, you can't change production code while the tests are green. You have to make a test red first."

"Here's how you know a line of code is covered: before the line was written, a test was red, and writing that line made the test go green. No static-analysis tool can tell you that; only self-discipline can tell you that."

"Testing only through the front door leads to an unnecessary number of tests and excessively long and difficult setup. Instead, mock where necessary and test through the side door as well. Remember, it's a unit test."

"A switch statement, or its if/else-if/else equivalent, is almost always a design smell. Write object-oriented code in an object-oriented language."

Occasionally, I'll serve on a Kairos weekend; when that happens, I generally do even less preaching. (Kairos is not about preaching, in case you weren't aware.)

Quote
This thread went downhill for me when Barak mentioned it wasn't so bad for a member of congress to be shot and a judge killed because they commit extortion on all tax payers that don't agree with them.

Not as bad as it is for innocents to be shot, no.

Quote
That is my issue and my reasoning for bickering. Everyone is Human and one of the 10 commandments says tho shall not murder. Yet its ok for some to be murdered according to Barak.

Whoa! You went from "wasn't so bad" to "ok" so fast it made me dizzy. How'd you get from A to B?
I have read every word of the 595 replies. I have to say there are several emotions running through my mind. First of all, you guys are scaring the crap out of me! Second emotion is I am appalled at the total disregard for human life I read is some, make that way too many opinions here.

Several people died, A woman is in the hospital with a gunshot wound to her head. And some say that it's OK because she chose to be a politician and some say that is OK because her opinions may have differed from their opinions. Step back and think about this for a moment. If someone differs with your opinions do they deserve to die? Where does the OK to die park begin and where does it end. I shoot a 22 K-hornet and like liver. Should I me shot for those opinions. I drive a Ford. Where should I report for execution? If my wife cooks my eggs to hard this morning am I justified in shooting her? Heaven forbid anyone like me should have a difference of beliefs or opinion.

Have we lost the respect for each other and the respect for the sanitary of life?

I value a difference of opinions. I understand there are GOOD PEOPLE out there who have different talents, beliefs, skills, callings and opinions. They do not deserve to die.

Finally, I am saddened. I am saddened by the loss of life and the damage done by one or perhaps two sick people. And I am saddened bu the responses of some here who I respected.

VA. I am spelling handicapped. I have tried all my adult life to overcome this handicap. It is a genetic problem that was acerbated by an experimental reading program when the taught me to read. It has been an embarrassment to me my whole life. If my spelling of use of a wrong work offends anyone I apologize up front. I am doing the best I can.

These are my last words on this tragic subject.
Scott, my friend, you do not embarrass any of us. To the contrary, you exemplify the best of us most of the time.

Well said, and thank you.

The spelling jab, is from someone who is CONSTANTLY spell-checking just about everything.
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
Originally Posted by Barak
On the other hand, it doesn't sound as though it was particularly high-visibility. No cameras, no live news coverage--if he was looking chiefly for a splash, doesn't it make sense that he'd wait for something showier?

Just because the event itself wasn't live on TV doesn't mean anything. Look at the visibility of the results.

It's a good point.
I think Scott Adams has been reading this thread.

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Scott F
I have read every word of the 595 replies.



I'm impressed--I went outside to sweep snow for 15 minutes and they ripped off 15 pages..........

No way am I going back and reading the middle twenty pages of this thread......



Casey
"For men may come, and men may go, but some threads go on forever."
Originally Posted by Scott F
Several people died, A woman is in the hospital with a gunshot wound to her head. And some say that it's OK because she chose to be a politician and some say that is OK because her opinions may have differed from their opinions. Step back and think about this for a moment. If someone differs with your opinions do they deserve to die? Where does the OK to die park begin and where does it end. I shoot a 22 K-hornet and like liver. Should I me shot for those opinions. I drive a Ford. Where should I report for execution? If my wife cooks my eggs to hard this morning am I justified in shooting her? Heaven forbid anyone like me should have a difference of beliefs or opinion.

Really? You read all the posts and you found somebody who said it was OK for her to be shot? I don't think I found anything like that even from the partisans. Where were you looking?

But your next point is indeed a good one. I'm pretty sure I heard some overtures about preemptively rounding up "lunatics," apparently defined as "people who don't agree with me," where the exact nature of the "me" is not clear.

I mean, I suppose I could tolerate the Ford, even though I'm a Toyota man myself, because I'm basically a nice guy. But owning a Smith & Wesson--especially if you bought it new rather than getting it used--might well approach lunacy as far as I'm concerned, right?

It is certainly sobering to see how desperate people are to throw their liberties--and other people's, especially other people's--at the State after something like this, so that the safety of their rulers might increase.

That's good, I like that.

Of course, it reminds me of trying to respond to one of isaac's posts...... grin


Casey


Originally Posted by bcp
I think Scott Adams has been reading this thread.

[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Steelhead
At least Barak is part of the Kairos Prison Ministry and spreading the good word of God.
Not so sure anymore.. And now a few posts backpedaling at full-speed??


Gentlemen, I'm totally serious when I say it's time to simply ignore Barak.. Tune him out.. Do not respond, reply, attempt to use logic, whatever.. It's obviously a total waste of time, energy and brain power..

I don't know what's happened to him, but whatever it is, I want no part of it.. As far as I'm concerned, from this very minute forward, he's a non-entity.. And to anyone in his vicinity, it might be time to be fore-warned and prepared.. Something's seriously wrong here.. Prayers for help needed now..

Y'all do what ya need to.. I know what I'll be doin'...
It sure was spot on as to the limits of your comprehension,that's for certain.
I can't believe I waded through all this crap except what Barak and TRH posted is not crap as usual.

1. I'm happy I'm a Pagan and don't have all that Bible stuff to deal with.

2. It is my greatest dream that medical science will be able some day to come up with a cure for the mental illness that afflicts financiers and politicans.

3. Without the financial and political class anarchy works.

4. It is tragic that anybody is killed or injured at any political rally but it goes with the territory. When one group of people tries to control and exercise power over another group well then it happens.

5. Some of the most insane people this country ever produced, or so King George the Third thought, were:

Sam Adams
John Adams
George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Ben Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Etc.

6. I guess I'm a radical anarcho-capitalist. The lowest form of life is the financial and political class. I find it very hard to shed a tear for whatever happens to them.
Barak,

You really are stupid! Every single person that was shot or killed was an innocent! How can you say that a politician and a judge are not innocent? Have you not read every scripture myself and others have posted? Apparrently you pick and choose the parts of the bible that you want to follow and ignore the rest.
It's people like you that give religion, God, Jesus and the bible a bad name!

When it comes to you punk not so bad and ok is the same thing. You refuse to understand everyone was innocent. Apparently in your limited brain capacity don't fully understand the situation, the bible, or this world. You are a punk that is no better than the killer for in your own way trying to justify and support this azzhole because he whacked a judge and almost whacked a congress member.
You sir are no christian or God fearing.

God forgive me for being agry and arguing, but you need an awakening barak. You need a better understanding. Maybe some omega 3 or ginko will help!
The Dude has showed up. It will be on now. Amazing.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Barak,

You really are stupid! Every single person that was shot or killed was an innocent! How can you say that a politician and a judge are not innocent? Have you not read every scripture myself and others have posted? Apparrently you pick and choose the parts of the bible that you want to follow and ignore the rest.
It's people like you that give religion, God, Jesus and the bible a bad name!

When it comes to you punk not so bad and ok is the same thing. You refuse to understand everyone was innocent. Apparently in your limited brain capacity don't fully understand the situation, the bible, or this world. You are a punk that is no better than the killer for in your own way trying to justify and support this azzhole because he whacked a judge and almost whacked a congress member.
You sir are no christian or God fearing.

God forgive me for being agry and arguing, but you need an awakening barak. You need a better understanding. Maybe some omega 3 or ginko will help!
You've studied the New Testament and what you took away was that everyone is innocent??? You'll have to excuse me for being utterly amazed at this.
Everyone was! How can you say someone wasn't?
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
The Dude has showed up. It will be on now. Amazing.


Nope, I made my statement. After 64 pages this thread is over.

The lines are drawn in the sand. You have the financial and political class screwing everything up. The sheeple class who enjoy the screwing and the super small minority who understand the screwing and are waiting for a better life on the other side.

Nothing will change.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Everyone was! How can you say someone wasn't?
Why do we need a redeemer, then?
Originally Posted by derby_dude
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
The Dude has showed up. It will be on now. Amazing.


Nope, I made my statement. After 64 pages this thread is over.

The lines are drawn in the sand. You have the financial and political class screwing everything up. The sheeple class who enjoy the screwing and the super small minority who understand the screwing and are waiting for a better life on the other side.

Nothing will change.


The "literate 5%", or something like that, right?
They were doing nothing wrong! They were out on a saturday morning visiting with each other and talking with their elected official when this happened. Explain to me please what they were doing wrong?
Haven't read the whole thread, and not gonna.

I would think that in principle at least, the "it's time to shoot the politicians!" chest-thumpers around here are very supportive of this shooting? Not the particulars, perhaps, but in principle?

Internet invective can have consequences. Every person here knows in their heart that this wack-job built up to this, internally, by finding people sayin' chit on the Internet who talked openly about shooting politicians. This is the power of words.




Originally Posted by Enrique
They were doing nothing wrong! They were out on a saturday morning visiting with each other and talking with their elected official when this happened. Explain to me please what they were doing wrong?
You implied that an understanding of the New Testament informs one that everyone is innocent. Stop trying to squirm out of your statements via obfuscation.
'kique;

You are going nowhere with this one. Not because you are incorrect, but because you are rational.
Legally, when we talk about "innocent" victims, it typically refers to whether those people were engaged in a crime at the time of the shooting. Every single one of the people at that gathering MAY have committed a crime in their past, but at the time of the shooting, they were just exercising their right to assemble peacefully. The fact that this kid shot them during this gathering is not justified legally in any way. If any of them had been engaged in a crime at the time of the shooting, this would be an entirely different discussion. For some here, the act of being a politician is a crime against humanity. That is the root of the disagreement. Unfortunately for their argument, there is no law on the books that says it is a crime to engage in politics.
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by derby_dude
Originally Posted by ColeYounger
The Dude has showed up. It will be on now. Amazing.


Nope, I made my statement. After 64 pages this thread is over.

The lines are drawn in the sand. You have the financial and political class screwing everything up. The sheeple class who enjoy the screwing and the super small minority who understand the screwing and are waiting for a better life on the other side.

Nothing will change.


The "literate 5%", or something like that, right?


That apparently don't have the testicular fortitude to back up their so-called convictions.

Talk is cheap, and so very disappointing.......

George
Originally Posted by Jeff_O
Haven't read the whole thread, and not gonna.

I would think that in principle at least, the "it's time to shoot the politicians!" chest-thumpers around here are very supportive of this shooting? Not the particulars, perhaps, but in principle?

Internet invective can have consequences. Every person here knows in their heart that this wack-job built up to this, internally, by finding people sayin' chit on the Internet who talked openly about shooting politicians. This is the power of words.




Perhaps, before making such statements, you actually should read the entire thread, or at least all the posts of those you believe you're referring to.
Originally Posted by OutlawPatriot
Legally, when we talk about "innocent" victims, it typically refers to whether those people were engaged in a crime at the time of the shooting. Every single one of the people at that gathering MAY have committed a crime in their past, but at the time of the shooting, they were just exercising their right to assemble peacefully. The fact that this kid shot them during this gathering is not justified legally in any way. If any of them had been engaged in a crime at the time of the shooting, this would be an entirely different discussion. For some here, the act of being a politician is a crime against humanity. That is the root of the disagreement. Unfortunately for their argument, there is no law on the books that says it is a crime to engage in politics.
Certainly, but he was making a specific theological argument, not a criminal law argument.
Originally Posted by derby_dude
I can't believe I waded through all this crap except what Barak and TRH posted is not crap as usual.

1. I'm happy I'm a Pagan and don't have all that Bible stuff to deal with.

2. It is my greatest dream that medical science will be able some day to come up with a cure for the mental illness that afflicts financiers and politicans.

3. Without the financial and political class anarchy works.

4. It is tragic that anybody is killed or injured at any political rally but it goes with the territory. When one group of people tries to control and exercise power over another group well then it happens.

5. Some of the most insane people this country ever produced, or so King George the Third thought, were:

Sam Adams
John Adams
George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Ben Franklin
Patrick Henry
Thomas Paine
Etc.

6. I guess I'm a radical anarcho-capitalist. The lowest form of life is the financial and political class. I find it very hard to shed a tear for whatever happens to them.

=================

Laffin' ...what a slobbering vegetable,you are!!
Originally Posted by Enrique
� he claims to have a ministry and claims to know the Bible. �

Ought to make the scene � uh � interesting when he scolds God for daring to permit things that he doesn't approve.

Oh, how nice it'd be if only God were wiser!
Thanks VA!

TRH,
I implied no such thing. I implied that everyone in this was equal and that your buddy barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot. He reasoned they were not so bad because they are extortionists of the tax payers. I pointed out by way of the bible that HE supposedly reads and understands where he was wrong.

Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
I implied no such thing. I implied that everyone in this was equal and that your buddy barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot. He reasoned they were not so bad because they are extortionists of the tax payers. I pointed out by way of the bible that HE supposedly reads and understands where he was wrong.

Barak never said that. Are you aware that bearing false witness is a sin?
the three of them are just unbelievable.....when you think they can't get any loonier, they always manage to surprise.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
I implied no such thing. I implied that everyone in this was equal and that your buddy barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot. He reasoned they were not so bad because they are extortionists of the tax payers. I pointed out by way of the bible that HE supposedly reads and understands where he was wrong.

Barak never said that. Are you aware that bearing false witness is a sin?


Really?

Originally Posted by Barak


If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.

The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist.

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.

There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.

In my world, if somebody commits a crime (initiates force) against you, you're the only one who's qualified to determine what retaliation is justified. The decision should be ultimately yours, if you're the victim.

Anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.
But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.
Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion.

The injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

As to whether politicians are subhuman or not...it's an interesting question. If they are simply fundamentally incapable of restraining themselves, then they don't bear any moral responsibility for the death and devastation they cause, but they're also pretty undeniably subhuman.
On the other hand, if they're fully human, it means that they've chosen to commit the crimes they've committed, when they could have made different choices instead, and are therefore fully responsible for them.
I'll admit that it'd be awfully difficult for me to love a politician. Much easier to love an armed robber.

I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.

Originally Posted by Barak

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.


I'm going to cross my fingers and hope you get a very special wee hours in the morning visit from some totally humorless men, who without fanfare, introduce you to a pair of shiny bracelets, and are dragged, kicking and screaming, to some Godforsaken underground hole somewhere. I also hope someone 'forgets' standard protocol, and you are left with only your delusions and a belt for company in the quiet of the night.

There is a line, and you have crossed it.



TRH,
Read thru all the posts. He said that. He said they were extortionists because people that didn't vote for them are paying their salaries.
That is what got this whole thing started and me so upset. That he is trying to justify the act!

Originally Posted by levrluvr
These are not the ramblings of a different person, but of a sick one. The ramblings of one who believes that one life is more important than another, simply by what they do in life, and that he has the power to judge and stratify them.
Unbelievable.
Seek some psychiatric care fella, before you hurt someone.

Originally Posted by barak


If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.

The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist.

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.

There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.

In my world, if somebody commits a crime (initiates force) against you, you're the only one who's qualified to determine what retaliation is justified. The decision should be ultimately yours, if you're the victim.

Anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.
But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.
Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion.

The injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

As to whether politicians are subhuman or not...it's an interesting question. If they are simply fundamentally incapable of restraining themselves, then they don't bear any moral responsibility for the death and devastation they cause, but they're also pretty undeniably subhuman.
On the other hand, if they're fully human, it means that they've chosen to commit the crimes they've committed, when they could have made different choices instead, and are therefore fully responsible for them.
I'll admit that it'd be awfully difficult for me to love a politician. Much easier to love an armed robber.

I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.




Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Enrique
In no way shape or form were any of the victims doing anything to harm anyone.

Giffords and Roll: how were they paid? Do you know where their salaries came from? One group of people, or its delegates, put them in office over the protests of another group of people, yet the second group of people is still extorted by the State to pay their salaries.

Completely ignoring any and all other offenses they may have committed while in office, that right there qualifies as doing something to harm someone. Extortion is a crime. (When the government does it, it's called taxation rather than extortion, but it's still an initiation of force, therefore a crime.)
Sean...I can't believe you spent two seconds dealing with TRDA's inability to comprehend the written word.
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
Read thru all the posts. He said that. He said they were extortionists because people that didn't vote for them are paying their salaries.
That is what got this whole thing started and me so upset. That he is trying to justify the act!

Show me where Barak said this: "Barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot."
Originally Posted by lhonda
Originally Posted by Barak

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.


I'm going to cross my fingers and hope you get a very special wee hours in the morning visit from some totally humorless men, who without fanfare, introduce you to a pair of shiny bracelets, and are dragged, kicking and screaming, to some Godforsaken underground hole somewhere. I also hope someone 'forgets' standard protocol, and you are left with only your delusions and a belt for company in the quiet of the night.

There is a line, and you have crossed it.






Yeah,...and he CROSSED it HERE.

GTC
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
Read thru all the posts. He said that. He said they were extortionists because people that didn't vote for them are paying their salaries.
That is what got this whole thing started and me so upset. That he is trying to justify the act!

Show me where Barak said this: "Barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot."


Read the [bleep]' quotes, with COMPREHENSION this time.

Originally Posted by Steve_NO
the three of them are just unbelievable.....when you think they can't get any loonier, they always manage to surprise.


I'd like to see the three of them solemnize an EFFECTIVE and successful suicide pact, myself.

It would look good on them,....we could kick back and have drink (and a laugh) in their honor.

[bleep]' creeps.

GTC
TRH,
I think VA already posted enough evidence to back what I wrote.
Enrique/VA, it's a waste of time. It doesn't fit his/their "right" way of thinking so it's not going to sink in.

George
This thread is unbelievable...

Unfortunately, Greg, it's very believable.
It's hilarious how these things always turn into an assessment of each other as opposed to the subject of the thread itself.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Certainly, but he was making a specific theological argument, not a criminal law argument.

Actually, it was a natural-law argument.

We know she has voted--and done so where it counts--to have the State take resources away from people in group A and give them instead to people in group B. It's reasonable to argue--heck, lots of people here made this very argument--that without those resources, people on the margins in group A will die. It is not clear--again, lots of people here made this argument--that those resources will save anyone in group B; as a matter of fact, it's more likely that as a result of the nationalization of health care, more people in both group A and group B will die.

We know that she voted to use federal tax money, extorted from people who are passionately opposed to abortion, to pay for abortions.

We know that she voted to greatly expand the powers of the FDA, which will significantly raise the price of food, putting it further out of the reach of people on the margin and undoubtedly killing some of them.

We know that she voted to have the State extort more money from responsible, successful people and use it to bail out irresponsible, unsuccessful people.

We know that she voted for an expansion of the definition of employer discrimination, trampling the property rights of small business owners.

There's much, much more. She's been a federal politician for four years.

She is not innocent. She has used the coercive power of the state to hurt many, many people, undoubtedly killing some of them; and her legacy will live on after her, hurting and killing more.

As for John Roll, it's anybody's guess--which means I don't feel like doing the research--how many people he's sent to prison over his lifetime for actions that didn't hurt anybody but of which the State disapproved. 63 is a decent-sized lifetime. My guess is that there were at least hundreds. If he hadn't been a minion of the State, every single one of those would count as a felony kidnapping. He's not innocent either.

The thing that makes politicians and other criminals different from regular folks in my mind is that they deliberately pursue a compulsion to coercively control other people rather than minding their own business.

But yes, for all those keeping score, even though Giffords and Roll were politicians, it was not OK for some guy to walk up and shoot them.
Gotta quit reading this, I am getting PIZZED!
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
I think VA already posted enough evidence to back what I wrote.
Who??
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Certainly, but he was making a specific theological argument, not a criminal law argument.

Actually, it was a natural-law argument.

We know she has voted--and done so where it counts--to have the State take resources away from people in group A and give them instead to people in group B. It's reasonable to argue--heck, lots of people here made this very argument--that without those resources, people on the margins in group A will die. It is not clear--again, lots of people here made this argument--that those resources will save anyone in group B; as a matter of fact, it's more likely that as a result of the nationalization of health care, more people in both group A and group B will die.

We know that she voted to use federal tax money, extorted from people who are passionately opposed to abortion, to pay for abortions.

We know that she voted to greatly expand the powers of the FDA, which will significantly raise the price of food, putting it further out of the reach of people on the margin and undoubtedly killing some of them.

We know that she voted to have the State extort more money from responsible, successful people and use it to bail out irresponsible, unsuccessful people.

We know that she voted for an expansion of the definition of employer discrimination, trampling the property rights of small business owners.

There's much, much more. She's been a federal politician for four years.

She is not innocent. She has used the coercive power of the state to hurt many, many people, undoubtedly killing some of them; and her legacy will live on after her, hurting and killing more.

As for John Roll, it's anybody's guess--which means I don't feel like doing the research--how many people he's sent to prison over his lifetime for actions that didn't hurt anybody but of which the State disapproved. 63 is a decent-sized lifetime. My guess is that there were at least hundreds. If he hadn't been a minion of the State, every single one of those would count as a felony kidnapping. He's not innocent either.

The thing that makes politicians and other criminals different from regular folks in my mind is that they deliberately pursue a compulsion to coercively control other people rather than minding their own business.

But yes, for all those keeping score, even though Giffords and Roll were politicians, it was not OK for some guy to walk up and shoot them.


But, by your own words, you believe it to be less wrong; for their injuries or death to be less tragic, than if it happened to someone who was not a politician or judge? And, you think that they chose those careers because they were corrupt and because God might have forgotten to put something important in them?

Those are your words, Ed, and clearly evidence as to why you need help.
I'll repeat my earlier, it's not worth your stress/time Terry. How much is the "man's" opinion and/or warped logic really worth to you.

George
It's what impact that man's warped logic might have upon others that is more of a concern.
Originally Posted by T LEE
Gotta quit reading this, I am getting PIZZED!


I'm more than pizzed... miserable F'ers... I can no longer associate with this scum or where they are abided.

It is what it is. He's already shown he can't actually face his own "convictions".

I meet plenty of "them" in "real life". The actions of a few on the 'net give me nothing but humor.

Talk....

George
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Unfortunately, Greg, it's very believable.


The hypocrisy and perverted justification here is utterly astounding.

Utterly astounding.

Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Certainly, but he was making a specific theological argument, not a criminal law argument.

Actually, it was a natural-law argument.

We know she has voted--and done so where it counts--to have the State take resources away from people in group A and give them instead to people in group B. It's reasonable to argue--heck, lots of people here made this very argument--that without those resources, people on the margins in group A will die. It is not clear--again, lots of people here made this argument--that those resources will save anyone in group B; as a matter of fact, it's more likely that as a result of the nationalization of health care, more people in both group A and group B will die.

We know that she voted to use federal tax money, extorted from people who are passionately opposed to abortion, to pay for abortions.

We know that she voted to greatly expand the powers of the FDA, which will significantly raise the price of food, putting it further out of the reach of people on the margin and undoubtedly killing some of them.

We know that she voted to have the State extort more money from responsible, successful people and use it to bail out irresponsible, unsuccessful people.

We know that she voted for an expansion of the definition of employer discrimination, trampling the property rights of small business owners.

There's much, much more. She's been a federal politician for four years.

She is not innocent. She has used the coercive power of the state to hurt many, many people, undoubtedly killing some of them; and her legacy will live on after her, hurting and killing more.

As for John Roll, it's anybody's guess--which means I don't feel like doing the research--how many people he's sent to prison over his lifetime for actions that didn't hurt anybody but of which the State disapproved. 63 is a decent-sized lifetime. My guess is that there were at least hundreds. If he hadn't been a minion of the State, every single one of those would count as a felony kidnapping. He's not innocent either.

The thing that makes politicians and other criminals different from regular folks in my mind is that they deliberately pursue a compulsion to coercively control other people rather than minding their own business.

But yes, for all those keeping score, even though Giffords and Roll were politicians, it was not OK for some guy to walk up and shoot them.
I was referring to Enrique, not you.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
I think VA already posted enough evidence to back what I wrote.
Who??

==================

No need to pretend to be a dumb-schit any longer; that cat has long been out of the bag.
Guessing Barak's gonna find himself up [bleep] without a paddle this time. Should probably be expecting a visit from the feds shortly.
TRH,

VAnimrod Posted what Barak had to say when you said Barak didn't say what I say he said. The information is there to back my statement.
Barak keeps insisting that the government is extorting from the taxpayers even when the bible mentions to pay taxes and listen to the government. It doesn't say we can pick and choose.
I'll post it again since you missed it.


Originally Posted by VAnimrod
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,
I implied no such thing. I implied that everyone in this was equal and that your buddy barak is wrong in saying just because one is in congress and one is a judge that it was not so bad and in a sense ok for them to have been shot. He reasoned they were not so bad because they are extortionists of the tax payers. I pointed out by way of the bible that HE supposedly reads and understands where he was wrong.

Barak never said that. Are you aware that bearing false witness is a sin?


Really?

Originally Posted by Barak


If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them.

The only thing you got right is that I'm anti-Constitutionalist.

I'm not going to say it was right for this particular congresswoman and judge to be shot; but however right or wrong it was, it was more wrong for the other people and the little girl to be shot.

There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me. My objective is to suck power away from the State, not to hand it more.

Plumbers and farmers and doctors help people. Politicians hurt people. To me, a politician is a peg or two lower on the scale than an armed robber.

In my world, if somebody commits a crime (initiates force) against you, you're the only one who's qualified to determine what retaliation is justified. The decision should be ultimately yours, if you're the victim.

Anyone who expects politicians to be anything other than gilded scum is a fool.

I don't know whether being a politician is a sin or not. Is it a sin for a fish to swim or a bird to fly? Perhaps politicians are politicians simply because God chose to leave something important out of them when he created them, and it's not to be held against their account at all. After all, I have to believe God doesn't hold retarded people to account for not being smart.
But if it's a crime to take something that belongs to somebody else without his permission, and being a politician implies being paid with taxes, then being a politician is essentially a crime, yes, if not a sin. The only reason it's not popularly called a crime is the popular legitimization of the State's monopoly on the initiation of force.
Of course, the vast majority of politicians in the real world are guilty of far more than just extortion.

The injuries and deaths of the bystanders are more tragic than the injuries and deaths of the politicians. I would have said the same thing if the damage had been caused by an earthquake or a tornado.

As to whether politicians are subhuman or not...it's an interesting question. If they are simply fundamentally incapable of restraining themselves, then they don't bear any moral responsibility for the death and devastation they cause, but they're also pretty undeniably subhuman.
On the other hand, if they're fully human, it means that they've chosen to commit the crimes they've committed, when they could have made different choices instead, and are therefore fully responsible for them.
I'll admit that it'd be awfully difficult for me to love a politician. Much easier to love an armed robber.

I rate my compassion for politicians based on whether they're politicians or not.

Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH,

VAnimrod Posted what Barak had to say when you said Barak didn't say what I say he said. The information is there to back my statement.
Barak keeps insisting that the government is extorting from the taxpayers even when the bible mentions to pay taxes and listen to the government. It doesn't say we can pick and choose.
Is there a member here by that screen name?
LOL you are a funny man when you aren't defending people with moronic tendencies.
More along the lines of "ignorance is bliss".

George
Originally Posted by Enrique
LOL you are a funny man when you aren't defending people with moronic tendencies.
Nothing this VA fellow has quoted defends you from your false claim that Barak said that it was in some sense OK for this nutjob to have killed any of these people.
You best get a coloring book and some crayons if you wish to keep explaining it to him. Even the 6th graders he teaches know he's not smarter than a 6th grader.
I've had Barak on ignore for quite some time, but occasionally toggle his posts. Human nature I suppose. Hard to look the other way when there's a train wreck....

I see he has out-done himself this time.

You need help Barak...
Originally Posted by Enrique
Barak keeps insisting that the government is extorting from the taxpayers even when the bible mentions to pay taxes and listen to the government. It doesn't say we can pick and choose.

Okay, look. I have a presentation to prepare, and I can't spend all day here. But let me take one more shot at this.

Enrique: in first-century Palestine, it was perfectly legal for a Roman soldier to grab a random Jew, who was just going about his business and hurting nobody, and force him to carry the soldier's load--in whatever direction the soldier happened to be going and for as long as he felt like--under threat of violence.

Okay? In our world today, that's kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Felonies. Prison.

So what did Jesus say about that? He said that if a soldier demands that you carry his burden a mile, you should carry it two miles instead.

Now did Jesus mean by this that when a soldier forces his burden on you, it's not kidnapping or involuntary servitude?

No, of course not. It's still kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Jesus is just saying that you shouldn't resist it. (Why not is a whole other lesson. No time now. Later, maybe.)

So...by analogy, when he says you shouldn't resist taxation, he is not saying that taxation isn't extortion. Of course it's extortion: it fits every single definition of extortion there is, other than ones that make a clear exception for the State. (No, he didn't say "extortion." The word "extortion" didn't exist. The entire English language didn't exist. If he had said "extortion" nobody would have known what he meant.)

It's not a crime to give a robber what he demands; but it's still a crime for him to rob you, whether or not he gets what he demands.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Enrique
Barak keeps insisting that the government is extorting from the taxpayers even when the bible mentions to pay taxes and listen to the government. It doesn't say we can pick and choose.

Okay, look. I have a presentation to prepare, and I can't spend all day here. But let me take one more shot at this.

Enrique: in first-century Palestine, it was perfectly legal for a Roman soldier to grab a random Jew, who was just going about his business and hurting nobody, and force him to carry the soldier's load--in whatever direction the soldier happened to be going and for as long as he felt like--under threat of violence.

Okay? In our world today, that's kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Felonies. Prison.

So what did Jesus say about that? He said that if a soldier demands that you carry his burden a mile, you should carry it two miles instead.

Now did Jesus mean by this that when a soldier forces his burden on you, it's not kidnapping or involuntary servitude?

No, of course not. It's still kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Jesus is just saying that you shouldn't resist it. (Why not is a whole other lesson. No time now. Later, maybe.)

So...by analogy, when he says you shouldn't resist taxation, he is not saying that taxation isn't extortion. Of course it's extortion: it fits every single definition of extortion there is, other than ones that make a clear exception for the State. (No, he didn't say "extortion." The word "extortion" didn't exist. The entire English language didn't exist. If he had said "extortion" nobody would have known what he meant.)

It's not a crime to give a robber what he demands; but it's still a crime for him to rob you, whether or not he gets what he demands.
Well said. Sort of what I was trying to say earlier.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Enrique
Barak keeps insisting that the government is extorting from the taxpayers even when the bible mentions to pay taxes and listen to the government. It doesn't say we can pick and choose.

Okay, look. I have a presentation to prepare, and I can't spend all day here. But let me take one more shot at this.

Enrique: in first-century Palestine, it was perfectly legal for a Roman soldier to grab a random Jew, who was just going about his business and hurting nobody, and force him to carry the soldier's load--in whatever direction the soldier happened to be going and for as long as he felt like--under threat of violence.

Okay? In our world today, that's kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Felonies. Prison.

So what did Jesus say about that? He said that if a soldier demands that you carry his burden a mile, you should carry it two miles instead.

Now did Jesus mean by this that when a soldier forces his burden on you, it's not kidnapping or involuntary servitude?

No, of course not. It's still kidnapping and involuntary servitude. Jesus is just saying that you shouldn't resist it. (Why not is a whole other lesson. No time now. Later, maybe.)

So...by analogy, when he says you shouldn't resist taxation, he is not saying that taxation isn't extortion. Of course it's extortion: it fits every single definition of extortion there is, other than ones that make a clear exception for the State. (No, he didn't say "extortion." The word "extortion" didn't exist. The entire English language didn't exist. If he had said "extortion" nobody would have known what he meant.)

It's not a crime to give a robber what he demands; but it's still a crime for him to rob you, whether or not he gets what he demands.
Well said. Sort of what I was trying to say earlier.


Completely wrong, as to carry the load for 2 miles would have created a crime that the soldier would have been guilty of, or a service for which the Jew would have had to have been paid for the entire time of service (both miles).
Any way to delete this whole thread..? It has lived past its usefulness.
If nothing else, it's served as a reminder just how [bleep] up some of the idiots around here are.
WOW!

I know the rest of you guys are right. Can't fix stupid.

I'm done on this subject. TRH and Barak can defend the azzclown that killed and injured all those people all they want. I am sure they are part of the Westboro Baptist Church.

I am only going to stay on topic and the news at hand. No sense if trying to get them to understand when they don't want too.
20 people were shot, some killed while holding a peaceful assembly. God protect the victims and the family members of each and every family affected.

Kique
Posted By: Ready . - 01/09/11
Let us hold a minute in silence for all victims in this senseless act.

After a breezer - let us show them respect and let this thread end.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Certainly, but he was making a specific theological argument, not a criminal law argument.

Actually, it was a natural-law argument.

We know she has voted--and done so where it counts--to have the State take resources away from people in group A and give them instead to people in group B. It's reasonable to argue--heck, lots of people here made this very argument--that without those resources, people on the margins in group A will die. It is not clear--again, lots of people here made this argument--that those resources will save anyone in group B; as a matter of fact, it's more likely that as a result of the nationalization of health care, more people in both group A and group B will die.

We know that she voted to use federal tax money, extorted from people who are passionately opposed to abortion, to pay for abortions.

We know that she voted to greatly expand the powers of the FDA, which will significantly raise the price of food, putting it further out of the reach of people on the margin and undoubtedly killing some of them.

We know that she voted to have the State extort more money from responsible, successful people and use it to bail out irresponsible, unsuccessful people.

We know that she voted for an expansion of the definition of employer discrimination, trampling the property rights of small business owners.

There's much, much more. She's been a federal politician for four years.

She is not innocent. She has used the coercive power of the state to hurt many, many people, undoubtedly killing some of them; and her legacy will live on after her, hurting and killing more.

As for John Roll, it's anybody's guess--which means I don't feel like doing the research--how many people he's sent to prison over his lifetime for actions that didn't hurt anybody but of which the State disapproved. 63 is a decent-sized lifetime. My guess is that there were at least hundreds. If he hadn't been a minion of the State, every single one of those would count as a felony kidnapping. He's not innocent either.

The thing that makes politicians and other criminals different from regular folks in my mind is that they deliberately pursue a compulsion to coercively control other people rather than minding their own business.

But yes, for all those keeping score, even though Giffords and Roll were politicians, it was not OK for some guy to walk up and shoot them.


In a republic, the majority elects representatives that vote for what they perceive the common good.

Some people strongly believe that abortion is wrong, yet the Congress can say that we will use taxpayer money to support abortions. Others may believe that spending 48% of the combined world's entire defense budget is wrong, yet our leaders have decided that is justified. Some want to build bridges to nowhere; others want to do something else. Some oppose universal healthcare, others want all people to have access to medical care while hospitals want someone to pay for it.

This is how it works in our republican form of government.

Originally Posted by Enrique
TRH and Barak can defend the azzclown that killed and injured all those people all they want.

Enrique
More bearing of false witness? Have you no shame?
Originally Posted by NH K9
It is what it is. He's already shown he can't actually face his own "convictions".

I meet plenty of "them" in "real life". The actions of a few on the 'net give me nothing but humor.

Talk....

George


Me too. The difference being at that time I was being paid and didn't have a choice to interact with them. I'm glad I don't know their true identities as I still feel morally encouraged to report psychotic behavior as displayed here by Barak and to a lessor degree, Hawkeye. Very disturbing that they freely roam in their chosen fields of "education" and incarceration.
Just incase you guys missed this, I posted it on a thread I started.

Three Sonorans (of which I am no fan of) posted on the Tucson Citizen the following:
"Fred Phelps� Westboro Baptist Church says that God sent the shooter today.

His church also plans on protesting at the funeral of 9 year-old Cristina Taylor Greene.

They plan on coming to OUR town and disgracing us?

YA BASTA!"


http://tucsoncitizen.com/three-sonorans/...reenes-funeral/

Like I said I don't care for Three Sonorans, but I will stand by him on this issue. This is our common ground. plus these nutjobs are the antichrist on earth covering themselves up like christians.


Kique
Posted By: Ready Argue with Barak... - 01/09/11
[Linked Image]

Originally Posted by Ken Howell
Ending World War Two was worthy of global applause.

Assassinating Hitler to do it, however justifiiable or necessary that may have been, would not have been worthy of the same applause.

Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki saved tens of millions more lives than it took � thunderous applause and woeful tragedy, not an either-or matter at all. Neither one alone nor the other alone.


Wasn't so much speaking to applause, I agree there is no need for applauding any killing, but rather the acceptance of assassination.

People in general, tend to get tripped up in justifying murder, on some individual sliding scale of the victim's merit.

I find it interesting that we as a society, often find shooting a soldier from 20 yards, or firebombing a civilian populace from 20,000' an acceptable practice, yet wince when a leader of a country is shot at point blank range.

I see little difference in the act itself, the difference lies in the moral justification. A whack job who murders a congresswoman will find little sympathy with the populace and be properly punished. A whack job who murders a tyrant, may find refuge with the people who were oppressed by the tyrant. A whack job who murders a Hitler may end a war and be treated a hero by millions of people.

The differences lie not with the act, but within a sliding scale of acceptance by others...i.e., you do not want to be someone who is in a distinct minority in feeling that individual deserved death.

It is for this reason that Jared Loughner will find little sympathy within the populace for his actions, and will deservedly spend the rest of his life in prison or be executed. Not because he was an assassin, but because he assassinated people the vast majority of us, will deem undeserving of death.
BTW not speack false witness sir. Its true and the proof is in the thread with all both of you have said.


Anyone have a prayer that can be posted for a time and situation like this?
Originally Posted by Enrique
BTW not speack false witness sir. Its true and the proof is in the thread with all both of you have said.


Anyone have a prayer that can be posted for a time and situation like this?
You will need to post some quotes, then.
Nope read what Barak wrote and read what you wrote. You dig it up and find it. It's there. If VA found Baraks I am sure you are smart enough to find the info.


What do you think of the Westboro idoits trying to protest a 9yo's funneral?
Posted By: OutlawPatriot Re: Argue with Barak... - 01/09/11
Originally Posted by cmg
[Linked Image]

You owe me a new keyboard laugh
Originally Posted by Enrique
Just incase you guys missed this, I posted it on a thread I started.

Three Sonorans (of which I am no fan of) posted on the Tucson Citizen the following:
"Fred Phelps� Westboro Baptist Church says that God sent the shooter today.

His church also plans on protesting at the funeral of 9 year-old Cristina Taylor Greene.

They plan on coming to OUR town and disgracing us?

YA BASTA!"


http://tucsoncitizen.com/three-sonorans/...reenes-funeral/

Like I said I don't care for Three Sonorans, but I will stand by him on this issue. This is our common ground. plus these nutjobs are the antichrist on earth covering themselves up like christians.


Kique
I was down in Tulsa at the big gunshow the weekend the Westboro freaks went down to McAlester (a small city about 100 miles south of there) and protested a dead soldier's funeral. I have a cap that says simply "Kansas" on it, which I was wearing. I ditched it and wore my Cowboy hat instead because I didn't want to be associated with the Westboro nuts.

The people in McAlester protested right back at the Westboro people and when the freaks got back to their minivan all the tires were flat. They couldn't get anybody to fix it on a Saturday. Finally, they got some dude from the auto club to bring a flatbed truck and haul it to Walmarts where they got it fixed. A rather cold reception.

The jackasses also protested a National Guardsman that I knew who was killed over in the Sandbox. They are a disgrace to Kansas. It is great to ignore them because they are attention whores, perpetual victims and also lawsuit mavens. I can't say I dislike the McAlester approach though. Just thought I'd share.
Quick reply utilized so not addressed to Cole:

I finally waded through all 21 (to me) pages. One and only comment.

I pray to God that some of the sick assed comments that have been expressed on this thread are NOT representative of the campfire. If they are then GOD HELP US ALL.
Giffords and the other poor people had done nothing deserving of injury or death at the hands of some deranged moron.






BCR
Originally Posted by Enrique
Nope read what Barak wrote and read what you wrote. You dig it up and find it. It's there. If VA found Baraks I am sure you are smart enough to find the info.


What do you think of the Westboro idoits trying to protest a 9yo's funneral?
Downright disgusting.
Man, this thread is terrible in so many different ways.

Brian.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Nope
That's what I figured.

Excellent post Foxbat.....


Casey


Originally Posted by Foxbat

Wasn't so much speaking to applause, I agree there is no need for applauding any killing, but rather the acceptance of assassination.

People in general, tend to get tripped up in justifying murder, on some individual sliding scale of the victim's merit.

I find it interesting that we as a society, often find shooting a soldier from 20 yards, or firebombing a civilian populace from 20,000' an acceptable practice, yet wince when a leader of a country is shot at point blank range.

I see little difference in the act itself, the difference lies in the moral justification. A whack job who murders a congresswoman will find little sympathy with the populace and be properly punished. A whack job who murders a tyrant, may find refuge with the people who were oppressed by the tyrant. A whack job who murders a Hitler may end a war and be treated a hero by millions of people.

The differences lie not with the act, but within a sliding scale of acceptance by others...i.e., you do not want to be someone who is in a distinct minority in feeling that individual deserved death.

It is for this reason that Jared Loughner will find little sympathy within the populace for his actions, and will deservedly spend the rest of his life in prison or be executed. Not because he was an assassin, but because he assassinated people the vast majority of us, will deem undeserving of death.
Here's the thing that conserns me. This guy is a mental case. They can't use his ideology so much to denigrate the republicans of the Tea Party. Bet they will make some political hay from it. That will be the "Mentally Ill" end.

Right now the standard is "Adjudicated mentally defective or INVOLUNTARILY committed to a mental institution". Both of these cases require an action by court. An action that has the effect of limiting the exercise of rights. It fills the Due Process clause of the constitution.

Now we go to simple mental illness. What exactly is that. In fact if you would look through DSM-V you would see that just about everyone is mentally ill in some way. It comes down to if you don't ascribe to some ideology. Maybe you are anti- social. Just the opinion of a quack shrink. And who set the standards?

Maybe you went through a spell of major depression, and you checked into a facility. It doesn't mean you are a danger to society, it doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong. Maybe you had problems in the service and were treated, maybe even discharged, that still doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong or that you are wholly or partially a "Mental Case" like this guy.

These things happen in a free society. In fact they happen much more often in a society less free. Let's understand that living in a free society has inherent risks. Do we really want some bureaucratic hack or politician to set a standard in which ANY of your rights can be restricted without due process? Is that the crack in the door we want to give to the politicians? Over rare instances, as a reaction.

Perhaps if we want such a standard people with diabetes of heart disease should not be allowed to drive. In fact they can and do cause accidents in which people get hurt or killed. Yet we have them driving school buses. In fact, that scenario comes to light one heck of a lot more often than a shooting.
Originally Posted by crosshair
Here's the thing that conserns me. This guy is a mental case. They can't use his ideology so much to denigrate the republicans of the Tea Party. Bet they will make some political hay from it. That will be the "Mentally Ill" end.

Right now the standard is "Adjudicated mentally defective or INVOLUNTARILY committed to a mental institution". Both of these cases require an action by court. An action that has the effect of limiting the exercise of rights. It fills the Due Process clause of the constitution.

Now we go to simple mental illness. What exactly is that. In fact if you would look through DSM-V you would see that just about everyone is mentally ill in some way. It comes down to if you don't ascribe to some ideology. Maybe you are anti- social. Just the opinion of a quack shrink. And who set the standards?

Maybe you went through a spell of major depression, and you checked into a facility. It doesn't mean you are a danger to society, it doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong. Maybe you had problems in the service and were treated, maybe even discharged, that still doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong or that you are wholly or partially a "Mental Case" like this guy.

These things happen in a free society. In fact they happen much more often in a society less free. Let's understand that living in a free society has inherent risks. Do we really want some bureaucratic hack or politician to set a standard in which ANY of your rights can be restricted without due process? Is that the crack in the door we want to give to the politicians? Over rare instances, as a reaction.

Perhaps if we want such a standard people with diabetes of heart disease should not be allowed to drive. In fact they can and do cause accidents in which people get hurt or killed. Yet we have them driving school buses. In fact, that scenario comes to light one heck of a lot more often than a shooting.
Good post.
Originally Posted by Enrique
Just incase you guys missed this, I posted it on a thread I started.

Three Sonorans (of which I am no fan of) posted on the Tucson Citizen the following:
"Fred Phelps� Westboro Baptist Church says that God sent the shooter today.

His church also plans on protesting at the funeral of 9 year-old Cristina Taylor Greene.

They plan on coming to OUR town and disgracing us?

YA BASTA!"


http://tucsoncitizen.com/three-sonorans/...reenes-funeral/

Like I said I don't care for Three Sonorans, but I will stand by him on this issue. This is our common ground. plus these nutjobs are the antichrist on earth covering themselves up like christians.


Kique

kique, if they do come to town, which you please let some of us know in advance?
thanks.
that guy is a real piece of work, isn't he?
http://networkedblogs.com/cLuTY
With the left's gnashing of their teeth over Palin's use of a gunsite over those districts that included Giffords.....

A very relevant dose of hypocrisy...


�If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun, because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I�ve seen Eagles fans.�

Barack Obama - 2008 to a rally in Philadelphia
Keep digging that hole deeper! Douche bag!
Originally Posted by Boggy Creek Ranger
Quick reply utilized so not addressed to Cole:

I finally waded through all 21 (to me) pages. One and only comment.

I pray to God that some of the sick assed comments that have been expressed on this thread are NOT representative of the campfire. If they are then GOD HELP US ALL.
Giffords and the other poor people had done nothing deserving of injury or death at the hands of some deranged moron.











BCR



I agree on all counts ,James .
Originally Posted by crosshair
Here's the thing that conserns me. This guy is a mental case. They can't use his ideology so much to denigrate the republicans of the Tea Party. Bet they will make some political hay from it. That will be the "Mentally Ill" end.

Right now the standard is "Adjudicated mentally defective or INVOLUNTARILY committed to a mental institution". Both of these cases require an action by court. An action that has the effect of limiting the exercise of rights. It fills the Due Process clause of the constitution.

Now we go to simple mental illness. What exactly is that. In fact if you would look through DSM-V you would see that just about everyone is mentally ill in some way. It comes down to if you don't ascribe to some ideology. Maybe you are anti- social. Just the opinion of a quack shrink. And who set the standards?

Maybe you went through a spell of major depression, and you checked into a facility. It doesn't mean you are a danger to society, it doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong. Maybe you had problems in the service and were treated, maybe even discharged, that still doesn't mean you don't know right from wrong or that you are wholly or partially a "Mental Case" like this guy.

These things happen in a free society. In fact they happen much more often in a society less free. Let's understand that living in a free society has inherent risks. Do we really want some bureaucratic hack or politician to set a standard in which ANY of your rights can be restricted without due process? Is that the crack in the door we want to give to the politicians? Over rare instances, as a reaction.

Perhaps if we want such a standard people with diabetes of heart disease should not be allowed to drive. In fact they can and do cause accidents in which people get hurt or killed. Yet we have them driving school buses. In fact, that scenario comes to light one heck of a lot more often than a shooting.

crosshair, I don't know your background other than that I believe you work in penology, but you really nailed it. Thank you for your excellent post. It should be a wake up to those who think "nut jobs" are somebody else, and have no problem denying rights to anybody who is designated mentally ill. You really have to know something about the system to appreciate the danger this presents to civil rights. Too many people think it couldn't apply to them. Remember what happened to people labeled mentally ill in Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.

Paul
Originally Posted by Barak
� the vast majority of what I preach to the inmates goes like this:

"You can use a do/while loop as an abortable straightline. As a matter of fact, that may well be its best and highest purpose."

"No, you can't change production code while the tests are green. You have to make a test red first."

"Here's how you know a line of code is covered: before the line was written, a test was red, and writing that line made the test go green. No static-analysis tool can tell you that; only self-discipline can tell you that."

"Testing only through the front door leads to an unnecessary number of tests and excessively long and difficult setup. Instead, mock where necessary and test through the side door as well. Remember, it's a unit test."

"A switch statement, or its if/else-if/else equivalent, is almost always a design smell. Write object-oriented code in an object-oriented language." �

I have about three dozen Bibles, in Greek, Hebrew, Latin, French, Spanish, and Dutch, as well as of course well over a dozen English versions � can't find any glimmer of that in any of 'em even with the help of a few dozens of commentaries, lexicons, encylcopedias, and contemporary peripheral works.

Not sure that I'd understand Barak's Complete Annotated Commentary on the Bible even if I had it. Too bad that the Holy Spirit ain't really Twins, as some seem to like to believe that He is. Obviously, I could use a lot more of His help.

Haven't seen my beloved old copy of Berkof's Principles of Biblical Interpretation in several years, so I've just ordered another copy. Looking forward to getting reacquainted with an old friend. Maybe that'll help.

It ain't easy bein' senile! frown
The point is that I generally serve a Kairos weekend in some prison or other once every six months, during which I do precisely no preaching whatever; but every week I'm in there with my Agile Java class, teaching principles of modern software development to a mess of prisoners with two other volunteers who are also programmer consultants. That I suppose you could call preaching in a secular sense, but it'd be stretching a point.
Originally Posted by Barak
The point is that I generally serve a Kairos weekend in some prison or other once every six months, during which I do precisely no preaching whatever; but every week I'm in there with my Agile Java class, teaching principles of modern software development to a mess of prisoners with two other volunteers who are also programmer consultants. That I suppose you could call preaching in a secular sense, but it'd be stretching a point.


I knew that. grin
Hate to dig up this toxic thread but...

Barak, ya asked my opinion.

You're the guy who has a hard time with the finer, non-literal nuances of normal human communication, like how it is difficult for you to percieve sarcasm, so I'll cut you some slack. Perhaps you have no idea how you appear over the 'net.

Your assertion that all government figures are corrupt and worse than armed robber and perhaps even rapists is absurd. I know that in your perfect world people live in small, self-governing communities wherein they can set their own norms of acceptable behavior and rules, and if they dont like it, can find another one.

Your belief is that innate human goodness or Christian values whatever would prevent people from committing abuses upon others or upon their own children (to use that particularly egregious example), but if there was a community that WANTED to abuse their kids, they could go for it. Your assertion being IIRC that such communities would die a natural death resulting from their own behavior, whatever it might be.

A nicely idealized world perhaps. Except that innumerable examples past and present, show that left unchecked, all sorts of perversions and violence can become the norm and yet those communities persist indefinitely. Indeed, those who live in such setting generally lead short and violence-filled lives relative to what we have in Western societies, with far less freedoms.

In short, experience has shown that a rule of law, as imposed by a government, is a necessary adjunct. No government is perfect, ours ain't bad, especially considering the alternatives.

All well and good, difference of opinion among ourselves, though numerous obvious examples would back my argument.

Where it becomes more than just a difference of opinion is your lunatic assertion that anyone in government is necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil. IN this Tuscon case most of us see a tragedy involving an insane person inflicting horrible losses on decent people, you see a young man carrying out an act of public good.

Even more lunatic, you go on to aver that the children of politicians are themselves deficient, by genetics one presumes.

'Oh the shooter ain't a hero' you say 'because he also shot the general public, and a kid'. Leaving us with the implication that if he had just murdered or maimed the politician and the judge, then his act would have been virtuous in your eyes.

I think you would have made a very fervent Islamic radical, the logic and assumptions being very similar.

If stupidity is a function of context and likely cost/benefits in a given setting, then indeed your posting what you did on a public forum was stupid.

Birdwatcher
Birdwatcher +100 Your post is probably the best post in this entire 72 page mess!
Originally Posted by mjc
Birdwatcher +100 Your post is probably the best post in this entire 72 page mess!
I think it's a pretty good post, too, and I like Birdie (he's generally a fair man, and doesn't look to stir up trouble), but I do think he has read into Barak's posts elements which are not, upon careful reading, actually in them. High emotions (which the current tragedy quite naturally engenders) tend to have that effect, so I don't blame folks for reading with emotions high rather than dispassionately, considering the circumstances.
Barak's a [bleep]' NUTCASE,.....and I'm with LHonda,.....I hope they haul his azz away in handcuffs.

This idiot TRH is trying to dodge HIS endorsement of vile behavior with typical bullchit, and loony rhetoric.

GTVC
Originally Posted by lhonda
Originally Posted by Barak

Actually, I've already been through that stage and come out the other side. I'm actually further down the road than he is. There was a span of maybe three months or so a few years back when it's only by the grace of God that I didn't set my affairs in order, withdraw a bunch of savings, toss a rifle in the truck, drive to Washington, and pot me as many politicians as I could before they got me.


I'm going to cross my fingers and hope you get a very special wee hours in the morning visit from some totally humorless men, who without fanfare, introduce you to a pair of shiny bracelets, and are dragged, kicking and screaming, to some Godforsaken underground hole somewhere. I also hope someone 'forgets' standard protocol, and you are left with only your delusions and a belt for company in the quiet of the night.

There is a line, and you have crossed it.





I have TOTALLY stayed out of this because I feel I have nothing intelligent to add. But Barak, you REALLY have pizzed me off. You should be jailed and the key tossed for posting words like that. All the prayes and forgiveness in the world wouldn't help your sorry a$$. You sir are a pathetic waste of oxygen.
Yup, and the little prick did it HERE, ...on this board.

GTC
Well , this board IS a cross-section of humanity .

Which fact don't speak well of humanity .grin

I ain't seen Big Stick on this thread .Maybe he is off workin' [ or maybe just smart].grin
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by KevinGibson
Originally Posted by Barak
Laffin' here...

John 13:34-35
A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.



By this I know you're NOT a disciple of Christ

Laughing at a funny post--one intended to be funny--is what? An insult to your sense of humor? And insulting your sense of humor is less than loving? Is that how you're thinking?

Did you read alpinecrick's post?
You know damn well what I'm talking about. It's your cold calused heart that preaches hate. That is not of Christ, and you know it. You sir are an anti-Christ.
The COLDNESS of the rhetoric discussed that makes it so disheartening and downright creepy.

GTC
Wow....

Good thing y'all didn't "attack" Barak by saying he needed to get help.

Lord only knows what folks would be saying about you, had you crossed THAT bridge....
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Hate to dig up this toxic thread but...

Barak, ya asked my opinion.

Sorry--I didn't know you had responded, so I didn't look here for awhile.

Quote
Your assertion that all government figures are corrupt and worse than armed robber and perhaps even rapists is absurd.

I don't think I said politicians are worse than rapists; I just compared the professions of politician and rapist to say that one can be morally condemned for being a politician according to the same mechanism by which one can be morally condemned for being a rapist, without reference to individual nuances. In order to qualify as either a politician or a rapist, you have to hurt people; therefore being a politician or a rapist is always bad, period.

Quote
Your belief is that innate human goodness or Christian values whatever would prevent people from committing abuses upon others or upon their own children

There may be an ancap somewhere who believes in innate human goodness, but the overwhelming majority of us believe just the opposite: in innate human depravity, corruption, and wickedness.

If people were basically good, any kind of government would work swimmingly. It's the fact that people are basically evil that makes government dangerous, in that its coercive power amplifies the innate evil of those in the ruling class so that it can devastate the lives of hundreds or millions of people, rather than just a handful. Because people are basically evil, all forms of human government are also basically evil.

Quote
A nicely idealized world perhaps. Except that innumerable examples past and present, show that left unchecked, all sorts of perversions and violence can become the norm and yet those communities persist indefinitely.

It'd be an interesting debate to have, and maybe we should have it at some point; but as I said before, I'm a moralist, not a utilitarian. Utilitarianism has led to some of the greatest atrocities in human history.

Quote
In short, experience has shown that a rule of law, as imposed by a government, is a necessary adjunct.

What experience has shown is that no entity in human history is as prolific in torture, murder, and wholesale destruction as a government. Last century, as I'm sure you've heard me say before, governments murdered between 160 and 200 million of their own innocent subjects--not criminals, not foreign soldiers, but just regular folks. I suspect that in this century, with technology advancing, unless governments soon become obsolete, the government murder toll may exceed a billion.

No private entity has ever achieved anything within orders of magnitude of those numbers; it's inconceivable that any private entity could. Keeping in mind my disavowal of utilitarianism above, it still seems clear that however bad a free society could be, it couldn't be nearly as bad as a government.

Quote
No government is perfect, ours ain't bad, especially considering the alternatives.

Everyone's entitled to an opinion.

Quote
Where it becomes more than just a difference of opinion is your lunatic assertion that anyone in government is necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Politicians hurt people. They have to, in order to be politicians. A person who doesn't hurt people can't be a politician, any more than he can be a rapist. I posted the beginnings of a list of the ways in which we know Gabbie Giffords in particular hurt people.

You're free to consider it lunatic if you like; but in my world, people who make a living by hurting other people are necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Quote
IN this Tuscon case most of us see a tragedy involving an insane person inflicting horrible losses on decent people, you see a young man carrying out an act of public good.

Normally I don't bother to defend myself against false accusations like this, because in most cases if people don't bother to read carefully the first time they're not going to bother to read carefully a second or third time either, and experience shows that you-show-me-where-I-said-that flame wars are almost universally unprofitable and ineffectual.

But I have the impression that you're a little smarter than the average bear, so with you I'll go this far: I never said any such thing.

Quote
Even more lunatic, you go on to aver that the children of politicians are themselves deficient, by genetics one presumes.

What makes the child of a politician become a politician? Is it nature or nurture? If it's nature, then it'd be difficult to argue that the child wasn't just as deficient as his parent. If it's nurture, then the degradation and corruption of the child can be laid on the account of the parent. Either way, it's not pretty.

Quote
'Oh the shooter ain't a hero' you say 'because he also shot the general public, and a kid'. Leaving us with the implication that if he had just murdered or maimed the politician and the judge, then his act would have been virtuous in your eyes.

You're of course free to draw whatever implication you like; but given that I pointed out several times that I thought shooting the politicians was wrong, just not as wrong as shooting the innocents, hanging on to that implication seems a little disingenuous.

Quote
I think you would have made a very fervent Islamic radical, the logic and assumptions being very similar.

Similar in what way?
Originally Posted by Longbeardking
You should be jailed and the key tossed for posting words like that.

Am I to understand, then, that you advocate the commission of violence in response to an act of mere speech? (Kind of the way folks say the Tucson shooter did, I mean.)

If so, there's a familiar feel to you. I may have gone to high school with you.
Originally Posted by KevinGibson
It's your cold calused heart that preaches hate. That is not of Christ, and you know it. You sir are an anti-Christ.

Booga booga!
[Linked Image]
Barak, OMG, I can't believe you said what you said.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Hate to dig up this toxic thread but...

Barak, ya asked my opinion.

Sorry--I didn't know you had responded, so I didn't look here for awhile.

Quote
Your assertion that all government figures are corrupt and worse than armed robber and perhaps even rapists is absurd.

I don't think I said politicians are worse than rapists; I just compared the professions of politician and rapist to say that one can be morally condemned for being a politician according to the same mechanism by which one can be morally condemned for being a rapist, without reference to individual nuances. In order to qualify as either a politician or a rapist, you have to hurt people; therefore being a politician or a rapist is always bad, period.

Quote
Your belief is that innate human goodness or Christian values whatever would prevent people from committing abuses upon others or upon their own children

There may be an ancap somewhere who believes in innate human goodness, but the overwhelming majority of us believe just the opposite: in innate human depravity, corruption, and wickedness.

If people were basically good, any kind of government would work swimmingly. It's the fact that people are basically evil that makes government dangerous, in that its coercive power amplifies the innate evil of those in the ruling class so that it can devastate the lives of hundreds or millions of people, rather than just a handful. Because people are basically evil, all forms of human government are also basically evil.

Quote
A nicely idealized world perhaps. Except that innumerable examples past and present, show that left unchecked, all sorts of perversions and violence can become the norm and yet those communities persist indefinitely.

It'd be an interesting debate to have, and maybe we should have it at some point; but as I said before, I'm a moralist, not a utilitarian. Utilitarianism has led to some of the greatest atrocities in human history.

Quote
In short, experience has shown that a rule of law, as imposed by a government, is a necessary adjunct.

What experience has shown is that no entity in human history is as prolific in torture, murder, and wholesale destruction as a government. Last century, as I'm sure you've heard me say before, governments murdered between 160 and 200 million of their own innocent subjects--not criminals, not foreign soldiers, but just regular folks. I suspect that in this century, with technology advancing, unless governments soon become obsolete, the government murder toll may exceed a billion.

No private entity has ever achieved anything within orders of magnitude of those numbers; it's inconceivable that any private entity could. Keeping in mind my disavowal of utilitarianism above, it still seems clear that however bad a free society could be, it couldn't be nearly as bad as a government.

Quote
No government is perfect, ours ain't bad, especially considering the alternatives.

Everyone's entitled to an opinion.

Quote
Where it becomes more than just a difference of opinion is your lunatic assertion that anyone in government is necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Politicians hurt people. They have to, in order to be politicians. A person who doesn't hurt people can't be a politician, any more than he can be a rapist. I posted the beginnings of a list of the ways in which we know Gabbie Giffords in particular hurt people.

You're free to consider it lunatic if you like; but in my world, people who make a living by hurting other people are necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Quote
IN this Tuscon case most of us see a tragedy involving an insane person inflicting horrible losses on decent people, you see a young man carrying out an act of public good.

Normally I don't bother to defend myself against false accusations like this, because in most cases if people don't bother to read carefully the first time they're not going to bother to read carefully a second or third time either, and experience shows that you-show-me-where-I-said-that flame wars are almost universally unprofitable and ineffectual.

But I have the impression that you're a little smarter than the average bear, so with you I'll go this far: I never said any such thing.

Quote
Even more lunatic, you go on to aver that the children of politicians are themselves deficient, by genetics one presumes.

What makes the child of a politician become a politician? Is it nature or nurture? If it's nature, then it'd be difficult to argue that the child wasn't just as deficient as his parent. If it's nurture, then the degradation and corruption of the child can be laid on the account of the parent. Either way, it's not pretty.

Quote
'Oh the shooter ain't a hero' you say 'because he also shot the general public, and a kid'. Leaving us with the implication that if he had just murdered or maimed the politician and the judge, then his act would have been virtuous in your eyes.

You're of course free to draw whatever implication you like; but given that I pointed out several times that I thought shooting the politicians was wrong, just not as wrong as shooting the innocents, hanging on to that implication seems a little disingenuous.

Quote
I think you would have made a very fervent Islamic radical, the logic and assumptions being very similar.

Similar in what way?


I get the same feeling from this manifesto from Barak that I got from Ted Kaczynski's manifesto.

Lunatic Fringe! crazy eek shocked
Trouble with the ignore - feature - posters quoteing the ignored.

Conclusion -

the ignore - feature is useless.

We have to deal with ignorance, callousness, abusiveness, bitterness...
fringe?
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.
Yes it was and so was Ted Kaczynski's! crazy
Originally Posted by nsaqam
Yes it was and so was Ted Kaczynski's! crazy
You believe that Kaczynski's defense of his actions was rational and well reasoned??
Nope.

Hence the crazy face.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by Birdwatcher
Hate to dig up this toxic thread but...

Barak, ya asked my opinion.

Sorry--I didn't know you had responded, so I didn't look here for awhile.

Quote
Your assertion that all government figures are corrupt and worse than armed robber and perhaps even rapists is absurd.

I don't think I said politicians are worse than rapists; I just compared the professions of politician and rapist to say that one can be morally condemned for being a politician according to the same mechanism by which one can be morally condemned for being a rapist, without reference to individual nuances. In order to qualify as either a politician or a rapist, you have to hurt people; therefore being a politician or a rapist is always bad, period.

Quote
Your belief is that innate human goodness or Christian values whatever would prevent people from committing abuses upon others or upon their own children

There may be an ancap somewhere who believes in innate human goodness, but the overwhelming majority of us believe just the opposite: in innate human depravity, corruption, and wickedness.

If people were basically good, any kind of government would work swimmingly. It's the fact that people are basically evil that makes government dangerous, in that its coercive power amplifies the innate evil of those in the ruling class so that it can devastate the lives of hundreds or millions of people, rather than just a handful. Because people are basically evil, all forms of human government are also basically evil.

Quote
A nicely idealized world perhaps. Except that innumerable examples past and present, show that left unchecked, all sorts of perversions and violence can become the norm and yet those communities persist indefinitely.

It'd be an interesting debate to have, and maybe we should have it at some point; but as I said before, I'm a moralist, not a utilitarian. Utilitarianism has led to some of the greatest atrocities in human history.

Quote
In short, experience has shown that a rule of law, as imposed by a government, is a necessary adjunct.

What experience has shown is that no entity in human history is as prolific in torture, murder, and wholesale destruction as a government. Last century, as I'm sure you've heard me say before, governments murdered between 160 and 200 million of their own innocent subjects--not criminals, not foreign soldiers, but just regular folks. I suspect that in this century, with technology advancing, unless governments soon become obsolete, the government murder toll may exceed a billion.

No private entity has ever achieved anything within orders of magnitude of those numbers; it's inconceivable that any private entity could. Keeping in mind my disavowal of utilitarianism above, it still seems clear that however bad a free society could be, it couldn't be nearly as bad as a government.

Quote
No government is perfect, ours ain't bad, especially considering the alternatives.

Everyone's entitled to an opinion.

Quote
Where it becomes more than just a difference of opinion is your lunatic assertion that anyone in government is necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Politicians hurt people. They have to, in order to be politicians. A person who doesn't hurt people can't be a politician, any more than he can be a rapist. I posted the beginnings of a list of the ways in which we know Gabbie Giffords in particular hurt people.

You're free to consider it lunatic if you like; but in my world, people who make a living by hurting other people are necessarily corrupt and fundamentally evil.

Quote
IN this Tuscon case most of us see a tragedy involving an insane person inflicting horrible losses on decent people, you see a young man carrying out an act of public good.

Normally I don't bother to defend myself against false accusations like this, because in most cases if people don't bother to read carefully the first time they're not going to bother to read carefully a second or third time either, and experience shows that you-show-me-where-I-said-that flame wars are almost universally unprofitable and ineffectual.

But I have the impression that you're a little smarter than the average bear, so with you I'll go this far: I never said any such thing.

Quote
Even more lunatic, you go on to aver that the children of politicians are themselves deficient, by genetics one presumes.

What makes the child of a politician become a politician? Is it nature or nurture? If it's nature, then it'd be difficult to argue that the child wasn't just as deficient as his parent. If it's nurture, then the degradation and corruption of the child can be laid on the account of the parent. Either way, it's not pretty.

Quote
'Oh the shooter ain't a hero' you say 'because he also shot the general public, and a kid'. Leaving us with the implication that if he had just murdered or maimed the politician and the judge, then his act would have been virtuous in your eyes.

You're of course free to draw whatever implication you like; but given that I pointed out several times that I thought shooting the politicians was wrong, just not as wrong as shooting the innocents, hanging on to that implication seems a little disingenuous.

Quote
I think you would have made a very fervent Islamic radical, the logic and assumptions being very similar.

Similar in what way?


Res ipsa loquitur.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.


Res ipsa loquitur.
Quote

Res ipsa loquitur.
I well remember the doctrine from law school, but it has no applicability here, unless you're just trying to dazzle us with your feigned mastery of Latin. smile
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.


There it IS folks,...there it is.

This creep's school district should be CC'd with some of this drivel.



GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.


There it IS folks,...there it is.

This creep's school district should be CC'd with some of this drivel.

Hey TRH: your turn for a hearty "Booga booga!"
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.


There it IS folks,...there it is.

This creep's school district should be CC'd with some of this drivel.

Hey TRH: your turn for a hearty "Booga booga!"
smile Yes, I'm clearly a danger to the morals of our youth. Crosseyes says so. smile
"Ignore Function" is down again,eh.....attention Whore ?

You and Barak make a good match,...I hope the 2 of you will continue in this vein today,.....

GTC
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
I thought Barak's defense was rational and well reasoned.


There it IS folks,...there it is.

This creep's school district should be CC'd with some of this drivel.

Hey TRH: your turn for a hearty "Booga booga!"
smile Yes, I'm clearly a danger to the morals of our youth. Crosseyes says so. smile

Bummer. You have me beat. I'm only a danger to the morals of our prisoners. I'll have to try harder so that I can be like you.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Quote

Res ipsa loquitur.
I well remember the doctrine from law school, but it has no applicability here, unless you're just trying to dazzle us with your feigned mastery of Latin. smile


The literal translation is: "the thing speaks for itself".

I suspect most here can and will understand that VERY clearly.

But, please do, continue.
Certainly hope they DO continue their bizarre show.

GTC
[Linked Image]
Originally Posted by Barak
I'm only a danger to the morals of our prisoners.


Prisoners ? Morals ?
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Certainly hope they DO continue their bizarre show.

GTC

I don't. I have been thinking a lot about this thread over the last couple of day.
A couple of posters just thrive on throwing b.s. on the campfire.
One is particular i suspect needs psycological help maybe both, but i know they thrive on stirring the pot.

I was talking to a friend of mine today that made a comment that is night and day from one of the posters comments.
My friend has the idea most people are basically good.
The poster here feels that most people are basically the other way, especially politicians.
You can see the contrast. I think twisted works for me.
in my opinion i think i understand the need to work in prisons. He feels at home with his fellows.
Ron , the question of whether people are basically good or basically bad is the divide between secular humanists and christians .

Logically , the argument that people are basically good belongs to the liberal faction in politics .
C. S. Lewis, in the opening paragraphs of Mere Christianity, says essentially that humans are basically evil, but that we tend to expect good from other humans, and be disappointed and angered when we don't get it.
No doubt at ALL any more about YOU being evil though, you little freak, is there ?

GTC

Originally Posted by Barak
C. S. Lewis, in the opening paragraphs of Mere Christianity, says essentially that humans are basically evil, but that we tend to expect good from other humans, and be disappointed and angered when we don't get it.
Who cares what CS Lewis said? Go directly to the source.

"As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:" Romans 3:10.

"No one is good--except God alone." From Luke 18:19
It must really suck to be you Barak.

Oppressed by a Gov't you despise, subject to laws you feel are immoral and over the top, and surrounded by people you feel are basically evil.

What a crappy way to live!
Originally Posted by nsaqam
It must really suck to be you Barak.

Oppressed by a Gov't you despise, subject to laws you feel are immoral and over the top, and surrounded by people you feel are basically evil.

What a crappy way to live!
People are by nature prone to corruption. This is central both to the Founders' approach to designing government and to Christian theology.
Damn,...SteveNO NAILED IT,.....

"not to mention the amazing delusions of grandeur that lead these loons to compare their own bizarre fantasies and strange little lives to the men who made our Revolution."

GTC
What CS Lewis was pointing out and Barack was alluding to , Cole ,was the absurdity of being a christian [ the very term means we are lost and need a saviour] and being shocked when people mis-treat us .

Barack knows the bible about as well as anyone around this 'fire .
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
No doubt at ALL any more about YOU being evil though

Nope. No doubt about either you or me. Never has been.
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
No doubt at ALL any more about YOU being evil though

Nope. No doubt about either you or me. Never has been.
Absolutely no doubt.
Originally Posted by curdog4570
What CS Lewis was pointing out and Barack was alluding to , Cole ,was the absurdity of being a christian [ the very term means we are lost and need a saviour] and being shocked when people mis-treat us .

Barack knows the bible about as well as anyone around this 'fire .
Indeed. I never said any different.
Originally Posted by curdog4570


Barack knows the bible about as well as anyone around this 'fire .


Then ask him why he puts his trust in his "eastern gods."
Originally Posted by Bigbuck215
Originally Posted by curdog4570


Barack knows the bible about as well as anyone around this 'fire .


Then ask him why he puts his trust in his "eastern gods."

Or you could ask me yourself...
[Linked Image]
Oiled, Waxed, and properly set up with 13 wraps.

Yup.

GTC
Guaranteed not to break?
Originally Posted by VAnimrod
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]
Finally, an actual picture of the diseased monkey.

Is that Acne, or Genital Herpes around your yawp ?

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Finally, an actual picture of the diseased monkey.

Is that Acne, or Genital Herpes around your yawp ?

GTC

Man alive, you are _so easy._

Sorry about that; my intent really wasn't for you to embarrass yourself. Don't you know about flickr?
It is reported that she is sitting on the edge of the bed and dangleing her legs!
Is it time to Lee24 this guy yet ?
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Finally, an actual picture of the diseased monkey.

Is that Acne, or Genital Herpes around your yawp ?

GTC

Man alive, you are _so easy._

Sorry about that; my intent really wasn't for you to embarrass yourself. Don't you know about flickr?


All,......

would somebody please explain to me what this little deranged prick is trying to convey for me ?

We don't speak the same Brand of English, .......Hell, I'm not sure we live on the same Planet.

Yo, Monkey Breath,.....I'm not in the least embarrassed, and fail to see why I would be.



GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Yo, Monkey Breath,.....I'm not in the least embarrassed, and fail to see why I would be.

You remind me of an old saying from my father: "'Vengeance is mine,' saith the Lord; but sometimes we get to watch."

But no, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, why _should_ you be embarrassed? No--just keep right on going. I apologize for interrupting. What were you going to say?
Originally Posted by ColsPaul
It is reported that she is sitting on the edge of the bed and dangleing her legs!

+1
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Yo, Monkey Breath,.....I'm not in the least embarrassed, and fail to see why I would be.

You remind me of an old saying from my father: "'Vengeance is mine,' saith the Lord; but sometimes we get to watch."

But no, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, why _should_ you be embarrassed? No--just keep right on going. I apologize for interrupting. What were you going to say?
Dancing around in word twisting delight, ....you little CREEP.

WTF are you SAYING here,.....ya' know ,....in regular English ?

SPEAK,...Monkey Heart

GTC
Holy Cow! I thought this thread was dead! I figure with the Westboro Baptist Church and Followers coming to AZ this thread would be dead since the followers would be en route instead of online.
Guess I was wrong!

O hi Greg!
Actually, this "Anarchole", Barak" has been playing all sorts of ducking, dodging, twisting and other stunts,...ably assisted by his co-hort "Nun-Chuk Boy".

These 2 cornholers lit this off with some BAD text,...and shone some sort of unholy light of "Justification" on Loughners behavior......WAY early on in the chronology of this sad event.

From pontificating that this was justifiable ,....we've gone to THIS,

"You remind me of an old saying from my father: "'Vengeance is mine,' saith the Lord; but sometimes we get to watch."

But no, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, why _should_ you be embarrassed? No--just keep right on going. I apologize for interrupting. What were you going to say?"

It's pretty goddam simple Kique,.....this event is but 5 1/2 days old,...and apparently this creep thinks this'll fade, or that he'll smarm his way out of it with hooting and gibbering. The filthy corksoocker DID pick a good likeness, and is now verbally swinging in the tree, ....flinging dung.....that'll make this "Go Away"

It Won'T.

I think I stopped posting about 2 or 3 pages ago when I realized you can't fix stupid.
Glad you are here Greg!
Originally Posted by Barak
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Yo, Monkey Breath,.....I'm not in the least embarrassed, and fail to see why I would be.

You remind me of an old saying from my father: "'Vengeance is mine,' saith the Lord; but sometimes we get to watch."

But no, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, why _should_ you be embarrassed? No--just keep right on going. I apologize for interrupting. What were you going to say?


Let's just "Say"......

"Originally Posted By: Bristoe
A seriously mentally ill man shot some people.

And a politician and a judge too--don't forget them."

and,....

"Giffords? Roll? It's just a politician and a judge, for Pete's sake. Why all the hoopla? Shouldn't government legislators and adjudicators expect to get shot at when they ignore the will of their subjects? Isn't that what the Second Amendment is about? I know government enforcers certainly expect to get shot at when they trample the will of the people: it's why they hide their identities, carry heavy firepower, wear vests, and ride in armored vehicles. Why should the other two branches of the State be any different?

"Congratulations: the computers say you won the election. So: here is the power to tax away our income. Here's the power to regulate away our livelihoods. Here's the power to throw us in prison for doing harmless things you disapprove of. Here's the power to conscript our children and use them up in pointless foreign wars. Here's the power to send thugs to break down our doors in the middle of the night and murder us in our sleep. Here's the power to make radical foreign terrorists so angry at us that they kill us by the thousands.

"Okay...got all that? Can you carry it? You okay? Great: good luck. See you on C-SPAN.

"Oh--wait. One more thing. Almost forgot. Here's a bullseye to wear on your back in case we decide you're getting a bit uppity in the way you use all those powers."

Sounds fair to me."

or

"Hey--it's not as though they involuntarily became a politician and a judge through a random act of God. They both worked very hard at getting to where they were. Lots of deliberate time, effort, money, influence, and corruption to get to the point where they had enough power to piss off enough people that statistically they ran across one who would do something about it.

I'm sure it was very gratifying to them to be part of the ruling-class elite. Well, ruling-class elite sometimes get assassinated. Corruption has a price. They knew--or should have known--what they were getting into. Hopefully they provided for their families accordingly.

On the other hand, the disease of political ambition has been demonstrated to be at least partly genetic. If their kids are going to grow up to be politicians too, it's tough for me to feel too bad for them."


Keep dodging, you filthy little parasite.

GTC
Originally Posted by crossfireoops
Actually, this "Anarchole", Barak" has been playing all sorts of ducking, dodging, twisting and other stunts,...ably assisted by his co-hort "Nun-Chuk Boy".

These 2 cornholers lit this off with some BAD text,...and shone some sort of unholy light of "Justification" on Loughners behavior......WAY early on in the chronology of this sad event.

From pontificating that this was justifiable ,....we've gone to THIS,

"You remind me of an old saying from my father: "'Vengeance is mine,' saith the Lord; but sometimes we get to watch."

But no, no, you're absolutely right. I mean, why _should_ you be embarrassed? No--just keep right on going. I apologize for interrupting. What were you going to say?"

It's pretty goddam simple Kique,.....this event is but 5 1/2 days old,...and apparently this creep thinks this'll fade, or that he'll smarm his way out of it with hooting and gibbering. The filthy corksoocker DID pick a good likeness, and is now verbally swinging in the tree, ....flinging dung.....that'll make this "Go Away"

It Won'T.


(grin)
/
© 24hourcampfire