Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Muzzleloaders File a complaint against Swampman700

He's been on ignore for a couple months. Best internet decision I've made. It's a waste of time confronting a fool or a drunkard. All that's left to question is his state of sobriety.

I have 40-50 of you on ignore. You never add anything but faux info.

33,275 more members on ignore and he can start "talking" to hisself. Not much of a stretch, really?

He's doing it to prove a point to Rick that this place needs a moderator.

Between that, and him driving hit counts daily, he's safe.

I've had you on iggy since the day you repeatedly ranted at me and accused me of not knowing WTH I was talking about, concerning last fall's thread on the big (hand fed) PA bear killed in the Poconos. Toggled to see what your reply was.

Don't see a need for more moderation here. Just a bit more attention paid to attention ho's like the one on this thread, who has a bad habit of senseless stirring, lying, exaggerating, bragging and posting utter nonsense most of the time.

Then there's the really poor advice given, from time to time?

Some can stir, brag and post nonsense that is amusing and appropriate to the general tenor of a thread. Others are just a PITFA. Thinkin' most of can discern the difference, but I could be wrong? ;O)

waaa....

I can go back onto ignore from you, if facts scare you that much.

I simply said exactly what Mark was up to, and why.... and why nothing will be done about him.

Those facts things again, though; so please, run away.

LMAO. The maux of all faux has spoken.

Here are "the facts", relative to the big puff you got into last fall, over that PA bear:

As I knew at the time it was a topic here, but did not want to get into, the game commission was between the proverbial rock and hard place, on whether or not to "allow" that kill, or file charges. Tried to discretely explain that at the time, apparently failed?

The guys that killed the fed bear, had been after it for some time and finally just got "lucky", IF one considers hunting/killing a human-acclimated, well known locally and fairly tame bear, as luck? They are pariahs in their own community, as a result. One is still defiant over it, but no surprise, according to those I know, that know him?

They were also buds with a few Deputy conservation officers and the conservation officer in the area. They had often been allowed along to help with trap/transfer/tagging of problem bears in the area. There's more to that, but that's all I am going to say.

Bottom line: The bear will not be credited as a record bear, due to the "shaky" circumstances under which it was killed; That conservation officer is no longer with the game commission, due to his poor judgement in the matter. He had the choice: be canned, or resign. He resigned. Some "face" was saved by all.

So stick yer "waaa" where the sun don't shine. If I don't know WTF I am talking about, I generally keeps things to myself. ;O)

You should probably take your own advice.

Bad PR makes for short careers. Thus, what you reference above.

Jeez, will you guys cut it out?

You keep sh**-canning my thread title!!!!

.

That post is wayyyy off base. I can't remember the last time I wore a tie.......

There, it looks much better now! ;O)

I have no need for the faux info so I just keep them on ignore.

Mark:

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/ubb/showflat/Number/4996910

Which I did.....

Liar.

Rick keeps you here because you drive hit counts with your trolling.

Other than that, and that being ad revenue, you bring nothing to the table.

I did what Rick asked me too. I just do exactly what nearly everyone else does now.