|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
Nope not at all. I assumed three day inspection was part of the transaction and when he told me he already spent the money it pissed me off, that is bs. Like I said, I assumed the three day inspection applied here, that is my fault. I should have specifically asked about the 3-day inspection. Noted!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058 |
Bricktop
another appeal to the Masses
I think it is you who replies because you cannot help it. You want everyone to think how "cute" you are and how smart you are, so you use language and arguments that you think will make you sound cute and smart. Its a very common thing. Used alot, of course, by politicians and people who claim to be leaders.
Do you think it might be possible for you to enter one discussion without commenting once on the personalities of the other people in the discussion, and stay strictly on the merits of the discussion?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
Waputi, I don't smoke. I don't understand that at all, stated that to you right from the beginning. I will still argue that
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625 |
Waputi, it wasn't defective at all. You stated it smelled like smoke, which I don't smoke never have. Look at the 4th or 5th feedback down on my ebay, it worked fine for that gentleman. EBay feedback doesn't mean chit anymore because they've done away with the ability to leave negative feedback, so their ratings aren't accurate. I agree totally. I do believe Donnie follows throught with his sales accuratly. It's his buying method that I question. He almost always asks for above and beyond the original agreement and when he doesn't get it, he comes back with threats of lawsuits. What a wiener. Jeff
"Blessed are those who give without remembering and receive without forgetting" -Elizabeth Bibesco-
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058 |
Nope not at all. I assumed three day inspection was part of the transaction and when he told me he already spent the money it pissed me off, that is bs. Like I said, I assumed the three day inspection applied here, that is my fault. I should have specifically asked about the 3-day inspection. Noted! I have sold a lot of items here on 24 and have always assumed a 3 days inspection as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,467
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,467 |
Nope not at all. I assumed three day inspection was part of the transaction and when he told me he already spent the money it pissed me off, that is bs. Like I said, I assumed the three day inspection applied here, that is my fault. I should have specifically asked about the 3-day inspection. Noted! I keep assuming a supermodel is going put me up as a kept man, but it ain't happened yet and I ain't getting any younger. I think I'll sue, too. I don't suppose it ever occurred to you that approaching your seller with an accusatory tone didn't help much either, did it?
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum. I do tend to fit in well wherever I go in person. The campfire is the most outside exposure I get. No TV, no newspaper.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625 |
Nope not at all. I assumed three day inspection was part of the transaction and when he told me he already spent the money it pissed me off, that is bs. Like I said, I assumed the three day inspection applied here, that is my fault. I should have specifically asked about the 3-day inspection. Noted! I have sold a lot of items here on 24 and have always assumed a 3 days inspection as well. There is no "understood" inspection time required with a sale. Only if stated in the original agreement. I agree most of us on here are willing to give an inspection period if the buying party agree to pay shipping. I'm sure all my brothers and sisters here would say the same. There was no inspection period with this purchhase. Donnie, Answer my question please. Jeff
"Blessed are those who give without remembering and receive without forgetting" -Elizabeth Bibesco-
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
I obviously didn't start out like that. I was told if the rifle was sent back it would be sold to the highest bidder and my money not refunded.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,467
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 7,467 |
Bricktop
another appeal to the Masses
I think it is you who replies because you cannot help it. You want everyone to think how "cute" you are and how smart you are, so you use language and arguments that you think will make you sound cute and smart. Its a very common thing. Used alot, of course, by politicians and people who claim to be leaders.
Do you think it might be possible for you to enter one discussion without commenting once on the personalities of the other people in the discussion, and stay strictly on the merits of the discussion? I should ask the same of you.
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum. I do tend to fit in well wherever I go in person. The campfire is the most outside exposure I get. No TV, no newspaper.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,459 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,459 Likes: 2 |
I "assumed" a 3-day inspection period on that POS rangefinder and was told not to send it back, but did anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058 |
Well, if there were no inspection period, then the only questions left are whether there was a verbal promise that the gun was in a certain condition, and then whether it was not in that condition. As I stated in the begining, condition is a very subjective thing, which is why there should have been an inspection period. None of this would have come about, including all of the swearing, arguing, and hard feelings.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
There is always an assumed inspection period. I am sure everyone who buys something here assumes that when it arrives they have an inspection period. I have assumed and will not anymore.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058 |
Privatepilot
Was there a specific promise that the gun was in a certain condition? And if so, why do you say specifically that it was not in the condition you thought you were told it was in?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 520
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 520 |
I will submit all emails to whomever needs them with the original pics of the rifle. I never gave an inspection period of any sort. U take the pics he sent longarch n the pics I sent him tell me its not the same rifle n I will glady offer my name here up for banning. after u have read the original emails .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 569
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 569 |
Isn't the very definition of assume counter to your argument?
assume: 1.To authenticate by means of belief; to surmise; to suppose to be true, especially without proof.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
Gun was described in a certain condition and yes I do not think it is in that condition, so I ask to send it back.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,058 |
I agree. I think the assumption argument fails here. I think that an inspection period means that a person can look the item over for a few days and then send it back for little or no reason. From the postings of the seller here it appears that was not offered, and if it were not offered then it could not be accepted.
But there still remains the issue of condition. Yes, photos were sent. The question remains, did those photos adequately show the condition that the item was described as. if they did, then the matter is over. If not, then the buyer has a valid claim.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 625 |
I obviously didn't start out like that. I was told if the rifle was sent back it would be sold to the highest bidder and my money not refunded. That was quoted to you by the FFL dealer following your continued raging accusations of a civil court law suit. The decision was reversed when we did a little research on you other dealings. I say bring your a$$ to Chattanooga and sue. I would so enjoy Don reaping the benefits of the counter-suit. Again, do you deny any of the posting of our email conversation? Jeff
"Blessed are those who give without remembering and receive without forgetting" -Elizabeth Bibesco-
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 292 |
I said I assumed. Won't happen again
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,459 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 18,459 Likes: 2 |
Seems what's good for the goose, is not good for the gander. He wants an "inspection period", but doesn't grant the same. [bleep] him and 22WRF!
|
|
|
|
207 members (10gaugemag, 300_savage, 1minute, 260Remguy, 264mag, 204guy, 31 invisible),
2,151
guests, and
1,226
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,116
Posts18,483,456
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|