|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 313
Campfire Member
|
OP
Campfire Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 313 |
whats my best bet?
warthog impala kudu
down to last box of 140 grain Combined Technology Fail safes for deer season have to do some knob twisting
thanks for the input
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,207 Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,207 Likes: 1 |
My brother uses a 280. A controlled expansion 140, 150, or 160 will do what you need.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,249 |
I have shot pretty much all of it with 7x57's and 160 partitions, right at 2800 fps. Last time I looked on the wall, they're all still dead! 140 TTSX would work mighty fine as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,015 |
160 Partitions out of a 7x57 at 2800 fps? Man that is smoking.
I have always been a fan of the 175gr Partition (both old style semi-spitzer and new pointier version) and have taken lots of game with it, both big (over 1000lb moose) and small (100lb Sitka Blacktails). It is reliable and works very well. I have used it almost exclusively out of a 7mm RM, but many of my loads are actually quite mild at around 2800 fps over a 35P.
I am confident in recommending that bullet - I believe you will be happy with its performance.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 992
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 992 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 874
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 874 |
I hunt with the 280 myself. Took 15 animals in Namibia with it a few years back. NO need for the 160s. I used 140s and everything hit right, was a DRT kill. This was from Steenbok to Oryx. Took several deer when I got home.. the 140s will give you more speed, and kill as well as the heavier bullets. At least they did for me.
Ghost
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,515 Likes: 1 |
I have used 140 Swift A Frames, 140 TTSX, and 145 LRX. I would never use anything heavier.
“Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away”. Antoine de Saint-Exupery. Posted by Brad.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,736 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,736 Likes: 6 |
I used 140 Accubonds on two antelope and they performed well
The deer hunter does not notice the mountains
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve" - Isoroku Yamamoto
There sure are a lot of America haters that want to live here...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 179
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 179 |
which ever one shoots best in YOUR rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,874 |
For the three animals mentioned, there is no difference.
RS
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,643
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,643 |
which ever one shoots best in YOUR rifle. +1
Kevin Haile
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 516
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 516 |
which ever one shoots best in YOUR rifle. +1 Did you actually think it worth the effort to ask this question? Your 280 will kill 97.67543% of all game animals on the this planet and several more. If anything goes south it's not your rifle or the bullets. Check the scope, then a mirror. Hummm jm2c
Why does a man who is 50 pounds overweight complain about a 10 pound rifle being too heavy? SCI Life Member 4**
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 44 |
Our 2010 experience in Zambia was like yours in Namibia. Both my son and I shot his .280 Ackley Imp. with 140 gr Accubonds. We took: kudu, sable, sitatunga, zebra, puku, waterbuck, impala, oribi, warthog, and bushbuck all with the 140s. It worked very well. The shots were from 50 yards to almost 300 yards. Hit the right spot and the 140 Accubond will kill any plains game save, maybe, eland.
Last edited by blancocounty; 12/30/13. Reason: typo
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,145 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,145 Likes: 1 |
which ever one shoots best in YOUR rifle. +1 Did you actually think it worth the effort to ask this question? Your 280 will kill 97.67543% of all game animals on the this planet and several more. If anything goes south it's not your rifle or the bullets. Check the scope, then a mirror. Hummm jm2c Did Santa leave you coal for Christmas? Lighten up, really!
Regards,
Chuck
"There's a saying in prize fighting, everyone's got a plan until they get hit"
Ghost And The Darkness
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 322
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 322 |
I'd go with the 160 accubond.
Or even a 140 class Barnes X (I'm a big fan).
I used a 180 TSX in 300 WSM, was more than I needed.
Be sure you can shoot a nice 2" group at 150 ish and you'll be fine. Have fun!
Last edited by jrkotz; 12/31/13.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,625
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,625 |
140 partitions out of a .280...
Gary
Never underestimate the likelihood that the Republicans will cave...
|
|
|
|
89 members (6MMWASP, 6mmbrfan, 444Matt, 2ndwind, 10gaugemag, 673, 10 invisible),
1,556
guests, and
834
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,554
Posts18,510,417
Members74,002
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|