I've never found the .270, .308, or .30-06 to be difficult to shoot. I can't understand how so many people fail to master a little recoil? We aren't talking .375 H&H's here. But that is another that I like to shoot. Too many people on here make way too much out of recoil.
How many rounds we talking, and from what position?
Some guys struggle to shoot 20+ rounds from prone with a hunting weight 30-06. Buddy was recently having trouble at 40 rounds with a 7RM. Shooting off a bench at the club or off the hood of the truck ain't quite the same as being all contorted for a field shot. Likewise, a handful of offhand shots with a magnum doesn't equal recoil tolerance like some people think.
Easy to shoot 40-60+ rounds in one session from prone if the recoil don't get to you... plus add some offhand, seated, and more shots from other field positions. A light kicker makes this easy and enjoyable. Haven't met anyone that likes to shoot less rounds, rather than more.
Shoot more, learn more?
Having lived on the east coast for awhile I know a lot of dudes that mostly shoot offhand and at woods ranges (~100 yards or less) or farm ranges (mebbe out to 300 yards). On the wet-coast, seems like a lot more shooting out to "medium" ranges (300-600+ yards). More open country here with longer shots... and wind. A fella needs to practice if he plans to shoot these distances. These longer shooting opportunities are probably less common in many parts of the country.
Prone + recoil = pain for most, which means less shooting.
20 rounds off the bench with the 30-06 does it for me for a days shooting. I can do more than that offhand but less prone. The farthest I've ever had to shoot to take a deer was right around 300 and thats the only time I've had to shoot beyond 200 except in my pronghorn hunting. 90 some % of my shots have been inside of 150 and you just don't need to buy a .223 and fire hundreds of rounds a week to be able to make those shots. I do shoot beyond 300 yards but that is on groundhogs and mostly with the 270 Winchester. People in more open parts of the country have different needs.
Now don't go swiping her Imagination and Pretend away from her...if only because it's all she's got and that would be mean.(grin)
She's simply a clueless kchunt,in well over her head and simply talking out her ass. Not that it ain't funnier than schit!
EPIC humor.
Dooshmike,
Now a 20 round day,is a Big 'Un?!? Laffin'!
Do say a leetle sumptin' about the Long Range 270's "particulars",beings you was more than a leetle less than comfy with the Dime Rifle and the groundhog '06. Dare ya'. Laffin'!
I getta kicka outta you stupid [bleep] perpetually concocting reasons not to shoot,then frost it with your "knowledge","experience" and "results".
It's no "secret" that people everyfhukkingwhere,do farrrrrrrrrrrrrr more than you.
A good 243,6.5 creedmoor or even 308 will (should) turn on lots of lighbulbs in the more astute fellers heads..But most dont get that far and seem content beating around the bush instead of shooting..
Lots of those guys that dont get it will skip the inherent goodness of those rounds and jump to a Lapua/EDGE type gun (topped with a vortex of course)..9 times out of ten disappointment sets in, then maybe you can talk to those types..They will then either listen, or come to the conclusion that shooting is whichcraft..its funny chit to see
As always in these GW vs Boxer threads, the score seems a little higher for the Texan. If GW were forced to slum Alaska, Larry would be in a heap o' trouble.
*If anything, its entertaining and somewhat informative at times.
One day meebbee heeeel he'll wise up to the superiority of the quarter bore, and absolutely in blue/Walnut. Painted Stainless /synthetic is for lazy basttids.
As always in these GW vs Boxer threads, the score seems a little higher for the Texan. If GW were forced to slum Alaska, Larry would be in a heap o' trouble.
*If anything, its entertaining and somewhat informative at times.
Prairie - which one would you rather spend the day hunting with, then relax around the fire with a plate of game and some bourbon?
I suspect they would be entertaining and good company in their own right. But comparing Texas to Alaska for hunting is like comparing North Korea to America in a "Which country do you prefer" contest.