Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Not an effing WORD, yet................

tjm10025,

I've never deviated from my position of not knowing a damned thing about the circumstances of the killings. I do not have a clue. Nor will I guess. Who knows, maybe it was a drug burn. I do not know.

The reality is we do not know who killed the three, how they were killed, and why they were killed. But that hasn't stopped some posters from assigning blame. Hell, cops might not have a clue of who's responsible and why the three were killed.

Here's one thing I do know: murders committed by suspects who are not known to their victims are very difficult to solve.

Maybe it might be a better idea to see what fleshes out in the investigation instead of guessing.

Jus' sayin'...

Are you going to keep this current name for a while, softgooey?

I mean, you've had about 5 of them, right? Oh yeah...you forgot who you were.

he is a malcontent he hates all of you and his many personalities

Let me guess ... Travis?

His was almost, almost as bad. His expectations he could turn Iraq into a stable, western-style democracy was pretty ridiculous. Then again, that has been the centerpiece of US Foreign Policy since WWII. We don't get it and never will.

I don't think you're as stupid as this post makes you appear to be with your manufactured naivete as to who killed those kids (I'm just waiting for you to grow a pair and say what you really want; it was the Israelis who killed them in order to justify another round of punitive action against the hapless Hamas). Speaking of a pair, you and TRH need to get one of these and spare us your incessant ball-washing:

if you stop and think about it, America has made damn few GOOD foreign policy decisions. Ever. Period.
We just don't seem to be able to zero in on what course would be BEST FOR US.

More and more, you're sounding like a California social worker. You're a funny guy.

Because most foreign policy decisions have been made for the purpose of advancing corruption (whatever the provided rationale for them), as is the nature of the state whenever given a free hand in anything. This is the reason the Founders made the making of war by the state such a difficult hill to climb for it, requiring a Declaration by the majority of both houses of Congress (The House of Representatives of which being subject to dismissal by the electorate every two years, thus assuring that war wouldn't be engaged in absent the electorate's definite approval). Naturally, once that requirement was abandoned, the nation's foreign policy decisions became mere machinations for war, by which the corrupt (both in and out of government) profit.

When I think of Obama in the White House, I think of voters like you.

Typical jorge, providing aid, comfort, and lies to an enemy that has declared war on us.

You don't have balls to wash. You have a mangina.

Which of your 4 personalities should we be addressing today,officer?

TFF.

Are you back on the wagon? How pickled is your brain? Must be tough doin' moonlight shillin' for the enemy 'cause family ruinin' ain't keeping you in gin.

IT is who we are, the antithesis of Machiaveli and we try to do what is right, instead of what is right for us. We should have partitioned Iraq, kept the sheiks happy and taken their oil, and in 1947, we should have never supported the establishment of a jewish state where it is. The French offered up Madagascar which would have avoided this huge mess.

There it is. Israel is the sole enemy, while Hamas are just poor inoccent victims. A mangina, I have to laugh, but do keep that ballwasher in mind. You and TRH should just post it and avoid the syrupy ball-washing..

whatever dickhead

Obama has always said he would support Muslims before Jews. And he proves it by his actions.

this thread has little merit.

in contrast to those other threads that DO have merit?

When's he gonna start supporting Americans?