Home
... believed to be heading for Ukraine ...
Just that.
Wonder what 100 billion ‘Merican dollars looks like as ash? Hope the unnumbered accounts are in really really fire proof locations.

On a serious note:
This can’t be good
We will see soon enough.

An hour has passed, more than long enough.
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance. Dumb bombs, smart bombs, cruise missiles, whatever? Times 13....that's going to leave a mark somewhere.

Heck, the TU 95 is even older than the B 52.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance. Dumb bombs, smart bombs, cruise missiles, whatever? Times 13....that's going to leave a mark somewhere.

Heck, the TU 95 is even older than the B 52.
.
Spring "Bear" season just opened.
It’s a Russian plane.

Safe bet it crashed before reaching its destination.
Clickbait ?
those are old, slow, lumbering and have no defense. The easiest bomber in the world to just shoot down. That is IF they function long enough to get to even Ukraine.
13... so that 3 or 4 make it to target and 1 or 2 make it back.
Seems like last nite I was reading about how well the ukes have learn to use patriots guess we will see.
Originally Posted by Magnum_Bob
Seems like last nite I was reading about how well the ukes have learn to use patriots guess we will see.
No, the Ukes haven't learned to use Patriots. Americans have been manning the crews.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance.

Are they gonna run 'em out of town with new zoning laws?
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

Quite a curious phenomenon, usually it's "old and bitter."
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

probably something to do with so many of us training and planning to meet Russia in the Fulda Gap

Purposeful lives and all that...
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

probably something to do with so many of us training and planning to meet Russia in the Fulda Gap

Purposeful lives and all that...

Nah just generational narcissism, the world shouldn't...or couldn't possibly go on without such a perfect generation
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
They should make themselves a "NO BOMBING ZONE"

Works for guns

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

probably something to do with so many of us training and planning to meet Russia in the Fulda Gap

Purposeful lives and all that...

Nah just generational narcissism, the world shouldn't...or couldn't possibly go on without such a perfect generation

Don't know about shouldn't, but it likely won't...
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Nah just generational narcissism, the world shouldn't...or couldn't possibly go on without such a perfect generation

This has to the most astonishing bit of irony on the innaweb in a long time.
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.

The difference is the wishful "hoping for" mutually assured destruction. They want the world to be destroyed. They can't wait...why? Who knows, but I assume a nihilistic approach to life by most and an extreme degree of narcissism.

Hell, most from that pathetic generation hope their own children/grandchildren don't succeed in life. Pathetic folks.
Any of you who support a war with russia should do the world a favor and go play in traffic. That way YOU are the only one who wont go on living and hopefully the rest of us will be left in peace
Do ya'll realize they use stand off weapons? Its not like flying B-17's over Germany. The Bears will never be in range of any Ukrainian SAMs.
Originally Posted by blairvt
Do ya'll realize they use stand off weapons? Its not like flying B-17's over Germany. The Bears will never be in range of any Ukrainian SAMs.

This.
Don't worry. Mark Zuckerberg has an elaborate and very well stocked underground base that would put Number One at SPECTRE to shame.
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
This post perfectly sums up the stupidity of the generational animosity.
We dead yet?
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
This post perfectly sums up the stupidity of the generational animosity.


That one might sum it up perfectly, but this one is the best example:

Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
The difference is the wishful "hoping for" mutually assured destruction. They want the world to be destroyed. They can't wait...why? Who knows, but I assume a nihilistic approach to life by most and an extreme degree of narcissism.

Hell, most from that pathetic generation hope their own children/grandchildren don't succeed in life. Pathetic folks.


If you're not happy with how your own life turned out, it's always someone else's fault. Victim mentality.
Originally Posted by Teal
We dead yet?


Maybe
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Don't worry. Mark Zuckerberg has an elaborate and very well stocked underground base that would put Number One at SPECTRE to shame.

And he can spend the rest of his existence in too. Who knows, maybe by the time he is 80 it might be safe to go above ground.
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

You’re just chapped you didn’t start it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^LOL!!
Originally Posted by smokepole
If you're not happy with how your own life turned out, it's always someone else's fault. Victim mentality.

So easy to tell who the soft folks are.

I'm just making observations. Does that bother you?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance.

That’s funny! 🤣 Carry 3 times max payload of a B52 you say!?
Originally Posted by blairvt
Do ya'll realize they use stand off weapons? Its not like flying B-17's over Germany. The Bears will never be in range of any Ukrainian SAMs.



Boomers aren't very bright and dont understand change and still have their fever dreams passed out on their recliners with Fox News playing in the background that the US is a mighty military power bringing freedom to the world via 800 plus military bases around the world bankrupting America while we have open borders and DEI in our military. They still believe the Iraq WMDs fairytales and think still think we won bringing democracy in Vietnam, Afghanistan, Somalia, Libya, Syria.....

Russia took out 3 patriot systems, plus NSAMs last week. And they are upping production of FAB 3000 glide bombs, okhotnik drones. they can drop FABs now from 60 or more KM from the target. Plus hyper sonic missiles the US can't even develop yet .In the meantime the US is spending trillions on planes that don't work and aircraft carriers. lol
Notice something state of the art, high tech, circa 1920!😁😁😁😁😁

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]





Not fair really, their props are more advanced than the Red Barron's,
but still. Props on a plane in use by a major country in 1980?
Oh shizz, it's the 2020s.
Originally Posted by Teal
We dead yet?

Apparently that's not the important takeaway from this thread.

Reckless predictions are what matter here; not disappointing, boring reality.
Originally Posted by smokepole
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance.

Are they gonna run 'em out of town with new zoning laws?

Ha! With resolution!
Originally Posted by Dillonbuck
Props on a plane in use by a major country in 1980?
Oh shizz, it's the 2020s.

Wow, you really know your stuff!
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..


LOL.....this coming from a commie living in the Chicago hellhole. Easy to tell you're a product of the liberal indoctrination system formerly known as our education system.

What a stupid assessment. We boomers have kids, grandchildren, and great grandchildren and hope nothing but the best long lives possible for each one of them. Democrats are the ones seeking the end of our constitutional republic, believe in free spending by the government, running up the national debt 1 trillion dollars every 100 days, that what the government gives away is actually free, believe 1st amendment rights only apply to those who agree with them, believe in disenfranchising voters by taking candidates off the ballot, etc.

Go back to your parent's basement and play some more video games and quit expressing your ignorance here.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
those are old, slow, lumbering and have no defense. The easiest bomber in the world to just shoot down. That is IF they function long enough to get to even Ukraine.

I’ve spent many hours flying on the wing of those guys while escorting them around the Carrier Battle Group. They’re faster than you would think and the Bear-D versions I escorted did have guns…top, belly, and tail IIRC. I have some good photos of their tail gunners and other crew members in the observation windows.

Their pilots in WestPac were A-holes and would try to turn into you at low altitude and drag you off on the water or a ship’s superstructure. On the other hand, the guys we encountered in the North Atlantic were pretty professional. I flew formation on one Bear off of Norway for a couple of hours in clouds from 25,000’ down to 500’ and they didn’t scare me at all. My RIO kept me posted on turns but the copilot would signal before a turn or descent/climb. It was actually pretty cool.

What was really annoying was that you could feel the props pounding the air and if the crew wanted, they could de-synchronize the props and create a “beat” that you would feel in your chest sort of like the a top fuel dragster.
Originally Posted by plumbum
you need to grow up.

Simplified your post for him

Well intentioned, but just naive.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
The boomers I know are NOT giddy for WWIII. We wanted NATO to pull back and try to talk some sense before spending 100 billion on a failed war.

kwg
Originally Posted by navlav8r
I’ve spent many hours flying on the wing of those guys while escorting them around the Carrier Battle Group. They’re faster than you would think and the Bear-D versions I escorted did have guns…top, belly, and tail IIRC. I have some good photos of their tail gunners and other crew members in the observation windows.

Their pilots in WestPac were A-holes and would try to turn into you at low altitude and drag you off on the water or a ship’s superstructure. On the other hand, the guys we encountered in the North Atlantic were pretty professional. I flew formation on one Bear off of Norway for a couple of hours in clouds from 25,000’ down to 500’ and they didn’t scare me at all. My RIO kept me posted on turns but the copilot would signal before a turn or descent/climb. It was actually pretty cool.

What was really annoying was that you could feel the props pounding the air and if the crew wanted, they could de-synchronize the props and create a “beat” that you would feel in your chest sort of like the a top fuel dragster.

Love this post. Thank you. These are the gems which make it worthwhile to wade through the boomer/fu boomer/this country sucks/I want to move back to mother Russia posts.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

How do you come to these moronic conclusions? Have any useful links showing that your delusions are not delusions?
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

probably something to do with so many of us training and planning to meet Russia in the Fulda Gap

Purposeful lives and all that...

Nah just generational narcissism, the world shouldn't...or couldn't possibly go on without such a perfect generation

Now that's funny. Your continued boomer hate shows you to be the narcissist. Tell me just how special your generation is? Not talking about your LGBTQ issues, general lack of useful skills, piss poor work ethics or your hand out gimme attitudes. Something positive.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by smokepole
If you're not happy with how your own life turned out, it's always someone else's fault. Victim mentality.

So easy to tell who the soft folks are.

I'm just making observations. Does that bother you?


What you're posting is not an observation, because it's based on nothing. It's just one bitter aśśhole's opinion.

My observation is that you're about the most bitter individual who posts on here. Why is that?
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance.
That’s funny! 🤣 Carry 3 times max payload of a B52 you say!?
Data from Pravda.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

Looks like your brain has been cooked to perfection by the liberal media, and the 'education' system.
Originally Posted by rickt300
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

How do you come to these moronic conclusions? Have any useful links showing that your delusions are not delusions?

Mainly just to trigger old fùcks around here. But there's obviously some truth in my posts, or boomies would not be so upset (they...you...find my boomer observations upsetting because you know they are true)
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world

It's true. But until these idiots come to grips with the fact they've been duped by the military industrial complex, nothing will change.

Just more blood spilled and treasure lost...all for nothing. You would have thought the last 20yrs would have made it obvious
Originally Posted by shootem
Wonder what 100 billion ‘Merican dollars looks like as ash? Hope the unnumbered accounts are in really really fire proof locations.

On a serious note:
This can’t be good

That money is likely just passing thru to somewhere else- with secure anonymous banking laws. And Ato American? politicians .
Originally Posted by kwg020
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
The boomers I know are NOT giddy for WWIII. We wanted NATO to pull back and try to talk some sense before spending 100 billion on a failed war.

kwg

That's great, maybe there is hope after all!
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]
[/quote]

Hell, most from that pathetic generation hope their own children/grandchildren don't succeed in life. Pathetic folks.[/quote]

This is my Dad when I was growing up. Always seemed happy to see us fail and upset if we accomplished something he had not. I was always like he was in competition to prove he was better than us and never gave us anything but took and took.

Seems so bizarre now that I have kids because I want the best for mine and want the world to be better for them and hope they all achieve more than I did.

I never had any one give me a compliment about something with my dad present where he didn't interrupt with something like saying well thats nothing you should see what I did. Biggest mistake I made was spending some years underpaid working for him trying to win his approval. He told someone once at least while he's working for me he won't be able to out do me. So bizarre to think of now that I'm a dad.

He has gotten better in his old age and realizes that his days are numbered and seems at least happy that I'm doing OK. No, his actions in the past were not a calculated attempt to make us stronger for his own good. It was just he couldn't handle any of us doing better than him.

He was even really upset when I bought my first rifle with my own money because I had a BDL and he only had an ADL. He told me I had to trade him or he was taking away my allowance. He did take away my allowance. Said I didn't need it because I just saved my money anyways. Didn't think I should have savings when he didn't. I worked tough jobs for 4 years to save for that bdl and I still have it.

I don't understand my dad's generation. Though most aren't like him many seemed very self absorbed and willing to see their kids go without. That's what created gen x who seem to be the ones who got things done. It was for our betterment but they didn't mean it to be. Then we ruined our kids helocoptering and giving them too much trying to compensate for how our parents left us to fend for ourselves while they partied with their friends.

I think generations cycle. Those from the ww2 and depression time tried to give their kids all they didn't have too and created the 60s who ignored and emotionally abandoned gen X who then gave too much to millennial and gen z while trying not to be like their parents. These are broad generalizations and their are still some parents in each generation that managed to get the balance pretty well right.

Bb
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.

Bb
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.

Bb
Pretty spot on!
Couldn't agree more with BurleyBoy
Originally Posted by navlav8r
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
those are old, slow, lumbering and have no defense. The easiest bomber in the world to just shoot down. That is IF they function long enough to get to even Ukraine.

I’ve spent many hours flying on the wing of those guys while escorting them around the Carrier Battle Group. They’re faster than you would think and the Bear-D versions I escorted did have guns…top, belly, and tail IIRC. I have some good photos of their tail gunners and other crew members in the observation windows.

Their pilots in WestPac were A-holes and would try to turn into you at low altitude and drag you off on the water or a ship’s superstructure. On the other hand, the guys we encountered in the North Atlantic were pretty professional. I flew formation on one Bear off of Norway for a couple of hours in clouds from 25,000’ down to 500’ and they didn’t scare me at all. My RIO kept me posted on turns but the copilot would signal before a turn or descent/climb. It was actually pretty cool.

What was really annoying was that you could feel the props pounding the air and if the crew wanted, they could de-synchronize the props and create a “beat” that you would feel in your chest sort of like the a top fuel dragster.


At the risk of sounding weird, I never skip your posts!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.

Bb
Pretty spot on!


The time for gross cough medicine was 60 years ago.
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.

Bb

It's way beyond that, WWIII has started, most of us don't realize it just because we haven't seen a second sunrise yet. Pres. Putin will not let this terror attack go unanswered. He's not insane like our FedGov overlords.
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
AYE !!!!!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.
Russian Cruise Missile passed thru Polish Air Space on its way to Ukielund ..

I smell Smoke ..
Originally Posted by Calvin
Originally Posted by Teal
We dead yet?


Maybe

I’m putting off grocery shopping til we know for sure.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.
I don't know where the rumor of isolationism got started, but the us has been meddling around the world since the Spanish American war.

Prior to World war, the sequel, isolationism was a conservative principle. During World war 2, leftist politicians realized they could make bank on endless war. Since then, conservative politicians have slowly become an extinct species such that now almost all politicians are leftists. Unfortunately, their propaganda has been effective enough to convince even run-of-the-mill conservatives to clamor for endless intervention, for fear of another world war.

(Never mind that we're on the verge of that world war, and we haven't been "isolationist" for 8 decades.)
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

We've had peace with Japan and Western Germany since 1945.

Your policies got us into the war. A brutal application of overwhelming force that didn't stop until we achieved unconditional surrender is a good part of the reason the peace has held.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.

It's not hard to decern who here prayed the Bully on the playground would take their lunch money last.

The Enemy always get a vote.
Well at least the world was peaceful and without conquest before the USA came along................give or take.

You want to be a pu$$y-azzed country and get ran over by everyone else? I don't. The only reason some of the lame-assed countries can exist, is because they are allies with the US.
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
The US is a maritime nation.

If you don't grasp what that means, I'm not going to explain it to you.
What's happeing at the southern border is a perfect example of being weak. Thank your President for that.
When did we become a maritime nation? Before or after Cuba? Why weren't we involved in constant overseas conflict prior to that?
Originally Posted by dassa
When did we become a maritime nation? Before or after Cuba? Why weren't we involved in constant overseas conflict prior to that?

On the first day.

We've always been involved in foreign interventions. Prior to WWII it was far more limited.

"....From the halls of Montezuma, to the shores of Tripoli....."
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

That’s just silly.

Britain had a very strong military, on an island, including a world class Navy, and without massive help from the US it would be speaking German right now.

Had they stood up and punched Hitler in the nose after Sudetenland, the Germans would have had three less years of militarization and political consolidation.

Kinda like appeasing Putin when he annexed Crimea.

The US has a geographic advantage through distance, but Putin reconstituting the USSR under a despot would be at our southern border in under a generation.
*discern

Why are you talking about lunch money? Hungry?

Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.

It's not hard to decern who here prayed the Bully on the playground would take their lunch money last.

The Enemy always get a vote.
Originally Posted by dassa
When did we become a maritime nation? Before or after Cuba? Why weren't we involved in constant overseas conflict prior to that?

Probably 1801-1815 when the Barbary Pirates were dealt with.
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

That’s just silly.

Britain had a very strong military, on an island, including a world class Navy, and without massive help from the US it would be speaking German right now.

Had they stood up and punched Hitler in the nose after Sudetenland, the Germans would have had three less years of militarization and political consolidation.

Kinda like appeasing Putin when he annexed Crimea.

The US has a geographic advantage through distance, but Putin reconstituting the USSR under a despot would be at our southern border in under a generation.
Right now, at this moment in time it's like the 1930's all over again.
We even have the Isolationist Faction reconstituted.
Hope it doesn't end the same way.
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

The reason you could care less is because you enjoy the fruits from the labor of those that did care. It's easy to sit on your couch here in the USA because the USA has done the work to establish wide spread trade and peace. You're just to dumb and lazy to understand how the world works and watch your imported TV while typing on your imported computer safe from an invading horde of Orcs.

By establishing the way to trade with the Reserve Dollar the USA taxes the world in exchange for making world wide trade feasible.

Those who whine and whimper and want the USA to be isolationist will be whining and whimpering at a much higher pitch if they ever got their wish.

As other have said the southern border is just one example of showing weakness for which you advocate.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

Looks like your brain has been cooked to perfection by the liberal media, and the 'education' system.
Um yeah. I can't wait for Putey to deploy some Jewish Space Lasers, or smoke them uppity 'Kranies with some Chemtrails.
So, we protected American shipping in the first 2 decades of the 1800s, the had no foreign adventures until 1898. Since then, we've been involved everywhere. And it was always leftists that got us involved. Conservatives wanted to mind our own business.

As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened.

If we judge the current world situation applying the logic of interventionist, the world should be at perfect peace under the leadership of the US. But that's not the case. There is still as much conflict. The only difference is that the US govt has spent the treasure and manpower of the country to enrich the political class.

Now, let's imagine that Russia is he'll bent on global dominion. Ask yourselves, are we better prepared after wasting hundreds of billions in Ukraine and expending all the munitions there that we have? Are we better off having worried more about Ukraine than our own southern border?

I would have to say that I think interventionism has been a failure.

(And to everyone who analogizes about bullies. Bullies pick on pussies. Sorry, but someone had to explain it to you.)
Originally Posted by Eric308
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

Looks like your brain has been cooked to perfection by the liberal media, and the 'education' system.
Um yeah. I can't wait for Putey to deploy some Jewish Space Lasers, or smoke them uppity 'Kranies with some Chemtrails.

Or just fluoridate their municipal water.

LOL
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

The reason you could care less is because you enjoy the fruits from the labor of those that did care. It's easy to sit on your couch here in the USA because the USA has done the work to establish wide spread trade and peace. You're just to dumb and lazy to understand how the world works and watch your imported TV while typing on your imported computer safe from an invading horde of Orcs.

By establishing the way to trade with the Reserve Dollar the USA taxes the world in exchange for making world wide trade feasible.

Those who whine and whimper and want the USA to be isolationist will be whining and whimpering at a much higher pitch if they ever got their wish.

As other have said the southern border is just one example of showing weakness for which you advocate.
Holy [bleep], you're stupid. In the very post you quoted, I talked about protecting our southern border, instead of waiting time in Ukraine.
The fatfuk wizard flappin his jowls again
Originally Posted by dassa
..............I would have to say that I think interventionism has been a failure.

(And to everyone who analogizes about bullies. Bullies pick on pussies. Sorry, but someone had to explain it to you.)

It's quite likely that 'thinking' isn't your strong suit.

There will always be two sides to things. Choose wisely.
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

The reason you could care less is because you enjoy the fruits from the labor of those that did care. It's easy to sit on your couch here in the USA because the USA has done the work to establish wide spread trade and peace. You're just to dumb and lazy to understand how the world works and watch your imported TV while typing on your imported computer safe from an invading horde of Orcs.

By establishing the way to trade with the Reserve Dollar the USA taxes the world in exchange for making world wide trade feasible.

Those who whine and whimper and want the USA to be isolationist will be whining and whimpering at a much higher pitch if they ever got their wish.

As other have said the southern border is just one example of showing weakness for which you advocate.
Originally Posted by dassa
Holy [bleep], you're stupid. In the very post you quoted, I talked about protecting our southern border, instead of waiting time in Ukraine.

Your appeal to weakness invites situations like the invasion on the southern border. Strong USA policy stops that kind of problem.

Trump stopped the flood through strong policy, intervention works. Fact.
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.

Spot on. Problem with the democrats and the younger generation is they think if you say nice things to an enemy, give them money, and talk nice about them they will reciprocate.
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance.

That’s funny! 🤣 Carry 3 times max payload of a B52 you say!?

Yes Dan, you are correct. With just a quick look on the web, I failed to realize how much of the gross tonnage was fuel.
Thanks for the correction.

further searching:

B-1 b...Payload 75,000 lbs internal (34,019 kg), 50,000 lbs external.

B-52 ....
Maximum Takeoff Weight: 488,000 pounds (219,600 kilograms)
Fuel Capacity: 312,197 pounds (141,610 kilograms)
Payload: 70,000 pounds (31,500 kilograms)


TU-95.. This is what I was looking at yesterday

Empty weight: 90,000 kg (198,416 lb)
Gross weight: 171,000 kg (376,990 lb)
Max takeoff weight: 188,000 kg (414,469 lb)

Found today:Armament - Primary Bomb tonnage up to 12,000kg (26,400 lb)

I do find myself quite amused by the reactions of many to this OP.
Russia launches a flight of TU 95 bombers so the world is ending in a nuclear holocaust.

Does Russia go to DefCon ONE every time we put a B-2 or a B-52 into the air? They are "nuke capable".
Brother NyQuil,
I got a 30-30.gimme coordinates
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Like it or not, we are still the Indespensable Nation, and our withdrawal from the world stage would bode ill for the future and not improve the lot of those without the wattage to thrive in the 21st Century.

Plus, we are winning economically.
https://www.axios.com/2024/01/31/us-economy-2024-gdp-g7-nations
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
I’m a POL

Stat Now

(Crickets)
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany. Instead, he aligned with Jewish influence to bring the US into it against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Your appeal to weakness invites situations like the invasion on the southern border. Strong USA policy stops that kind of problem.

Could you walk me through how sending billions to Ukraine has improved the situation at our southern border?

Has NAFTA / USMCA? Has any other move the US has made to support global trade? Have any of them hurt or improved China's position with regard to global power?
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

We've had peace with Japan and Western Germany since 1945.

Your policies got us into the war. A brutal application of overwhelming force that didn't stop until we achieved unconditional surrender is a good part of the reason the peace has held.
What policy is mine? Not starting endless wars and stop causing chaos around the world? I like that one. You should too.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Nobody says "war will give us peace."

Being prepared for war encourages peace, because there are repercussions to adventurism.

Nothing is perfect. As Plato D. Boomer observed long ago, "only the dead have seen the end of war."

Also, as Adolph Boomer said to the appeaser Neville Chamberlain, "thanks sucker. Just the tip."

You forget Putin is a boomer.

You don't know what you don't know, either. But they do.
Can any of you sit here and tell me that the war on terror was good and successful? What about vietnam? Why are we going to war with russia now? Lets see how much some of you war mongering cocks know. So many like to spout off at the mouth, but your fat old asses would be sitting on the sofa while our kids fo off to die for abdolutely nothing. F uck off with that nonsense and f uck what this country has become
Oh wow
We have zero reason to have russia as an enemy. Funny how so many of you claim to be right conservatives, but you are on the side of the deep state, rinos and dems. I enjot being on the oppossing side of those pukes
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Nobody says "war will give us peace."

Being prepared for war encourages peace, because there are repercussions to adventurism.

Nothing is perfect. As Plato D. Boomer observed long ago, "only the dead have seen the end of war."

Also, as Adolph Boomer said to the appeaser Neville Chamberlain, "thanks sucker. Just the tip."

You forget Putin is a boomer.

You don't know what you don't know, either. But they do.
Im all for being prepared. Im all for an extremely strong military. Not the joke we currently have.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.

This. If we had not mobilized for war in 1941, everyone East of the Rockies would be speaking German and saluting statues of Adolf, while those of us in the west would be speaking Japanese and worshiping the god-emperor of Japan.

Those few of us allowed to live anyway.

Without US intervention, Hitler would have soon turned the full man power and manufacturing capability of Russia against England and America. Germany already had strong foot holds in Mexico and South America.

Without Us intervention, Japan would have done the same with Chinese resources. Australia would have succumbed quickly. Japan was already building bases in Alaska and would have leap frogged those bases on to Canada and US.

That is not to say that US military excursions done since 1950 are fully justified. But we see today the effects Socialism is having on our nation, despite doing everything we could to battle that trend across the globe.

China has been drooling over our Alaskan oil reserves for decades. The only thing protecting our resources is our military capabilities.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
aybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?
Read The Myth of German Villainy, by retired US Naval Officer Benton Bradberry.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.

The difference is the wishful "hoping for" mutually assured destruction. They want the world to be destroyed. They can't wait...why? Who knows, but I assume a nihilistic approach to life by most and an extreme degree of narcissism.

Hell, most from that pathetic generation hope their own children/grandchildren don't succeed in life. Pathetic folks.

You aren't a boomer, but you're an expert on all things pertaining to people born between 1946 and 1964, is that right?

Every boomer who I know, including me, wants his/her kids to succeed in life. Good/competent parents want their kids to succeed so that they become contributing members of society. Good/competent parents hope that their kids will have happy and successful lives and do what they can to point them in the right direction.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
We have zero reason to have russia as an enemy. Funny how so many of you claim to be right conservatives, but you are on the side of the deep state, rinos and dems. I enjot being on the oppossing side of those pukes
+1
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.

Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while shuffling along mumbling "none of my business".
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.

Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while mumbling "none of my buisness".

All that is needed for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
aybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?
Read The Myth of German Villainy, by retired US Naval Officer Benton Bradberry.
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?

Because he knew the world would never believe civilized humans capable of such atrocities without full documentation.

I had an Uncle who was behind Patton as they liberated some of those camps. His stories could curdle my blood forty years later.

Get over it! It happened!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
We have zero reason to have russia as an enemy.

The enemy gets a vote too.

Quote
Funny how so many of you claim to be right conservatives, but you are on the side of the deep state, rinos and dems. I enjot being on the oppossing side of those pukes

Being a contrarian requires no original thought. It may be fun, but it accomplishes nothing.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance. Dumb bombs, smart bombs, cruise missiles, whatever? Times 13....that's going to leave a mark somewhere.

Heck, the TU 95 is even older than the B 52.

90 tons, LOL!
Try 12 tons.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.

Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while shuffling along mumbling "none of my business".
Yes you dumb f ucking pile of fat chit. I wouldnt help an old women in need because im against sending my child off to die for absolutely no reason other than thats what the deep state wants and the retarded boomers who have no clue and still think its the 60s and russia is commie lmao
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Nobody says "war will give us peace."

Being prepared for war encourages peace, because there are repercussions to adventurism.

Nothing is perfect. As Plato D. Boomer observed long ago, "only the dead have seen the end of war."

Also, as Adolph Boomer said to the appeaser Neville Chamberlain, "thanks sucker. Just the tip."

You forget Putin is a boomer.

You don't know what you don't know, either. But they do.
Im all for being prepared. Im all for an extremely strong military. Not the joke we currently have.

But...but....Diversity is Our Greatest Strength!!! Waving rainbow flags on duty and promoting f ags/unqualified women/etc. makes our .mil Super-duper stronger!!!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

We've had peace with Japan and Western Germany since 1945.

Your policies got us into the war. A brutal application of overwhelming force that didn't stop until we achieved unconditional surrender is a good part of the reason the peace has held.
What policy is mine? Not starting endless wars and stop causing chaos around the world? I like that one. You should too.

Are you not an isolationist?
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It looks like each plane can carry about 90 tons of ordinance. Dumb bombs, smart bombs, cruise missiles, whatever? Times 13....that's going to leave a mark somewhere.

Heck, the TU 95 is even older than the B 52.

90 tons, LOL!
Try 12 tons.

I was thinking that 90 tons couldn’t be right. That would be an insane number.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany. Instead, he aligned with Jewish influence to bring the US into it against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.


Revisionist History!

If Hitler did not want war with England, he should have kept his ass out of nations with which England held mutual defense treaties.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Prior to WWII, the US tried the isolationist strategy. Small military, limited interventions. Didn't work so well. Humans have been fighting and killing each other since the beginning of time. It's just in us. We're tribal like that. And humans certainly have no monopoly on competition/killing for resources.

You want to be the weakest kid on the block and see what happens? I don't.

This. If we had not mobilized for war in 1941, everyone East of the Rockies would be speaking German and saluting statues of Adolf, while those of us in the west would be speaking Japanese and worshiping the god-emperor of Japan.

Those few of us allowed to live anyway.

Without US intervention, Hitler would have soon turned the full man power and manufacturing capability of Russia against England and America. Germany already had strong foot holds in Mexico and South America.

Without Us intervention, Japan would have done the same with Chinese resources. Australia would have succumbed quickly. Japan was already building bases in Alaska and would have leap frogged those bases on to Canada and US.

That is not to say that US military excursions done since 1950 are fully justified. But we see today the effects Socialism is having on our nation, despite doing everything we could to battle that trend across the globe.

China has been drooling over our Alaskan oil reserves for decades. The only thing protecting our resources is our military capabilities.

That is the dumbest schit ever posted on this board. Hitler couldn’t even muster enough force or will to invade England BEFOREwe got into the war, but you think he was going to take three quarters of the USA.
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Self awareness….it’s a thing.
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by dassa
..............I would have to say that I think interventionism has been a failure.

(And to everyone who analogizes about bullies. Bullies pick on pussies. Sorry, but someone had to explain it to you.)

It's quite likely that 'thinking' isn't your strong suit.

There will always be two sides to things. Choose wisely.
So, our strong overseas adventures are gonna protect us from being over run? That's was the position you stated earlier, right? I don't want to misconstrue what you said.

But I think I'll stick with my thoughts on the matter, since virtually every thing you've stated should be a benefit of interventionism is not happening in the world today.


Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany. Instead, he aligned with Jewish influence to bring the US into it against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.


Hitler knew that the UK had pledged to go to war with Germany if they invaded Poland. Maybe he thought that they were bluffing and that PM Chamberlain would back down like he did with the Munich Agreement after Germany annexed the Sudetenland portion of Czechoslovakia. If Hitler hadn't wanted to go to war with the UK, he wouldn't have invaded Poland. By appeasing Hitler, the UK and French emboldened Hitler to keep breaking the terms of the Versailles Treaty and annexing neighboring countries.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while shuffling along mumbling "none of my business".
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Yes you dumb f ucking pile of fat chit. I wouldnt help an old women in need because im against sending my child off to die for absolutely no reason other than thats what the deep state wants and the retarded boomers who have no clue and still think its the 60s and russia is commie lmao

This post is a prime example of irrational thought process.

First, if the poster does not want his child fighting then he can forbid his child from entering Millitary service. Pretty easy fix.

Next we all know this is a thread about Ukraine and the Orcs and the discussion is about providing aid to Ukraine, not sending the posters child to die. But because of his irrational thinking he has created a straw man to argue a different point because he know he has lost this point.

The Orcs are threating the USA with Nukes so whether we call them Commies or Orcs has no bearing on the EVIL threat. Some here want to roll over and show their belly to the Orc in the hopes of appeasement.

Others with a bit of world knowledge and understanding of history know that won't bring peace. Strength brings peace.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

Nobody says "war will give us peace."

Being prepared for war encourages peace, because there are repercussions to adventurism.

Nothing is perfect. As Plato D. Boomer observed long ago, "only the dead have seen the end of war."

Also, as Adolph Boomer said to the appeaser Neville Chamberlain, "thanks sucker. Just the tip."

You forget Putin is a boomer.

You don't know what you don't know, either. But they do.
Im all for being prepared. Im all for an extremely strong military. Not the joke we currently have.

But...but....Diversity is Our Greatest Strength!!! Waving rainbow flags on duty and promoting f ags/unqualified women/etc. makes our .mil Super-duper stronger!!!
For sure
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

The reason you could care less is because you enjoy the fruits from the labor of those that did care. It's easy to sit on your couch here in the USA because the USA has done the work to establish wide spread trade and peace. You're just to dumb and lazy to understand how the world works and watch your imported TV while typing on your imported computer safe from an invading horde of Orcs.

By establishing the way to trade with the Reserve Dollar the USA taxes the world in exchange for making world wide trade feasible.

Those who whine and whimper and want the USA to be isolationist will be whining and whimpering at a much higher pitch if they ever got their wish.

As other have said the southern border is just one example of showing weakness for which you advocate.
Originally Posted by dassa
Holy [bleep], you're stupid. In the very post you quoted, I talked about protecting our southern border, instead of waiting time in Ukraine.

Your appeal to weakness invites situations like the invasion on the southern border. Strong USA policy stops that kind of problem.

Trump stopped the flood through strong policy, intervention works. Fact.
Good Lord! learn to read. Did you miss the part where I talked about having a strong military? That stayed home and protected our own borders? It was right there in my post?
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.

Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while shuffling along mumbling "none of my business".
Yes you dumb f ucking pile of fat chit. I wouldnt help an old women in need because im against sending my child off to die for absolutely no reason other than thats what the deep state wants and the retarded boomers who have no clue and still think its the 60s and russia is commie lmao

Russia will be a virtual dictatorship as long as president for life Putin is alive, but if that is what the Russian people want, that is what they should have.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
First, if the poster does not want his child fighting then he can forbid his child from entering Millitary service. Pretty easy fix.

Are you speaking from first hand experience here?
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me
There seems to be a crew of them that are so worried about not being involved in every one else's problems, that they overlook the fact that their very fears are currently coming true.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

We've had peace with Japan and Western Germany since 1945.

Your policies got us into the war. A brutal application of overwhelming force that didn't stop until we achieved unconditional surrender is a good part of the reason the peace has held.
What policy is mine? Not starting endless wars and stop causing chaos around the world? I like that one. You should too.

Are you not an isolationist?
I understand there are times that we would need to be involved in things around the world, so no, im not an isolationist in the long game. For the current time, we need to be more on the isolationist side of things. Our country is broken. Almost completely lost. We have so many issues here that deserves our full attention and if we dont give it, we are done. I am 100% against war with russia in any way. I dont give a chit about israel or palestine. They can sort their own chit out. China is going to be a huge problem at some point, but refer to my original point that if we dont fix our current issues here , it wont matter because we wont have a country.
Certainly using hind sight, instead of acting like we wanted stop Putin’s invasion.

We allowed the war machine to make political gains and profit for the elite.

With the billions spent already………why they need bullets?

It’s the first thing I saw Z Dawg request.

“ I don’t need safe passage……I need bullets.”

I feel our country has a pathetic political situation and am ashamed.
15 hours have now passed since the OP's post.

When should I start looking for the Bears over Bracken County, KY?
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me
There seems to be a crew of them that are so worried about not being involved in every one else's problems, that they overlook the fact that their very fears are currently coming true.
Exactly. Every reason these guys give for us being involved in everyones business is happening or has happened to us. We have caused death every day around the world and our country is just about done. So glad we wasted all of those american lives
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by dassa
As to great Britain speaking German, again, couldn't care less. The case could be made that the terms at the end of ww1 led to the economic situation that resulted in the nazi party coming to power. If the allies had been more interested in trade than they were in vengeance, ww2 might have never happened. )

You are so charmingly naive.

Had Britain fallen, Russia would have fallen. Soon thereafter, Japan and Germany would have divided up the rest of the world, Asia, Africa. More Lebensraum in South America, which would have left North America the lone democracy standing.

Would you care, then?
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?


SERIOUSLY?

The world would have been fascist within a generation. The Americas are isolated, and the Fascist sympathizers go to work on the banana republics in South and Central America. Ten years, MAX, and one or more of them would have gone Fascist, and invited the “liberators” in. Perhaps you forgot about the strong level of Fascist sympathy among the Spanish?

That leaves North America with its belly exposed, unable to trade, and literally the economic might of the entire world, run by Germans and Japanese set agains it in armed conflict.

Then, THEN, would you act?
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
This. If we had not mobilized for war in 1941, everyone East of the Rockies would be speaking German and saluting statues of Adolf, while those of us in the west would be speaking Japanese and worshiping the god-emperor of Japan.

Those few of us allowed to live anyway.

Without US intervention, Hitler would have soon turned the full man power and manufacturing capability of Russia against England and America. Germany already had strong foot holds in Mexico and South America.

Without Us intervention, Japan would have done the same with Chinese resources. Australia would have succumbed quickly. Japan was already building bases in Alaska and would have leap frogged those bases on to Canada and US.

That is not to say that US military excursions done since 1950 are fully justified. But we see today the effects Socialism is having on our nation, despite doing everything we could to battle that trend across the globe.

China has been drooling over our Alaskan oil reserves for decades. The only thing protecting our resources is our military capabilities.

That is the dumbest schit ever posted on this board. Hitler couldn’t even muster enough force or will to invade England BEFOREwe got into the war, but you think he was going to take three quarters of the USA.

Why don't you think about this for a bit.

Why was England able to resist Hitler's bombing campaigns for so long. And only a fool would believe that bombing was not a prelude to invasion. The Germans claimed it was a prelude to invasion. They expected a "Blitzkrieg" of Britain just as they had France, Poland, and all the rest of Europe.

England survived the beginning years of WW II solely due to American support, even though we were not fighting. We kept England alive by supplying her with everything form food to planes to tanks.

The same is true of Russia. Russia could not have held off the Germans without our Lend-Lease act. Russia was fond of proclaiming that Germany was defeated with Russian blood and American dollars.

And yes, America would have been safe, probably until about 1947, which is about how long it would have taken the
Axis powers to settle their control over the rest of the world. Then they could have turned the complete military might of Europe and Asia toward N America. What would Canada have done after Britain and the rest of the UK surrendered to Hitler?

Japan would have still had all her Battleships, Aircraft Carriers, planes, and seasoned pilots. The Manhattan Project would have not existed.. Germany would have had nukes and, as they were sharing technology with Japan, most likely Japan would have had nukes by 1947 as well.
Originally Posted by dassa
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?

The Trump administration stopped the southern border invasion through intervention in other countries. Biden reversed those policies.

How anyone does not know this very recent history boggles the mind but then again the 24hr Campfire has a few real slow folks who love to post their ignorance.
Hitler shot his wad in Russia
I think putty boy a prancing on his pony half necked got the bot boys hot and wanting to puff!

If we didn’t have the Hispanic immigration the USA would be a Muslim nation very quickly.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by dassa
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?

The Trump administration stopped the southern border invasion through intervention in other countries. Biden reversed those policies.

How anyone does not know this very recent history boggles the mind but then again the 24hr Campfire has a few real slow folks who love to post their ignorance.
Pot meet kettle
Originally Posted by Angus1895
I think putty boy a prancing on his pony half necked got the bot boys hot and wanting to puff!

If we didn’t have the Hispanic immigration the USA would be a Muslim nation very quickly.
Oh, so our 20 year war in which we did not win in the middle east stopped us from becoming muslim? F ucks sake
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..

If anybody really wanted WWIII and MAD, we would have had it long ago.

A boomer's boomer once advised that to see peace, one must prepare for war.

If that scares you, then you need to grow up.

You don't know what you don't yet know. Boomers do know what you don't yet know.

But hey, why learn from somebody else.
Yes, the old war will give us peace bullchit. So when does this peace come? As long as the US is a thing, the world will never have peace. We create death and destruction all over the world. Been doin it long before i wqs born

We've had peace with Japan and Western Germany since 1945.

Your policies got us into the war. A brutal application of overwhelming force that didn't stop until we achieved unconditional surrender is a good part of the reason the peace has held.
What policy is mine? Not starting endless wars and stop causing chaos around the world? I like that one. You should too.

Are you not an isolationist?
I understand there are times that we would need to be involved in things around the world, so no, im not an isolationist in the long game. For the current time, we need to be more on the isolationist side of things. Our country is broken. Almost completely lost. We have so many issues here that deserves our full attention and if we dont give it, we are done. I am 100% against war with russia in any way. I dont give a chit about israel or palestine. They can sort their own chit out. China is going to be a huge problem at some point, but refer to my original point that if we dont fix our current issues here , it wont matter because we wont have a country.

We are past peak woke. America is already fixing itself.

China has more problems then you can imagine. They screwed themselves with "one child" and their property market bubble. Best case they're looking at 3 decades of stagnation, and the most likely scenario's are not that pretty.

I'm also against war and violence in general, but in detail understand it's not a matter of if, but where and how. What I'm most against is war inside, on or near America's borders. The most destructive war is the one fought inside your own borders, so we keep the wars as far from our borders as possible and outsource the bleeding when we can. Part of keeping the violence far from our shores is having allies and bases so we have global reach for our weapons and intelligence, and logistics. Let me remind you, only our carriers and submarines are nuclear powered, and even their crews have to eat.

Yes, we have our problems, but in the grand scheme, they're not as bad as you think, and it's good to hear you're not a true isolationist.
I am referencing population dynamics in the USA.

The Hispanic population is expanding fast enough to keep the Muslim population from outpacing the Christian population sooner than what it is predicted.

Either way……looking foreword to a nice bowl of goat!
Quote
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?

Japan bombing hell out of our holdings in the Philippines, and Hawaii don't count?

How about an actual Japanese base in Alaska?

How do people forget? We took no active part in that war until we were attacked. Maybe we should have just surrendered to Japan on Dec 8, 1941?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Quote
Had either one of them tried to invade the Americas, we should have been involved. And if they had invaded, they would have had to figure out how to get an army across the ocean without being annihilated.

But again, please explain how our overseas involvement has prevented what many of you seem to far the most: the invasion of our homeland?

Japan bombing hell out of our holdings in the Philippines, and Hawaii don't count?

How about an actual Japanese base in Alaska?

How do people forget? We took no active part in that war until we were attacked. Maybe we should have just surrendered to Japan on Dec 8, 1941?

In order to project meaningful power onto the Japanese mainland we had to construct a chain of island bases across the pacific.

Contrast that with German where we had an ally on their border until France fell, then we had one only 21 miles across the English Channel. Sure we had to defeat the U-boat menace, but we already had a launch point for Normandy.
To the warmongers who want eternal war, with anybody:

With the Proclamation of Neutrality, President Washington established a U.S. foreign policy of neutrality. In his famous 1796 Farewell Address, drafted in collaboration with Hamilton, he reaffirmed his proclamation and admonished his fellow citizens to keep neutrality a cornerstone of American diplomacy. “Our true policy,” Washington’s Farewell declared, is “to steer clear of permanent Alliances with any portion of the foreign world.” The United States continued to do just that until the mid-twentieth century.
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.

I stand with Pres. George Washington and the Founding Fathers and against warmongers like you. Your bloodlust is reprehensible and unAmerican.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
In order to project meaningful power onto the Japanese mainland we had to construct a chain of island bases across the pacific.

Contrast that with German where we had an ally on their border until France fell, then we had one only 21 miles across the English Channel. Sure we had to defeat the U-boat menace, but we already had a launch point for Normandy.

My point exactly.

Japan started bombing US bases on Dec 7, 1941. Six months later, June 6,1942 they attacked the Aleutian Islands. They built a base on Kiska which was the first stepping stone across the Pacific in preparation for invasion of N America.

We responded by building a base on Adak in Aug 1942, from which we attacked Kiska. The US Navy formed a blockade of Kiska and we bombed hell out of the island for almost a year before the Japanese abandoned the island.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
In order to project meaningful power onto the Japanese mainland we had to construct a chain of island bases across the pacific.

Contrast that with German where we had an ally on their border until France fell, then we had one only 21 miles across the English Channel. Sure we had to defeat the U-boat menace, but we already had a launch point for Normandy.

My point exactly.

Japan started bombing US bases on Dec 7, 1941. Six months later, June 6,1942 they attacked the Aleutian Islands. They built a base on Kiska which was the first stepping stone across the Pacific in preparation for invasion of N America.

We responded by building a base on Adak in Aug 1942, from which we attacked Kiska. The US Navy formed a blockade of Kiska and we bombed hell out of the island for almost a year before the Japanese abandoned the island.

Conversely, if England had fallen Germans could of hoped to Iceland then Greenland for their launch point into North America.
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.

I stand with Pres. George Washington and the Founding Fathers and against warmongers like you. Your bloodlust is reprehensible and unAmerican.

Should we have ever taken up arms against any of the Native Americans? Should we have helped the Texans against Santa Anna?
Or pushed the Mexicans out of California, New Mexico, etc?

Would you limit the US to the original 13 states?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
In order to project meaningful power onto the Japanese mainland we had to construct a chain of island bases across the pacific.

Contrast that with German where we had an ally on their border until France fell, then we had one only 21 miles across the English Channel. Sure we had to defeat the U-boat menace, but we already had a launch point for Normandy.

My point exactly.

Japan started bombing US bases on Dec 7, 1941. Six months later, June 6,1942 they attacked the Aleutian Islands. They built a base on Kiska which was the first stepping stone across the Pacific in preparation for invasion of N America.

We responded by building a base on Adak in Aug 1942, from which we attacked Kiska. The US Navy formed a blockade of Kiska and we bombed hell out of the island for almost a year before the Japanese abandoned the island.

Conversely, if England had fallen Germans could of hoped to Iceland then Greenland for their launch point into North America.

The world was much smaller in 1945 that it was in 1780. And it is a heck of a lot smaller today than it was in '45.

Hell, even Iran or N Korea could reach us with weapons today. Appeasement won't prevent that. Sometime you have to go kill people and break things.

That said, I hope Putin dropped everything those thirteen planes could carry right on Zelensky's head. Along with any American over there helping to suck the American Treasury dry and lining their own pockets.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
BULLSCHITT! NAZI APOLOGIST!
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
If Hitler did not want war with England, he should have kept his ass out of nations with which England held mutual defense treaties.
Poland, encouraged by the Western powers, perpetrated outrage after outrage (to include mass murder) against former German provinces (ethnically German), designed specifically to provoke Germany to invade. Sound familiar??
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I stand with Pres. George Washington and the Founding Fathers and against warmongers like you. Your bloodlust is reprehensible and unAmerican.

Your ilk gave Mugabe and the commies all of Africa.

Ian Smith and George Washington had nothing but scorn for those who appease evil.
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
This post perfectly sums up the stupidity of the generational animosity.



The stupidity is impressive, though.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
You were anticipated. And it’s taken less than a century.
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Hitler shot his wad in Russia
The Soviet Union was our mutual enemy, the enemy of all the West. We should have been helping Germany to defeat them.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
If Hitler did not want war with England, he should have kept his ass out of nations with which England held mutual defense treaties.
Poland, encouraged by the Western powers, perpetrated outrage after outrage (to include mass murder) against former German provinces (ethnically German), designed specifically to provoke Germany to invade. Sound familiar??




Poland and Czech Republic ethnically cleansed as many Germans as the Nazis killed in those 2 countries.
I would be more concerned about what those aircraft could drop in the water with future affect.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.
Spoken like a true leftist. They say the exact same thing when they want to mold the constitution to their likings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.

TRH what drives this Jew hatred and twisted version of history you continually display.
Was your dad a guard at one of the camps?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
BULLSCHITT! NAZI APOLOGIST!
Were you actually curious about the truth, you'd already know that it is the proponents of your position who are full of it. The information is readily available, from sources you'd never challenge, but they are not handed to you on a silver platter the way the official history of the war is. You have to actually wish to know the truth of the matter.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
[Linked Image from external-content.duckduckgo.com]

The world is not exactly the same as it was in 1797.

Things have changed a bit and for some here it's really scary.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Spoken like a true leftist. They say the exact same thing when they want to mold the constitution to their likings

Please tell the class where USA foreign policy is codified in the US Constitution.

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me



Can't see it because Texas National Guard wasn't serving ice cream at the border.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Very unlikely that GB would have fallen.
Hitler didn't even want war with Great Britain. He was desperate for a peace deal with them which involved nothing more than ceasing hostilities between them, but Churchill would have none of it. Churchill could have easily saved Britain by merely ceasing hostilities against Germany.

Read Churchill's War by David Irving.

Maybe even helped Hitler out by rounding up some British Jews, eh TRH?

Appeasing Evil is always the plan for the weak.

Standing up to Evil sure is not for everyone.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Minding one's own business is not appeasement.

Quite litterally appeasement when dealing with EVIL.

Your type would let goons on the street rob little old ladies while shuffling along mumbling "none of my business".
What are you doing, Capt America? When was the last time you dealt with a "goon"?
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
You were anticipated. And it’s taken less than a century.
Yes, those shrunken heads, human skin lampshades, and human fat bars of soap, that Eisenhower forced everyone to peruse, were just awful, or would have been had they not been fabricated for the purpose of anti-German propaganda, which fact literally no one with any legitimate history credentials any longer denies.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Can't see it because Texas National Guard wasn't serving ice cream at the border.

As has been pointed out multiple times Trump stopped the invasion with interventionist foreign policy.

Biden reversed those interventionist policies.

If you girls don't know US history from 4 years ago how do we get you up to speed on how the world works?
Perhaps a little Common Sense?


The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure is."
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Poland and Czech Republic ethnically cleansed as many Germans as the Nazis killed in those 2 countries.
Over what time period Dirt? How far back are you going?
The fat drunkard is possibly the dumbest person on this forum.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
You were anticipated. And it’s taken less than a century.
To be perfectly fair. Hitler was no worse than many others. Hitler and Stalin were about equally guilty of committing atrocities against their countrymen. Mao Zedong killed 45,000,000 of his own. Pol Pot is up there, though he had a smaller population base to work from. Milosevic was just a weak pretender. I won't even try to get into the scittstorm that is Africa.

There was Genghis Khan, Alexander, etc.

That is what humans do. The strong kill the weak and take away their resources. It has been that way since the first cave man clubbed his neighbor for a hunk of venison and a chance at his mate.

That is why we must not allow the Us to become weaker than China, and why we should be allied strongly with Russia.
Originally Posted by jimone
Perhaps a little Common Sense?


The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure is."
How does promoting abortion, sodomy, and the Federal Reserve fit in with "the cause of all mankind"?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
We must not allow the US to become weaker than China, and ... we should be allied strongly with Russia.
Correct.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
You were anticipated. And it’s taken less than a century.
Yes, those shrunken heads, human skin lampshades, and human fat bars of soap, that Eisenhower forced everyone to peruse, were just awful, or would have been had they not been fabricated for the purpose of anti-German propaganda, which fact literally no one with any legitimate history credentials any longer denies.
And you claim there were no gas chambers or ovens. Zyklon B was just a delousing agent......right?

The sad thing is, you believe this schitt. The sadder thing is that more believe it every generation.

History has a strong tendency to repeat itself. I wonder who will be herded into the gas chambers next time?
So, what about those bombers???
Originally Posted by jimone
Perhaps a little Common Sense?


The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure is."

Nice.

You have a way with words and would have made a fine founding father with your "Common Sense".
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me



Can't see it because Texas National Guard wasn't serving ice cream at the border.
Lol!
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.

Bb




Bb, you are right on. We have not yet begun to see the hell we have yet to pay for the open border policy that lying swine squatter traitor in the White House created.

A President of the United States selling his country out to china. Who would have ever thought?
Originally Posted by NVhntr
So, what about those bombers???
No Chit. WTF
Originally Posted by DMc
Originally Posted by NVhntr
So, what about those bombers???
No Chit. WTF

Threw some missiles at population centers in Ukraine.

Most were intercepted.

Just another day in the Orc invasion.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by jimone
Perhaps a little Common Sense?


The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure is."

Nice.

You have a way with words and would have made a fine founding father with your "Common Sense".

That is the preamble to the pamplet by Thomas Paine of that title. Sorry I don't manage italics on my phone to denote a title.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
And you claim there were no gas chambers or ovens. Zyklon B was just a delousing agent......right?

The sad thing is, you believe this schitt. The sadder thing is that more believe it every generation.

History has a strong tendency to repeat itself. I wonder who will be herded into the gas chambers next time?
Originally, after the war, it was claimed that all the camps featured homicidal gas chambers. Very quickly, however, they were forced by reports from inspectors to drop the claims with regard to every single camp that wasn't at that time located in Soviet territory (What a coincidence, right?).

The camps in Soviet territory were not accessible to investigation by Western inspectors, so Soviet anti-German propaganda about them was permitted to persist unchallenged throughout the Cold War period, resulting in said claims eventually being incorporated into the official history of WWII.

As for Zyclon B, it isn't possible to reasonably deny that it was a pesticide for delousing clothing. That was its purpose for manufacture. It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by jimone
Perhaps a little Common Sense?


The cause of America is, in a great measure, the cause of all mankind. Many circumstances have, and will arise, which are not local, but universal, and through which the principles of all lovers of mankind are affected, and in the event of which, their affections are interested. The laying a country desolate with fire and sword, declaring war against the natural rights of all mankind, and extirpating the defenders thereof from the face of the earth, is the concern of every man to whom nature hath given the power of feeling; of which class, regardless of party censure is."

Nice.

You have a way with words and would have made a fine founding father with your "Common Sense".
Originally Posted by jimone
That is the preamble to the pamplet by Thomas Paine of that title. Sorry I don't manage italics on my phone to denote a title.

That's why I put quotes on "Common Sense" in my reply. wink

As you saw a few here were going on about the founding fathers and how they would have just minded their own buisness in the face of evil. Your posting of that from Paines "Common Sense" points out, starkly, how wrong their unnderstanding of what the Founding Fathers believed.
Johnny NyQuil and I love Joe Biden. Yeehaw.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh

You’re right. Never in the history of mankind has something been manufactured, and then used for a purpose other than that for which it was originally intended.

Good point, Hawkeye.
I just went outside and checked. There are no TU-95s in the airspace inside the Greater Browningsville Metroplex. I went back and calculated. If they'd been wanting to hit Falmouth or Brooksville, they should have been overhead about 6 hours ago.

Guys, I'm calling this a big non-issue.

I really wish some of y'all would find a doctor that would get you on a good mood-lightener.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
And you claim there were no gas chambers or ovens. Zyklon B was just a delousing agent......right?

The sad thing is, you believe this schitt. The sadder thing is that more believe it every generation.

History has a strong tendency to repeat itself. I wonder who will be herded into the gas chambers next time?
Originally, after the war, it was claimed that all the camps featured homicidal gas chambers. Very quickly, however, they were forced by reports from inspectors to drop the claims with regard to every single camp that wasn't at that time located in Soviet territory (What a coincidence, right?).

The camps in Soviet territory were not accessible to investigation by Western inspectors, so Soviet anti-German propaganda about them was permitted to persist unchallenged throughout the Cold War period, resulting in said claims eventually being incorporated into the official history of WWII.

As for Zyclon B, it isn't possible to reasonably deny that it was a pesticide for delousing clothing. That was its purpose for manufacture. It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh
It is a shame the SS and NAzis did not allow the queers, Gypsies, Jews, Slavs, retards, and other undesirables to remove their clothing before delousing. :GRIN:

Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
Good job, dudes. Think and react.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by Burleyboy
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
I hope Russia pounds the schitt out of Ukraine. That failed nation-state has been the source of uncountable crimes by the Deep State and Democrats getting kick-backs from laundered US dollars, as well as the secret bioweapon labs.

[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

The problem with this is its the average ukraining citizen and Russian trooper who will suffer while all the dirt bags who created this mess are out yachting on their private ship thousands of miles away. That's the problem when citizens fail to rise up against their own dirt bag leaders. It always comes back on the average guy.

Makes me wondering what's in store for us for allowing Biden to steal the office and do all these corrupt deals. You know we'll pay a heavy price for his open borders alone. Makes a guy think if we don't take a little gross cough medicine now it'll be chemo for everyone soon.


Bb
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Right here on page 3. The big money people and the swamp dwellers don't care as long as the dollars or shekels or rubles continue to poor in. Why is it the common citizen has to pay the ultimate price for the powerful's poor decisions ? Joe Biden and the swamp sold us and the boys and the citizens of Ukraine out years ago for their 13 pieces of silver.

kwg
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh

You’re right. Never in the history of mankind has something been manufactured, and then used for a purpose other than that for which it was originally intended.

Good point, Hawkeye.
That wasn't the point. He claimed that it was not a pesticide for delousing clothing. The non-existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers doesn't depend on the purpose for which Zyklon B was manufactured.
I heard a turkey gobble a bit ago and med flight flew ovr about 30 mins after quiet here
Zyklon B is still used as a pesticide today.

Amazingly, it's marketed under a different name.
Russia should nuke Ukraine, its not NATO
Originally Posted by JohnnyLoco
Russia should nuke Ukraine, its not NATO
I will bet they thought it over a number of times.

kwg
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The non-existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers doesn't depend on the purpose for which of Zyklon B was manufactured.

Nor does the fact that it wasn’t originally manufactured for use in the gas chambers negate the fact that it was; or that those chambers existed.

Try harder.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
And you claim there were no gas chambers or ovens. Zyklon B was just a delousing agent......right?

The sad thing is, you believe this schitt. The sadder thing is that more believe it every generation.

History has a strong tendency to repeat itself. I wonder who will be herded into the gas chambers next time?
Originally, after the war, it was claimed that all the camps featured homicidal gas chambers. Very quickly, however, they were forced by reports from inspectors to drop the claims with regard to every single camp that wasn't at that time located in Soviet territory (What a coincidence, right?).

The camps in Soviet territory were not accessible to investigation by Western inspectors, so Soviet anti-German propaganda about them was permitted to persist unchallenged throughout the Cold War period, resulting in said claims eventually being incorporated into the official history of WWII.

As for Zyclon B, it isn't possible to reasonably deny that it was a pesticide for delousing clothing. That was its purpose for manufacture. It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh


My friend Hal Roberts, who now rests in Arlington, was a combat photographer attached to Eisenhower at the end of the war. He showed me pictures he took that convinced me along with his and many others' stories from the time that evil knew no bounds.

One needs to look no further than the Clintons, Obamas, Bidens, and most of Congress to see it still exists today.

The Ukraine region was and remains the Nazi's most prolific recruting ground outside of Germany and Mordor on the Potomic by my estimation.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The non-existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers doesn't depend on the purpose for which Zyklon B was manufactured.

Nor does the fact that it wasn’t originally manufactured for use in the gas chambers negate the fact that it was; or that those chambers existed.
Nor did I claim anything of the sort. Try to keep up.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh

You’re right. Never in the history of mankind has something been manufactured, and then used for a purpose other than that for which it was originally intended.

Good point, Hawkeye.
That wasn't the point. He claimed that it was not a pesticide for delousing clothing. The non-existence of Nazi homicidal gas chambers doesn't depend on the purpose for which Zyklon B was manufactured.
No, I was laughing any who would believe that a delousing agent was the primary use of this poison. Yes it was invented as a pesticide. But its primary use soon became the eradication of human pests. Obviously as deffined by the insane maniac holding the reigns of power over the German Empire.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
No, I was laughing any who would believe that a delousing agent was the primary use of this poison. Yes it was invented as a pesticide. But its primary use soon became the eradication of human pests. Obviously as deffined by the insane maniac holding the reigns of power over the German Empire.
That narrative doesn't withstand even the slightest scrutiny, as already explained.
Unfortunately for the Nazi apologists. The Nazis were nothing if not meticulous record keepers. Much of the evidence for the Holocaust comes straight from the Nazis' own record books.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Nor does the fact that it wasn’t originally manufactured for use in the gas chambers negate the fact that it was; or that those chambers existed.
Nor did I claim anything of the sort. Try to keep up.

Ok.

Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and bones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Unfortunately for the Nazi apologists. The Nazis were nothing if not meticulous record keepers. Much of the evidence for the Holocaust comes straight from the Nazis' own record books.
Quite the opposite is the case. Due to the utter nonexistence of said documentary evidence, the proponents of the hoax assert that orders were given and passed along like a game of telephone.
AK, your confusion is too complex for me to unravel.
How were the dead bodies removed from the Zyklon B showers?? What steps were taken to keep the body movers from being killed by merely touching the corpses with their bare hands?? How was the Zyklon B gas removed from the showers?? Was the air "scrubbed" of Zyklon B?? What about everybody downwind, including all the German guards around the perimeter of the camps??
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Unfortunately for the Nazi apologists. The Nazis were nothing if not meticulous record keepers. Much of the evidence for the Holocaust comes straight from the Nazis' own record books.
Quite the opposite is the case. Due to the utter nonexistence of said documentary evidence, the proponents of the hoax assert that orders were given and passed along like a game of telephone.

Right????
The Nazi's own records contributed heavily to the convictions at Nuremberg. Or would you claim those were all faked and forged?
Quote
Documentary Evidence

The IMT prosecutors aimed to use the Germans' own words to convict them. They did not rely on personal testimony that might be viewed as biased. The case thus relied primarily on thousands of documents written by the Germans themselves.

Nineteen investigative teams collected and analyzed hundreds of thousands of German records. The records chosen to be presented in evidence were translated into the court’s four official languages: English, French, German, and Russian. These records were reproduced for distribution to defense attorneys and other trial participants.

Crimes against Jews were a small subset of the crimes prosecuted at the IMT. Nevertheless, the prosecutors submitted more than 100 German records that documented the persecution and murder of Jews by Nazi Germany.

One of these documents was the transcript of a speech given by Heinrich Himmler on October 4, 1943. Himmler was Reich Leader of the SS and German Police. Addressing high-ranking SS officers, he described "the annihilation of the Jewish people" as "a glorious page of our history" that was never to be written.

Another document was a detailed SS report on the use of gas vans to murder Jews. Also submitted into evidence was the infamous “Stroop Report.” This commemorative album by SS and Police Leader Jürgen Stroop documents the destruction of the Warsaw Ghetto in text and photos.
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
How were the dead bodies removed from the Zyklon B showers?? What steps were taken to keep the body movers from being killed by merely touching the corpses with their bare hands?? How was the Zyklon B gas removed from the showers?? Was the air "scrubbed" of Zyklon B?? What about everybody downwind, including all the German guards around the perimeter of the camps??

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?
Spot on. Why theee clowns cant see this is beyond me
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Can't see it because Texas National Guard wasn't serving ice cream at the border.

As has been pointed out multiple times Trump stopped the invasion with interventionist foreign policy.

Biden reversed those interventionist policies.

If you girls don't know US history from 4 years ago how do we get you up to speed on how the world works?



You've just awarded yourself the dunce hat for telling everybody what they already know. Put the cough syrup down.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
AK, your confusion is too complex for me to unravel.

That’s one way out.
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
How were the dead bodies removed from the Zyklon B showers?? What steps were taken to keep the body movers from being killed by merely touching the corpses with their bare hands?? How was the Zyklon B gas removed from the showers?? Was the air "scrubbed" of Zyklon B?? What about everybody downwind, including all the German guards around the perimeter of the camps??
I will not claim to know how the Nazis handled these problems. But the following are facts related to the issue.

Zyklon B is/was Hydrogen Cyanide. As a gas, it disperses quickly and is lighter than air. It could be safely vented through a smokestack. And purged with positive air pressure.

This is the same substance commonly used in execution chambers in the American Penal system. Handling of the corpse and post execution clean up did not seem to present a problem here.

Residue on naked bodies could easily be washed away in a shower. Those handling contaminated corpses would not be doing so without rubber gloves, pants, and raincoat.

I spent many, many years of my life working in a wet lab. Potassium Cyanide (ETA: corection, we used NaCN, Sodium Cyanide. Though there is very little practical difference between the two.) was a reagent I used every hour on the hour. It was perfectly safe in solution at pH levels above 7. Had I mixed 10 or 20 ml of the stuff into an acid solution, I could have probably killed everyone in the lab.


Point being, there are ways to handle stuff like this with training and care. Otherwise we would not use any pesticides anywhere.

Cyanide is commonly found in nature. It is present in many grasses, apple seeds, cherry leaves, and in the pits of most common fruits. Sometimes in lethal toxic levels.

Also of note is records in Germany of a tank exhaust, or the exhaust of a motor vehicle piped into a van and used to asphyxiate undesirables.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Poland and Czech Republic ethnically cleansed as many Germans as the Nazis killed in those 2 countries.
Over what time period Dirt? How far back are you going?


Right after the war. Leaders of US, Britain, Soviet Union Turn the blind eye. I never knew that myself. Just watched a documentary about it a couple nights ago. Branding germans with swastikas on their foreheads. Burying them in mass graves just like the Einsatzgruppen videos. All kinds of crazy stuff. When the hammer came down that they couldn't kill them anymore, they ran them out of the country.

Update:
Upon further consideration, I don't see how the czechs and poles could have killed an equal number of Germans to what the nazis did during the war..I'll have to watch that documentary again. Not getting much out of google-fu.
Originally Posted by gonehuntin
How were the dead bodies removed from the Zyklon B showers?? What steps were taken to keep the body movers from being killed by merely touching the corpses with their bare hands?? How was the Zyklon B gas removed from the showers?? Was the air "scrubbed" of Zyklon B?? What about everybody downwind, including all the German guards around the perimeter of the camps??
LOL. Just a small sampling of the multitude of problems with the narrative.
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
FO azzwipe.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Documentary evidence, Nuremberg.

"The Nuremberg Trials have made the waging of an unsuccessful war a crime; the generals on the defeated side were tried and then hanged." - Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery. June 9th 1948

"The truth of the matter is that not one of the victors was free of the guilt which its judges attributed to the vanquished." - The Chicago Tribune, October 2nd 1946

"In my Judgment, the procedure by which the Nuremberg Tribunal was created and the criminal trials thereunder conducted, was completely fraught with illegality." - William L. Hart, The Supreme Court of Ohio

"This kangaroo court at Nuremberg was officially known as the 'International Military Tribunal.' That name is a libel on the military profession. Nuremberg was, in fact, a lawyers' tribunal, although I can readily understand why the legal profession is ashamed to claim it, and deliberately stuck a false label on it.

"I am glad our real military men had nothing to do with the travesty on justice that the lawyers and 'statesmen' conducted on Nuremberg." - Rear Admiral Dan V. Gallery. U.S.N. (Ret.)

"It was a libel on the military profession." - Vice Admiral Hewlett Thebaud, USN

"It was a fantastic desecration of the ideals of Western Civilisation, and appalling miscarriage of justice... a misuse of evidence for vicious ends, all of which will someday be exposed as a shocking travesty of high legal and moral principles." - Henry M. Adams, Ph.D. Professor of History, University of California

In his book, Profiles in Courage, President John F. Kennedy praised Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio, for having the courage to publicly denounce the Nuremberg Trials and reveal them to have been held in, "a spirit of vengeance, and vengeance is seldom justice. In these trials we have accepted the Russian idea of the purpose of trials - government policy and not justice - with little relation to Anglo-Saxon heritage."

"It constituted a step backward in international law." - Honorable Justice, Learned Hand

"The trials at Nuremberg constitute a travesty of justice." - Admiral Harry E. Yarnell, U.S.N Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Asiatic Fleet

"It was wholly unjustified and a disgrace to the national governments sanctioning it." - Rear Admiral Reginald R. Belknap, U.S.N. Atlantic Fleet

"The whole notion of such a trial is dishonorable, and offends my Saxon sense of fair play." - General George S. Patton, Commander of the Third United States Army in France and Germany

It wasn't well thought of by its contemporaries.
Does that change the facts contained within the pages of the documents presented?
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Does that change the facts contained within the pages of the documents presented?
One must consider the source. I notice you provide no actual documents.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Why did Eisenhower demand that conditions in German concentration camps be well documented, filmed, and photographed?
The conditions were awful, with dead victims of typhus piled high, and many of the survivors suffering from it, requiring treatment. This scored tremendous propaganda points in favor of what they had intended to do to Germany after the war, so they played it up, instead of categorizing it for what it was, i.e., one in a long string of tragedies associated with the war.
BULLSCHITT! NAZI APOLOGIST!

You left out, STORMFRONT!!!!!

Is that you, Steve_NO?
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Hitler shot his wad in Russia

There are a few "what ifs" that contributed to the German's failure to defeat the USSR in 1941.

What if they hadn't been delayed in starting Operation Barbarossa? A portion of the German forces that had been earmarked for Barbarossa were sent to the Balkans to bail out the Italians. When they were done there, the soldiers needed to rested and refit, the equipment was worn and needed to go through maintenance overhaul, and the losses needed to be replaced. The Germans got to within sight of Moscow before they were stopped. Would the outcome have been different if Barbarossa had started earlier and the forces that had been diverted to the Balkans had been available for the initial thrust of Barbarossa?

The German military was not highly mechanized and depended to a large part, as the Russian do today, on rail transportation to provide the enormous logistics support network that war requires. German and Soviet railroad gauges were different, so the Germans couldn't travel over the Soviet railroad network without changing the Soviet's 1.520m gauge to the European standard of 1.435m or changing the European standard wheelsets to Soviet standard wheelsets on every car and every engine. You would have expected the thorough Germans to have had a solution to this known problem ready to implement, but they apparently didn't. It takes a lot of transportation capacity to move the huge volumes of POL, food, ammo, repair parts, etc. to where they are need and when they are needed there.

The Soviet KV-1 and T-34 had better armor protection and a more capable gun, the 76.2mm F-32, until the Panzer IVs were up-gunned with the 75mm KwK 40.

Hitler might have done better if he had concentrated more resources on the attack on Moscow and not spread them so thin.

Another one of those coulda, shoulda, woulda if I'd only known scenarios.
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.
This post perfectly sums up the stupidity of the generational animosity.



Handy's knowledge of world history starts when JFK was assassinated.
Diary of Anne Frank - fake/fraud

Simon Wiesenthal - fake/fraud

Start to pull some of the thread from the narrative fabric..., it will unravel in front of you.
Originally Posted by rost495
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
FO azzwipe.




rost, This is his f'd up way of saying he's jealous. Of what, who the heck knows. It's a him problem and I wouldn't waste two minutes trying to figure it out.
Originally Posted by rost495
Originally Posted by Jackson_Handy
Boomers can't help themselves, they are giddy for WWIII and destruction of the planet. A pathetic generation they are..
FO azzwipe.

Lol lol #triggeredboomie
Originally Posted by bearhuntr
... believed to be heading for Ukraine ...
Just that.

A bit amazed that no one commented on the likelihood of Ivan actually getting 13 of these relics in the air at once...
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Can any of you sit here and tell me that the war on terror was good and successful?

How would we know? Maybe it was. Maybe the world would be worse off today without it. Or maybe not. The trouble is that we can't really know either way.

Quote
What about vietnam?

The Russian and Chinese communist colonialism pretty much stopped after the Viet Nam war. Maybe it was worth it.

Quote
Why are we going to war with russia now?

We are not.

Quote
Lets see how much some of you war mongering cocks know. So many like to spout off at the mouth, but your fat old asses would be sitting on the sofa while our kids fo off to die for abdolutely nothing. F uck off with that nonsense and f uck what this country has become

I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by bearhuntr
... believed to be heading for Ukraine ...
Just that.

A bit amazed that no one commented on the likelihood of Ivan actually getting 13 of these relics in the air at once...

They are a pretty solid design. Classic USSR; very practical, simple, and rugged.
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by johnw
Originally Posted by bearhuntr
... believed to be heading for Ukraine ...
Just that.

A bit amazed that no one commented on the likelihood of Ivan actually getting 13 of these relics in the air at once...

They are a pretty solid design. Classic USSR; very practical, simple, and rugged.

And!!! Quite useful for moving dirt...
Originally Posted by dassa
I have no desire to get over run. But that could be accomplished with a strong military, that stayed at home and protected opine own borders, rather than being deployed around the world and often being used to cause more problems than it solved.

As to your sarcastic comment concerning world peace before the US, I couldn't care less if every other country fought itself to death. The US was at peace until we adopted the role of world police.

As far as being over run like a pu$sy a$s country, have you seen the recent news from Texas?

There are 2 sides of America. The slaves and the Slave holders. We've been getting run over for a long time.

We give foreign aid to over 100 countries and they kick some to the Slave Holders who are Israel, their people on Wall Stree, the CYA, NWO, WRF, and Illuminous ones.

We been getting run over, from within by the Neonazis govt infiltrators and them getting us in wars to profit off the Military/Industrial Complex. Their owners are the ones who push and run the wars and MM thinks it means we take no schiett off anyone.

Your pretty spot on.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by earlybrd
Hitler shot his wad in Russia
The Soviet Union was our mutual enemy, the enemy of all the West. We should have been helping Germany to defeat them.

I was thinking it was Germany who killed a few million Christians and gypsies along with the jews.

So, seems you push the idea the Jews AND Ruskies need to be destroyed.

I would appreciate your clarification.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
If Hitler did not want war with England, he should have kept his ass out of nations with which England held mutual defense treaties.
Poland, encouraged by the Western powers, perpetrated outrage after outrage (to include mass murder) against former German provinces (ethnically German), designed specifically to provoke Germany to invade. Sound familiar??

Yes, it sounds like the fabricated justifications offered by contrarians to oppose what actually happened.

Germany was just defending itself against Poland.

Putin is just defending himself against Ukraine.

They are familiar, alright. And equally ridiculous.
Originally Posted by jimone
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
And you claim there were no gas chambers or ovens. Zyklon B was just a delousing agent......right?

The sad thing is, you believe this schitt. The sadder thing is that more believe it every generation.

History has a strong tendency to repeat itself. I wonder who will be herded into the gas chambers next time?
Originally, after the war, it was claimed that all the camps featured homicidal gas chambers. Very quickly, however, they were forced by reports from inspectors to drop the claims with regard to every single camp that wasn't at that time located in Soviet territory (What a coincidence, right?).

The camps in Soviet territory were not accessible to investigation by Western inspectors, so Soviet anti-German propaganda about them was permitted to persist unchallenged throughout the Cold War period, resulting in said claims eventually being incorporated into the official history of WWII.

As for Zyclon B, it isn't possible to reasonably deny that it was a pesticide for delousing clothing. That was its purpose for manufacture. It's not a fact that's denied by anyone who has so much as scratched the surface in investigating it. Was it seriously your belief that it was manufactured for gas chambers?? laugh


My friend Hal Roberts, who now rests in Arlington, was a combat photographer attached to Eisenhower at the end of the war. He showed me pictures he took that convinced me along with his and many others' stories from the time that evil knew no bounds.

One needs to look no further than the Clintons, Obamas, Bidens, and most of Congress to see it still exists today.

The Ukraine region was and remains the Nazi's most prolific recruting ground outside of Germany and Mordor on the Potomic by my estimation.

Yes, it's been the home of the decendants of Cain who became the Kenites who became the Khazarian Mafia who became the False Jew Ashkenazi Jews of which Hitler became their leader.

Putin cleaned them out of Kazakhstan before moving into Ukraine. They are the proverbial Head of the Snake.

That's why Trump is calling this the Final Battle.

1 John 3:10 IIRC, Be like Able and not like Cain who is OF the Evil One.

That's how Planted his seed of tares in GODS fertile farrow of Wheat.

(The Evil One seduced Eve in the Garden and for that GOD cut off his legs and wings. Since that time Satan's decendants have hated and fought GODS decendants).

Note JESUS in the Holy Temple. Yee Vipers (they came from the snake), I knew your father, the murderer from the beginning. Yeah, Cain.

That's what we are fighting. For our battle is with the Principalities of evil, they are the decendants of Satan and Cain.
Jag and TRH infecting the same thread.
Hard to tell which is the most Bonkers!
Hey Jag, hey TRH

This is about bombers.
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Jag and TRH infecting the same thread.
Hard to tell which is the most Bonkers!



One is willfully ignorant.

The other is fucking nuts.
.
NATO reporting name : Jaginoff


laugh
Originally Posted by RockyRaab
You haven't studied history, Jackson, or you'd know that it was a generation of oldsters who send my generation to Vietnam. And their elders sent them to WWII. And on and on back to the Punic Wars. But because you think history began when you were in grade school, you know none of this.

Rocky, I don't think that moron made it through grade school. It's obvious he's an underachiever and lashes out and those who've actually accomplished something in life.
Originally Posted by ribka
Boomers aren't very bright
This coming from a loser civil servant....classic
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by ribka
Boomers aren't very bright
This coming from a loser civil servant....classic

"When I was a boy of 14, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be 21, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years."

Maybe ribka will learn, maybe not.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Jag and TRH infecting the same thread.
Hard to tell which is the most Bonkers!



One is willfully ignorant.

The other is fucking nuts.

Indeed.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Poland and Czech Republic ethnically cleansed as many Germans as the Nazis killed in those 2 countries.
Over what time period Dirt? How far back are you going?


Right after the war. Leaders of US, Britain, Soviet Union Turn the blind eye. I never knew that myself. Just watched a documentary about it a couple nights ago. Branding germans with swastikas on their foreheads. Burying them in mass graves just like the Einsatzgruppen videos. All kinds of crazy stuff. When the hammer came down that they couldn't kill them anymore, they ran them out of the country.

Update:
Upon further consideration, I don't see how the czechs and poles could have killed an equal number of Germans to what the nazis did during the war..I'll have to watch that documentary again. Not getting much out of google-fu.

Could be that it's not true, or at least exaggerated.
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Can any of you sit here and tell me that the war on terror was good and successful?

How would we know? Maybe it was. Maybe the world would be worse off today without it. Or maybe not. The trouble is that we can't really know either way.

Quote
What about vietnam?

The Russian and Chinese communist colonialism pretty much stopped after the Viet Nam war. Maybe it was worth it.

Quote
Why are we going to war with russia now?

We are not.

Quote
Lets see how much some of you war mongering cocks know. So many like to spout off at the mouth, but your fat old asses would be sitting on the sofa while our kids fo off to die for abdolutely nothing. F uck off with that nonsense and f uck what this country has become

I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Literally every one of your answers is wrong. Every single one
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.
The war on terror was a money making scheme. 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi, yet we attacked 2 different countries, not them. The middle east is a bigger nightmare now that it was before we invaded. Thats not even debatable.

Vietnam served no purpose other than to feed the MIC and kill off thousands upon thousands of our countries young men. We didnt stop communism and better yet, our country has become exactly what we were told we were stopping

We are already at war with Russia. Nato has boots on the ground and NATO has been the ones controlling the show. Ukes dont have anyone left. This is why Putin just officially announced they are at war. Everyone who has any clue as to what is happening in Ukraine knows that its the US and nato that Russia is currently fighting

Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman
Originally Posted by plumbum
I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Maybe our ruling cabal and NATO don't want a war with Russia and are not trying to provoke that war but they apparently for sure have Russia fooled into thinking they do.

Personally I'm positive the NWO/NATO/USA and their bankers are intent on the destruction of Russia as an independent nation.

Russia and its vast wealth has been a target of the west since Napoleon and even earlier.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by plumbum
I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Maybe our ruling cabal and NATO don't want a war with Russia and are not trying to provoke that war but they apparently for sure have Russia fooled into thinking they do.

Personally I'm positive the NWO/NATO/USA and their bankers are intent on the destruction of Russia as an independent nation.

Russia and its vast wealth has been a target of the west since Napoleon and even earlier.
Our current illegal gov hates anything that they cant control. Especially white religious folks
Originally Posted by gunchamp
The war on terror was a money making scheme. 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi, yet we attacked 2 different countries, not them. The middle east is a bigger nightmare now that it was before we invaded. Thats not even debatable.

Vietnam served no purpose other than to feed the MIC and kill off thousands upon thousands of our countries young men. We didnt stop communism and better yet, our country has become exactly what we were told we were stopping

We are already at war with Russia. Nato has boots on the ground and NATO has been the ones controlling the show. Ukes dont have anyone left. This is why Putin just officially announced they are at war. Everyone who has any clue as to what is happening in Ukraine knows that its the US and nato that Russia is currently fighting

Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

That nasty ole Russian boogeyman again, 70 years now that Russia is behind everything wrong. Getting old hat folks kinda like the racist tag, throw it out there enough and you take it for the lie it is. NATO/EU/USA were behind this otherwise they wouldnt be trying so hard to gaslight it.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
Originally Posted by Swifty52
That nasty ole Russian boogeyman again, 70 years now that Russia is behind everything wrong.

Nobody is saying that.
Quote
Getting old hat folks kinda like the racist tag, throw it out there enough and you take it for the lie it is. NATO/EU/USA were behind this otherwise they wouldnt be trying so hard to gaslight it.

You assume what you seek to prove.

It's not "gaslighting" to tell the truth. You are welcome of course to your opinion, but that doesn't mean it's true.
Originally Posted by Swifty52
Originally Posted by gunchamp
The war on terror was a money making scheme. 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi, yet we attacked 2 different countries, not them. The middle east is a bigger nightmare now that it was before we invaded. Thats not even debatable.

Vietnam served no purpose other than to feed the MIC and kill off thousands upon thousands of our countries young men. We didnt stop communism and better yet, our country has become exactly what we were told we were stopping

We are already at war with Russia. Nato has boots on the ground and NATO has been the ones controlling the show. Ukes dont have anyone left. This is why Putin just officially announced they are at war. Everyone who has any clue as to what is happening in Ukraine knows that its the US and nato that Russia is currently fighting

Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

That nasty ole Russian boogeyman again, 70 years now that Russia is behind everything wrong. Getting old hat folks kinda like the racist tag, throw it out there enough and you take it for the lie it is. NATO/EU/USA were behind this otherwise they wouldnt be trying so hard to gaslight it.
Spot on!
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.
It's a classic example of Gaslighting - telling you you don't see what is right in front of you.
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.
It's a classic example of Gaslighting - telling you you don't see what is right in front of you.
Who you gonna believe, plumbum or your lying eyes?
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.
It's a classic example of Gaslighting - telling you you don't see what is right in front of you.
For sure
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by Tyrone
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.
It's a classic example of Gaslighting - telling you you don't see what is right in front of you.
Who you gonna believe, plumbum or your lying eyes?
Haha!
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.

Please cite one example.

It's only a "waste of time" if you know there are no examples to be found.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by plumbum
I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Maybe our ruling cabal and NATO don't want a war with Russia and are not trying to provoke that war but they apparently for sure have Russia fooled into thinking they do.

Personally I'm positive the NWO/NATO/USA and their bankers are intent on the destruction of Russia as an independent nation.

Russia and its vast wealth has been a target of the west since Napoleon and even earlier.

Spot on ^

History, culture, religion, national identity, family...everything the Elitist Globalist cabal hate.(Russia made LGBTQ illegal) Soros said it in 1991 when the USSR collapsed, "Russia must be destroyed" but added that Eastern European boys must pay the butcher's bill cause Western countries would not tolerate it. This has all come true. But Russia said not today.

Most of Europe is in line with the globalist dream but Russia is a thorn in the side of the elitist, globalist utopia.

As well as almost unlimited resources so it can be raped of these resources when Russia is defeated, balkanized, and a puppet regime installed favorable to the west.

The problem is too many ignorant, brainwashed, cold war boomers still think Russia is the USSR, which it is not.

MAGA!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.

Please cite one example.

It's only a "waste of time" if you know there are no examples to be found.
Uh no, its a waste of my time because there are so many examples, its not worth arguing with you. Look into yourself
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Originally Posted by TreeMutt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by plumbum
I do not want war with Russia and I don't know anybody who does. Nobody. Who do you know that actually wants war with Russia?
Maybe our ruling cabal and NATO don't want a war with Russia and are not trying to provoke that war but they apparently for sure have Russia fooled into thinking they do.

Personally I'm positive the NWO/NATO/USA and their bankers are intent on the destruction of Russia as an independent nation.

Russia and its vast wealth has been a target of the west since Napoleon and even earlier.

Spot on ^

History, culture, religion, national identity, family...everything the Elitist Globalist cabal hate.(Russia made LGBTQ illegal) Soros said it in 1991 when the USSR collapsed, "Russia must be destroyed" but added that Eastern European boys must pay the butcher's bill cause Western countries would not tolerate it. This has all come true. But Russia said not today.

Most of Europe is in line with the globalist dream but Russia is a thorn in the side of the elitist, globalist utopia.

As well as almost unlimited resources so it can be raped of these resources when Russia is defeated, balkanized, and a puppet regime installed favorable to the west.

The problem is too many ignorant, brainwashed, cold war boomers still think Russia is the USSR, which it is not.

MAGA!
Spot on as well! At least the voting base who believes that chit is shrinking every day. Clot shot is puttin in work lol. Enough of the Gen x and up are waking up to the world around them.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Exactly what Im basing this on. All the ones who hate Russia and want war are on the complete opposite side of me and every true freedom loving conservative. Im totally fine with where Im at on all this craziness. Being on the other side of dems, rinos and angry fat old war mongering men has me sleeping well at night
Have the dropped their loads yet?
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Have the dropped their loads yet?

A few Putin Pufters are swallowing Orc loads. grin
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Have the dropped their loads yet?

A few Putin Pufters are swallowing Orc loads. grin


But what did Q say?
13? 13? Back in the day our little country had way more than 13 up in the air...SAC.
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Exactly what Im basing this on. All the ones who hate Russia and want war are on the complete opposite side of me and every true freedom loving conservative. Im totally fine with where Im at on all this craziness. Being on the other side of dems, rinos and angry fat old war mongering men has me sleeping well at night

Yup.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia.

Nobody, and they are not now.

You really think the Russian justice system and freedoms are better than ours? What "freedoms" do they have?
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Exactly what Im basing this on. All the ones who hate Russia...

Nobody hates Russia

Quote
...and want war...

Nobody wants war

Quote
...are on the complete opposite side of me and every true freedom loving conservative.

Ah yes, the No True Scotsman fallacy.

Quote
Im totally fine with where Im at on all this craziness. Being on the other side of dems, rinos and angry fat old war mongering men has me sleeping well at night

Sleep well in your imaginary world.

Nobody hates Russia, nobody wants war with Russia, that's all in your head. Until you show is where anybody said those things here, *you* are gaslighting *us*, and perhaps unwittingly yourself too.

Support your accusations, it's your burden.
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia.

Nobody, and they are not now.

You really think the Russian justice system and freedoms are better than ours? What "freedoms" do they have?

They are free to have the Orcs cut your ear off and make you eat it during an arrest.


Originally Posted by Putin Pufters watching the arrest videos
FREEDOM and JUSTICE
Putin Stronk
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia.

Nobody, and they are not now.

You really think the Russian justice system and freedoms are better than ours? What "freedoms" do they have?

They are free to have the Orcs cut your ear off and make you eat it during an arrest.


Originally Posted by Putin Pufters watching the arrest videos
FREEDOM and JUSTICE
Putin Stronk
Good, the US paid terrorists deserved it
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Exactly what Im basing this on. All the ones who hate Russia...

Nobody hates Russia

Quote
...and want war...

Nobody wants war

Quote
...are on the complete opposite side of me and every true freedom loving conservative.

Ah yes, the No True Scotsman fallacy.

Quote
Im totally fine with where Im at on all this craziness. Being on the other side of dems, rinos and angry fat old war mongering men has me sleeping well at night

Sleep well in your imaginary world.

Nobody hates Russia, nobody wants war with Russia, that's all in your head. Until you show is where anybody said those things here, *you* are gaslighting *us*, and perhaps unwittingly yourself too.

Support your accusations, it's your burden.
Are you one of Burns sock puppet accounts? Once again, this info I have posted is so well known, that I would be embarrassed to write what you just wrote. Not worth my time. Do yourself a favor and do some research. You really need it bad lol
Originally Posted by Hastings
Things can sure make some odd twists and turns. 50 years ago who would have thought the defender of freedom and justice in the world would be Russia. I am almost to the point of seeing Russia and a few smaller nations such as Hungary as the last holdouts against an evil plan to rule the world.

What I like most about Russia is its enemies. They give Russia a lot of credibility.
Bingo!
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.



My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
I'm just waiting for the campfire to come across the video of desert scheme armor being moved on a train, headed west, outside of Las Vegas last week as proof positive we're gearing up for civil war, Russian War, China War, WWIII. (Ignore NTC)
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.



My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
My pap fought over there and told me of many stories as well. Obviously I wasnt there, but I believe my pap and the terrible things he saw. Gave him nightmares
Originally Posted by Teal
I'm just waiting for the campfire to come across the video of desert scheme armor being moved on a train, headed west, outside of Las Vegas last week as proof positive we're gearing up for civil war, Russian War, China War, WWIII. (Ignore NTC)
Havent heard this one yet
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.

Who decides who are "legitimate" and "serious" historians? Is it like during the pandemic any scientist, physician, or epidemiologist who didn't agree with leftwing ideology was classified a quack, fired, and/or ostracized? Now, we're finding out they were correct all along.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.

Utter repugnant bullshit.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.

Please reference these serious historians so that we may all read their theories for our edification.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by brush_buster
Who decides who are "legitimate" and "serious" historians? Is it like during the pandemic any scientist, physician, or epidemiologist who didn't agree with leftwing ideology was classified a quack, fired, and/or ostracized? Now, we're finding out they were correct all along.
Well, eliminate those with an axe to grind on the question, first off. But even most of them no longer claim there were any homicidal gas chambers in any camps outside the control of the post-war Soviet Union. To do otherwise would make them laughing stocks among historians.
Originally Posted by AB2506
Please reference these serious historians so that we may all read their theories for our edification.


Also odd how they all tattooed themselves in a similar fashion, funny that.
aneyone dedd yet?
editication, that mean you gettin humgry
.
Good on Eisenhower to make the local villagers walk through and see all those dead bodies, starving survivors and the ovens that produced that strange smell over the village.
Or maybe it was just Hollywood trickery ?
Originally Posted by AB2506
Please reference these serious historians so that we may all read their theories for our edification.

Dr. Martin Broszat (Munich's Institute of Contemporary History) stated in 1960 that, at the very least, we can be certain that "no mass gassings ever occurred in the Old Reich" (i.e., Germany). Dachau is in Germany.

In April of 1975, Simen Weisenthal (acclaimed Holocaust historian) stated that "No gassings took pace in any camp on German soil." He stated in 1993, "It is true that there were no extermination camps on German soil."

I could go on.
Originally Posted by Direct_Drive
Good on Eisenhower to make the local villagers walk through and see all those dead bodies, starving survivors and the ovens that produced that strange smell over the village.
Or maybe it was just Hollywood trickery ?
Nobody denies any of that.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.

I've toured the Dachau Concentration Camp twice. It is located just northwest of Munich and didn't have a gassing facility, inmates were just killing other ways. There were many concentration camps, but only 6 extermination factories were established following the Wannsee Conference in 01/42 where "The Final Solution" was mapped out, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka, all in occupied Poland.

Are you denying that the Wannsee Conference took place and that it was where the SS, represented by Reinhard Heydrich, mapped out the process for exterminating European Jews?
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Are you denying that the Wannsee Conference took place and that it was where the SS, represented by Reinhard Heydrich, mapped out the process for exterminating European Jews?
Let's see the precise language. No one denies that a resolution to the "Jewish Question" was a common topic of conversation, not only in Germany, but throughout Europe. Germany was operating in alliance with the international Zionist movement to relocate Jews to Palestine. This "final solution," however, was interrupted by the breakout of general war, preventing German transport of civilians via the high seas. The alternative they transitioned to was the FDR strategy, i.e., internment, as he was putting into operation vis a vis Americans of Japanese ancestry.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Are you denying that the Wannsee Conference took place and that it was where the SS, represented by Reinhard Heydrich, mapped out the process for exterminating European Jews?
Let's see the precise language. No one denies that a resolution to the "Jewish Question" was a common topic of conversation, not only in Germany, but throughout Europe. Germany was operating in alliance with the international Zionist movement to relocate Jews to Palestine. This "final solution," however, was interrupted by the breakout of general war, preventing German transport of civilians via the high seas. The alternative they transitioned to was the FDR strategy, i.e., internment, as he was putting into operation vis a vis Americans of Japanese origin.

Ho
Lee
Phuck
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Ho
Lee
Phuck


Here's a coin minted by the international Zionist movement to commemorate Hitler's efforts to relocate Jews to Palestine.

[Linked Image from i0.wp.com]
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by plumbum
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Just back read through any of these types of threads and you will see more than enough fat, old, tough guys that are more than willing to send our children off to die to fight the Russian boogeyman

Please quote where anybody in this thread wants war with Russia. Si vis pax, parabellum works both ways, war with Russia would seriously hurt, and vice-versa.

Nobody here wants war with Russia and nobody here wants to send any of our troops over there.
If you seriously think that, you should spend some time back reading on any thread that involves Russia or Ukraine. There are people on here foaming at the mouth for it. Same in our Gov. This is a waste of time even debating this.



Man, do I ever agree with you on that.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.



My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
You do realize I was being sarcastic to the max I hope. Holocaust deniers know better. They approve of Hitler's solution is the only thing I can figure.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.




You are a full of schit Holocaust denier, as I have always said. BTW, Jews weren't the only group that died in the Holocaust.
The first Kibbutz farm was set up in Germany, with the cooperation of at least two international Zionist organizations. The purpose was to instruct German Jews on what life will be like after they are relocated to Palestine, in accordance with the final solution to Europe's Jewish question. The instructors there were all Jewish Zionists, at Hitler's invitation. The program remained active till 1942.

It might be thoroughly scrubbed from the internet since the purge of 2016, but try looking up the Haavara Agreement
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
I've toured the Dachau Concentration Camp twice. It is located just northwest of Munich and didn't have a gassing facility, inmates were just killing other ways. There were many concentration camps, but only 6 extermination factories were established following the Wannsee Conference in 01/42 where "The Final Solution" was mapped out, Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor, and Treblinka, all in occupied Poland.

Are you denying that the Wannsee Conference took place and that it was where the SS, represented by Reinhard Heydrich, mapped out the process for exterminating European Jews?

TRH is playing sematics word games.

Poland was controlled by the Soviet Union POST WAR. Just not when the Nazis were gassing the undesirables.

Plenty of machine gunning and such went on in places that did not have gassing showers.

Pretty sick to play those types of word games on the topic but his Jew hate will justify his behaviour in his mind.
Originally Posted by dassa
Originally Posted by MontanaMarine
Originally Posted by dassa
..............I would have to say that I think interventionism has been a failure.

(And to everyone who analogizes about bullies. Bullies pick on pussies. Sorry, but someone had to explain it to you.)

It's quite likely that 'thinking' isn't your strong suit.

There will always be two sides to things. Choose wisely.
So, our strong overseas adventures are gonna protect us from being over run? That's was the position you stated earlier, right? I don't want to misconstrue what you said.

But I think I'll stick with my thoughts on the matter, since virtually every thing you've stated should be a benefit of interventionism is not happening in the world today.

Sometimes an intervention is demanded by national interests. It's not about creating some imaginary global utopia. You can add an "ism" to it to suit your own ideas, but an intervention is a means to an end, not the end itself. Intervention is not the desired endstate.

I'm going to help you out here, going back to the fundamental fact we are a maritime nation,

"...........A maritime nation is any nation that borders the sea and is dependent on its use for the majority of the following state activities: commerce and transport, war, to define a territorial boundary, or for any maritime activity (activities using the sea to convey or produce an end result)...."
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.




You are a full of schit Holocaust denier, as I have always said. BTW, Jews weren't the only group that died in the Holocaust.

Twenty years ago the John Birch Society was peddling they Holocaust Denying crap and gun shows. The idea seemed interesting so I took one of their fliers with all the evidence that the Holocaust was a farce. After about 2 weeks of research it became clear to me these guys were Kooks and I wanted nothing to do with them.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.



My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
You do realize I was being sarcastic to the max I hope. Holocaust deniers know better. They approve of Hitler's solution is the only thing I can figure.



Yes, I know. A little humor or baiting is all it takes to smoke out these Holocaust deniers. And they will go on for days with their "proof"
Try to keep up, John. The above concerns the observation that the only camps that continued after the war to be identified as death camps under German control during the war were those located within the Soviet sphere of influence after the close of the war, i.e., beyond the reach of Western investigators. Thus the claims about gas chambers there could not be challenged. The Soviets had been generating anti-German propaganda about such things since early on in the war, and continued to perpetuate it long after its end.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Try to keep up, John. The above concerns the observation that the only camps that continued after the war to be identified as death camps under German control were those located within the Soviet sphere of influence, i.e., beyond the reach of Western investigators. Thus the claims about gas chambers there could not be challenged. The Soviets had been generating anti-German propaganda about such things since early on the war, and continued to perpetuate it long after its end.

Okay.

Are you just quibbling about the method of mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans or claiming there was no mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Try to keep up, John. The above concerns the observation that the only camps that continued after the war to be identified as death camps under German control were those located within the Soviet sphere of influence, i.e., beyond the reach of Western investigators. Thus the claims about gas chambers there could not be challenged. The Soviets had been generating anti-German propaganda about such things since early on the war, and continued to perpetuate it long after its end.


So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

He shoots, he scores !!! Foo for the Win.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
.
I had no idea the Hitler was such a humanitarian and so concerned with the welfare of the Jews.
The things that one can learn on the Fire.
Who knew ?
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

He shoots, he scores !!! Foo for the Win.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Technically we are at 16 pages now lol
7 pages if you're doing it right.
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Try to keep up, John. The above concerns the observation that the only camps that continued after the war to be identified as death camps under German control were those located within the Soviet sphere of influence, i.e., beyond the reach of Western investigators. Thus the claims about gas chambers there could not be challenged. The Soviets had been generating anti-German propaganda about such things since early on the war, and continued to perpetuate it long after its end.


So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?

Up for the response.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Heck, the TU 95 is even older than the B 52.

The B-52 still gets it done.
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

He shoots, he scores !!! Foo for the Win.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Ghey
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
Just Kidding! It is a commonly known fact that the victims entered the showers naked.
The showers were for showering, so naked would be the right way to enter them. Delousing of clothing was done in completely different facilities (with high tech, sealed, doors marked with skulls and crossbones and danger warnings). There were no fake shower rooms. They all had functioning shower heads, with running hot and cold water, absent any mechanism for introducing any sort of gas. Many inmates included in their memoirs how they appreciated the opportunity to shower on a daily basis in them, and how they'd get up early in order to avoid the crowds that gathered there for showers.
Originally Posted by Hastings
I am so glad I ran across this discussion. I had no idea how kindly the Nazis treated their Jewish citizens. All these years I had been told the Jews and other undesirables were loaded up and taken off to camps designed to murder them and efficiently dispose of the bodies.

Now I find out the Germans were just moving them out of harms way and taking them to nice places where they could shower and then have nice well fumigated barracks free from lice and vermin.

If the Americans, British, and Russians would not have cut off the food supply we would have never seen the awful photographs of starving typhus infected guests at the German civilian protection camps.

Those of us that had the temerity to think the Jewish citizens of Third Reich controlled territory were murdered owe a heartfelt apology to the Germans and our resident anti-Semites for the slander we put on them.



My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
You do realize I was being sarcastic to the max I hope. Holocaust deniers know better. They approve of Hitler's solution is the only thing I can figure.



Yes, I know. A little humor or baiting is all it takes to smoke out these Holocaust deniers. And they will go on for days with their "proof"

Well, that and the moon landing.....
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Originally Posted by SupFoo
Watch this folks, Campfire chattering class is about to perform it's amazing trick of turning a Fake News post into a 15 page thread.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

He shoots, he scores !!! Foo for the Win.

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Technically we are at 16 pages now lol

Only if you're a tard who does not know how to work the internet.

Originally Posted by Teal
7 pages if you're doing it right.

[Linked Image from imagizer.imageshack.com]
You guys never let me down. Thanks !!!

[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Okay.

Are you just quibbling about the method of mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans or claiming there was no mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans?
I'm saying that "It is true that there were no extermination camps on German soil." - Simon Wiesenthal

In other words, while it was originally claimed that all the German camps were extermination camps, after investigation by Western historians following the war, the claim that an extermination program was underway in the camps that were subject to Western examination after the war had to be abandoned. All that was left after that were the Soviet claims that the camps under their ambit of control after the war had indeed been extermination camps, with gas chambers and all.

This, however, was a mere continuation of their wartime propaganda program against Germany. After the end of the Cold War, their claims could not be upheld as true. In fact, when pressed, the curator of Auschwitz was forced to admit that the gas chamber people visit there is a prop, constructed by the Soviets after the war. It had actually been a bomb shelter during the war onto which the Soviets added ports on top through which they proposed that the Germans poured Zyklon B on top of the Jews who were locked inside.

It's a fake. In fact, Zyklon B cannot even be used that way. It comes in the form of little pebbles that are perfectly safe until heated to high heat in a specialized machine with a blower.
This thread reveals that TRH is making a play for Jags KOTY status. They’re neck in neck.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Okay.

Are you just quibbling about the method of mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans or claiming there was no mass murder of Jews and others by the Germans?
I'm saying that "It is true that there were no extermination camps on German soil." - Simon Wiesenthal

In other words, while it was originally claimed that all the German camps were extermination camps, after investigation by Western historians following the war, the claim that an extermination program was underway in the camps subject to Western examination after the war had to be abandoned. All that was left after that were the Soviet claims that the camps under their ambit of control after the war had indeed been extermination camps, with gas chambers and all.

This, however, was a mere continuation of their wartime propaganda against Germany. After the end of the Cold War, their claims could not be upheld as true. In fact, when pressed, the curator of Auschwitz was forced to admit that the gas chamber people visit there is a prop, constructed by the Soviets after the war. It had actually been a bomb shelter during the war onto which the Soviets added ports on top through which they proposed that the Germans poured Zyklon B on top of the Jews who were locked inside.

It's a fake. In fact, Zyklon B cannot even be used that way. It comes in the form of little pebbles that are perfectly safe until heated to high heat in a specialized machine with a blower.

Okay.

I'll ask more directly.

Do you believe the Germans conducted systemic mass murder of Jews and others?

I really don't care about the means of the mass murder or whether it happened in Germany or Poland.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
My father went on 2 missions into the Dachau camps. He rarely spoke about it, but did infrequently tell me short stories about what he saw.

Don't ever believe these wacko nutbag history revisionists here. The Holocaust was real.
"The Holocaust" is a doctrinal rubric. There were certainly real things that happened during WWII, and lots of people were mistreated, suffered, and died, on all sides. Nobody denies that. The questions relate to the existence of a program of mass murder of Jews. That's where the arguments break down, and aren't supported by real facts.

PS No legitimate historians any longer even claim that there were homicidal gas chambers at Dachau. In fact, all allegations regarding gas chambers in any camp outside the post-war control of the Soviet Union have been dropped by all serious historians.

35 years ago when I toured Dachau, they said there were no gassing showers there. The gasding took place at a nearby facitlity.

The idea that Germans would not have rejected Holocaust lies as false is as unrealistic as your lies.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Okay.

I'll ask more directly.

Do you believe the Germans conducted systemic mass murder of Jews and others?

I really don't care about the means of the mass murder or whether it happened in Germany or Poland.
I thought I'd been clear on that. No. That started as Soviet war propaganda, and once Germany was prostrate, the West decided they could play that angle up to justify to the world what they had planned to do to Germany.

Were there war crimes? Yes, on all sides.
So, let me get this right...

Putin didn't nuke us? And now the holocaust didn't happen?

Lol.
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.
Originally Posted by plumbum
35 years ago when I toured Dachau, they said there were no gassing showers there. The gasding took place at a nearby facitlity.
Do you dare contradict the word of Simon Wiesenthal??
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.


Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.

Originally Posted by NVhntr
Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?

He's not so good at interneting.

I read his post as directed to TRH but I am good a diciphering gibberish.
If your going to call someone a Holocaust Denier you should at least address the correct person.
Originally Posted by NVhntr
If your going to call someone a Holocaust Denier you should at least address the correct person.

I thought it was pretty clear he was addressing TRK.

The multi quotes can get cumbersome - we’ve all done it.
Thank God (Rik Bin) for the UP button
I remember as a child my dad said when he was a prisoner of war in Germany he was “ de loused” at I believed a concentration camp.

But I never really followed it up …….

I can’t imagine it’s all fake?

Did they sell tin foil back then?

Was it rationed?
The Germans didn’t kill six million Jews in the camps, they killed more like two to three million in the camps. In the Soviet Union, Poland, and the Baltics they killed at least three million Jews by shooting. Of course, they killed a lot more civilians who weren’t Jews than that. They also killed at least as many, probably more, Soviet Prisoners of war in camps than they did Jews in the camps. Around three million Soviet prisoners of war died in POW camps.

There is no doubt that Hitler wanted to rid Germany of its Jews. Before the war, they wanted to send them to Palestine and maybe, Madagascar. That’s historical fact. Once the war started, they couldn’t ship them anywhere and frankly no one wanted them. Roosevelt refused to accept an mere shipload of Jews and they were turned down at port after until the ship was forced to return Europe.

I don’t think there is any doubt Jews were worked to death and many killed outright. But, lots of things get lost in the shuffle. More were killed by shooting than any other means and there were relatively few German soldiers involved. What they did would have been impossible without the enthusiastic help of the local populations in Poland, Ukraine, the Baltics, and elsewhere. Only in a few countries was there any official resistance to getting rid of the Jews. Most of the ones in the camps came from Western countries where they would have balked at shooting them but were only too happy to load them onto trains, steal all their stuff, and ship them east.

About six million Polish citizens died during the war. About half of them were Poles and the rest were Jews. So of the alleged six million Jews who died, half were Polish and as many non-Jew Poles died as Jews. About two million Soviet Jews were killed. Of course, 19 million Soviet civilians who weren’t Jews were killed as well. And of course, almost 4 million German civilians died in the war.

From say October 1944 to the end of the war there were around one million deaths a month. I’m just not all that worked up by the Jews anymore. A bunch of them got killed. Welcome to the party. It was the biggest war in human history and most of them lived in the area where the bulk of the people who got killed lived. Were they targeted? Yeah, probably. That doesn’t make them any more or less dead than anyone else. Hitler was no more or less evil than any number of people like Ghengis Khan (who killed at least a tenth of the world’s population), Timurlaine, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and many others simply because he chose to direct a big portion of his efforts towards Jews.
OK, I guess we can agree that Hitler was no worse than Tamerlane or maybe Genghis Khan so he was an OK guy.
First World War anti-German propaganda.

[Linked Image from imgc.artprintimages.com]

[Linked Image from upload.wikimedia.org]

Of course, after the war, Germany still existed, so it could publicly contradict it. As a result, it was eventually accepted that it wasn't true, having been mere war propaganda.
Originally Posted by Hastings
OK, I guess we can agree that Hitler was no worse than Tamerlane or maybe Genghis Khan so he was an OK guy.

I suspect when everyone who was alive then is dead, and one group of people no longer wants to milk the victimhood teat above all other groups, Hitler will be looked at with the same detachment by history all those other guys.

Whatever happened back then, I didn’t do it, I refuse to feel guilty about, nor do I feel the need to try and compare every modern situation to it and look for lessons in it. About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
OK, I guess we can agree that Hitler was no worse than Tamerlane or maybe Genghis Khan so he was an OK guy.

I suspect when everyone who was alive then is dead, and one group of people no longer wants to milk the victimhood teat above all other groups, Hitler will be looked at with the same detachment by history all those other guys.

Whatever happened back then, I didn’t do it, I refuse to feel guilty about, nor do I feel the need to try and compare every modern situation to it and look for lessons in it. About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.
Well now, it might be that Jews were a special target, not just collateral damage. It might be that Jews are not much over 1% of the population of the world but get singled out most likely due to envy over their high level of achievement and intelligence.

It most of all might have to do with the percentage of their population killed in the war without regard to sex, age, or any other condition. All that was required was to be a Jew.

Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.


Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?



Relax. It's directed at TRH. Including your post was only to add context Of the documentary I saw.
Originally Posted by JohnBurns
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.

Originally Posted by NVhntr
Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?

He's not so good at interneting.

I read his post as directed to TRH but I am good a diciphering gibberish.




I don't ever post gibberish, you stupid fugk. I've explained why I included his post, genius.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
OK, I guess we can agree that Hitler was no worse than Tamerlane or maybe Genghis Khan so he was an OK guy.

I suspect when everyone who was alive then is dead, and one group of people no longer wants to milk the victimhood teat above all other groups, Hitler will be looked at with the same detachment by history all those other guys.

Whatever happened back then, I didn’t do it, I refuse to feel guilty about, nor do I feel the need to try and compare every modern situation to it and look for lessons in it. About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.
Well now, it might be that Jews were a special target, not just collateral damage. It might be that Jews are not much over 1% of the population of the world but get singled out most likely due to envy over their high level of achievement and intelligence.

It most of all might have to do with the percentage of their population killed in the war without regard to sex, age, or any other condition. All that was required was to be a Jew.

Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.
Al Gore made a documentary.

It won more awards than the ones bout the hoaxocaust.

But then it's easy ta convince people that ya can show half a head and will therefore conclude six mil died.
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.

That's what you're going with? Final answer?
Postin amorphous statistics ta justify a result went out with bolo-19.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.
How DARE you question a 79 yr old member with 20 year membership pen

No links posted, etc
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.

That's what you're going with? Final answer?

Sure, why not? Got to be some reason why Dutch Jews were eliminated at a much higher percentage than they were in Belgium and France, or anywhere else in Europe for that matter.
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.



I know. Right?

Talk about the scope creep..
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of non combatant Gypsies died and what percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations. I admit I don't have the breakdown by ethnicity but it is generally conceded that 1/2 or more of continental European Jews did not survive the war

By the way, lets don't consider the Jews killed in the Warsaw uprising as combatant Jews please.

And JoeBob, do you approve of lethal elimination of Jews?
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.



I know. Right?

Talk about the scope creep..
There is no Soviet Union anymore.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.



I know. Right?

Talk about the scope creep..
There is no Soviet Union anymore.

Apparently no holocaust either.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.



I know. Right?

Talk about the scope creep..
There is no Soviet Union anymore.
And the Germans didn’t kill some ethnicity severely? You’re being questioned for that ,brother.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations.

The International Red Cross, who had access to the camps throughout the war, right after the war went to great lengths to calculate an accurate figure for that, so you are in luck. They figured about 271,000 total deaths in the camps (mostly during the last months of the war, and mostly from typhus), of which about half were Jewish.

They also noted that, despite many visits to the camps during their operation, they witnessed no evidence of a mass murder program of any sort, and no gas chambers. In fact, they inspected the shower facilities in every camp to make sure they functioned correctly, so that inmates could regularly bathe themselves. No fake showers were found.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations.

The International Red Cross, who had access to the camps throughout the war, right after the war went to great lengths to calculate an accurate figure for that, so you are in luck. They figured about 271,000 total deaths in the camps (mostly during the last months of the war, and mostly from typhus), of which about half were Jewish. They also note that, despite many visits to the camps, they saw no evidence of a mass murder program of any sort, and no gas chambers.
Well, I am relieved to hear that.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of non combatant Gypsies died and what percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations. I admit I don't have the breakdown by ethnicity but it is generally conceded that 1/2 or more of continental European Jews did not survive the war

By the way, lets don't consider the Jews killed in the Warsaw uprising as combatant Jews please.

And JoeBob, do you approve of lethal elimination of Jews?

See, you can’t even have your narrative questioned in the slightest way, without quickly accusing someone of anti-Semitism. I’ll bet you got pissed when people who said “All lives matter” got accused of being racist for not saying “Black lives matter.” I don’t approve of the lethal elimination of any human being. Jews are no better or worse than any other and don’t deserve special victimhood status.
Biggest victory for the jews wasn't Israel, but gettin white people to virtue signal bout the holocaust.
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Biggest victory for the jews wasn't Israel, but gettin white people to virtue signal bout the holocaust.
grin
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of non combatant Gypsies died and what percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations. I admit I don't have the breakdown by ethnicity but it is generally conceded that 1/2 or more of continental European Jews did not survive the war

By the way, lets don't consider the Jews killed in the Warsaw uprising as combatant Jews please.

And JoeBob, do you approve of lethal elimination of Jews?

See, you can’t even have your narrative questioned in the slightest way, without quickly accusing someone of anti-Semitism. I’ll bet you got pissed when people who said “All lives matter” got accused of being racist for not saying “Black lives matter.” I don’t approve of the lethal elimination of any human being. Jews are no better or worse than any other and don’t deserve special victimhood status.
I guess my question was somewhat accusatory in the context of this whole discussion so I will apologize for that. But I do wonder about some of our members here that seem to have an abiding distaste for the Jewish people with some even siding with and justifying the recent attack by the Arabs that was well coordinated, murderous, and launched from the Gaza Ghetto using money and material donated by foreign benefactors for humanitarian relief.
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of non combatant Gypsies died and what percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations. I admit I don't have the breakdown by ethnicity but it is generally conceded that 1/2 or more of continental European Jews did not survive the war

By the way, lets don't consider the Jews killed in the Warsaw uprising as combatant Jews please.

And JoeBob, do you approve of lethal elimination of Jews?

See, you can’t even have your narrative questioned in the slightest way, without quickly accusing someone of anti-Semitism. I’ll bet you got pissed when people who said “All lives matter” got accused of being racist for not saying “Black lives matter.” I don’t approve of the lethal elimination of any human being. Jews are no better or worse than any other and don’t deserve special victimhood status.
I guess my question was somewhat accusatory in the context of this whole discussion so I will apologize for that. But I do wonder about some of our members here that seem to have an abiding distaste for the Jewish people with some even siding with and justifying the recent attack by the Arabs that was well coordinated, murderous, and launched from the Gaza Ghetto using money and material donated by foreign benefactors for humanitarian relief.

Do you winder about the distaste that people have for the race hustlers who make everything about “racism”?
Originally Posted by Hastings
Well, I am relieved to hear that.
Amazing how real facts are always in conflict with the received narrative on this subject, isn't it?
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.

That's what you're going with? Final answer?

Sure, why not? Got to be some reason why Dutch Jews were eliminated at a much higher percentage than they were in Belgium and France, or anywhere else in Europe for that matter.

See, here where speculation and supposition gets you in trouble. The primary cause of the high rate of capture was the near perfect population records of the Dutch civil service, and the failure of the various Dutch county authorities to destroy those records before they could fall in German hands. The Netherlands was overrun in a matter of days, and the Germans had learned from their earlier forays into Poland and other countries to control the civil service immediately.

Unlike Denmark, where 90% of the Jews survived mostly by fleeing in a flotilla of little gentile fishing boats across the Baltic to Sweden, The Netherlands was immediately occupied and governed by Germany, and no escape for the Jews across the North Sea was practical. The loss of the vast majority of Jews, including of course, Anne Frank, remains a black mark on the nation.

Even French Jews had a path to escape through the mountains to Switzerland or Spain. The % of jews lost in the war was generally correlated to the ability to leave and the level of organization and documentation of the individual country.
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.

That's what you're going with? Final answer?

Sure, why not? Got to be some reason why Dutch Jews were eliminated at a much higher percentage than they were in Belgium and France, or anywhere else in Europe for that matter.

See, here where speculation and supposition gets you in trouble. The primary cause of the high rate of capture was the near perfect population records of the Dutch civil service, and the failure of the various Dutch county authorities to destroy those records before they could fall in German hands. The Netherlands was overrun in a matter of days, and the Germans had learned from their earlier forays into Poland and other countries to control the civil service immediately.

Unlike Denmark, where 90% of the Jews survived mostly by fleeing in a flotilla of little gentile fishing boats across the Baltic to Sweden, The Netherlands was immediately occupied and governed by Germany, and no escape for the Jews across the North Sea was practical. The loss of the vast majority of Jews, including of course, Anne Frank, remains a black mark on the nation.

Even French Jews had a path to escape through the mountains to Switzerland or Spain. The % of jews lost in the war was generally correlated to the ability to leave and the level of organization and documentation of the individual country.

Like I said, the Dutch surrendered early and easily and their civil authorities were all too willing to cooperate with their German cousins.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Dutch
Originally Posted by JoeBob
About eight to ten times more non Jews died in that war than Jews did. So why do we insist on making it all about them? Answer that.

Total deaths attributed to WW2 in The Netherlands was 2.36% of the population.

Three quarters of the Dutch Jewish population died in WW2.

Any other questions?


Mainly because the Dutch were extra anxious to get rid of their Jews and not too anxious to fight the Germans.

That's what you're going with? Final answer?

Sure, why not? Got to be some reason why Dutch Jews were eliminated at a much higher percentage than they were in Belgium and France, or anywhere else in Europe for that matter.

See, here where speculation and supposition gets you in trouble. The primary cause of the high rate of capture was the near perfect population records of the Dutch civil service, and the failure of the various Dutch county authorities to destroy those records before they could fall in German hands. The Netherlands was overrun in a matter of days, and the Germans had learned from their earlier forays into Poland and other countries to control the civil service immediately.

Unlike Denmark, where 90% of the Jews survived mostly by fleeing in a flotilla of little gentile fishing boats across the Baltic to Sweden, The Netherlands was immediately occupied and governed by Germany, and no escape for the Jews across the North Sea was practical. The loss of the vast majority of Jews, including of course, Anne Frank, remains a black mark on the nation.

Even French Jews had a path to escape through the mountains to Switzerland or Spain. The % of jews lost in the war was generally correlated to the ability to leave and the level of organization and documentation of the individual country.

Like I said, the Dutch surrendered early and easily and their civil authorities were all too willing to cooperate with their German cousins.


Yeah, you said that. It doesn’t bother me at all when you are wrong.

Again, compare with the Danes. The Danes didn’t even fight, and negotiated for self rule. Both countries had moderate resistance levels that led to retribution actions in ‘43, including the start of round ups of the Jews. In Denmark, there were far fewer Jews than in The Netherlands, and far less concentrated.

Was there collaboration? Hell, yes, both in Denmark and in The Netherlands. The main difference was than in Denmark, the Jews were few enough that escape was possible, mostly in one night in ‘43, across the Baltic. In the Netherlands, Jewish survival depended on cooperation and protection from gentiles, at risk of death, for over two years. With all necessities of life rationed, food, fuel, clothing, travel, everything. In the harsh winter of ‘44/‘45, the population in occupied Holland was starving, literally, due to low food rations. Starving, as in eating tulip bulbs and rats. The Germans cut off all food shipments to the major Northern cities, and the allies literally made bombing runs with bread. An estimated 20,000 civilians starved to death. Hiding and keeping Jews fed under those circumstances was practically impossible.
Gilad Atzom, an ex-Jew who has written a lot on Judaism, has a simple formula: "Antisemitism used to mean you hate Jews. Now it means Jews hate you."
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Do you wonder about the distaste that people have for the race hustlers who make everything about “racism”?
I have mixed emotions on the racism issue and race hustlers. I despise the hue and cry of racism when the likes of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, or George Floyd end up dead because of their crimes. And the race hustlers such as Al Sharpton, Maxine Waters, and Ben Crump, et al are beneath contempt. But I was a child raised on a farm in the south in the late 50s and early 60s and I saw what was basically slavery and extreme racial discrimination. My parents weren't racist but we lived amongst an extended family and neighbors that were racist to the extreme. My father was a retired U.S Naval officer and almost 50 when I was born. We lived among my mother's relatives. In 1963 we moved to Utah for 5 years so we missed a lot of the turmoil.

Anyway, from what I witnessed as a child if I were black of that age I don't know if I would be forgiving. That said, we've made good progress in that our majority white parish (county) elected a good black lawman as sheriff for 5 terms and he served admirably and blacks enroll in our local university and work in just about all of the trades and professions here locally.

So, no I don't like race hustlers but I do understand why my best neighbor who is black and 68 years old hasn't quite let go of how his family was treated back then. I wouldn't completely let it go if it were me.

I think pre 1960s race problems in the USA being remembered correlate somewhat with the Jews and others not forgetting where anti Semitism ended up in the memory of some still living.
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Gilad Atzom, an ex-Jew who has written a lot on Judaism, has a simple formula: "Antisemitism used to mean you hate Jews. Now it means Jews hate you."
This. Although I thought it was Joe Sobran who came up with it.
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.
How DARE you question a 79 yr old member with 20 year membership pen

No links posted, etc

He he he, you are off by over a decade. No one that I know would have believed what came over on the radio via bs national news anyway. (no fricken links available.) 😀
Originally Posted by bearhuntr
Originally Posted by slumlord
Originally Posted by PaulBarnard
Are them goddam Soviet planes still in the sky? Sheesh.
How DARE you question a 79 yr old member with 20 year membership pen

No links posted, etc

He he he, you are off by over a decade. No one that I know would have believed what came over on the radio via bs national news anyway. (no fricken links available.) 😀
How 'bout pics ?
Got any pics ?


smile
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Hastings
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
Sure, a lot of people died in a most savage decade but percentage wise the Jews took the worst of it.

That’s not even true. By percentage more Gypsies died than Jews.
What percentage of noncombatant Jews died out of their respective populations.

The International Red Cross, who had access to the camps throughout the war, right after the war went to great lengths to calculate an accurate figure for that, so you are in luck. They figured about 271,000 total deaths in the camps (mostly during the last months of the war, and mostly from typhus), of which about half were Jewish.

They also noted that, despite many visits to the camps during their operation, they witnessed no evidence of a mass murder program of any sort, and no gas chambers. In fact, they inspected the shower facilities in every camp to make sure they functioned correctly, so that inmates could regularly bathe themselves. No fake showers were found.

Where did you get that?

https://www.icrc.org/en/document/icrc-wwii-holocaust
If the Jews in Europe were not rounded up and murdered what happened to them? Why were they rounded up and shipped to detention? For a country at war that would have been a huge drag on the war effort to have to locate and send millions of productive age citizens to summer camp and take them away from work and service.
Originally Posted by Hastings
If the Jews in Europe were not rounded up and murdered what happened to them? Why were they rounded up and shipped to detention? For a country at war that would have been a huge drag on the war effort to have to locate and send millions of productive age citizens to summer camp and take them away from work and service.

Only ordinary citizens were sent to forced labor in Germany. Jews were thought of so highly, they didn’t have to work in the war effort at all! Just leisure camps!
Originally Posted by Hastings
If the Jews in Europe were not rounded up and murdered what happened to them? Why were they rounded up and shipped to detention? For a country at war that would have been a huge drag on the war effort to have to locate and send millions of productive age citizens to summer camp and take them away from work and service.

You think the Germans were the ones doing the rounding up of the Jews? Ha, most countries couldn’t wait to do it for them.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by Hastings
If the Jews in Europe were not rounded up and murdered what happened to them? Why were they rounded up and shipped to detention? For a country at war that would have been a huge drag on the war effort to have to locate and send millions of productive age citizens to summer camp and take them away from work and service.

You think the Germans were the ones doing the rounding up of the Jews? Ha, most countries couldn’t wait to do it for them.
I think there is quite a bit of truth in what you say. I understand that once Romania came under German "protection" the Romanians gleefully killed their Jews.

What was the impetus to eliminate the Jews in continental Europe?
And I thought the discussion was about nukes.
Originally Posted by rainshot
And I thought the discussion was about nukes.
No. We chase whatever rabbit jumps up.
Originally Posted by Hastings
If the Jews in Europe were not rounded up and murdered what happened to them?
Many died in the camps during the last (European theater) months of the war, due to sudden overcrowding (a result of the German withdrawal), lack of supplies like food, medicine, potable water, pesticide for the control of typhus-spreading lice, etc. (the result of allied bombing and strafing raids), many moved to Palestine (The Nazis established over 100 settlements for them in Western Galilee - research the Haavara Agreement), and many simply ended up behind the Iron Curtain after the war. But, according to the World Almanac, despite all this, the world's Jewish population actually rose when measured before and after the war (15,748,091 – 15,753,638).
Quote
Why were they rounded up and shipped to detention? For a country at war that would have been a huge drag on the war effort to have to locate and send millions of productive age citizens to summer camp and take them away from work and service.
The camps were work camps. Not all Jews were sent there, though.

During this time period, Jewish and communist were nearly synonymous, so any rounding up of communists (presumed Soviet sympathizers/operatives) would necessarily involve a large percentage of Jews.

Germany was at war with communism in the form of the Soviet Union. Jews were known sympathizers and supporters of the Soviet Union during this period, and went to no great lengths to hide this fact. Germany made essentially the same calculation that the FDR administration did vis a vis Japanese Americans, that is to say (after the continuation of the relocation program to Palestine was made impossible due to the outbreak of world war), interned them.
Originally Posted by plumbum
Where did you get that?
The International Red Cross published a three volume report immediately after the war in which that information is contained.
My dad’s recollection of being in a prisoner of war camp by the Germans was not one of accommodations.

He was lucky to escape, the SS arrived with a deuce and half type truck, wanted all officers to load up.

He stripped off his rank, entered the enlisted barracks .The enlisted men gave him a wire cutter, told him to leave.

If he didn’t leave the enlisted men believed they would all be executed.

A polish officer went with him. He said it was harder to escape from the French, who captured him escaping the Germans.

My dad was 100% German…..the French of course captured him out of uniform.

When I served in Germany in the 8 th ID in the eighties …I couldn’t believe how many times I thought I saw my Dad.

Many people in Germany looked like my Dad.
Originally Posted by Angus1895
My dad’s recollection of being in a prisoner of war camp by the Germans was not one of accommodations.

He was lucky to escape, the SS arrived with a deuce and half type truck, wanted all officers to load up.

He stripped off his rank, entered the enlisted barracks .The enlisted men gave him a wire cutter, told him to leave.

If he didn’t leave the enlisted men believed they would all be executed.

A polish officer went with him. He said it was harder to escape from the French, who captured him escaping the Germans.

My dad was 100% German…..the French of course captured him out of uniform.

When I served in Germany in the 8 th ID in the eighties …I couldn’t believe how many times I thought I saw my Dad.

Many people in Germany looked like my Dad.



Thank God the Russian beat the German nazis and helped save your Dad's life .

Is that why you hate Putin now?
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.


Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?

lol confused boomer
The Germans are notoriously careless bookkeepers (said no one with afucking brain…ever). Their own books show detailed data regarding who, when and where they rounded up. I’m no fan of Jews in general but I’m even more disgusted by revisionist bullshit! Never did the Nazis at Nuremberg say it “didn’t happen”…why?…..because it did happen and their own pen along with copious volumes of detailed bookkeeping convicted them! If we can’t trust their own records then we simply need to look at the evidence from the mass graves, the stories of the locals (who also never claimed that it didn’t happen only that they “didn’t know”). It’s only now 80 years later, after our grandfathers are no longer around…..you remember the greatest generation that WAS ACTUALLY there?…..can no longer defend against the stupid bullshit that some try to rewrite the truth. I don’t give 2fucks about whether it was 2 million Jews or 6 million Jews but the notion that more than a half a decade of rounding up Jews and shipping them via railway only resulted in a couple hundred thousand Jews dying of secondary or accidental deaths flies in the face of EVERYTHING that the Nazis wrote in detail about accomplishing!

Every once in awhile these ridiculous retards crawl out into the sunlight in the safety of their basements claiming they know better than the detailed German records. You don’t have to like the Jews to accept the truth…
Originally Posted by ribka
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by NVhntr
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
So, all of the records that the SS kept and were captured by the western allies were fake?
Let's see them.

You’re the one making outlandish claims. The burden of proof is on you.


They murdered a LOT of people without gas. I guess you've never seen the German locals paraded past and forced to look at stacks and stacks of dead and disfigured bodies. The documentary I saw the other night had a man's head submerged in a plastic case full of liquid sawed perfectly in half down the middle of his head. One eye and half his nose peering eerily from the one side. But I didn't check to see if he was gassed, shot or starved to death.

You Holocaust deniers really are a bunch of kooks.


Are you confused?
My post was addressed to TRH to provide evidence of his claims.
What outlandish claims did I make?

lol confused boomer



There was no confusion. The You was meant to be en groupe'.

Do "YOU" Understand what the word Ustedes means?

Read some more.
History has a lot of documentation and documentaries with PICTURES. And BTW, There was no AI back then.

Clown world.
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
The Germans are notoriously careless bookkeepers (said no one with afucking brain…ever). Their own books show detailed data regarding who, when and where they rounded up. I’m no fan of Jews in general but I’m even more disgusted by revisionist bullshit! Never did the Nazis at Nuremberg say it “didn’t happen”…why?…..because it did happen and their own pen along with copious volumes of detailed bookkeeping convicted them! If we can’t trust their own records then we simply need to look at the evidence from the mass graves, the stories of the locals (who also never claimed that it didn’t happen only that they “didn’t know”). It’s only now 80 years later, after our grandfathers are no longer around…..you remember the greatest generation that WAS ACTUALLY there?…..can no longer defend against the stupid bullshit that some try to rewrite the truth. I don’t give 2fucks about whether it was 2 million Jews or 6 million Jews but the notion that more than a half a decade of rounding up Jews and shipping them via railway only resulted in a couple hundred thousand Jews dying of secondary or accidental deaths flies in the face of EVERYTHING that the Nazis wrote in detail about accomplishing!

Every once in awhile these ridiculous retards crawl out into the sunlight in the safety of their basements claiming they know better than the detailed German records. You don’t have to like the Jews to accept the truth…



Thank you, Aces. Hope these Holocaust deniers don't have any kids.

IMY FATHER WAS AT DACHAU TWICE. TOLD ME ABOUT WHAT HE SAW, AND HE WEREN'T NO LIAR.

I mentioned it prior and got no responses from these history revisionists.
Cheese and Rice! Those bombers have been in the air a long time! I thought they only had an 11,000 mile range.
Originally Posted by ribka
.


lol confused boomer

ribka, gets his ass handed to him (again) by a boomer
Originally Posted by shaman
Cheese and Rice! Those bombers have been in the air a long time! I thought they only had an 11,000 mile range.


well, the Bears are propellor driven, so it takes awhile.

russkies have 85 jet bombers (65 of Tu 22 and 20 of Tu 16) compared to 62 of B-1B, 76 of B52H, 20 of B-2 and one B-21 Raider, all of them use jets.
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
The Germans are notoriously careless bookkeepers (said no one with afucking brain…ever). Their own books show detailed data regarding who, when and where they rounded up. I’m no fan of Jews in general but I’m even more disgusted by revisionist bullshit! Never did the Nazis at Nuremberg say it “didn’t happen”…why?…..because it did happen and their own pen along with copious volumes of detailed bookkeeping convicted them! If we can’t trust their own records then we simply need to look at the evidence from the mass graves, the stories of the locals (who also never claimed that it didn’t happen only that they “didn’t know”). It’s only now 80 years later, after our grandfathers are no longer around…..you remember the greatest generation that WAS ACTUALLY there?…..can no longer defend against the stupid bullshit that some try to rewrite the truth. I don’t give 2fucks about whether it was 2 million Jews or 6 million Jews but the notion that more than a half a decade of rounding up Jews and shipping them via railway only resulted in a couple hundred thousand Jews dying of secondary or accidental deaths flies in the face of EVERYTHING that the Nazis wrote in detail about accomplishing!

Every once in awhile these ridiculous retards crawl out into the sunlight in the safety of their basements claiming they know better than the detailed German records. You don’t have to like the Jews to accept the truth…
Spot on
Originally Posted by gunchamp
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
The Germans are notoriously careless bookkeepers (said no one with afucking brain…ever). Their own books show detailed data regarding who, when and where they rounded up. I’m no fan of Jews in general but I’m even more disgusted by revisionist bullshit! Never did the Nazis at Nuremberg say it “didn’t happen”…why?…..because it did happen and their own pen along with copious volumes of detailed bookkeeping convicted them! If we can’t trust their own records then we simply need to look at the evidence from the mass graves, the stories of the locals (who also never claimed that it didn’t happen only that they “didn’t know”). It’s only now 80 years later, after our grandfathers are no longer around…..you remember the greatest generation that WAS ACTUALLY there?…..can no longer defend against the stupid bullshit that some try to rewrite the truth. I don’t give 2fucks about whether it was 2 million Jews or 6 million Jews but the notion that more than a half a decade of rounding up Jews and shipping them via railway only resulted in a couple hundred thousand Jews dying of secondary or accidental deaths flies in the face of EVERYTHING that the Nazis wrote in detail about accomplishing!

Every once in awhile these ridiculous retards crawl out into the sunlight in the safety of their basements claiming they know better than the detailed German records. You don’t have to like the Jews to accept the truth…
Spot on

THIS. I've SEEN the records. If it would have been any other country, but not the Germans.
Originally Posted by AcesNeights
The Germans are notoriously careless bookkeepers (said no one with afucking brain…ever). Their own books show detailed data regarding who, when and where they rounded up. I’m no fan of Jews in general but I’m even more disgusted by revisionist bullshit! Never did the Nazis at Nuremberg say it “didn’t happen”…why?…..because it did happen and their own pen along with copious volumes of detailed bookkeeping convicted them! If we can’t trust their own records then we simply need to look at the evidence from the mass graves, the stories of the locals (who also never claimed that it didn’t happen only that they “didn’t know”). It’s only now 80 years later, after our grandfathers are no longer around…..you remember the greatest generation that WAS ACTUALLY there?…..can no longer defend against the stupid bullshit that some try to rewrite the truth. I don’t give 2fucks about whether it was 2 million Jews or 6 million Jews but the notion that more than a half a decade of rounding up Jews and shipping them via railway only resulted in a couple hundred thousand Jews dying of secondary or accidental deaths flies in the face of EVERYTHING that the Nazis wrote in detail about accomplishing!

Every once in awhile these ridiculous retards crawl out into the sunlight in the safety of their basements claiming they know better than the detailed German records. You don’t have to like the Jews to accept the truth…
Like being Japanese American in the 1940s made one instantly suspect of being an Imperial Japan sympathizer/partizan, being Jewish (which was, at that time, nearly synonymous with communist) in Germany or its occupied territories instantly made one suspect of being a Soviet sympathizer/partizan.

I don't excuse it in either America or Germany (a crime in both cases), but that's what the round up and internment was about in both places.

It was only in the last months of the war that calamity occurred in the German run work/internment camps, resulting in huge numbers of deaths. The purpose of the camps, however, was internment and manufacture of products needed for the war, not genocide.

Glossing over that fact doesn't make you a good person. It just makes you ignorant of history.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
MY FATHER WAS AT DACHAU TWICE. TOLD ME ABOUT WHAT HE SAW, AND HE WEREN'T NO LIAR.
That's in Germany Right?

"It is true that there were no extermination camps on German soil." - Simon Wiesenthal
So this thread got me curious and I looked it up. The only outright extermination and death camps were Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzek, and to some degree Auschwitz. That doesn’t mean people didn’t die at other places and conditions weren’t hard, that just means those camps in Poland were the places where death was the express purpose.

Curiously there are few to no records from those places or the records are only partial. Said records having never been created or having been destroyed. They say they have only ten percent of the records for Auschwitz. There are transport lists and things like that from other places to there that have allowed researchers to get an idea of how many people went through and who was sent where, but a certain amount of guesswork is involved.

I’m not offering judgement either way except to simply point out that those records don’t exist. It’s not surprising. If they ever existed, they certainly would have been destroyed before capture.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
So this thread got me curious and I looked it up. The only outright extermination and death camps were Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzek, and to some degree Auschwitz. That doesn’t mean people didn’t die at other places and conditions weren’t hard, that just means those camps in Poland were the places where death was the express purpose.

Curiously there are few to no records from those places or the records are only partial. Said records having never been created or having been destroyed. They say they have only ten percent of the records for Auschwitz. There are transport lists and things like that from other places to there that have allowed researchers to get an idea of how many people went through and who was sent where, but a certain amount of guesswork is involved.

I’m not offering judgement either way except to simply point out that those records don’t exist. It’s not surprising. If they ever existed, they certainly would have been destroyed before capture.
There would have been way too many duplicates for them all to have been destroyed.

There are plenty of records that contradict the narrative, however, which are glossed over for obvious reasons, such as communiques sent to camp commandants by their superiors complaining about deaths there being at a higher rate than would be expected at a typical manufacturing plant, and that greater care needs to be taken in regard to inmate safety and health.

We don't, however, see the types of messages we'd expect to see were the death camp narrative true, such as, "You are way behind on your quota of Jewish deaths, and need to increase the numbers per month." Such communiques simply don't exist. Odd, right?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
MY FATHER WAS AT DACHAU TWICE. TOLD ME ABOUT WHAT HE SAW, AND HE WEREN'T NO LIAR.
That's in Germany Right?

"It is true that there were no extermination camps on German soil." - Simon Wiesenthal



shove your childish geography up sideways. Millions of people died. That's the worm you cannot hide and have to eat.
So, where did 95% of the Dutch jews go? Summer camp? Palestine?
I don’t think “ Russia saved my Dads life”.

The way I remember it …..Stalins Russia was in cahoots with Hitler until they got double crossed by the nazis.

It is my impression that USA support for the Russian war effort , ( once they were attacked by their one time Allie’s the Axis), is what saved Russia.

I was stationed in Germany to protect the Fulda Gap. My boomer azz was trained to fight Soviets.

Guess it’s hard to let go , and feel the Love for ol puty boi.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
shove your childish geography up sideways. Millions of people died. That's the worm you cannot hide and have to eat.
Millions died during WWII, for sure, but not millions of Jews in German run camps.

Do you suppose the members of the International Red Cross were all secret Jew haters when they released their three volume, post-war, report estimating about a 160,000 total Jewish deaths (and about an equal number of non-Jewish deaths) having occurred in the German run camps, 30,000 of which having occurred at Auschwitz?

They also concluded that the majority of those deaths occurred during the last months of the European theater of war, and were generally attributed to typhus, due to overcrowding and loss of supplies during that period, such as food, potable water, medicine, and pesticides for the eradication of typhus-spreading lice.

The International Red Cross also included in that report that they had never seen, or heard any mention of, from inmates, a homicidal gas chamber (disguised as a shower or otherwise) or any indication of a genocidal program being carried out in the camps. They had a regular presence in the camps throughout the war.
Originally Posted by Dutch
So, where did 95% of the Dutch Jews go? Summer camp? Palestine?
Prior to the war, in all of what became German occupied Europe, there were about 3.4 million Jews. An estimated 2.2 million of them fled in the face of German occupation, mostly to the Soviet Union but, yes, many also to Palestine.
With reference to Germany alone, according to The World Jewish Congress, "The majority of German Jews succeeded in leaving Germany before the war broke out."

- Unity in Dispersion, p. 377
Originally Posted by Dutch
So, where did 95% of the Dutch jews go? Summer camp? Palestine?

They got shipped east by the collaborationist Dutch where a lot of them died.
The records exist, or at least a good portion of them. I SAW THEM at the National Archives when I was doing research on another topic.
How did this go from Russian bombers to Dutch Jews? Geez
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
shove your childish geography up sideways. Millions of people died. That's the worm you cannot hide and have to eat.
Millions died during WWII, for sure, but not millions of Jews in German run camps.

Do you suppose the members of the International Red Cross were all secret Jew haters when they released their three volume, post-war, report estimating about a 160,000 total Jewish deaths (and about an equal number of non-Jewish deaths) having occurred in the German run camps, 30,000 of which having occurred at Auschwitz?

They also concluded that the majority of those deaths occurred during the last months of the European theater of war, and were generally attributed to typhus, due to overcrowding and loss of supplies during that period, such as food, potable water, medicine, and pesticides for the eradication of typhus-spreading lice.

The International Red Cross also included in that report that they had never seen, or heard any mention of, from inmates, a homicidal gas chamber (disguised as a shower or otherwise) or any indication of a genocidal program being carried out in the camps. They had a regular presence in the camps throughout the war.


There were millions of "Jews" killed in the holocaust.Get it through your chrome plated head. And millions of "others". Your clinging to geography is puke worthy. It displays mental issues.
Originally Posted by viking
How did this go from Russian bombers to Dutch Jews? Geez
.
The Fire has its own Department of State and that's how they roll.
If something's effed up, then it was the Dutch Jews that did it.
Originally Posted by viking
How did this go from Russian bombers to Dutch Jews? Geez



The proclivity for Jew haters to constantly bring up Holocaust denial is strong.

I'm not Jewish. Nor am I a Jew hater or Jew lover. They are simply another strain of Adam and Eve, just like everybody else.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The records exist, or at least a good portion of them. I SAW THEM at the National Archives when I was doing research on another topic.
"The records" is meaningless. Records of what, specifically? No one doubts there were orders to intern them. Same with FDR vis a vis Japanese Americans.

I'll make this simple: Show me one official order to a camp commandant either ordering the carrying out of gassings of Jews (or anyone else), or a complaint about the killing of Jews going too slowly, or anything even close to that. If they existed, they'd be reproduced in all our history books.
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
There were millions of "Jews" killed in the holocaust.Get it through your chrome plated head. And millions of "others". Your clinging to geography is puke worthy. It displays mental issues.
If you'd put on your Columbo hat for a minute, you'd realize that geography is crucially important to the discussion. You see, originally, the claim was that all the German camps were death camps, along with elaborate stories of mass executions and gassings in them. Western investigation of the camps to which they had access (camps that were on our side of the Iron Curtain after the war), however, quickly revealed that said claims could not be supported, so they were abandoned by all. All that was then left were the claims maintained by the Soviets that the camps on their side of the Iron Curtain had indeed, during the war, been German-operated death camps. But this claim is a mere continuation of what had been Soviet war propaganda during the war vis a vis the Germans and, post Cold War, could not be substantiated.

In fact, the curator of Auschwitz, when pressured, was forced to admit that the structure they'd been promoting all along as the Auschwitz gas chamber had actually been a bomb shelter when under German control. The Soviets, upon capture, transformed it into a crude simulation (a prop) of a gas chamber by installing ports into the ceiling through which Zyklon B was said to have been tossed on top of Jews to kill them.

Leaving aside the issue of Zyklon B not working that way (it requires a machine to heat it to a high heat, with a blower), the way that "gas chamber" is constructed would result in the Germans being regularly wiped out by the poison gas. Just one example is that there are drains on the floor inside that lead to drainage pipes, which connect up to the drains in all the other buildings. The gas would have killed everyone in all those other buildings each time people were gassed in the "chamber."
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by local_dirt
There were millions of "Jews" killed in the holocaust.Get it through your chrome plated head. And millions of "others". Your clinging to geography is puke worthy. It displays mental issues.
If you'd put on your Columbo hat for a minute, you'd realize that geography is crucially important to the discussion. You see, originally, the claim was that all the German camps were death camps, along with elaborate stories of mass executions and gassings in them. Western investigation of the camps to which they had access (camps that were on our side of the Iron Curtain after the war), however, quickly revealed that said claims could not be supported, so they were abandoned by all. All that was then left were the claims maintained by the Soviets that the camps on their side of the Iron Curtain had indeed, during the war, been German-operated death camps. But this claim is a mere continuation of what had been Soviet war propaganda during the war vis a vis the Germans and, post Cold War, could not be substantiated.

In fact, the curator of Auschwitz, when pressured, was forced to admit that the structure they'd been promoting all along as the Auschwitz gas chamber had actually been a bomb shelter when under German control. The Soviets, upon capture, transformed it into a crude simulation (a prop) of a gas chamber by installing ports into the ceiling through which Zyklon B was said to have been tossed on top of Jews to kill them.

Leaving aside the issue of Zyklon B not working that way (it requires a machine to heat it to a high heat, with a blower), the way that "gas chamber" is constructed would result in the Germans being regularly wiped out by the poison gas. Just one example is that there are drains on the floor inside that lead to drainage pipes, which connect up to the drains in all the other buildings. The gas would have killed everyone in all those other buildings each time people were gassed in the "chamber."



Glad to see you've made something so important to your soul your life's work.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Leaving aside the issue of Zyklon B not working that way (it requires a machine to heat it to a high heat, with a blower), the way that "gas chamber" is constructed would result in the Germans being regularly wiped out by the poison gas. Just one example is that there are drains on the floor inside that lead to drainage pipes, which connect up to the drains in all the other buildings. The gas would have killed everyone in all those other buildings each time people were gassed in the "chamber."

Quick question: do you know the difference between Zyclon A and Zyclon B?

If I were you, I'd look into it. Perhaps ask a friend who is good at chemistry.

Ymmv

Also, how does a lighter than air gas do "down" piping?
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Glad to see you've made something so important to your soul your life's work.
This is one of the most important issues in the field of 20th century history.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by ribka
.


lol confused boomer

ribka, gets his ass handed to him (again) by a boomer



Ass clown, meet ass.
Originally Posted by viking
How did this go from Russian bombers to Dutch Jews? Geez

Well, the first was pretty much a non-event; as expected.

The other is a somewhat interesting exploration of an Egyptian river.
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Quick question: do you know the difference between Zyclon A and Zyclon B?

If I were you, I'd look into it. Perhaps ask a friend who is good at chemistry.

Ymmv

Also, how does a lighter than air gas do "down" piping?
It's Zyklon B (normally used as a pesticide) that's alleged to have been used in German gas chambers, thus the many images of the piles of empty cans of it whenever the topic is referenced in this context by advocates for the received narrative. It comes in the form of small stones that require heating to high heat to release the poison gas. This is done in a specialized machine with a blower. The contents of the cans, to be effective, cannot be simply dropped into a gas chamber from roof ports.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Quick question: do you know the difference between Zyclon A and Zyclon B?

If I were you, I'd look into it. Perhaps ask a friend who is good at chemistry.

Ymmv

Also, how does a lighter than air gas do "down" piping?
It's Zyklon B that's alleged to have been used in German gas chambers, thus the many images of the piles of empty cans of it whenever the topic is referenced in this context by advocates for the received narrative. It comes in the form of small stones that require heating to high heat to release the poison gas. This is done in a specialized machine with a blower. The contents of the cans, to be effective, cannot be simply dropped into a gas chamber from roof ports.


Is 27 degrees C "high heat" to you?

There is a reason I asked A vs B.
No one is stopping you, if you believe you have a point to make.

Is it your contention that it can be merely dropped into a room containing people to kill them? Sounds like very dangerous stuff to be handled regularly by exterminators.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
No one is stopping you, if you believe you have a point to make.


No, you are spouting your views without considering any other evidence, that is called belief.

27C is all it takes to vaporize Zyclon B. Is that "high heat?"

My point is you are making very basic mistakes with chemistry as a foundation. Do you not see this as a problem?

Also, how does a lighter than air gas go "down" the piping of the buildings? Noticed you ignored that question.



Regards
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
No one is stopping you, if you believe you have a point to make.

Is it your contention that it can be merely dropped into a room containing people to kill them? Sounds like very dangerous stuff to be handled regularly by exterminators.


Since you edited you post to add the last paragraph and the sarcasm. No one said it isn't very dangerous, it is. Hence, why the Nazis and exterminators use(d) it in enclosed spaces to KILL.
These A/C have supposedly been airborne for a week now, according to the dates on this thread.

You'd think they would have reached the Ukraine by now.. unless they flew around the world, and are attacking it from the west.

They either have one hell of a range, or they've landed 5 or 6 times or more to reach their 'target' by now.

Pretty sneaky of those Russians....
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Jcubed
Quick question: do you know the difference between Zyclon A and Zyclon B?

If I were you, I'd look into it. Perhaps ask a friend who is good at chemistry.

Ymmv

Also, how does a lighter than air gas do "down" piping?
It's Zyklon B (normally used as a pesticide) that's alleged to have been used in German gas chambers, thus the many images of the piles of empty cans of it whenever the topic is referenced in this context by advocates for the received narrative. It comes in the form of small stones that require heating to high heat to release the poison gas. This is done in a specialized machine with a blower. The contents of the cans, to be effective, cannot be simply dropped into a gas chamber from roof ports.

You don’t know what you don’t know. Or refuse to learn. You repeatedly state that it has to be heated to high temperature to work. It doesn’t.
Originally Posted by Jcubed
My point is you are making very basic mistakes with chemistry as a foundation.
This isn't a discussion of chemistry. It's merely a fact that Zyklon B must be used with specialized equipment (involving being heated) to be effective. Short of that, the pebbles it's contain in will not release the poison gas. This is by design, so that its users can do so with safety. We can argue about what the definition of high is, but heating is required.

But assuming, arguendo, that I were to concede your point, even the Auschwitz curator admited that the gas chamber there is a post war reconstruction of a German bomb shelter. It was transformed to look, he conceded, to the average uncritical tourist, like a gas chamber, but could not actually function as one. Not even close.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Jcubed
My point is you are making very basic mistakes with chemistry as a foundation.
This isn't a discussion of chemistry. It's merely a fact that Zyklon B must be used with specialized equipment (involving being heated) to be effective. Short of that, the pebbles it's contain in will not release the poison gas. This is by design, so that its users can do so with safety. We can argue about what the definition of high is, but heating is required.

But apparently it needs to be. Because you don’t know what you don’t know.
Originally Posted by AKwolverine
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Jcubed
My point is you are making very basic mistakes with chemistry as a foundation.
This isn't a discussion of chemistry. It's merely a fact that Zyklon B must be used with specialized equipment (involving being heated) to be effective. Short of that, the pebbles it's contain in will not release the poison gas. This is by design, so that its users can do so with safety. We can argue about what the definition of high is, but heating is required.

But apparently it needs to be. Because you don’t know what you don’t know.


This.

I am trying to help you out here.

I think you live in Florida, TRH...is 80F aka 27C "high heat" to you?

Just start there...

Also, you still haven't explained how a lighter than air gas goes though the underground piping into other buildings?

Your statement about zyclon b is not a "fact." (You won't even define high heat and a blower issue required when the chemical is released into a SEALED ROOM.)

The Nazis did have specialized equipment, they were called gas chambers with doors sealed so that the gas would be more effective.

The SS received specialized training from the chemical manufacturers about the handling etc of zyclon b. They were the only people authorized to use it, transport it, administer it, etc.

You statement on the "pebbles" won't release the gas, again, shows your ignorance of the chemistry.


As to the second paragraph in your post...

The Nazis destroyed the chambers. I could point you to resources to determine that on you own, but, you would ignore as you previously showed with Jorge.


You really need to consider your position because you are starting to sound like a Democrat politician.

Ignore the facts because you BELIEVE in your NARRATIVE.



Apparently, the Socratic method shall not be used on the campfire is a commandment. Apologies, I will just use X links in the future, though I don't have an account...bummer.
.
Whatever they did, it worked.
According to this article is was merely exposure to air that caused the pellets to gas off.
The pellets were sealed in cans.

What Was Zyklon B?
Zyklon B was an insecticide used in Germany before and during World War II to disinfect ships, barracks, clothing, warehouses, factories, granaries, and more.

It was produced in crystal form, creating amethyst-blue pellets. Since these Zyklon B pellets turned into a highly poisonous gas (hydrocyanic or prussic acid) when exposed to air, they were stored and transported in hermetically sealed metal canisters.
Originally Posted by Direct_Drive
.
Whatever they did, it worked.
According to this article is was merely exposure to air that caused the pellets to gas off.
The pellets were sealed in cans.

What Was Zyklon B?
Zyklon B was an insecticide used in Germany before and during World War II to disinfect ships, barracks, clothing, warehouses, factories, granaries, and more.

It was produced in crystal form, creating amethyst-blue pellets. Since these Zyklon B pellets turned into a highly poisonous gas (hydrocyanic or prussic acid) when exposed to air, they were stored and transported in hermetically sealed metal canisters.


Gotta remember too that the Germans had A LOT of experience with HCN from WW1.

They knew what they were doing.
"Shouting and screaming of the victims could be heard through the opening and it was clear that they fought for their lives"

~Johann Kremer, SS doctor (prescriber)


Piper, Franciszek (1994). "Gas Chambers and Crematoria". In Gutman, Yisrael; Berenbaum, Michael (eds.). Anatomy of the Auschwitz Death Camp. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 157–182. ISBN 0-253-32684-2.
Okay, J. For the sake of argument, I will concede that it doesn't need heating, and can be simply tossed into a room chock full of people from ports in the ceiling, and that this will be lethal for its occupants. Okay, what now? You have a room full of dead folks, and piles of Zyklon B pebbles on the floor emitting toxic gas (somehow). You need to kill your next batch of Jews. What do you do in order to prepare that room for the next batch?

And keep in mind, we're supposedly talking about the very efficient, and technologically advanced, 1940s Germans.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Okay, J. For the sake of argument, I will concede that it doesn't need heating, and can be simply tossed into a room chock full of people from ports in the ceiling, and that this will be lethal for its occupants. Okay, what now? You have a room full of dead folks, and piles of Zyklon B pebbles emitting toxic gas (somehow). You need to kill your next batch of Jews. What do you do in order to prepare that room for the next batch?


You "cede" a point but still attempt to validate more of your "facts."

Who said anything about "piles of zyclon b" being left in the chamber?

Again, you dont understand the basic science. If you continue to use these ignorant statements as a part of you argument, well, it makes the rest of your argument look pretty bad.

Something in the Bible about not building a house on a foundation of sand.

Ymmv

Oh, and if you do a quick Google search there are plenty of sources you can peruse to answer "what next"
It is just Cyanide. The same as has often been used in American gas chambers.

You clear the room of gas, and remove the bodies just like has been done with every cyanide execution in America.

Except on an industrial scale.
Originally Posted by Idaho_Shooter
It is just Cyanide. The same as has often been used in American gas chambers.

You clear the room of gas, and remove the bodies just like has been done with every cyanide execution in America.

Except on an industrial scale.


Ya don't say?

Did you Google that? 😉
Nobody tell TRH how they leach to recover his favorite metal gold.
So, at a time when the Germans were actually using Zyklon B regularly to rid clothing of lice in special fumigation chambers (chambers no one asserts were used for killing people), and when doing so, always used the manufacturer-recommended machinery for extracting (via heat) and introducing the resultant toxic gas into the chambers via blowers, you are suggesting that, when it came to gas chambers designed to kill large numbers of people, suddenly they couldn't remember that they had those machines set up in other rooms in the complex, and tried just tossing the Zyklon B pebbles in through ports in the ceiling??

Okay. Got it.
[Linked Image from i.postimg.cc]
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
So, at a time when the Germans were actually using Zyklon B regularly to kill lice in special fumigation chambers (chambers no one asserts were used for killing people), and when doing so, always used the manufacturer-recommended machinery for extracting (via heat) and introducing the resultant toxic gas into the chambers via blowers, you are suggesting that, when it came to gas chambers designed to kill large numbers of people, suddenly they couldn't remember that they had those machines set up in other rooms in the complex, and tried just tossing the Zyklon B pebbles in through ports in the ceiling??

Okay. Got it.


No. I said you don't understand the basic science.

And you continue to attempt to insert your "facts."



I'll ask you again...how does a lighter than air gas go "down" into the piping and travel to other buildings?
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Okay, J. For the sake of argument, I will concede that it doesn't need heating, and can be simply tossed into a room chock full of people from ports in the ceiling, and that this will be lethal for its occupants. Okay, what now? You have a room full of dead folks, and piles of Zyklon B pebbles emitting toxic gas (somehow). You need to kill your next batch of Jews. What do you do in order to prepare that room for the next batch?

And keep in mind, we're supposedly talking about the very efficient, and technologically advanced, 1940s Germans.

After about 20 minutes (after the screaming stopped), they would pump the contaminated air out of the room for about 15 minutes. Then they would send in Jewish prisoners (or other camp prisoners) to pull the dead bodies out. After the bodies were removed they would wash down the walls, ceiling and floor of the gas chamber and it would be ready for the next batch to be murdered.
Originally Posted by Jcubed
No. I said you don't understand the basic science.

And you continue to attempt to insert your "facts."



I'll ask you again...how does a lighter than air gas go "down" into the piping and travel to other buildings?
There is zero indication that the room in question (a room admitted by its curator to be a prop for tourists) was ever gas-sealed in any manner whatsoever, and every indication that it was not.

Oddly, however, the chambers in the same complex used to actually fumigate clothing with Zyklon B (chambers no one contends were ever used to kill people), were indeed sealed in a highly technologically advanced way, with very sophisticated doors and frames, chambers possessing built in methods for removing the gas afterwards so that workers could safely enter to retrieve the clothing.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by Jcubed
No. I said you don't understand the basic science.

And you continue to attempt to insert your "facts."



I'll ask you again...how does a lighter than air gas go "down" into the piping and travel to other buildings?
There is zero indication that the room in question (a room admitted by its curator to be a prop for tourists) was ever gas-sealed in any manner whatsoever.

Oddly, however, the chambers in the same complex used to actually fumigate clothing with Zyklon B (chambers no one contends were ever used to kill people), were indeed sealed in a highly technologically advanced way, with very sophisticated doors and frames, chambers with built in methods for removing the gas afterwards so that workers could safely enter to retrieve the clothing.


So you are saying the "prop for tourists" wasn't built to German gas chamber specs?

That's your argument?


Dude, are you on about the Jews today because it's Good Friday and, well you about Jesus and all...

Or is it that your family is Italian and during ww2 ol hitler and mussolini were good buds and you feel personally hurt evertime the holocaust is beought up?

Good Lord.
Originally Posted by Jcubed
So you are saying the "prop for tourists" wasn't built to German gas chamber specs?

That's your argument?
It was a German bomb shelter, modified by the Soviets after the war to look like something a tourist would take for a gas chamber, once told that's what it was.
Quote
Dude, are you on about the Jews today because it's Good Friday and, well you about Jesus and all...

Or is it that your family is Italian and during ww2 ol hitler and mussolini were good buds and you feel personally hurt evertime the holocaust is beought up?
Yeah, you got it, J. I'm just an old Mussolini fan from way back (good old El Duce), and today makes me mad at the Jews. Otherwise, I'd just accept all the nonsense propaganda as true.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Yeah, you got it, J. I'm just an old Mussolini fan from way back (good old El Duce), and today makes me mad at the Jews. Otherwise, I'd just accept all the nonsense propaganda as true.


You be you but the victim card really doesn't suit you.

Again, how does a lighter than air gas go "down" the piping and travel to other buildings?

Or will you avoid this question again?
Originally Posted by Jcubed
You be you but the victim card really doesn't suit you.

Again, how does a lighter than air gas go "down" the piping and travel to other buildings?

Or will you avoid this question again?
It's a moot point, as I've explained. I can concede it, for the sake of argument, and it doesn't advance your position one iota.
You really like to go back and edit you comments etc after I replied to your Original post.

You are not having an honest debate.
Silly man.
Play honest and we can chat.

Your lack of scientific knowledge in this case advances my point perfectly. You argued what you claimed wrere irrefutable "facts." When, in fact, you were completely wrong and it undermines the rest of everything you say.



Have a peaceful Good Friday, TRH.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Okay, J. For the sake of argument, I will concede that it doesn't need heating, and can be simply tossed into a room chock full of people from ports in the ceiling, and that this will be lethal for its occupants. Okay, what now? You have a room full of dead folks, and piles of Zyklon B pebbles on the floor emitting toxic gas (somehow). You need to kill your next batch of Jews. What do you do in order to prepare that room for the next batch?

And keep in mind, we're supposedly talking about the very efficient, and technologically advanced, 1940s Germans.

The logistics and required energy of the transport, killing (by gas anyway) and cremation and disposition of the six million, not ta mention the other six million non-jews, makes the claimed numbers impossible.
They shot many but soldiers started having mental problems over the constant murder of so many innocent people. Many died of starvation, sickness and disease. Able bodied men and youth were used in factories for slave labor. Young women were used as they wished in ways pretty despicable. Ukrainian men of that generation have testified that they murdered masses of Jews and threw them in pits. Eisenhower ordered documentation so the world “would never forget”. I’m not so sure Nazi weren’t democrats.
My dad said in prisoner of war camp.

The meat stew was filled with chunks of wood.

He believes the gaurds picked out the meat and replaced it with wood.

I think he lost almost a pound a day in body weight while incarcerated.
Did Ukrainian NAZis do this to your dad?


They sure killed a lot of joos in Ukraine, but now they are building a democracy in Ukraine lmao


Originally Posted by Angus1895
My dad said in prisoner of war camp.

The meat stew was filled with chunks of wood.

He believes the gaurds picked out the meat and replaced it with wood.

I think he lost almost a pound a day in body weight while incarcerated.
Originally Posted by RHOD
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Okay, J. For the sake of argument, I will concede that it doesn't need heating, and can be simply tossed into a room chock full of people from ports in the ceiling, and that this will be lethal for its occupants. Okay, what now? You have a room full of dead folks, and piles of Zyklon B pebbles emitting toxic gas (somehow). You need to kill your next batch of Jews. What do you do in order to prepare that room for the next batch?

And keep in mind, we're supposedly talking about the very efficient, and technologically advanced, 1940s Germans.

After about 20 minutes (after the screaming stopped), they would pump the contaminated air out of the room for about 15 minutes. Then they would send in Jewish prisoners (or other camp prisoners) to pull the dead bodies out. After the bodies were removed they would wash down the walls, ceiling and floor of the gas chamber and it would be ready for the next batch to be murdered.

Thank God we have pro Jooish president now like Trump. who would never let that happen again like bidumb
No he was a pilot in world war 2.

The plane he got shot down was the Maj Mac.

His was too shot up to fly that mission.

I guess the Maj Mac is a video game now..

He said most of the ground support men quit talking to him……

He had lost his mojo….kept getting hit….no g suits….pulling outta a dive can make the blood come outta yer head.

Attached picture 9885694D-A4D4-4F63-9CD6-6996119B87AA.jpeg
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.

I'm not on trial here. List of "inmates" by name, nationality, religion, sex, age for every "camp." I'm not going to do the work for you. There were pproximately eleven million European Jews and by 1945, they were notched down by about 4.7 M, not to mention homos, gypsies, etc. It's there. I am no fan of Jewry, but to continue to deny what the Germans did makes you look like an idiot.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.

I'm not on trial here. List of "inmates" by name, nationality, religion, sex, age for every "camp." I'm not going to do the work for you. There were pproximately eleven million European Jews and by 1945, they were notched down by about 4.7 M, not to mention homos, gypsies, etc. It's there. I am no fan of Jewry, but to continue to deny what the Germans did makes you look like an idiot.

Those lists, or at least not complete ones, do not exist for the camps in the east according to the National Archives.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.

I'm not on trial here. List of "inmates" by name, nationality, religion, sex, age for every "camp." I'm not going to do the work for you. There were pproximately eleven million European Jews and by 1945, they were notched down by about 4.7 M, not to mention homos, gypsies, etc. It's there. I am no fan of Jewry, but to continue to deny what the Germans did makes you look like an idiot.

Those lists, or at least not complete ones, do not exist for the camps in the east according to the National Archives.
And no one any longer alleges that the camps on our side of the Iron Curtain were "death camps." Just camps that suffered mass casualties in the last months of the war due to war-related conditions causing huge numbers of deaths from typhus. Such labels only applied to camps that Western investigators had no access to during the Cold War, so it was impossible to challenge the claims about them made by the Soviets.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.

I'm not on trial here. List of "inmates" by name, nationality, religion, sex, age for every "camp." I'm not going to do the work for you. There were pproximately eleven million European Jews and by 1945, they were notched down by about 4.7 M, not to mention homos, gypsies, etc. It's there. I am no fan of Jewry, but to continue to deny what the Germans did makes you look like an idiot.



This... times 1000.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Originally Posted by jorgeI
The National Archives...even you can get an account.. It is all there.
What, precisely, is "it" ? And don't say The Holocaust. What specifically do you allege is shown in those records? Provide specific quotes. If what you imply were correct, those quotes would have been drilled into the head of every school child by now.

I'm not on trial here. List of "inmates" by name, nationality, religion, sex, age for every "camp." I'm not going to do the work for you. There were pproximately eleven million European Jews and by 1945, they were notched down by about 4.7 M, not to mention homos, gypsies, etc. It's there. I am no fan of Jewry, but to continue to deny what the Germans did makes you look like an idiot.

Those lists, or at least not complete ones, do not exist for the camps in the east according to the National Archives.
And no one any longer alleges that the camps on our side of the Iron Curtain were "death camps." Just camps that suffered mass casualties in the last months of the war due to war-related conditions causing huge numbers of deaths from typhus. Such labels only applied to camps that Western investigators had no access to during the Cold War, so it was impossible to challenge the claims about them made by the Soviets.




Straight up 100% horseschit.
Originally Posted by local_dirt
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
And no one any longer alleges that the camps on our side of the Iron Curtain were "death camps." Just camps that suffered mass casualties in the last months of the war due to war-related conditions causing huge numbers of deaths from typhus. Such labels only applied to camps that Western investigators had no access to during the Cold War, so it was impossible to challenge the claims about them made by the Soviets.
Straight up 100% horseschit.
Immediately after the defeat of the Germans, both the US and the Brits made documentary movies about the camps they had gained access to. They clearly state in those documentaries the cause of deaths (typhus), and emphasized that a large percentage of the survivors were suffering from it, too, requiring immediate and intensive treatment to avoid them dying as well.

The liberating forces brought in massive medical resources and personnel to deal with it, along with an effort to control the typhus-spreading lice. Ultimately, they chose to burn down all the structures to kill the lice.

Typhus was a massive problem, resulting in mass casualties, all documented on film with narration to that effect by the two nations under the auspices of their respective militaries.

The documentary films didn't get widespread distribution because the decision had been made, shortly after their production, to play up the death camp/genocide narrative, and the typhus information tended to contradict that.
Some "light reading" for the kooks among us

For the Sgt Schultz crowd
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Some "light reading" for the kooks among us

For the Sgt Schultz crowd
Thanks for sharing. Beyond troubling that many here deny this objective reality.
My Dad refused to watch Hogans Heroes.
Extremely odd in their absence are any mentions of this issue by the authors of the three most significant and comprehensive books about the history of WWII, Churchill (The Second World War), De Gaulle (Memories De Geurre), and Eisenhower (Crusade in Europe).

These three books were published between 1948 and 1959.

Not one mention.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Extremely odd in their absence are any mentions of this issue by the authors of the three most significant and comprehensive books about the history of WWII, Churchill (The Second World War), De Gaulle (Memories De Geurre), and Eisenhower (Crusade in Europe).

These three books were published between 1948 and 1959.

Not one mention.

That's all you've got? The term "Holocaust" into vogue until much after these memoirs were published, but Churchill did most definitively address the issue: From Freeman, head of the Churchill Institute:

A July 1944 letter Churchill wrote about "German plans for the massacre of the Hungarian Jews."

"There is no doubt in my mind that we are in the presence of one of the greatest and most horrible crimes ever committed," Churchill said in the letter. "It has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilized men in the name of a great state and one of the leading races of Europe. I need not assure you that the situation has received and will receive the most earnest consideration from my colleagues and myself but, as the Foreign Secretary said, the principal hope of terminating it must remain the speedy victory of the Allied Nations."

Let me know when you need another lesson...
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
Extremely odd in their absence are any mentions of this issue by the authors of the three most significant and comprehensive books about the history of WWII, Churchill (The Second World War), De Gaulle (Memories De Geurre), and Eisenhower (Crusade in Europe).

These three books were published between 1948 and 1959.

Not one mention.

That's all you've got? The term "Holocaust" into vogue until much after these memoirs were published, but Churchill did most definitively address the issue: From Freeman, head of the Churchill Institute:

A July 1944 letter Churchill wrote about "German plans for the massacre of the Hungarian Jews."

"There is no doubt in my mind that we are in the presence of one of the greatest and most horrible crimes ever committed," Churchill said in the letter. "It has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilized men in the name of a great state and one of the leading races of Europe. I need not assure you that the situation has received and will receive the most earnest consideration from my colleagues and myself but, as the Foreign Secretary said, the principal hope of terminating it must remain the speedy victory of the Allied Nations."

Let me know when you need another lesson...

More, Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe:

Dwight D. Eisenhower on the Camps
This is what Eisenhower said on pages 408-9 of “Crusade in Europe”

“The same day [April 12, 1945] I saw my first horror camp. It was near the town of Gotha. I have never felt able to describe my emotional reactions when I first came face to face with indisputable evidence of Nazi brutality and ruthless disregard of every shred of decency. Up to that time I had known about it only generally or through secondary sources. I am certain, however that I have never at any other time experienced an equal sense of shock.
That was during the war. War propaganda was the order of the day.

Below is a typical example of First World War anti-German war propaganda. The supposed victims then were the thousands of Belgian babies that German soldiers took pleasure in running through with their bayonets.

[Linked Image from imgc.artprintimages.com]
Given the cultural norms of the times - not a shock at all that Churchill, Ike and Chuck didn't go into graphic detail of the Holocaust. That's just not something they would have devoted a pile of detail to when they wrote those books.
Originally Posted by The_Real_Hawkeye
That was during the war. War propaganda was the order of the day.

First World War anti-German war propaganda:

[Linked Image from imgc.artprintimages.com]

A perfect example of diverting the discussion when one's ass has been handed to them. "Curchill and Ike never mentioned the "Judenfrage", yet when shown irrefutable evidence, a picture of a WWI cartoon is proffered as a counter argument..Priceless.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
More, Eisenhower, Crusade in Europe:

Dwight D. Eisenhower on the Camps
This is what Eisenhower said on pages 408-9 of “Crusade in Europe”

“The same day [April 12, 1945] I saw my first horror camp. It was near the town of Gotha. I have never felt able to describe my emotional reactions when I first came face to face with indisputable evidence of Nazi brutality and ruthless disregard of every shred of decency. Up to that time I had known about it only generally or through secondary sources. I am certain, however that I have never at any other time experienced an equal sense of shock.
No one has denied the horrors in the camps.
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Some "light reading" for the kooks among us

For the Sgt Schultz crowd

I’ve never denied the death camps in the East. In fact, in my opening post on the subject I said that compilation rail transport records gave researchers a rough idea of the numbers. A study of those is what you have linked. Where are the detailed records from these camp’s themselves you claim to have seen?
Like I said, in the end, you'll come up with some bullshit story like that ridiculous cartoon of WWI.

the online archive focuses on the following themes:

Displaced persons: An easily searchable collection from the post-war period which includes documents such as questionnaires from the International Refugee Organization (IRO), often with photos of people.
Concentration camps, ghettos, Nazi penal institutions: Personal documents about individual prisoners, particularly comprehensive from the Dachau and Buchenwald concentration camps. Lists are also included, such as transport lists and prisoner lists from the various camps.

Digitized Records:
Buchenwald and Nordhausen Concentration Camps and Subcamps:

Series Information Cards for Inmates of the Langenstein-Zwieberge Concentration Camp, ca. 1947 - ca. 1947 (Record Group 549: Records of United States Army, Europe; NAID 581059; Microfilm Publication M2121). This series consists of an index to inmates of the Langenstein-Zwieberge concentration camp. Each index file includes the inmate's name, date of birth, nationality, and prisoner number. Files of deceased inmates are marked with a cross. The index, originally created by the German authorities in charge of the camp, is in German.

Series Index of Inmates to Whom Supplies Were Issued at Langenstein-Zwieberge Concentration Camp, ca. 1947 - ca. 1947 (Record Group 549; NAID 581060; Microfilm Publication M2121). This series consists of an index to inmates of the Langenstein-Zwieberge concentration camp. Each index file includes the inmate's name, prisoner number, and type and quantity of supplies issued to him or her. The series, originally created by the German authorities in charge of the camp, is in German.

The following records located in the series titled War Crimes Trials Case Files (“Cases Tried”), 1947 - 1958 (Record Group 549; NAID 581096) have been digitized:

Case Number 000-50-9, Vol IV: Telegram addressed to the Commander of Buchenwald..., Oct 1, 1942 - Jul 29, 1943; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Vol VII: Proposed lists for the awarding of the meritorious..., Jul 13, 1942 - Dec 30, 1944; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Folder A: Personnel file cards of inmates of Buchenwald..., Feb 4, 1943 - Sep 12, 1944; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Folder B: List of invalids at Work Camp Zwieberge..., Nov 4, 1944 - Apr 4, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Folder C: Hospital cards of sick inmates at Zwieberge..., Dec 29, 1944 - Apr 18, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Folder E: Sick report book of the hospital at Zwieberge..., Nov 1, 1944 - Jan 18, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit AAA: Daily lists of deceased inmates of Zwieberge, Dec 31, 1944 - Apr 25, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit BBB: Statistical data concerning rations at Zwieberge..., May 11, 1944 - Apr 1, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit CCC: Monthly disbursement lists for Zwieberge..., Jul 1944 - Feb 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit DDD: Clothing issued to SS members of Zwieberge..., Jul 31 - Nov 27, 1944; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit EEE: X-ray examinations of SS members of Zwieberge..., [Blank]; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit SS: Death certificates of inmates of Work Camp Zwieberge, Apr 24, 1944 - Apr 11, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibits UU and UU/1: Rosters of prisoners' transports from Camp Zwieberge..., Apr 29, 1944 - Mar 19, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit VV: Orders of Work Camp Zwieberge, Apr 21, 1944 - Mar 29, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit XX: Daily reports of transfer of inmates within Zwieberge..., Jan 7 - Feb 21, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit YY: Daily work assignment record for Work Camp Zwieberge, Sep 1, 1944 - Apr 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-9, Case No 117, Exhibit ZZ: Daily morning reports of Work Camp Zwieberge, Jun 6, 1944 - Apr 4, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vols 1 and 2: Daily death certificates of inmates of the auxiliary camps, Dec 3, 1944 - Mar 22, 1945; Category: Nordhausen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vols 1 and 2: Daily death certificates of inmates of the auxiliary camps, Mar 22 - Apr 17, 1945; Category: Nordhausen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vol 3: Death registers, Oct 16, 1943 - Feb 2, 1945; Category: Nordhausen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vol 8: A list of inmates at Work Camp Dora, [Blank]; Category: Nordhausen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vol 3: Reports on the quarterly and weekly inmate strength..., Dec 20, 1944 - Mar 31, 1945; Category: Nordhausen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vol 14: A directive designating Dora an independent conc..., 1944 - 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-19-23, Dirlewanger: A list naming inmates of concentration camp, [Blank]; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-37, Vol 25: Requests for the use of inmates for construction projects..., 1943 - 1944; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-12-257: List of inmates and camp personnel from Buchenwald, 1939 - 1943; Category: Niederhagen Concentration Camp

Case Number 000-50-89: Guard and duty rosters for the administrative personnel, Apr 1 - 14, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number Box 62: Death register of a hospital in Work Camp Malachit, Apr 5 - 16, 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Case Number 66-219: Current and monthly reports for work detail section, 1944 - 1945; Category: Buchenwald Concentration Camp

Series titled Lists and Registers of German Concentration Camp Inmates (Record Group 242: National Archives Collection of Foreign Records Seized; NAID 596972; Microfilm Publication A3355) contains digitized inmate cards for prisoners at Buchenwald.

The following records located in the series titled Motion Picture Films from the “Special Film Project” Program Series, ca. 1945 (Record Group 18: Records of the Army Forces; Local Identifier 18-SFP; NAID 5768) have been digitized:

Footage of Buchenwald Concentration Camp, Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9115)

Footage of Buchenwald Concentration Camp, Germany(Local Identifier 18-SFP-9119)

Footage of Free Prisoners; Human Remains; Buchenwald Concentration Camp, Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9114)

Footage of Buchenwald Concentration Camp; Wrecked German Aircraft; Tank Crewmen; German Civilians; Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9122)

Footage of Buchenwald Concentration Camp; American Army Officials; German Civilians; Aircraft in Flight and Taxiing; Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9116)

Footage of GSAP [Gun Sight Aiming Point] Strafing; Russian/American Dinner Party; Russian Soldiers and Officers; Major General Reinhardt; Buchenwald Concentration Camp; Germany. (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9148)

Footage of A-26 and B-26 Aircraft in Flight; Pilots; Bombardiers in Aircraft; Crews Loading Bombs on Aircraft; Buchenwald Concentration Camp, Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9113)

Footage of Buchenwald Concentration Camp; GSAP [Gun Sight Aiming Point] Strafing; Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9126)

Footage of P-47 Aircraft in Flight; Dachau Concentration Camp; Hitler’s House and Bomb Damage in Munich; German POW Camp; Rhine River; Germany (Local Identifier 18-SFP-9188)
Buchenwald and Nordhausen are in Germany. Where are the records for Chelmo, Sobibor, Treblinka, and Auschwitz you said you had seen?

The first three were the camps expressly designed for death. There are almost no actual records for them. There are partial records for Auschwitz. I don’t deny the Holocaust, I merely pointed out that contrary to assertions here a quick search showed that there really weren’t any records for those camps.
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Buchenwald and Nordhausen are in Germany. Where are the records for Chelmo, Sobibor, Treblinka, and Auschwitz you said you had seen?

The first three were the camps expressly designed for death. There are almost no actual records for them. There are partial records for Auschwitz. I don’t deny the Holocaust, I merely pointed out that contrary to assertions here a quick search showed that there really weren’t any records for those camps.
We were forced to simply take the word of the Soviets on that, a people with little regard for the truth, and with a strong motive to demonize the recently conquered German regime.

For jorge (LOL), just to lighten the mood: The Laughing Mexican

Also for jorge:

"I served in the United States Navy from 1955 until 1977, mostly as a Navy pilot, and saw a lot of the
world as a result. Aircraft carriers on which I served regularly visited European ports, as well as
other ports around the world. I have also traveled extensively in the years since leaving the Navy.
After traveling around most of Europe, Germany emerges as my favorite country. During our
visits there we found the German people to be pleasant, industrious, disciplined and civilized with
many similarities to traditional Americans. They in no way resemble the stereotypes depicted in all
the anti-Nazi movies, books and articles we have been subjected to over the years.
I am 74 as I write these words. My generation grew up virtually inundated with anti-German
propaganda. We were taught, quite literally, to hate the Germans as a people. Yet, Germans I have
met or befriended through the years seem no different from other Europeans, or even Americans, and
they seem no more inclined to violence and militarism than anyone else; if anything, less. I have never
detected anything that might be considered intrinsically “wrong” with the German character. They are
a highly cultured, highly civilized people in every respect. When studied objectively, even Germany’s
leaders of the 1930s and 40s were not very different from other European leaders. They were only
made out to be different by the relentless hate propaganda directed against them.
Germany suffered more than any other country by far as a result of World War II. Some 160 of
her largest cities and towns were completely destroyed by the Allied bombing campaign and perhaps
as many as 20 million Germans lost their lives as a result of the war. Yet, no one wants to hear their
tales of suffering, and no sympathy has been allowed the defeated and disgraced Germans. The anti-
German propaganda has cultivated the general feeling that they got what they deserved.
The entire responsibility for starting both wars and for all the death and destruction resulting
from them has been assigned to the Germans (though the facts don’t bear that out). Because they were
the losers of both World Wars, they were never permitted to present their case before the world
court, nor to tell their side of the story through any medium. The winners of wars, after all, write the
history books. Neither did the true story of what happened during the war come out in the Nuremberg
Trials. The Nuremberg Trials were nothing more than Soviet style show trials which violated every
standard of traditional British and American justice. Their purpose was not to discover guilt or
innocence, but to spread a legal gloss over a decision which had already been made to execute
Germany’s leaders. The entire Nuremberg circus was a sham and a travesty.
The anti-German propaganda, used to create the climate of hatred that made the massive
destruction and the mass slaughter of German civilians possible, continued relentlessly long after the
war was over when it would seem natural for sober minded historians to begin to moderate their
extreme views about Germany. The fantastic atrocity stories continue even today. One needs only to
tune in to the History Channel to see them repeated again and again. In contrast, World War I was not
long over before the atrocity stories attributed to the Germans during that war were exposed as the
deliberate lies they were. Responsible men conducted thorough investigations and found that none of
it was true. All the lurid stories were deliberately fabricated to win British public support for the war
against Germany and also to bring America into the war.
But a different factor was in play after World War II to keep the phony horror stories alive
which did not exist after World War I. After WWII, the Jews exploited the anti-German world
sentiment, which they themselves had largely created with their propaganda, to justify the creation of
their long sought after state of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people. Through manipulation of
the international information media, the Jews won worldwide sympathy for themselves with their
sensational stories of unique Jewish suffering at the hands of the cruel Germans. They claimed that
Germany had followed a systematic plan to exterminate all of Europe’s Jews and that by war’s end
had managed to kill 6 million of them. The alleged method was to round the Jews up from all over
Europe, haul them in trains to so-called “death camps” where they were herded into gas chambers
and killed, and their bodies then burned in giant crematoria, with, conveniently, no forensic evidence
of what had happened left behind. In the absence of forensic evidence, eye witness testimony, no
matter how bazaar, sufficed to convict Germany and to make her the pariah of civilized nations.
The judges at the Nuremberg Trials were themselves not immune to the torrents of anti-German
hate propaganda, and were already predisposed before the trials ever began to believe any horror
story, no matter how fantastic, about the Germans. Another factor which preordained the outcome of
the trials was that the accusers also served as investigators, prosecutors and final judges. The trials
were also permeated throughout with an atmosphere of Jewish vengeance seeking. Just behind the
Gentile front men, most of the lawyers, prosecutors, and investigators were Jews. Hundreds of Jews
who could barely speak English disported themselves in American Army officer uniforms. Two of the
eight Nuremberg judges were Jews, Robert Falco of France, and Lt. Col. A.F. Volchkov (real name
Berkman) of the Soviet Union. The General Prosecutor for the “High Court” was Dr. Jakob Meistner,
a Jew. Their dominance and control of the trials was blatant. Even the hangman for the 10 Nazi
leaders sentenced to death, Master Sergeant John C. Woods, was a Jew, and the hangings took place
on October 16, 1946, the Jewish holiday of “Purim.” In the Book of Esther, the 10 sons of Haman, an
enemy of the Jews, were hanged on Purim day. According to Louis Marschalko, a wartime Hungarian
journalist who wrote about the trials: “Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg
Courts, 2,400 were Jews.” The Holocaust story that we all know so well today was developed during
the Nuremberg Trials.
By skillfully cultivating and propagating this Holocaust story, the Jews have been able to extort
hundreds of billions of dollars out of Germany and the United States, much of which was used to fund
the new state of Israel. The claim that the Jews in Israel “made the desert bloom” was true. They did
it with German and American money. They are now hard at work extorting more billions out of other
European countries in what has been contemptuously but correctly called “the Holocaust industry.”
Even now, more than half a million so-called “Holocaust survivors” living mainly in Israel and the
United States receive lifetime pensions from the German government. And what is a “Holocaust
survivor?” Any Jew who lived anywhere in German controlled territory at any time during the war,
whether living in a concentration camp or in the lap of luxury, is a Holocaust survivor and therefore
eligible for a German pension. Moreover, any Jew who was forced to leave Europe during the Nazi
era is a Holocaust survivor. Christian survivors of the war, no matter how horrific their experience
are not eligible for pensions. “Shoah” is the Hebrew word for Holocaust. It has been joked around
that “there’s no business like shoah business.” The entire Holocaust racket has become nothing so
much as a vast shakedown of European countries, especially Germany. The Holocaust story has other
uses as well. It is routinely invoked to disarm the general public from defending itself against Jewish
predations. Prime Minister Netanyahu regularly invokes the Holocaust to justify Israeli attacks upon
its neighbors.
Keeping this gravy train moving requires the continued legitimization of Jews as history’s
ultimate victim group, which, in turn, requires an ultimate victimizer of the Jews, and Germany has
been designated to fill that role in perpetuity. The Jewish controlled History Channel, or the “Hitler
Channel,” as it is sometimes derisively called, owes its success to endlessly repeating these anti-
German propaganda programs. Any modification or revision of this carefully cultivated image of
Germany as the evil monster of history, and particularly as the evil victimizer of the Jews, would
threaten the entire Holocaust story. Therefore this image is jealously and carefully guarded by the
Jewish controlled press and information media, and woe upon anyone who dares to question it.
Anyone who does so is immediately attacked and smeared as a deranged anti-Semite.
The Jews are also unwilling to relinquish or even to moderate their quest for revenge. Old men
who have suffered all their lives as fugitives, are still being tracked down as “war criminals,” and
either “brought to justice,” or summarily murdered on the spot (they call it vengeance). The only
crime these old men may be guilty of was being an officer or soldier in the German army during the
war.
But, why, one might ask, amidst all the carnage, death and destruction that occurred during
World War II, has the so-called Holocaust emerged as the central atrocity story? Approximately 55
million people died during the war, only a tiny percentage of them Jews — surely only a fraction of
the 6 million claimed. All other combatant nationalities have long since put the war behind them and
have tried to make peace with their former enemies, but not the Jews! Two thirds of a century has
gone by, but the Jews are still nourishing their grievances, still building Holocaust museums and
memorials (at various governments’ expense, incidentally), and still investigating new ways to extort
money out of various countries as “compensation.” But why should only the Jews be compensated?
Scores of millions of other people across Europe lost everything in the war.
The “Holocaust” has evolved over the years to become the national myth of the Jewish people
with all the characteristics of a religion, complete with its very own Satan — Hitler. The Holocaust
myth is the glue that holds the Jewish people together as a distinct nationality, and because of that they
carefully guard and protect it. As a consequence, the poor Germans are consigned in perpetuity to the
role of history’s evil monster, regardless of what the actual facts may be.
But even if all the stories of German atrocities during WWII were true in every detail, they
would still not compare in their inhumanity to the atrocities committed against the Germans. The
indiscriminate saturation bombing of German cities, the brutal expulsion of entire German
populations after the war, the Allied imposed postwar deprivations, the Soviet massacres and
political liquidations, simply dwarf the Holocaust in their destruction of human life and their
destruction of the accumulated works of human civilization. Any final accounting and balancing of the
conduct of all combatants during WWII could only result in the exculpation of Germany as “uniquely”
barbarous in her methods of waging war, or in her treatment of subject populations.
The German people were devastated by the war, to a greater extent than any other participant,
including the Jews, while at the same time they have been stigmatized as the evil, predatory
perpetrators of the war. They have been made to pay a terrible price for atrocities during World War
II which may never have occurred, or at least, never occurred to the extent alleged. It is becoming
clearer as time goes by that the Germans were the real victims of both World Wars I and II, and
continue to be."

- Benton L. Bradberry, The Preface to his book The Myth of German Villainy
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Some "light reading" for the kooks among us

For the Sgt Schultz crowd

From your article:

"Most perished in gas chambers at the death camps Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka."

"However, the tempo, kill rates, and spatial dynamics of these events were poorly documented."

"Detailed records of the killings are almost nonexistent because of the Nazis’ tight secrecy around Operation Reinhard. Any information that was recorded was deliberately burnt and destroyed by the Nazis during the war for fear of future incrimination."

So, were the germs meticulous record-keepers, or were the records poorly documented and destroyed?
Originally Posted by Fubarski
Originally Posted by jorgeI
Some "light reading" for the kooks among us

For the Sgt Schultz crowd

From your article:

"Most perished in gas chambers at the death camps Belzec, Sobibor, and Treblinka."

"However, the tempo, kill rates, and spatial dynamics of these events were poorly documented."

"Detailed records of the killings are almost nonexistent because of the Nazis’ tight secrecy around Operation Reinhard. Any information that was recorded was deliberately burnt and destroyed by the Nazis during the war for fear of future incrimination."

So, were the germs meticulous record-keepers, or were the records poorly documented and destroyed?
There should be all sorts of communiques to the camp commandants about speeding up the killing of the Jews, or monthly quotas of dead Jews, and all kinds of communiques of that sort, if the received Holocaust narrative were correct, yet we find no such orders. What we find are complaints from superiors about inmate death rates being higher than should be for a manufacturing operation, and orders to take better measures to prevent this.
© 24hourcampfire