Home
Boy Scouts are bankrupt after sex abuse lawsuit barrage
By DAVID CRARY AP National Writer Feb 17, 2020

Barraged by hundreds of sex-abuse lawsuits, the Boy Scouts of America filed for bankruptcy protection Tuesday in hopes of working out a potentially mammoth victim compensation plan that will allow the hallowed, 110-year-old organization to carry on.

The Chapter 11 filing in federal bankruptcy court in Wilmington, Delaware, sets in motion what could be one of the biggest, most complex bankruptcies ever seen. Scores of lawyers are seeking settlements on behalf of several thousand men who say they were molested as scouts by scoutmasters or other leaders decades ago but are only now eligible to sue because of recent changes in their states' statute-of-limitations laws.

By going to bankruptcy court, the Scouts can put those lawsuits on hold for now. But ultimately they could be forced to sell off some of their vast property holdings, including campgrounds and hiking trails, to raise money for a compensation fund that could surpass a billion dollars.

"Scouting programs will continue throughout this process and for many years to come," said Evan Roberts, a spokesman for the Scouts. "Local councils are not filing for bankruptcy because they are legally separate and distinct organizations.""

The Boy Scouts are just the latest major American institution to face a heavy price over sexual abuse. Roman Catholic dioceses across the country and schools such as Penn State and Michigan State have paid out hundreds of millions of dollars in recent years.

The bankruptcy represents a painful turn for an organization that has been a pillar of American civic life for generations and a training ground for future leaders. Achieving the rank of Eagle Scout has long been a proud accomplishment that politicians, business leaders, astronauts and others put on their resumes and in their official biographies.

The Boy Scouts' finances have been strained in recent years by declining membership and sex-abuse settlements.

The number of youths taking part in scouting has dropped below 2 million, down from more than 4 million in peak years of the 1970s. The organization has tried to counter the decline by admitting girls, but its membership rolls took a big hit Jan. 1 when The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints — for decades a major sponsor of Boy Scout units — cut ties and withdrew more than 400,000 scouts in favor of programs of its own.

The financial outlook had worsened last year after New York, Arizona, New Jersey and California passed laws making it easier for victims of long-ago abuse to file claims. Teams of lawyers across the U.S. have been signing up clients by the hundreds to sue the Boy Scouts.

Most of the newly surfacing cases date to the 1960s, '70s and '80s; the organization says there were only five known abuse victims in 2018. The Boy Scouts credit the change to an array of prevention policies adopted since the mid-1980s, including mandatory criminal background checks and abuse-prevention training for all staff and volunteers, and a rule that two or more adult leaders be present during all activities.

In many ways, the crisis parallels the one facing the Catholic Church in the U.S. Both institutions boast of major progress over recent decades in combating abuse. whether by priests or scout leaders, but both face many lawsuits alleging negligence and cover-ups, mostly decades ago.

Among the matters to be addressed in bankruptcy court: the fate of the Boy Scouts' assets; the extent to which the organization's insurance will help cover compensation; and whether assets of the Scouts' more than 260 local councils will be added to the fund.
A great organization ruined.
Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.


Yep.
Another perv magnet organization. Not enough oversight and governance for groups where parents feel safe to dump their young boys.
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


Agreed
Ho-mos are a huge cost to humanity.
A wet dream come true for the communist left.....
Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.



Yup, thanks to the likes of folks like Goosey and poor decisions of upper management. Faags and liberals ruin everything they touch.
Political correctness is poison.
Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.

Indeed.
For submitting to cuckatude I guess they reap what they allowed to grow.
Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.

That was my first thought. However, I don't know how long the abuse has been going on, so maybe it wasn't such a great organization.
Good.............I hope they disband and have to tell the world that everything was going good until the queers took over.
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Good.............I hope they disband and have to tell the world that everything was going good until the queers took over.


pfaggotry kills good people and organizations that have flourished for centuries, pfaggotry is protected because they want to kill us [conservative valued folk] too.
They were ruined when it wasn't the "boy" scouts anymore. Every eagle scout I knew stopped giving them money. It's sad.
Maybe this is good. Under the protection of Chapter 11, maybe they can kick out the homo leaders that were foisted upon them by that dumbass former CEO of Exxon and tell the Libs to GFY.

The Boy Scouts are a good organization and deserve to carry on. The Left tries to ruin everything decent in America.

A word from your 'sponsor"-- if you or any decent American is not registered to vote, go to www.vote.gov right now. And then make sure you vote. About 50% of conservatives don't. If we fail to vote, we are just supporting the Left.
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Good.............I hope they disband and have to tell the world that everything was going good until the queers took over.
"Where's John....anybody seen John!"

pfaggotry kills good people and organizations that have flourished for centuries, pfaggotry is protected because they want to kill us [conservative valued folk] too.
Originally Posted by IndyCA35
Maybe this is good. Under the protection of Chapter 11, maybe they can kick out the homo leaders that were foisted upon them by that dumbass former CEO of Exxon and tell the Libs to GFY.

The Boy Scouts are a good organization and deserve to carry on. The Left tries to ruin everything decent in America.

A word from your 'sponsor"-- if you or any decent American is not registered to vote, go to www.vote.gov right now. And then make sure you vote. About 50% of conservatives don't. If we fail to vote, we are just supporting the Left.

Good points, all. I second the idea on registering to vote and doing so. It'll drive the left batty.
Originally Posted by kelbro
Another perv magnet organization. Not enough oversight and governance for groups where parents feel safe to dump their young boys.

Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


I'm of the opinion two opposite things can both be true.

Without a doubt, they had a problem with pedos in their ranks and that's been well documented, though "ambulance chasing" lawyers cooking up the numbers I also don't doubt one bit.
I have a good friend, just a couple years younger than me that was both an Eagle Scout and a converted Catholic. He was active with both institutions for many years.

We were talking about all the pedophile problems both institutions have been having. He stated that as far as he knew, both institutions did not "draw" pedophiles. The incidence of child molestation were no better or worse than elsewhere. The problem was the amount of trust folks placed in these institutions. I'm inclined to agree.

Dad was a boy scout. Grandpa was fearsome individual and was 100% involved with every scout trip-- even volunteered his dump truck to haul the gear. No one would have dared touch his three sons.

Me? I was a cub scout. I was in for a year or so and then we moved out to the 'burbs and that was that. I was close enough, that I could have stayed in my pack, but my folks said there were things going on that they didn't like. They didn't specify, but I suspect it was the fact a few families had full sway over all the other parents. I was inclined to agree. Their kids were taught they could ride herd on the rest of us. In that atmosphere, anything could have happened.

I had no interest in Boy Scouts. The scouts I knew growing up were all big on pornography and they'd smuggle smutty magazines along on campouts. Again, that was a situation that was an invitation to other worse things.

Where things really ran amok was in a cabal of teens that built the ultimate king-$hit tree fort back in the woods. This became a den for all sorts of stuff. Drug use? Buggery? Porn? Yes, and more. It finally burned down under mysterious circumstances shortly before I graduated high school. I got a tour of it by one of the guys who'd got wind of the worst of it and cleared out. It was something like 5 stories tall. The problem: no adult supervision.

Finally, my son's first bagpipe band had been victimized by a pedarest. At 8, Angus was the first youngster to join the band after this creep had been run out of town. He'd managed to get about half a dozen young boys involved. The families thought they were dropping the kids off for lessons. It's a long hairy story, but again, it was a lack of oversight by the parents that let this goon have his way. While my son was growing up, KYHillChick or I attended every lesson and both of us went to every practice. That still was almost not enough; Angus got harassed by a new Australian pipe major that wanted to make an example of him. Shortly before the pipe major got thrown out, I had to square off with him one night. He was ex-military, and I was an IT-schlub, but I outweighed him by a hundred pounds, and the guy decided rightly that I could probably crush him. The band leadership were all witnesses and were all ashamed that I had to step in and put a quick end to things.

I'm sorry for the Boy Scouts, but I'd say it was victimized by a lack of involvement by the parents and too much trust in the leaders.
Blame it on something that can't possibly be verified, (sexual abuse).

While I have no doubt it was a contributing factor, I also think it being turned into "kid" scouts turned a lot of people away.


JMO

Clyde
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


I agree. I got in to Cub Scouts in 1959, I was in Boy Scouts and then Explorers, total of 6 years. I went for 2 weeks to Camp Bert Adams in the summer, and I went on a hundred camp outs.
I never saw any funny stuff going on, such as, a boy going in to the adult tent at midnight, etc. I never heard a word about any pervert stuff going on.
I just can't believe that this was a common practice. Our Scout leaders were tough WW2 veterans, I just don't see this on a wide scale back in the sixties in Atlanta.

Makes me sick to see the Boy Scouts destroyed it was a great organization.
Sorry to see this once great organization go, but it is past time for Boy Scouts Inc. to die. First, they lost sight of their purpose - to prepare young men to be first responders and military men or at least men who could handle an emergency. Then they let open homosexuals in. Now it's girls. So, instead of making warriors, they are going to make pussies out of boys and fake men out of girls.

Goodbye! Good riddance!

Hopefully Trail Life or some other worthy organization will be able to pick up Philmont.
I was 100% against them allowing gay leaders. But that said, if you followed the rules, it didn't matter if the leader was gay - and lets face it - if this has been going on for quite some time, its not a gay leader issue, its a pedophile issue long before gays were - at least out in the open about being scout leaders.

I was involved in scouting from 2007-2015 in some form. The rules are very clear. You cannot EVER be alone with a scout, in our troop, that included not even being in the next room. When we would do testing for memorizing oathes it would be in a hallway next to the main hall, out of earshot but in plain view of everyone else.

Adults could not stay in tents with scouts at campouts , period, not even parents. You want your child in your tent? then we encourage you to take the child camping on your own, this is a scout function, not a family get together. And every parent that went on a trip had to take the child interaction training - I don't remember what it is called, but it was an online class that took about an hour that spelled out the rules on the steps they are taking to protect against that sort of thing.

in no case could only one adult scoutmaster take scouts on a camping trip.

If there was going to be abuse happening to a scout, it was going to have to be a multi-adult organized activity which seems highly unlikely. The only thing we couldn't really protect against was two boys doing whatever in a tent after we broke for the evening.

I'm sure other troops weren't as dedicated to following these rules as we were, some were pretty loose, some had too few parents wanting to be involved and some just had for lack of better choices, adult leaders that had no business leading children.

That said, I guess its a numbers game - it was bound to happen at some point, but I can't believe it happened with the numbers they are indicating.


My son is an Eagle Scout. He is still early in life, in his early 20's, and I see the positive influence of scouting every day , not to mention that being an Eagle Scout has landed him two jobs.


Quote
If there was going to be abuse happening to a scout, it was going to have to be a multi-adult organized activity which seems highly unlikely. The only thing we couldn't really protect against was two boys doing whatever in a tent after we broke for the evening.


I think you've got the recipe just about right. I think the only part you got wrong was the unlikeliness.

Let me give you an example. My youngest, Angus, was harassed by a creepy kid in Middle School. The boy had a screw loose and frequently made gross impositions on other boys. Other people laughed it off. Angus didn't. He finally stood up in the middle of class one day and announced his opposition to having this kid attempting to fondle him. It was a major blow-up. Everyone got hauled to the principal's office. It turned out the other boy was the son of one of the guidance counselors. They got the boy out of the class and moved him elsewhere. 'HillChick and I heard about it from Angus. We waited. Nothing happened.

In another example, a male substitute teacher (a real flamer) started making exceedingly rude remarks to male students. Angus came home and told us. I knew Angus was safe, so I just waited. Sure enough, the substitute just moved on after someone else complained. No word from the school. Lesson for us. Lesson for Angus.

There's just so much complicity in all this-- too many blind eyes.

I'd say about half of my girlfriends in college had a story about gross sexual imposition by a teacher or a coach or a minister. The boys I knew were more quiet about it. I got a BFA from a music school, so there were a larger than average number of gay guys in the dorm. Nearly every one of them had a story of being abused by a teacher, a minister, a coach or a scout leader. Most of them credited that for their homosexuality.
Lots of perverts out there.
I doubt there are near as many perverts in scouts as there are opportunists in court.
Originally Posted by Fireball2
I doubt there are near as many perverts in scouts as there are opportunists in court.



This is where I am at.

There are many political motivations in seeing the Scouts go down. If you question that, go back to the news clip reactions to those well known individuals who publicly stated being against gays being in the Scouts. They were driven through the fire.
Originally Posted by Fireball2
I doubt there are near as many perverts in scouts as there are opportunists in court.


Nobody really had any idea what the truth actually is.
I had several friends that were Eagle Scouts back in the 60s. I never was a scout. Got my son in it, but the scout leaders were terrible so he bailed out often a year or two.
With all the abuse, I’m glad he was only in for a short time.
An organized troop with real leadership makes such a huge difference in the scouting experience for these boys.
Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.


And doing it one Institution at a time.
I was a scout making to "Life" rank....didn't Eagle due to car fumes and perfume. Made sure my son "Eagled" and he did, Now I have four grandsons in scouting so going around a second time to insure my grandsons "Eagle" as well. We have an excellent troop with committed leadership.

Since returning to scouting I am impressed with the about of young boys who want to learn how to shoot, fish, shoot archery and camp. I'm all in. You create an outdoors mans one kid at a time.

I CHALLENGE ANY CAMPFIRE MEMBER HERE WHO SPENT TIME IN SCOUTING IF YOU REMEMBER YOUR SCOUTMASTERS NAME? Most old guys do regardless of your age. My point is with so many years that have passed "YOU" still remember your scoutmasters name......kinda tells you the influence scoutmasters have on a young
boys developing years.


There is not one campfire member here who cannot have a positive influence to a young man's life in the outdoors... and I say to you .."WHY NOT?
Trail Life USA taking over where Boy Scouts used to be.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


I don't know how many were molested, but the record of it occurring is undisputed.

"Between 1944 and 2016, at least 7,800 suspected assailants sexually abused 12,254 boys in the Boy Scouts. Experts say these numbers are a gross underestimation"

see: https://time.com/longform/boy-scouts-sex-abuse/
I joined scouting in 1958 in a troop that was sponsored by the LDS church, and earned the rank of Eagle in 1963. I had a great time, enjoyed all the fun events with other youths and learned valuable skills that have been useful for my entire life.

I was an assistant scoutmaster and scoutmaster when my son was in scouting. He earned his Eagle rank in 1994.
I again became assistant scoutmaster when a good friend asked me to help out with troop where he was the scoutmaster.

I have been assistant scoutmaster, scoutmaster and merit badge counselor for my grandson's troop. He has completed all the ranks and merit badge requirements for his Eagle rank. He just has to accomplish his Eagle project, which has been approved, to be awarded his Eagle. So now it's just a matter of time before he is awarded his Eagle. I hope that scouting doesn't collapse before he completes the journey.

In all that time, I have never seen any instance of abuse by an adult on a youth. I'm not saying that it didn't happen. I'm just saying that I never saw it.

The mistake that the Catholics and BSA made was that they should have reported any/all allegations of abuse to the police as soon as they were made aware it. By not reporting the allegations they became accessories to the crimes. I guess they were worried about their reputation. But they would have been better off if they had been honest. After all "Trustworthy" is the first of the twelve articles of the Scout Law. I suppose that they will get what they have earned by not living up to their own values. Hind sight is always 20/20.

Eeveryone could see what was probably going to happen when the National Council signed their own death warrant by allowing openly gay people to participate and by inviting girls into the organization. It no longer was the Boy Scouts of America after that. They didn't say why the Mormons pulled out, but most people think that it is because the moral compass of the BSA and that of the church no longer coincided.

Everyone on the Mailing list for the BSA got an e-mail this morning explaining the situation. The local Councils will continue because each is individually incorporated. But scouting is not what it was when I as a youth. I don't know where it will go from here. confused

I seem to remember reading an article not too long ago stating that the BSA was selling Phillmont in an attempt to make some money to pay off the law suits. Are they liquidating assests?

Originally Posted by hanco
A great organization ruined.
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
I was a scout making to "Life" rank....didn't Eagle due to car fumes and perfume. Made sure my son "Eagled" and he did, Now I have four grandsons in scouting so going around a second time to insure my grandsons "Eagle" as well. We have an excellent troop with committed leadership.

Since returning to scouting I am impressed with the about of young boys who want to learn how to shoot, fish, shoot archery and camp. I'm all in. You create an outdoors mans one kid at a time.

I CHALLENGE ANY CAMPFIRE MEMBER HERE WHO SPENT TIME IN SCOUTING IF YOU REMEMBER YOUR SCOUTMASTERS NAME? Most old guys do regardless of your age. My point is with so many years that have passed "YOU" still remember your scoutmasters name......kinda tells you the influence scoutmasters have on a young
boys developing years.


There is not one campfire member here who cannot have a positive influence to a young man's life in the outdoors... and I say to you .."WHY NOT?



Mr. D. Allen and Mr. J. Quinn.
Both were WW2 Airborne (101) combat veterans.
Originally Posted by KC
I joined scouting in 1958 in a troop that was sponsored by the LDS church, and earned the rank of Eagle in 1963. I had a great time, enjoyed all the fun events with other youths and learned valuable skills that have been useful for my entire life.

I was an assistant scoutmaster and scoutmaster when my son was in scouting. He earned his Eagle rank in 1994.
I again became assistant scoutmaster when a good friend asked me to help out with troop where he was the scoutmaster.

I have been assistant scoutmaster, scoutmaster and merit badge counselor for my grandson's troop. He has completed all the ranks and merit badge requirements for his Eagle rank. He just has to accomplish his Eagle project, which has been approved, to be awarded his Eagle. So now it's just a matter of time before he is awarded his Eagle. I hope that scouting doesn't collapse before he completes the journey.

In all that time, I have never seen any instance of abuse by an adult on a youth. I'm not saying that it didn't happen. I'm just saying that I never saw it.

The mistake that the Catholics and BSA made was that they should have reported any/all allegations of abuse to the police as soon as they were made aware it. By not reporting the allegations they became accessories to the crimes. I guess they were worried about their reputation. But they would have been better off if they had been honest. After all "Honest" is one of the twelve articles of the Scout Law. I suppose that they will get what they have earned by not living up to their own values. Hind sight is always 20/20.

Eeveryone could see what was probably going to happen when the National Council signed their own death warrant by allowing openly gay people to participate and by inviting girls into the organization. It no longer was the Boy Scouts of America after that. They didn't say why the Mormons pulled out, but most people think that it is because the moral compass of the BSA and that of the church no longer coincided.

Everyone on the Mailing list for the BSA got an e-mail this morning explaining the situation. The local Councils will continue because each is individually incorporated. But scouting is not what it was when I as a youth. I don't know where it will go from here. confused

I seem to remember reading an article not too long ago stating that the BSA was selling Phillmont in an attempt to make some money to pay off the law suits. Are they liquidating assests?



KC, if I’m not mistaken I think that the aclu labeled The Scouts as a hate group.

In and of itself that should make every American male want to support it.
Originally Posted by javman
Trail Life USA taking over where Boy Scouts used to be.
Our church made the switch a couple years ago. A few years ago when they were still BSA, I was trying to find a way to get more use out of my pack llamas so I volunteered to take them on a pack trip. We've made 4 trips now and have #5 in the planning for this summer. After they switched to Trail Life, they asked me to be an assistant leader. I'm 71 and all the boys could be my grandsons. I have years of outdoor experience to teach them.
Good on you, RC.

Interesting to compare what the Boy Scouts have become today with Baden-Powell's original concept.

For those who like going to the sources of things I highly recommend reading "The Matabele Campaign, 1896; Being a Narrative of the Campaign in Suppressing the Native Rising in Matabeleland and Mashonaland" by (then) Col. R.S.S. Baden-Powell, 13th Hussars and Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society.

In that book you can see Baden-Powell first forming the kernel of an idea for a scouts organization for boys and his reasons for thinking this would be a good thing for the preservation of British culture going into the future.

Inexpensive reprints can be found at Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=the+matabele+campaign&ref=nb_sb_noss

One more thing. You know it was at the local level where allegations regarding abuse would have been reported. And it was at the local level (the individual councils) where they would have been ignored or hushed up. But it is the national council that is being held accountable, not the local councils. So the actual accessories to the crimes are not being held accountable. It's also the local councils that actually own most of the real estate assets in the form of buildings and scout summer camps. Philmont and Summit Bechtel are the only properties owned by the national council that actually have much real estate value.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


I believe you're correct. Google "Litigation Financing". There's a new rage in alternate investments that specialize in financing litigation. The only ones that get rich on this sort of litigation is the lawyers and their staff. There's hardly any meaningful awards for the actual victims.
Originally Posted by Blueboy
Originally Posted by gunner500
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Good.............I hope they disband and have to tell the world that everything was going good until the queers took over.
"Where's John....anybody seen John!"

pfaggotry kills good people and organizations that have flourished for centuries, pfaggotry is protected because they want to kill us [conservative valued folk] too.



The Baptist? he left, hence the rabid pfaggotry!
The organization formerly known as the Boy Scouts is currently having its bones picked clean by high finance types who installed its current leadership to carve it up for serving.

It will never come back from this, other than in name only less every single other asset it ever owned.
Originally Posted by Old_Toot
Originally Posted by doctor_Encore
I was a scout making to "Life" rank....didn't Eagle due to car fumes and perfume. Made sure my son "Eagled" and he did, Now I have four grandsons in scouting so going around a second time to insure my grandsons "Eagle" as well. We have an excellent troop with committed leadership.

Since returning to scouting I am impressed with the about of young boys who want to learn how to shoot, fish, shoot archery and camp. I'm all in. You create an outdoors mans one kid at a time.

I CHALLENGE ANY CAMPFIRE MEMBER HERE WHO SPENT TIME IN SCOUTING IF YOU REMEMBER YOUR SCOUTMASTERS NAME? Most old guys do regardless of your age. My point is with so many years that have passed "YOU" still remember your scoutmasters name......kinda tells you the influence scoutmasters have on a young
boys developing years.


There is not one campfire member here who cannot have a positive influence to a young man's life in the outdoors... and I say to you .."WHY NOT?



Mr. D. Allen and Mr. J. Quinn.
Both were WW2 Airborne (101) combat veterans.



Thank you for helping proving my point......
Originally Posted by stevelyn
Political correctness is poison.



This is THE problem in a nutshell.
[
A grown man having sex with a sexually mature young male is a gay issue not pedo issue.


These were Gay scout masters, leaders doing the damage
And destroying the BSA. Just like the Catholic Church

Eagle Scout 1979


quote=KFWA]I was 100% against them allowing gay leaders. But that said, if you followed the rules, it didn't matter if the leader was gay - and lets face it - if this has been going on for quite some time, its not a gay leader issue, its a pedophile issue long before gays were - at least out in the open about being scout leaders.

I was involved in scouting from 2007-2015 in some form. The rules are very clear. You cannot EVER be alone with a scout, in our troop, that included not even being in the next room. When we would do testing for memorizing oathes it would be in a hallway next to the main hall, out of earshot but in plain view of everyone else.

Adults could not stay in tents with scouts at campouts , period, not even parents. You want your child in your tent? then we encourage you to take the child camping on your own, this is a scout function, not a family get together. And every parent that went on a trip had to take the child interaction training - I don't remember what it is called, but it was an online class that took about an hour that spelled out the rules on the steps they are taking to protect against that sort of thing.

in no case could only one adult scoutmaster take scouts on a camping trip.

If there was going to be abuse happening to a scout, it was going to have to be a multi-adult organized activity which seems highly unlikely. The only thing we couldn't really protect against was two boys doing whatever in a tent after we broke for the evening.

I'm sure other troops weren't as dedicated to following these rules as we were, some were pretty loose, some had too few parents wanting to be involved and some just had for lack of better choices, adult leaders that had no business leading children.

That said, I guess its a numbers game - it was bound to happen at some point, but I can't believe it happened with the numbers they are indicating.


My son is an Eagle Scout. He is still early in life, in his early 20's, and I see the positive influence of scouting every day , not to mention that being an Eagle Scout has landed him two jobs.


[/quote]
thats a shame. scouts is a great organization. i did 15 years and raised two eagle scouts and mentored countless others. in all the time i was working with the scouts i never, ever saw anything that could be considered in the least bit inappropriate. simple rules to follow and there is no chance for anything like that to happen.
Originally Posted by rem141r
thats a shame. scouts is a great organization. i did 15 years and raised two eagle scouts and mentored countless others. in all the time i was working with the scouts i never, ever saw anything that could be considered in the least bit inappropriate. simple rules to follow and there is no chance for anything like that to happen.


My experience mirrors yours. That's why I think this is political. Men in America are under attack from every angle because we are the ones most likely to resist a communist takeover.
Never have cared for clubs or groups.

Scouts at my elem school, some weird kids w weird parents.

Bad vibe

Nothing against scouting...just groups in general.
Was already shooting, hunting and trapping as a young kid.




Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.

Maybe, but this has been going on for decades. Statistically, pedophiles molest children 200-400 times before they are caught.
Ann Coulter's Take
I ran the numbers once. As I recall, public school teachers are about 25 times more likely to molest children than scout volunteers.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


BSA's bankruptcy filing says that over 8,000 boys were molested.
Originally Posted by TwoEyedJack
I ran the numbers once. As I recall, public school teachers are about 25 times more likely to molest children than scout volunteers.

I have a 7th grade son who has a flaming [bleep] music teacher trying to coax him into being on the flag team or chorus just the other day my son told me his substitute bus driver had a beard and wore a dress this [bleep] is getting out of hand I’m old old school and try to pass that gene to my kids but 20 yrs ago this was unheard of I’m good mind to March my happy ass to the bus garage and the school board and give them a piece of my mind
Originally Posted by ABC News
Dr. Janet Warren, who was hired by the BSA to evaluate its sex abuse cases testified that she worked with the scout’s "ineligible volunteer files" aka ‘"perversion files’s" and determined there were “7,819 perpetrators” and identified “12,254 victims” over the decades.
Link



"Ineligible volunteer files" spread sheets and searchable interactive map

This is the BSA own files and findings, not lawyers or bias opinions of others.
Most all of these cases have "timed out" and not prosecutable due to statute of limitations laws.
Nothing here is deniable.

The organization’s closely guarded “ineligible volunteer files" show that — at least from 1959 to 1985 — more than a few of the 1,247 men suspected of child abuse were not brought to justice or even kicked out of the Scouts.
These files were also long before girls and gay scout masters were allowed in to be involved with the BSA.

Some examples of text from these files:

“This subject and Scouts were not prosecuted to save the name of Scouting,” a Louisiana Scouting executive wrote to higher-ups in 1965. The “subject,” a 31-year-old Scoutmaster, had just admitted to law enforcement officials that he had sexually abused three brothers more than once.

In another case, in 1972, a Pennsylvania Scouting executive urged BSA headquarters to drop the case against a suspected abuser because he was undergoing professional treatment. “If it don’t stink, don’t stir it,” the local executive wrote.


In many instances more than a third, according to the Scouts' own count police and parents weren't told about the reports of abuse to protect the name of Scouting over their victims. Most that were reported to police were reported by the victims themselves or their parents, not the BSA.

This is what the problem is, this is why there are lawsuits, the BSA actions allowed for the same individuals to continue to abuse more children. It's plain to see when reading the cases in the "ineligible volunteer files" the same known abusers jumped from troop to troop, when trouble would arise for them in one area they'd just moved to another.
Originally Posted by djs
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
I question the allegation that tens of thousands of kids were molested. Sounds like lawyers stacking the deck.


BSA's bankruptcy filing says that over 8,000 boys were molested.


I personally know a man in his late 50's that was molested repeatedly by a scout master when he was a boy on camping trips. Guy would come into his tent at night and fondle him and try to get him to do it . He eventually told other scout leaders and the adults he told laughed it off and completely dismissed him. In fact the mans wife found out and pulled him aside and scolded him. He finally told his mother and she stopped making him do scouts and told him not to tell his father. Said he's sure his father would have killed the man.
© 24hourcampfire