Originally Posted by WhelenAway
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
Tikkas are cheaper and shoot as well or better.



P


There is no comparison between the feel of a Tikka and a Montana.

A few Tikkas have passed through my hands. Never really bothered to shoot one.


I'm not interested in the "feel", only the performance. As I think back to the numerous Montanas I owned, there were a few that were great out of the box.
There were some that were stinkers too - in fact all 4 Kimber .257's were bad.
Never tried a .260 cause a buddy had one that was ridiculously awful.
So while we see some talented fellows here can tweak a Montana into a performer, the lowly Tikka just performs right out of the box - at half the price.
An upgrade to the Tikka T3 is a Sako 85 Classic if you just can't stand copolymer stocks. In between is a Tikka Hunter with blue and walnut.
Its all good and great to have choices.

Last edited by bigwhoop; 07/18/15.

My home is the "sanctuary residence" for my firearms.