Originally Posted by teal
Originally Posted by bobhanson1
Originally Posted by teal


Once again - you're wrong. You asked for him to mention that he's cutting spending. He specifically said he's cutting spending.

You're wrong - I suspect you're used to it which is why you won't admit it.


Read his list of proposed cuts genius, which include "reworking trade deals" and tell me how that generates tax money other than the pie in the sky "we'll sell more stuff" overseas... Saying you're going to cut spending while referencing things that don't actually really affect spending is saying nothing at all...



Kerrrist - are you intentionally stupid?

Cutting SPENDING is not the same as GENERATING TAX MONEY.

What the F part of his statement of how we spend money to protect Germany, Korea, Saudi Arabia yet get no reimbursement and that this would change isn't "cutting spending"?

Wait - it's not the first thing listed?

Your flagrant stupidity is showing and you've easily proven you're not to be taken seriously about any subject.


Good try but no dice... Check out how many of those defense agreements occur via treaty or oil in Saudi Arabia's case. While it's easy to run off at the mouth about how he could do it overnight, that isn't actually the case and ignores we have financial interests served by maintaining some of those bases he would close or ask to be paid for... Just keep drinking the kool-aid and not asking for real answers and let us know how much better off you are under trump as president.