Originally Posted by Ringman
4ager,

Quote
You do realize you're "conversing" with someone who wasn't smart enough to NOT keep going to work for an employer long after that employer's checks started bouncing (as in many months of that),


Sometimes it helps to know the whole story. I didn't need the money and was extremely entertained by the actions. I didn't leave until I discovered there was no workman's compensation. Since I was regularly working with industrial knives, I quit that day.

Quote
and someone who believes that you can defy physics and magically flatten the trajectory of a bullet by installing extra super high rings under the scope, right?


You really stretch the truth. I did a three hour test comparing 1.68" high rings with 2.2" high rings. I sighted in the rifle at 200 yards with both and fired ten shots at 100 yards and 300 yards with the different rings. The rifle fired ten shots into .450" at 100 yards so it was easy to see how high or how low in relation to the point of aim the groups were. Both at the 100 and 300 yard targets the impact of the higher rings was closer to the point of aim. Even JBM will confirm this info for those who are inclined to be informed instead of wallowing in ignorance.

A couple years later Barnes Bullets ran the same test and made the same discovery. Science is observable, testable, repeatable and verifiable. On the other hand attackers and evolutionists need no facts.


That's laughable.

The first part, I responded to before you're second post.

You didn't quit that day (as you state in your second post). That would be a lie, Rich. A falsehood. A sin. Just in case you didn't understand that in the first place.

Here's some on that idiocy -

Wait, the checks aren't all good?

Okay, maybe I FINALLY figured it out... maybe... after my wife explained it to me again...

As to the second, we can resurrect that thread (even after it's been more than three days). Barnes DID NOT state that it flattened trajectory; and you still don't understand the difference.

Science, debunking Ringman... again

There's a point there (or more than a few), and you never will get it.

Last edited by 4ager; 02/15/16.
Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.