Originally Posted by urbaneruralite
Not having to be certified explains how there's so many economists posting on this thread.

Please understand I do not post these for Trumpkins. Trump could order a death raid on their cousin and they'd figure out a way that said cousin probably deserved it, and after all it was necessary to defeat Hillary. Wasn't it?

Democrats are well documented to have been good for the economy in the near term. They can be disastrous in the long term (see the Great Recession as caused by government mandated sub-prime mortgages), but presidencies don't last that long. So, Clinton is easily identifiable as likely good for the economy.

Fiscal conservatives tend to be good at stabilizing the economy after liberals wreck it. Enter Gary Johnson.

How about Trump? If you want to know about how he is bad for an economy, ask all those people he gave the shaft in Atlantic City.


Another interesting factoid: The United States' Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned lead paint in 1977 in residential properties and public buildings.

The window sill next to your crib must have had a fair amount of residual.

Last edited by rlott; 08/24/16.